iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Raymond J. Learsy

GET UPDATES FROM Raymond J. Learsy
 

The New York Times Sheds a Tear for Wall Street Paydays

Posted: 04/ 8/2012 4:19 pm

Andrew Ross Sorkin, The New York Times' and CNBC's stealth apologist for Wall Street, Goldman Sachs et al slinks again --this time in a featured babble on the growing difficulties being encountered by the Wall Street folk to strike it big time.

Mr. Sorkin presents us with a laundry list of why the cascade of wealth that has been showered on Wall Street players is coming to an en end. That henceforward times are going to be tough with its implication that we should all be more charitable and understanding in our judgments of the errant behavior that has done so much to bring our economy close to its knees. He plaintively intones, "It is harder than ever to become one of the world's wealthiest individuals by working on Wall Street."

He then goes on to draw a distinction between the Wall Street Poobahs such as JP Morgan's Jamie Dimon, Goldman's Lloyd Blankfein being the poorer cousins of the hedge fund crowd, a bit like saying they all belly-up to the same bar, but one set is drinking scotch, the other ordering gin.

Then he continues, brimming with a subtext of the unfairness of it all, that the Wall Street types haven't reached the herculean heights of wealth such as the likes of a Bill Gates. Without any qualifier, he thereby implies Bill Gates' billions were achieved by the same razzle-dazzle as the Wall Street players and their speculative excesses. No mention that Bill Gates earned his billions by his exemplar of American meritocracy, thanks to his entrepreneurial vision and courage, through which we have all realized richer lives -- this, in stark contrast to the largely self-enriching crony capitalism of Wall Street laid bare by the events of 2008 and thereafter.

In the meanwhile, working in the trenches, getting their hands dirty on farms, on assembly lines, tending the sick in emergency rooms, driving the trucks or buses, getting splattered with oil working on a rig, or whatever day to day undertaking in which they were engaged, clearly those below were too busy to take heed of Mr. Sorkin's concerns. Last year alone these hard working souls pulled in the following paydays from their one year's sweat and labor:

  • Ray Dalio, Bridgewater Associates,$3.9 Billion
  • Carl Icahn, Icahn Capital Management,$2.5 Billion
  • James H. Simmons, Renaissance Technologies Corp,$2.1 Billion
  • Kenneth C. Griffin, Citadel,$700 million
  • Steven A. Cohen, SAC Capital Partners,$585 million

If timing is everything, than the timing of Mr. Sorkin's article becomes ever so curious coming just one week after the publication of these humungous sums. There he was, as so often before, trying to steer our focus from the excesses of Wall Street's "Big Money" parade.

 
 
 

Follow Raymond J. Learsy on Twitter: www.twitter.com/raymondLearsy

 
 
  • Comments
  • 20
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PCPrincess
I'm probably gaming.
05:03 PM on 04/09/2012
Who has a smaller violin than me they'd like to play for those poor folk? I'll play mine otherwise.
10:48 AM on 04/09/2012
Wall Street accounts for just 1.7% of NYC's workforce but account for 14-20% of the city's revenue. So the irony is that if Wall Street makes less, NYC suffers. So go ahead and bash the Street, regulate them out of existence, cut their bonuses and clip their pay - BUT - then don't be surprised if NYC's schools and other public facilities suffer. I find it funny that a city that prides itself on progressive policies complete disregards where the money for these grand social experiments comes from. What is really amusing is that progressives love their little tech toys - apple et all - but forget that in today's interconnected internet driven world, traders, hedge funds, bankers and the lot DO NOT have to be located in New York to do business. Progressives in NYC are spoiled and hypocrites when they whine about Wall Street. Be careful Liberals, the more you harp on the evil of profits, the sooner that these businessmen will leave your socialist paradises. This is why states like Florida and Texas are growing and California, Illinois and NY are shrinking. Keep it up and you will have no one to tax at all :)
10:19 AM on 04/09/2012
.....and they are probably whining that they have to pay 15% in tax, like Romney.
10:11 AM on 04/09/2012
These guys make their money trading in the public markets.

These markets are open to all. Many have tried, but there are very few really good traders. Those who are really good can become fabulously rich.
SuZy0925
Big money pull a million strings
09:51 AM on 04/09/2012
And their little money parades are self-perpetuating, as spelled out in many prospectuses: "We just HAVE to pay these gents billions of dollars to keep them from going elsewhere."
09:39 AM on 04/09/2012
The New York Times is a conservatives idea of a liberal newspaper.
10:53 AM on 04/09/2012
Right. lol. What is a liberal newspaper? I guess Maureen Dowd and Paul Kugman don't cut it. I guess they are conservative because they still believe in some semblance of capitalism - though in a very adulterated and foolish way???
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wikwox
So there I was, playing the piano....
09:37 AM on 04/09/2012
Beside the billions Wall St. has sucked up countless young college grads who could have gone and done something usefull for America and perhaps the world. Imagine that they come out of a top notch school with a technical or science degree and chuck it all to work on Wall St., such is the pull of the billions floating around on Wall St. We, as a nation, are poorer because they are richer. That and near worthless in terms of what they "produce".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elizabeth Everett
People's Democracy Not Bankers' Oligarchy
07:44 AM on 04/09/2012
More proof that the New York Times is NOT a liberal paper. Maybe they are for the right of same sex couples to marry, but that is about it. Real liberals want to create a world where everyone who plays by the rules and works hard has a chance to make it, and we catch those who stumble in a safety net and give them a second change. The Times doesn't like that. They are economic royalists who want to preserve the status quo.
HopeWFaith
We the People
07:44 AM on 04/09/2012
Thanks for this article. Well said!

I can only add to it that people should also read Paul Krugman's article discussing the insanity of the Cultists who seem to have lost their minds and are trending towards a Paul Ryan-like thinking

"..$4.6 trillion is the revenue cost over the next decade of the tax cuts embodied in the plan, as estimated by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center. These cuts — which are, by the way, cuts over and above those involved in making the Bush tax cuts permanent — would disproportionately benefit the wealthy, with the average member of the top 1 percent receiving a tax break of $238,000 a year..."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/09/paul-krugman-paul-ryan_n_1411643.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
georgeny
01:02 AM on 04/09/2012
There is a mistake being made thinking that the NYT is some standard-bearer for any sort of liberalism, except possibly limousine-liberalism. The NYT is to newspapers, what Tim Geithner is to the financial world.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Frey
unCommon sense for the common good
11:57 PM on 04/08/2012
An imbalance between rich and poor is the oldest and most fatal ailment of all republics.
Plutarch

The causes which destroyed the ancient republics were numerous; but in Rome, one principal cause was the vast inequality of fortunes.
Noah Webster

In the long run men inevitably become the victims of their wealth. They adapt their lives and habits to their money, not their money to their lives. It preoccupies their thoughts, creates artificial needs, and draws a curtain between them and the world.
Herbert Croly

http://napoleonlive.info/economics/the-rich-get-richer/
10:56 AM on 04/09/2012
Actually, the primary driver of the fall of the Roman Empire was its lavished government spending. Rome is a case study in how to spend your way to poverty. And yes the US is currently on that trend with its 14 trillion deficit
01:53 PM on 04/09/2012
I agree. Let's quit spending money we don't have to extend and maintain our empire via military power.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Frey
unCommon sense for the common good
07:05 AM on 04/10/2012
Actually, to be precise, it was the high cost of paying off the army by emperors to achieve/maintain power, erosion of the tax base to avoid high taxation. People simply left the land
photo
BigBearcatBill
This is the real Bearcat - a Binturong
11:55 PM on 04/08/2012
Thought the center of evil was underground, did they move to Wall Street while their old home and office are under renovation or something?
photo
unfoxworthy
We:ScottOlsens,the misfits,out to change the world
06:14 PM on 04/08/2012
Ray,
We all understand the shameless crooked undertakings of the money changers.
We all have been touched by the reckage of the aftermath of Washington's manipulation by Wall St.
We all will have to work together to take it back...
first the power
then the money.
The 99% demand
CLAWBACK