Okay, what is a methane hydrate (or methane clathrate, as it's also called)? If a picture is worth a thousand words, it's this.
Yes, it looks like ice that's on fire, which is why one nickname is "fire ice" but it's not really ice. It's methane, surrounded by a cage of water molecules that forms a solid. Yes, weird. Gas + liquid = solid. Who knew?
Where do you find these guys?
For a long time, the idea of a clathrate (a gas trapped in a cage of another molecule) was just a wacky science experiment -- people had made them in a lab, but no one thought they actually existed on Earth naturally. It wasn't until the 1960s that methane hydrates were found in the real world -- in a gas mine in Siberia. Gradually, scientists realized that methane hydrates existed all over the world, most of them buried in mud at the bottom of the ocean where temperatures are cold enough and pressure is high enough for them to form. The methane to make them comes from the same plankton getting deposited on the seafloor over millions of years that form fossil fuels, except that in this case the methane gets locked up in a hydrate. Methane ending up as a fire ice is actually much more common that you might think -- the USGS estimates that the amount of carbon in methane hydrates is more than twice as much as in all other known fossil fuels on the planet. (Obviously, this is a really hard number to quantify, but the USGS calls their estimate "conservative.")
Why should we care about them?
In my research about these kooky critters, I found two different camps: One that's interested in methane hydrates as a possible energy source and another that's interested in them as a future cause of climate change. In the first camp is the U.S. Dept. of Energy, which has a National Methane Hydrates R&D Program whose purpose is to study these phenomena in order to learn how best to extract them and use them as an energy source. They're concerned with how to drill for them safely, how to determine where they exist and in what kinds of deposits, etc. Some deposits are large mounds of fire ice and some just fill in tiny cracks in mud.
To date, I found only one example of methane hydrate being actually mined for methane. In 2007 and 2008, Canadian and Japanese researchers successfully drilled a well into a hydrate deposit off the coast of Canada's Northwest Territories that brought a stable flow of methane to the surface, proving that methane hydrates are a potential energy source for the future. This success brings with it all sorts of issues about the advisability of mining hydrates for a fuel source... some analogy about using gas (methane gas, that is) to put out a fire comes to mind here, but I'm terrible about mixing up metaphors...
The other research around methane hydrates concerns their potential to effect future climate change. There's a narrow range of temperature and pressure conditions where these things can exist beneath the ocean. Most locations are more or less stable, but in the Arctic, especially cold water allows the hydrates to form at lower pressures, aka shallower depths. Being closer to the surface makes these hydrates more vulnerable as the Arctic warms up. The main cause for concern is that the Arctic Ocean could warm up to the point where the methane hydrates aren't stable any longer and could melt and release their stored methane to the atmosphere. Realclimate.org calculates that although this is a possibility we can't rule out, it would more likely be a slow process, gradually releasing methane into the atmosphere and not actually the dramatic upheaval of the ocean floor that comes to mind.
Methane hydrates also live buried in permafrost on land. In one spot on the coast of Siberia, the ocean has eaten into the coastline, breaking off chunks of permafrost into the sea. Methane concentrations in the ocean off this spot are 25 times higher than normal, indicating that methane from the permafrost is leaking out into the ocean and then the atmosphere. So melting permafrost is a worry, too.
In Realclimate's calculations, there's no single event, like the melting of methane hydrates, that could catastrophically release so much methane into the atmosphere that could trigger a doomsday scenario. All single point sources of methane are well below that level. However, the far less dramatic (but way more likely) scenario of steady, ongoing release of methane to the atmosphere from lots of sources, like permafrost, rice paddies, cows, etc. does have the potential to make or break whether we cross a tipping point or no.
One final interesting note I learned is that the CO2 that's produced once the methane in the atmosphere breaks down is just as important for causing climate change as the methane itself. (Methane lasts in the atmosphere for less long than CO2, with a lifetime of about a decade.)
So, to wrap it up, here are my Top 5 Things to Know About Methane Hydrates. They are...
1. Cool and mysterious
2. A very big, but badly quantified, reservoir of carbon
3. A potential fuel source
4. Something to keep an eye on for future climate change
5. And an exciting party trick (if you can get your hands on one)
Follow Rebecca Anderson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/climateed
See Ticking Time Bomb and other posts about this little discussed potential cataclysm at www.aesopinstitute.org
"If the Siberian (submarine) permafrost-seal thaws completely and all the stored gas escapes, the methane content of the planet's atmosphere would increase twelve fold. The result would be catastrophic global warming." --"A Storehouse of Greenhouse Gases Is Opening in Siberia," Spiegel, 17 April '08
Maybe with this new source my price for a gallon of gasoline equivalent will drop to less than $0.25 instead of just under a $1.00!
Question: Are methane hydrates unstable enough that they could produce a limnic eruption, similar to the CO2 eruptions in Lake Monoun in 1984, and Lake Nyos in 1986, killing over 1,700? (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limnic_eruption )
I know that there is some concern over methane in nearby Lake Kivu, but I think it's dissolved, and not in hydrate form. (I'm guessing that the tropical temperatures, shallower depths, and less dense fresh water would prevent them from forming there.)
Are there places where methane hydrates could produce enough concentrated methane to asphyxiate animals or humans directly?
Molecular density of methane is something that I hadn't thought of. If it is denser than regular air, capturing it would seem pretty easy. I imagine something like drip irrigation in reverse.
If I come across the molecular density of methane hydrate, I'll let you know or you might do the same for me.
https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Methane_Hydrate
Your wikipedia article gives the density of methane clathrate (9000 kg/m^3, after converting the units), but the relevant density is that of the pure methane gas that would be released when the clathrate melts.