iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Sen. Bernie Sanders
 
GET UPDATES FROM Sen. John Kerry
 
GET UPDATES FROM Sen. Barbara Boxer
 
GET UPDATES FROM Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse
 

America Must Not Back Down on Sustainable Energy

Posted: 12/16/11 12:06 PM ET

If you read just the headlines these days, you might think renewable energy in America is going the way of Solyndra. Don't take our word for it: a recent headline from Fox News declared "ENTIRE Solar Industry on Brink of Collapse."

We cannot allow long-time opponents of renewable energy to focus the discussion only on Solyndra (whose higher priced panels could not compete as solar costs came down) when we should be thinking about competing with China to win the next energy revolution. Why? Because the race is on to put the right policies in place so hundreds of thousands of new, good-paying renewable energy jobs will be created here, and not in China. With Bloomberg New Energy Finance reporting that for the first time ever, global investments in renewable electricity have exceeded investments in fossil fuel power plants, the question is not whether renewable energy is creating jobs; it is which country is going to lead the clean energy jobs revolution. We want it to be America.

The truth is we can win this race. The American solar energy industry is thriving, as is the renewable energy industry more broadly. Just look at the facts: we have doubled the number of solar jobs in America since 2009, and today more than 100,000 Americans work in the solar industry, at more than 5,000 companies in every single state. These include manufacturing, installation, and supply chain jobs.

Last year, we installed nearly 1,000 megawatts of solar power in the United States, more than double the amount installed in 2009. With the solar industry growing at a rate of 69 percent annually, it is one of America's fastest growing industries and is creating jobs all across the country. The cost of solar panels has fallen 30 percent over just the last two years, continuing a long-term decline in the price of solar.

As solar becomes more cost-competitive with conventional fossil fuels, everyone from Walmart to the United States Marine Corps is looking to solar. Walmart is installing solar panels at 130 stores in California and says "Walmart has reduced energy expenses by more than a million dollars through our solar program." The military is using solar energy with battery storage to fully power forward operating bases in Afghanistan, and Marine Colonel Bob Charette says for the Marines renewable energy is "about saving lives" by reducing the number of dangerous fuel convoys needed for resupply.

The wind industry is also growing rapidly. Texas alone has more than 10,000 megawatts of wind energy installed, which is equivalent in capacity to 10 nuclear reactors. Iowa now gets 20 percent of its electricity from wind. There are 75,000 wind energy jobs in America today, and more than 400 manufacturing facilities in 43 states. The price of wind energy has dropped by 90 percent since 1980, and wind electricity today is competitive with fossil fuels at 5 to 6 cents per kilowatt hour. At the same time, we are increasing American manufacturing of wind turbines, and now 60 percent of turbine components installed in the United States are made in America, up from 25 percent in 2005.

In these tough economic times, the story of renewable energy in the United States is actually a rare good news story. Renewable energy is helping to create hundreds of thousands of jobs, is making our nation more energy independent, and is cutting pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.

As with every energy technology in the past, federal policies play an important role in supporting renewable energy in America. Key among those policies is a provision known as the Treasury Grant Program (or 1603) which turns an existing wind and solar tax credit into a grant. This provides better financing options for American renewable energy developers and has helped to attract nearly $23 billion in private sector investments in renewable energy, supporting 22,000 projects. Unfortunately this program is set to expire at the end of this year, unless Congress acts to extend it. What is at stake in this fight? If this program expires, one study shows that financing for renewable energy projects would be cut in half, just at the time when renewable energy is experiencing explosive growth.

Although Solyndra is the major headline right now, the real challenge is that Congress is debating whether we can even extend the Treasury Grant Program and other important renewable energy incentives for another year.

Meanwhile, China outpaces the United States by a 2-to-1 margin in clean energy investments according to Energy Secretary Steven Chu. America needs to out-compete China on solar and wind, not surrender to China. At a time of nagging unemployment, with the middle class squeezed, and greenhouse gas emissions rising, it is imperative that our nation take the lead in creating clean energy jobs right here in America.

It is time to put in place stable, long-term policies to support these critical industries. Rather than fight to turn one energy company's demise into partisan points, it is time to point the way towards our energy future -- so that all Americans win.

 

Follow Sen. Bernie Sanders on Twitter: www.twitter.com/senatorsanders

If you read just the headlines these days, you might think renewable energy in America is going the way of Solyndra. Don't take our word for it: a recent headline from Fox News declared "ENTIRE Solar ...
If you read just the headlines these days, you might think renewable energy in America is going the way of Solyndra. Don't take our word for it: a recent headline from Fox News declared "ENTIRE Solar ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 442
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (10 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
429freckles
Ex Republican Now Devoted Democrat
06:53 PM on 12/28/2011
Preaching to the choir. Go green!! Save the world one green leaf at a time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:00 PM on 12/21/2011
There are ONLY THREE PERMANENT sources of energy, all the rest are very finite.

PERMANENT ENERGY:

- Energy from the sun. As long as the sun exists we will have an energy source.

- Energy from the Earth's core. The Earth has lots of heat energy in its core.

- Gravitational energy. Energy from the movement of the planets.

All the forms of energy humans currently use are just stored solar energy (oil, gas, coal) , and are very finite:

- The scientific consensus is Global Peak Oil production will happen about 2020.

- Gas production will continue for several more decades after that, BUT gas production does NOT follow the well defined production curve of oil but is subject to unpredictable sharp drop offs.

- Coal production should be able to continue for many decades, but the cost of production and usage will continue to increase.

The bottom line is if humans are going to survive, we need to shift most of our energy usage to the primary sources of energy (solar, geothermal and gravitational).

So the reality is we have no choice but to move to renewable energy as quickly as possible.

BTW - Hydrogen is NOT an energy source, but an energy storage media and it costs a lot of energy top make hydrogen.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deweaver
Scientist, businessman, semi-retired
08:08 PM on 12/24/2011
You forgot both fission and fusion. We have enough waste U238 above ground for a 900 year energy supply, using traveling wave reactor technology. If we finally get fusion to work economically, that energy supply is unlimited -- the sun will burn out before we could use all the deuterium in the oceans.

Notice it is all about economics and if you want more solar, wind, nuclear etc, you need to tax rather than subsidize oil and coal. Lets start with a $100/bbl oil tax and equivalent on coal and eliminate payroll taxes and end up with more jobs. Lower payroll taxes = more jobs, higher oil prices = more alternative energy and better fuel efficiency.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:00 PM on 12/21/2011
As these highly recognizable faces on the Left tout renewable energy, they are obligated to forcefully address their compatriots (like the late Sen. Kennedy) who complained that wind turbines off the shore of Martha's Vineyard would ruin the view scape. They are obligated to look the environmental lobby square in the face and say that the death of a few hundred bats is a small price to pay for one less coal-fired plant.

It's not enough to address your opponent's arguments. You also have to be willing to confront your friends.
11:19 AM on 12/21/2011
Every time I comment about solar or wind energy someone always comes back with the argument that it doesn’t replace oil or coal, that solar and wind only support a percentage of the energy that we need so their argument is to not even try. I say so what if they only replace even 30% of oil and coal, that’s 30% that doesn’t get used, gets saved and doesn’t pollute the environment. I find it narrow minded and short sighted to say that just because it doesn’t completely replace oil and coal that we shouldn’t even try.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:03 PM on 12/21/2011
The days of cheap energy from oil, gas and coal are OVER.

As Global Peak Oil drive up the price of oil, it will also drive up the cost of gas and coal.

The ONLY way for humans to survive at a reasonable cost is to move away form hydrocarbon based energy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MRstoner2udude
I'm a human being? What about you?
07:09 AM on 12/21/2011
We need to move towards clean energy. We need political leaders who want to embrace the future...and the future economy, which is clean energy.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
06:58 PM on 12/20/2011
Efficiency, Rooftop solar, offshore wind and waste bio char bio fuels are the ONLY solution on the map.

ONLY waste bio char using the char as fertilizer can actually reverse atmospheric CO2 in any major way, profitably, producing energy and fuels to back up solar and wind.

Solar is about the same price are nuclear or Clean coal. 15 cents per KWH. Don't believe the 3 cent worldnuclear lie.

Wind is half that cost, and waste bio char and bio fuels are half again.

solar wind and waste as above, is 24/7, forever, safe, clean, growing fast now, fast enough to replace nearly all fossil and nukes within 7-15 years.

Vote for the Warren, Kucinich, Grayson CPC progressive in the primaries over the blue dog DLC DINOs,

Vote for the Dems including Obama in the general since the GOP/Tea are anti republic, anti democracy, anti environment, anti green TORIES.

http://cleantechnica.com/2011/06/10/solar-power-graphs-to-make-you-smile/ rooftop solar cheaper than nukes.

http://cleantechnica.com/2011/03/18/offshore-wind-energy-cheaper-than-nuclear-energy-eu-climate-chief-says/

http://solarcellcentral.com/companies_page.html first solar 2.5$ per Wp installed.

http://www.plancanada.com/biochar_basics.pdf
02:37 PM on 12/20/2011
After Billions and Billions and Billions and Billions of dollars thrown down the rat hole of Alternative Energy (remember Corn Ethanol)(Boy, those Volts are leaping off the lot)(etc, going all the way back to the 70's), solar, wind, etc combined and highly subsidized still produce less than 2% of our energy. We should be backing gas, clean coal, tar sands and oil shale-- and we will achieve energy independence and become an energy exporter again.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Frustrated in PA
I am not frustrated, I am NOW disgusted
04:48 PM on 12/20/2011
No such thing as "clean coal" and the fracking process in deep shale gas extraction is worse for the long term environment than oil.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
07:03 PM on 12/20/2011
Corn ethanol is a terrible idea, on that we agree. ONLY WASTE should be used to fuel. And there is plenty of waste to backup solar and wind using existing Peaking fossil turbines but with clean bio fuels.

Everything else is Fox Fossil Nuke PR.

Solar is now the cheapest electricity for millions of Americans and billions of people world wide. Before any subsidies. Rooftop pv solar is cheaper than nukes , both about 15 cents per KWH using conservative estimates.

WInd and waste bio char are less than half that.

Efficiency is half that again.

2% is fantastic!

Since green energy has been doubling every year or so, that means we are only 7-15 years from over 100% green energy. Forever. 24/7, clean safe, no nuke disaster, oil wars, of coal pollution.

See my other posts for links and backup.

Nukes get 500M$ per reactor per year, and coal and oil get even more.

Obsessing on the last few drops of oil won;t save us.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TKDMike
01:58 PM on 12/20/2011
Bernie is THE MAN!
12:50 PM on 12/20/2011
All sources of energy should be pursued not just renewables. Renewables are not ready to completely take the place of foosil fuels and will not be for many years to come.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christian Howell
The STEM. The Whole STEM. Nothing but the STEM.
05:42 PM on 12/21/2011
Sure they are. If the auto makers and oil companies want them to. Most coal and other energy just creates electricity. Electricity can replace oil and gas heating. It has already replace the internal combustion engine for the most part.

Perhaps one issue is that people want loud cars and the Volt is not loud at all.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
05:45 PM on 12/19/2011
Ah, the irony of those defending ongoing dependence on oil and gas when the major oil and gas companies are investing billions in solar energy.
06:10 PM on 12/19/2011
They make a fortune selling gas to backup up the solar systems.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
06:21 PM on 12/19/2011
Check out what Chevron is doing in CA with solar to drill for oil. Using solar to get oil without new wells or pipelines. No gas is sold but you may be spruting some from claiming it is.
11:37 PM on 12/19/2011
You seriously need to stop making this comment. It doesn't make any sense. Solar systems are not backed up by gas. I don't understand why people insist on speaking on that which they know little.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FerrellGummitt
http://ferrellgummit.wordpress.com
01:29 PM on 12/19/2011
DRILL BABY DRILL!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:06 PM on 12/21/2011
Where?

Even if every square yard of the US was drilled, the US would still need to import 70% of the oil it uses while paying world market prices for every drop we use (that oil form Montana is sold to you at the global market prices).
11:54 AM on 12/19/2011
You all said it. You all are the ones who need to get it done. Extend the 1603 Treasury Grant. It is imperative for the renewables industry to continue to gain momentum.
11:38 PM on 12/18/2011
No statement more accurately reflects the thickness of the this bunch of low information attorney politicians than this one.

"...has more than 10,000 MW of wind energy installed, which is equivalent in capacity to 10 nuclear reactors.."

Nuke reactors run 95% of the time, wind 20% so capacity equivalent of two nuke reactors at many times the cost and with close to 100% of the wind power/gas backup scam coming from gas backup.

In fact Kerry was instrumental in shutting down the world's ticket to a clean energy future when the silly and treasonous senator payed off by Big Oil donations, shut down the ready to build IFR gen iV reactor. Now its left to the British to build the American design, twenty years later.

Today's Solar and wind backed up by gas costs and including 5 to 10 times sized transmission builds cost 70 and 30 cents a kwh respectively and save no GHG's - massive emitters of air pollution from the gas backup. Add a buck a kwh for green storage - $60K per American household per annum in a zero carbon future.

Clean and green zero environmental footprint Nukes are 3 cents a kwh. Note the Senators miss that one.

Wind and solar investments create jobs only in the sense that hiring a group of thugs to smash windows and another group to replace them creates jobs. Everybody else loses jobs as resources are wasted repairing windows.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
11:23 PM on 12/18/2011
i think these folks that believe in solar so much should install panels on their roof. make sure that you dont need power at night though.
11:57 AM on 12/19/2011
Perhaps before you comment on solar you should understand the basic premises of the technology.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
10:28 PM on 12/19/2011
i do understand it....folks like al gore dont.....he needs 10x more panels on his house to be doing anything more than a pr stunt.....
300-400 panels based on his utility bill......
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Cacey
Ignore rudeness, honor discussion
05:48 PM on 12/19/2011
Twenty years ago, I almost bought a condo with solar on the roof and I examined the records. Ninty percent of their electricy was provided by those panels and they amortized the cost in 2 1/2 years. Electricity is storable so don't worry about the night.
06:11 PM on 12/19/2011
When you generate solar electricity with a grid tied system you feed excess generation during the day back into the grid for the utilities use and at night draw from the grid but get credit for what you over generated during the day. Yes, you are still using another energy source during the evening, but overall you can generate all of your electricity. Since the grid is stressed more during the day, you are helping to not have to generate as much energy during peak times, then draw energy during low peak times.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
10:29 PM on 12/19/2011
that must have been a very very small condo....in la we can buy 25k systems for 5k after subsidies.....and it doesnt have a 3 year payout.
oilfield
large employer per obamacare
11:17 PM on 12/18/2011
energy conversion devices is on the brink of bankruptcy too....or at least mr. market thinks so as there stock is under 50 cents a share.