On June 21st a Huffington Post submission ("Boycott Iran's Oil Immediatley") called for the immediate boycott of Iran's oil. It was a seemingly draconian suggestion that was met with widespread skepticism. After all, what would happen to oil markets without Iranian oil?
Well, on today CNN's State of the Union program, Senator Evan Bayh (D-Ind), being interviewed by John King on the timely subject of Iran's nuclear pronouncements (or lack thereof), made a rather startling revelation. According to Senator Bayh, the Russians had informed their American interlocutors that the greatest fear of the current Iranian regime was that they would be denied access to world markets for their oil. Clearly the financial bounty generated by oil sales are key to maintaining their hold on government power and the funding of their nuclear and missile programs, not to speak of buying the loyalty of their goon militias giving them the wherewithal to terrorize their citizenry.
Certainly now is the time to establish the kind of international cooperation needed to boycott Iranian oil. With recent revelations about Iran's nuclear deception, the growing and shared concerns of the major European states and a far more amenable Russia and China, the moment for an international boycott has come.
The boycott would simply be a refusal to buy Iran's oil, either directly or indirectly (i.e. not lifting oil from Iranian ports nor from offshore storage facilities, nor turning a blind eye to third party exchanges). It would be analogous to boycotting Coca Cola (apologies Coca Cola) because of a nasty dispute with its management. No one buys Coke any longer. Soon their warehouse is full. Then their bottling plants shut down. Then after a while one would hope the workers and shareholders organize to oust the management so that business can carry on as before.
Please recall that although Iran produces some four million barrels of oil a day, only some 2.1 million is exported. It is the one year equivalent to the of 700 million barrels plus being held in our Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Given the potential national crisis at hand, certainly the SPR should be considered for a strategic role in the current imbroglio.
More significant, however, is the fact that currently, Saudi Arabia's excess, unused capacity is approximately 4.5 million barrels/day. That is more than twice the current exports of Iranian oil. It is probably more in the interest of Sunni Saudi Arabia to keep Shia Iran nuclear weapon free than virtually any other nation. Saudi Arabia should welcome the opportunity to play a role in defusing Iran's nuclear ambitions by declaring they will supply any and all oil to world markets caused by a consumers boycott of Iran's oil.
A willing Saudi Arabia should be celebrated. An unwilling Saudi Arabia should be placed on notice that the nuclear defense umbrella proffered by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (please see "Hillary Clinton's Nuclear Defense Umbrella for the Oil Price Gougers--Who Pays?") will remain moot and tucked away in an umbrella stand in the halls of Foggy Bottom.
By not buying Iran's oil the mullahs understand their sway over Iran's brave citizens will begin to crumble and the petro-potentates of Tehran will eventually have to cede governance to the Iranian masses without a foreign shot having been fired and without a blockade nor an embargo of goods and services(sanctions) having been put into place.
Follow Raymond J. Learsy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/raymondLearsy
David Harris: Iran's Nuclear Program: Crunch Time
Nehad Ismail: Air Strikes Against Iran Can Push the Price of Oil to $250 per Barrel
Defense Chief Says Iran Faces 'Severe' New Sanctions
Iran tests short-range missiles amid nuclear dispute
Venezuela Denies Iran Is Helping It
Russia has powerful levers to pull in persuading Iran to open up
Cryptic Iranian Note Ignited an Urgent Nuclear Strategy Debate
Less supply=higher price for the oil that they have
As far as trade embargoes on Iran. There already is one
Has been for over a decade
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctions_against_Iran
But obviously everyone gets around it by buying Iranian oil through middlemen
So, let's not continue this crap of beating the drums for punishing Iran for doing far, far less than we do, particularly as what they are doing, as far as ALL our intelligence, is totally legal. Was nothing learned from our drum beating against Iraq?
It is funny how some comments here take him seriously.
In their piggish greed for the next dollar, they have destroyed the basis of growth in their own economies and must permit the false creation of wealth so as to be able to bowwoe from the very countries to which they have transfused their wealth.
They need to boycott themselves.
google Marc Rich.
Saddam Hussein even used convoys of tanker trucks to drive oil over national boarders.
Your proposal is ridiculous on the face of it, sir.
Iran has repeatedly said that an embargo would be considered an act of war by them and our troops remaining in Iraq might find themselves in a very difficult situation. It could be the reason to get them out of Iraq as quickly as possible. Any firing of missiles by Iran toward Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, our troops in Iraq, and Israel would have to draw a tremendous and unified attack via air from the U. S., France, and the U.K., and possibly even Russia. It could all get very, very dangerous. One has to wonder if the same thing could be achieved by limiting Iran's exports and shutting off their importation of oil refined products since they have to import 70% of it. A combination of the both of those would cause huge problems for the already shaky Ayatollah headed regime.