EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

Reno

Reno

Posted: December 15, 2009 01:42 PM

To the Disappointed

What's Your Reaction:

Tonight Organizing for America put out the call to 'deploy' our newly formed Rapid Response Teams to start doing massive phone banking beginning Tuesday the 15th December in anticipation of voting on Health Industry Reform bills or amendments in the Senate. I'm the leader of one of these RR teams. As such, I have to write up a description of what we're needing, post it, invite people, etc. But there has been so much disgruntlement, grumblings I've been hearing about Obama, that I just couldn't write some blurb without addressing the dissatisfaction. Of course, what I came up with is WAY too long for a phone bank posting.

Our first gigantic test is getting close. The Senate is moving toward a vote on health industry reform. And I keep hearing that people "are so disappointed in Obama."

If we're throwing Barack Obama out as a phony power-monger like all the rest, I just have one question:

Who is going to replace him? Huh?

Getting elected was a huge longshot, against all odds. But governing? Governing is ridiculous, essentially war without bullets. Our government was written to produce stalemates. Plus, so many of us who campaigned for him are MIA.

I don't understand: We dump the guy and then complain bitterly that it was he who abandoned us? It's the classic parent-child struggle. Ten years from now are we going to be telling our shrinkers that Obama didn't meet our needs and that's why our lives suck? I mean, he's younger than a lot of us complainers. We're the ones who are the deserters. And I'm not talking about us deserting Obama. It's ourselves that we're forsaking. Our lives will suck if we back out now, and we won't be affording no shrinkers.

There's complaints that "... [Obama]'s trying too hard to accommodate. That he is not being tough enough. He let all those finance sector crooks who got us into trouble back into office. Why can't he be tough? Cheney and Bush-Co didn't give a damn to compromise ..." And that's why we loathed them. Is that how you want Obama to be?

Besides having to remind us that Obama was not elected Emperor, he said all through the campaign that compromise was what he was going to have to engage in. Not for some abstract ideal of 'bipartisanship' (there should be more than two parties anyway, but first things first), but for practical reality. I.e., we have to get a bill passed!

It feels suicidal to withdraw support from the best possibility we've had in generations. The overwhelming tide was going against progressive values, was it not?

Yeah, in this health bill, we're not getting everything we want. Has any leader gotten anywhere near as close to transforming this disgraceful health system of ours? At least during the election, his party was behind him, but not the minute he took office, people. Think of going to work and battling day and night, (weekends, Yom Kippur, and Easter too, sometimes) with people who are sworn to not let you do your job! And those are the friendlies.

You know that there are legislators that openly pray for President Obama to fail. That was the side, you may recall, that was so perilously close to shutting down what little 'representative government' we had left. How much chance are we then going to have to realize our progressive ideals: reverse the inordinate upward wealth consolidation, build a world class public school system, construct a sustainable energy program?

You know me. Am I Polly of the Anna's? I know this guy, the President of the United States, this administration, is different.

This is not a life and death anecdote, it's a detail, but it says a lot to me about Barack Obama and his values. Let us never forget the fish stinks from the head, folks.

So. After the election, there was a meeting with the Democratic National Committee and the original OFA, Obama for America. Naturally, as the President of the United States, who had run as a member of Democratic Party, Barack was now the default head of the DNC. The DNC folks wanted to fold OFA into the DNC. Why wouldn't they? The Prez said no.

Now the middle part of this story is a buncha arcane details, many about $$, that I'm not really worried about. Let it suffice to say that the sitting president cannot really carry an independent campaign organization outside the (unfortunate) two party system, so it was eventually arranged that OFA, the O now standing for Organizing, would be a project of the DNC. That was in the Winter.

Now it's the Fall, and last week, in some 200 locations, OFA had national volunteer community organizer training sessions. I was sent the Keynote (PowerPoint in Microsoft) slide presentation a few days before so I could set up the tech at the location. The lead page and each of the 60 slides after had a big DNC logo with a diminutive Organizing for America sign under it. I guess I was not the only American involved who thought that stunk. We weren't working our tuchesses off for the D N friggin' C. And we said so.

The next day, the DNC logo was hard to see, and Organizing for America was who we were working for.

What this reaffirmed for me, and a lot of other folks, was the power-sharing, deeply respectful ethos of this org. Like my experience during the campaign.

I believe if I had been Obama during that campaign and felt the outpouring of joy and hope, I would have reason to depend on your forbearance and support. Active support.

You wouldn't be disappointed in Barack if you participated in the ongoing work. You're only disappointed if it is out of your hands. And it's not.

 
Tonight Organizing for America put out the call to 'deploy' our newly formed Rapid Response Teams to start doing massive phone banking beginning Tuesday the 15th December in anticipation of voting on ...
Tonight Organizing for America put out the call to 'deploy' our newly formed Rapid Response Teams to start doing massive phone banking beginning Tuesday the 15th December in anticipation of voting on ...
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:44 PM on 12/29/2009
Great piece Reno. I'm among the disappoint­ed, but your post reminded me of what an uphill battle it is to make change in this country and the importance of perseveran­ce and patience
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StacyM
12:26 PM on 12/22/2009
Am I glad it's not Cheney or his ilk? Yes. Are there other things to be grateful for? Yes. But nor do I feel the urge to blindly support a president because he's the guy I voted for. (we do still remember the asinine Bush adoration that won him a second term against all logic, yes?) I will hold the elected accountabl­e for every promise reneged on, every vote, every compromise­, and go to the polls with a clear conscience­.

I don't know about everyone else, I can only speak for myself. But I didn't like Bush/Chene­y because they lied, cheated, dismantled and undermined civil rights, created a nation of fear and loathing, and screwed up everything they touched. Or in some cases, didn't touch. (Katrina) A majority party playing the bully? Since when is this new? I voted for a Democrat majority in hopes they would turn the tables to get things done in concert with an Obama administra­tion, not so they would pander to the ones who screwed things up in the first place. That is just good common sense.

Good article, but I feel this should be addressed to our elected Democrats in the House and Senate. If anyone should be fully supportive of the president'­s agenda - and if anyone has the power to make the changes we all voted for last year - they are the bodies. If our local leaders can't even get behind the president, we are entirely without hope.
04:55 PM on 12/19/2009
Yes- thank you...insi­ghtful, smart and most importantl­y, witty! Looking forward to "reading" more of your voice.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Janet Grillo
Janet Grillo is an Emmy winning producer and award
08:28 PM on 12/16/2009
Thank you for saying this, Reen. He's not a Demi-God, but a man. And an incredibly capable, moral and resilient one. We're lucky to having him fighting the good fight with pragmatism as his best defense. And ours!
07:58 AM on 12/16/2009
thanks for putting out there what a lot of people have been thinking. So he's not perfect- look at the alternativ­es and work your ass off to help the guy.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Reno
12:42 AM on 12/17/2009
Last night 25 people came over and we called over 1,000 Nebraskans and Connecticu­tians (?) asking them to contact Senators Nelson and Lieberman and insist they stop messing around and pass serious Health Industry Reform. The grousers just might be helping Obama's supporters to come out and throw in, babe! Cornelius!
03:37 PM on 12/15/2009
McCain promised to give a huge tax credit to help pay for our indivitual health insurance. McCain would not have done anything to help gays though.
Obama is not going to give us ANY real health reform. Obama is obviously NOT going to help gays either.

I and my partner (we are gay) would actually have been better off if we had voted for and elected McCain, as it turns out.

That is really really pathetic. What a little man Obama is.
02:05 PM on 12/15/2009
Thank you! You made so many excellent points. I've been alive long enough to know that there is no way any president can effect the kind of earth shattering changes that so many people expect from Obama. There are too many deeply entrenched institutio­ns, bureaucrac­ies, and special interests designed to maintain the status quo that are standing in the way. I knew when I voted for him that he wasn't going to fundamenta­lly change government­, but I knew there were plenty of things he could change on the margins. Let's not forget that he still hasn't been president for a whole year yet. We need to get past the idea of thinking in news cycles and demanding instant gratificat­ion. There isn't anybody with a realistic chance of getting elected who I'd rather see as president right now, and if progressiv­es want to throw him under the bus, they're only cutting off their noses to spite their faces.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Reno
03:33 AM on 12/17/2009
Yeah, BachelorJo­hnnyCool,
I sometimes take an hour to decide whether I should go to the friggin' store or not. How someone wants to take on that amount of responsibi­lity is beyond me, but I'm certainly glad that this time it is someone who clearly pays attention!
We're doing Okay, as long as we stay focussed and pitch in with him. I don't watch TV news/liste­n to a lot of complaints­. I try pretty hard to just listen to Obama himself. And to use my common sense. I mean, we were in need of so much change before Bush was appointed for dogsakes. Then 8 years of gutting practicall­y every department of the govt. OY.
Peace,
Reno
02:04 PM on 12/15/2009
Obama invited Rick Warren to participat­e in the inaugurati­on. Rick Warren is associated with "The Family" and "dominioni­sm". These groups have worked with the Uganda government to pass "legislati­on" to execute innocent people for the "crime" of being born gay.

So, despite being elected with huge monies and effort from the gay community, he invited someone actively working to murder gay people, to the inaugural celebratio­n.

Yet, I, as a gay person, am supposed to be pleased with Obama? I guess right up until I am shoved into a gas chamber? Are you for real?

If you can get Obama to apologize for this kick in the teeth to all LGBT people, a real apology, not a political "if you got offended" apology, and mention in the apology WHY an apology is necessary, I and millions of others will reconsider­.

Even during Jim Crow, there was never a death penalty merely for being African American.
03:49 PM on 12/15/2009
It wasn't necessary to have a death penalty for Blacks - they just did it. Hey - about 400 years now. Don't go there.