More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rebecca Sive

GET UPDATES FROM Rebecca Sive
 

A National Day of Action to Stop Stupak

Posted: 12/02/09 04:55 PM ET

I write as a member of the "menopausal militia," as the New York Times*, quoting NARAL's President, Nancy Keenan, characterized those of us "of a certain age" who have led America's decades-long fight for reproductive rights.

But, today, on this National Day of Action (to stop Stupak), I feel like I'm still 18, in the fall of 1968, gathering nickels, dimes and dollars for a friend to take the bus to Rapid City, South Dakota to get an (illegal) abortion.

On other recent days, I've felt like the newly married 23-year-old I was, living in Chicago the year abortion became legal, realizing that the fight was on, that I needed to make this fight a part of my life's work, for my personal sake.

But today, on this National Day of Action, though still a married woman living in Chicago, things are very different for me. Today, it doesn't matter to me, for me, whether abortion remains legal or not. It doesn't even matter to me for my immediate family: I don't have children or grandchildren. Even so, I know, with every bone in my body, that this is still a fight worth fighting.

So, it still feels like a day in1968. For if abortion becomes illegal again, or impossible to obtain in a conventional medical setting -- because the Stupak Amendment has become law -- it will be 1968 all over again. For sure, it will be 1968 all over again if America's young women don't wake up and realize that women's reproductive rights can only be secured by battling to secure this human right, the right to control one's own body.

In 1968, as we looked towards adulthood, we knew that the threshold determinant of women's equality is the capacity to control one's reproductive destiny. We recognized that, absent that capacity, the rest just isn't possible; nope, and hear me clearly on this one: none of it: not that cuddly family, not that nice home, not that non-sexist husband, not that good job, not the ability to choose when to have children, or how many to have, for the capacity to determine one's own reproductive life is what makes all the rest of this achievable.

So, yes, we've battled ever since, and in the process we've become a (menopausal) militia.

And because we have, we're here to tell you to stop talking about personal choice, as though it could be the basis of the strategy to win this fight (to stop Stupak) to keep abortion safe and legal. It isn't.

Time to leave the talk to the (male) academics, pollsters and journalists. And while you're at it, time to leave to the big time male executives at the big time ad agencies (they can waste their time) the business of proposing new taglines and "softer" messages: If you just try this one, mam, you're sure to get those middle-of-the-road moms on your side, as though selling a permanent commitment to women's reproductive choice were like selling perfume.

Listen to us, members of the menopausal militia. We know, from direct and repeated experience for decades, that there just isn't any "nice" way to convince politicians to keep abortion safe and legal. This one is "hard time," not in prison, but certainly in a war zone.

Time to get real -- you (younger) women who are wishing it were otherwise: This fight is about your bodies, and who controls them.

Why in the world do you think that it was only women's reproductive health care that was exempted from a reasonable and comprehensive approach to providing Americans with access to health care? Was this just the luck-of-the-draw, just Congressional business as usual? Hell, no.

There have been numerous other issues facing Congress, on which the Blue Dogs said they'd hold out. But, when it came down to it, they didn't. Yet, when it came to legislation that would guarantee women's autonomy, they did, and then, to add insult to injury, they convinced others to join them in their war against American women.

Why were these Members of Congress able to do this? Because women's autonomy -- remember: it took women almost 150 years to get the right to vote in this country -- isn't what the men who (still) rule America want for us. Why? Because our gaining our autonomy is about their giving up their power.

If I cede the basic position from whence my power stems, in the case of a male legislator, who's being male, what might I have left?

Forget the catchy slogans and friendly messages. Forget the pretty pink websites. Forget the pollsters. Forget trying to make deals with legislators fundamentally unsympathetic to the cause of women's autonomy. Forget trying to make ever-so-reasonable arguments about reducing the cost of health care, or about the benefits of health care, if we just have reproductive coverage for those mothers who love their children just so much.

Instead, recognize that today's fight is a defining battle for American women.

Today, and on every day to come, be battle-ready: be prepared to tell your legislators they've crossed the line. In fact, tell them they need to step back. Tell them you will lie down on the steps of the Capitol, so they can't get in to vote; tell them you will picket the White House, so they can't meet with the president; tell them you will ruin their family's Christmas, and oh, by the way, while you're at it, remind them you birthed the children now going to Afghanistan to fight, and because you did, you know every child should be a loved and wanted child; most of all, tell them you know that the America your children now fight for, and die for, is one which should give you, their mothers, equal rights, in all matters, and, in case they don't get it, tell them that means the right to control your own body. Tell them nothing less will do.

Young women of America: Fail to understand this at your peril. Take this lesson from the menopausal militia to heart.

Young women of America: Today is a national day of action; so, act, and then prepare for many, many more days like this one. We'll be right there with you.

 

Follow Rebecca Sive on Twitter: www.twitter.com/RebeccaSive

 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Denalidog
10:27 AM on 12/04/2009
If you were 18 in 1968, we are the same age. Is your friend still living? My post-abortive friends have devoted their menopausal years to drinking themselves to death.

If men could get pregnant, abortion would be considered an act of cowardice. Feminists have spent years declaring that women are strong and resilient, that they can do anything, except, of course, cope with an unplanned pregnancy. Once pregnant, all that strength and resiliency evaporates, and women turn into sniveling emotional wimps, and can only be rescued by abortionists.
If you can't handle an unplanned pregnancy, how will you cope with cancer? Job loss? Death of a loved one?
Abortions are for WIMPS. REAL WOMEN go the distance.
12:41 PM on 12/04/2009
REAL Women make smart choices. For some, it is the decision to have an abortion. For some it is the decision not to have an abortion. YOU, however, have NO DECISION to make regarding anyone else's decision. Butt out.
02:21 PM on 12/04/2009
If men could get pregnant abortion clinics would have a bar and game rooms.
How ignorant to imagine a patriarchy would not take care of their interests.

I wish America could have a ONE TIME ONLY vote, only women of child bearing age can vote.
Each side pro and anti choice get 6 weeks to give their point of view before the vote, and who ever wins settles abortion Rights,....FOREVER.

I would wager the vote would be 80% pro-choice, even women who wouldn't choose abortion in their lives, WON'T decide for another woman's life.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wallysmom
What Washington needs is adult supervision.
08:04 PM on 12/07/2009
I loved your first line. Totally agree. I also think the Stupak Amendment is a poorly veiled attempt at circumventing Roe v. Wade. Let's talk compromise here....Stupak Amendment stays in as long as V!agra or C!alis is not covered in Prescription Drug benefits and vasectomies aren't covered by insurance. Having a vasectomy is like having a gun without any bullets...no traceable evidence of foul play. Sure, like that's going to happen.
10:10 AM on 12/04/2009
From an email I received from Sen.George S. LeMieux, "I am opposed to taxpayer money being used to subsidize elective abortion services, whether it be through direct funding or otherwise,...."

My response to him.
That is very noble of you, and I do hope that you also oppose federal dollars to be spent on vasectomies as well as Viagra. Otherwise it would appear that your stance is gender specific. You of course then are oppose to federal monies for birth control and hysterectomies as well,if one is to follow your logic.I would like to ask, how many ovaries do you have? Why is it that males seem compelled to govern a female's body? And being as you are a believer in life, I trust that you have also voted against wars, conflicts etc. Continued....
10:16 AM on 12/04/2009
You see, I am having trouble understanding your selective approach to life. On one hand, you will vote against a Health Care Package that includes abortion, yet it is what happens to a" living being", as defined by science, that makes me wonder.Why are males so concerned only about female reproductive organs?Yet, once a child is born, it seems as though the caring ends. However, you are quick to send children off to war. I am so confused by your supposed sense of logic.By the way , how many children have you adopted? Just curious. Trust me, stop governing based on what you may think is your base. People in general are more concerned about foreclosures, food, unemployment. Not the old wedge issues that you think will keep you in office.We are so beyond that. Get with the times and keep your sexist mentality out of my ovaries.I'm a grown women and am capable of making my own decisions. Thank you very much.
photo
saami
Cranky old lady
02:49 PM on 12/03/2009
Abortion is a legal medical procedure that should only concern the woman and her doctor and if she wishes her partner. No religious group should interfere with a woman's right to choose. This is not a Christian nation; it is a nation that separates the law from religion. We have freedom of religion and from religion. There have been abortions since women have become pregnant. Keep them safe and legal. From someone who as a nurse cared for women dying from botched illegal abortions when back street abortionists with filthy hands and instruments and knitting needles and coat hangers doomed women to die.
11:47 PM on 12/03/2009
And it should not be done using my tax money.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brt929
10:25 AM on 12/04/2009
No one is using your tax money. That's why Stupak's amendment is overly broad. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:19 PM on 12/03/2009
I was at Capitol Hill yesterday, and I take issue with your assertion that younger women don't care enough. In the morning briefing, when asked to raise hands if born after 1973, the year of Roe V. Wade, I saw a great showing of hands. On the activist side, I see all ages, just as I see many older women who are complacent. Women of all ages need to stand up and fight together or lose ground on a myriad of fronts.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brt929
10:01 AM on 12/04/2009
That is so good to hear.
10:50 AM on 12/03/2009
The problem with young women and the choice debate is that they are all-too-willing to judge others for their sexuality. Every woman I speak to who judges herself as moderate feels there are too many abortions and most abortions are because irresponsible drunks are sleeping around. Yet every time I speak to a woman who has had an abortion, it's been because of difficult circumstances.

These young women generally take the tack that because they believe most women are irresponsible (I suspect because they haven't lived long enough to be informed of the complexity by their friends and like to believe it could never happen to them because they are careful) they are all for punishing the rest (though they'd never call it that).

Just like divorce, where people say it happens too often because people won't make an effort, but support their friends and family because they know the details and know how hard people work to make marriage work, the lack of information and the desire to judge others plays a central role in the judgement of those who say "ok sometimes, not all, therefore something must be done by society."
12:23 PM on 12/03/2009
And by difficult circumstances I mean the woman used birth control, but it failed, or a medical condition made the pregnancy a bad idea.

There was also a loss of insurance in one case, which points to why I think pro-lifers should be more pro-national healthcare and I'm surprised that they generally aren't. Well, not surprised, as the perception that unwanted pregnancy is part of laziness travels well with the perception that not having health insurance is also a function of shiftlessness and irresponsibility.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mark331blue
Left leaning independent
10:46 AM on 12/03/2009
I attended college twice in my life. My first go around was in the early '70s, when the air was thick with debate around women's reproductive rights. I am not a woman, but I marched with those demanding the right to choose.

I returned to college in 2007. I continue to be amazed at the ho-hum attitude of the young women claiming to care about choice today. They have no idea what those who came before them went through to get them to the point where they can just yawn in the face of the outright assault now be waged against them. Make no mistake; Roe-v-Wade is in the sights of the right wing, and they'll not rest until they've beaten it.

Our educational institutions are not only the seat of progress, they are sometimes the last bastion in the face of those reactionaries claiming the mantle of righteousness. Where is the vigilance?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brt929
10:13 AM on 12/04/2009
Although, sometimes I wonder, if the right wing succeeds at over turning Roe; what issue will they use to unite their Taliban in the future?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mark331blue
Left leaning independent
12:19 PM on 12/04/2009
Prayer in schools, gulags for gays, religious litmus tests for politicians...you name it.
10:23 AM on 12/03/2009
..."Because our gaining our autonomy is about their giving up their power"...

That's what it's always been about. Power to control others. Ever notice how the major religions teach that women are the root of sin and that their sexuality is evil.
11:46 PM on 12/03/2009
Wow...what religion are YOU talking about? Obviously, you learned about religion from some prof who came of age in the 60s.
10:08 AM on 12/04/2009
I'm writing about the religions where the woman is sub-serviant to the man (obeys) and also the ones where the woman ate the forbidden fruit and caused the original couple to be expelled from paradise on Earth. I think you meant apparantly, not obviously. Obviousness requires something to be true as well as apparent.
08:42 AM on 12/03/2009
Who the hell do these men think they are. How loud do you think they would scream if we stripped coverage for viagra. If they want to kill the bill if it doesn't restrict abortion, then let them kill the bill and the Democrats will pay the price. 70% of the country wants health care reform, are they so afraid of women's autonomy that they would hand the next election to the Cons.
photo
saami
Cranky old lady
02:51 PM on 12/03/2009
I totally agree. Let us restrict funds for Viagra and prostate cancer testing, since all men if they live long enough will get prostate cancer, so why the fuss?
03:46 AM on 12/03/2009
Some of the militia for safe legal abortions for poor and young women, aren't menopausal, they aren't even women.
I lobbied in MN before Roe vs Wade (and won).
Abortion was never going to be an issue in my life as a gay man, or for many of my lesbian feminist friends either (barring rape.)
We were of a generation that believed when one group was oppressed, everyone was diminished.

GOD I miss those days
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brt929
10:18 AM on 12/04/2009
That's the thing- women or feminists- need to stay united with the Gay community.

The destruction of these outdated stereotypes, helps both our causes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Northernmom
05:46 PM on 12/02/2009
Yes!!!! It's about who gets control of my body. There is no other argument.
We must continue the fight for the rights of all women. Do not cede this very important ground.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
brt929
10:22 AM on 12/04/2009
It isn't just control. It is the fact that Big Brother gets to stick his nose into my gynecologist's exam room. Where is my privacy?
02:13 PM on 12/04/2009
@brt929

We had one cause in common, through Roe vs. Wade and Lawrence vs. Texas, the Right to privacy and autonomy over our own bodies.

KEEP YOUR FILTHY LAWS OFF OUR BODIES
05:43 PM on 12/02/2009
Who do you think is embracing the "personal choice" messaging? Who do you think is hiring the ad agencies and the pollsters pushing "softer" messages? Who do you think is making deals with legislators fundamentally unsympathetic to the cause of women's autonomy? The same people that have been compromising and deal-making to the detriment of American women for the last 35+ years: the people 'in charge' of the pro-choice organizations with all the money and resource (aka "the menopausal militia"). I don't think it's young women that are in the most need of this message.