More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Rep. Bruce Braley
GET UPDATES FROM Gen. Wesley Clark

Breaking the Oil Addiction

Posted: 06/ 1/11 01:12 PM ET

Addiction is a dangerous thing, and tough to break.

Right now, the United States has an addiction to foreign oil -- an addiction that is not only crippling our economy, but is also funneling hundreds of billions of dollars to foreign governments and corporations. It's the biggest problem in America that no one seems serious about discussing and solving.

Part of breaking that habit is acknowledging just what kind of problem we have, and who benefits from it. That's why we've been working together to build support for country-of-origin labeling at the pump -- so that we know where that $4/gallon is coming from, and move beyond acknowledging our problem to solving it.

Today, I am introducing legislation in the House that would require a label that clearly states the nation of origin for the fuel you're pumping. The legislation, dubbed "COOL for Fuels," will require the Department of Energy to conduct a study and implement its recommendations to ensure American consumers have the ability to decide at the gas pump whether they want to purchase domestic fuel products or gas produced by potentially hostile oil-producing nations.

The numbers are clear: Foreign oil isn't a winning investment for our country. In April, we nearly shut down the government in a dispute over a final total of just over $40 billion in budget cuts; meanwhile we send over $300 billion overseas every year to cover our ravenous consumption of foreign oil.

In the long term, solving this problem is going to involve bringing that money back home and investing in new infrastructure and new technologies -- the backbone of a clean energy economy that will power a new era of innovation and growth.

But to do that, we need to end foreign oil's influence in the short term. And without incremental steps toward breaking our addiction to foreign oil, we'll not only be pumping billions of dollars to foreign nations but taking a huge step backwards away from building a strong and sustainable green economy. Instead of winning the future, we'll be exporting it.

Americans need to know what this addiction is costing us in real terms, and country-of-origin labeling is a commonsense way to get that message across. And that's why we hope you will sign on as a citizen co-sponsor of Congressman Braley's country-of-origin labeling legislation.

In capital not reinvested in new technology at home, in the damage to our environment and the health of our communities, and in American money that goes to states known to sponsor terrorism, our addiction to foreign oil is one of if not the greatest immediate and long-term threat to America's national security.

We've got a lot of work to do to fully break this addiction, but it's our sincere hope that this can be a real first step.

 

Follow Rep. Bruce Braley on Twitter: www.twitter.com/BruceBraley

 
 
  • Comments
  • 135
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
demockracy
Library cards are free
03:03 PM on 06/02/2011
I'm in agreement with the commenters who say "point of origin" labeling is a waste of time and a distraction. As for alternatives, don't miss this:

http://www.grist.org/renewable-energy/2011-05-26-how-to-get-to-a-fully-renewable-power-system

Germans are now planning to go 100% renewable. Yes, they know it has problems. There plan: fix the problems, then profit from the technology.

Meanwhile, the U.S. subsidizes oil consumption to the tune of $300 billion annually (says wri.org).
01:07 PM on 06/02/2011
Henry Ford ran his first Model T automobile on OIL made from the seed of an annually renewable plant. But today, You can't use it.
"Not even to save the world?" asked Jack Herer
"No, not even to save the world. You can't use it. It's illegal." replied Steve Rawlings, the US Dept of Ag top guy on the Greenhouse effect in 1989.
www.jackherer/thebook chapter 2
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TexasBahr
act as you would like to be treated
12:09 PM on 06/02/2011
Labeling gas with a country of origin is a waste of time.
When you need a car to get to work or go to the grocery you dont care where the oil came from you just worry aboutthe price you paid at the pump and what you will have to get rid of because the price of gasoline is so high.
ALL of our oil gets sold on the world market and very little if any of our own oil gets processed into gasoline and distributed nationally. If you want the price of gasoline to go down, stop wall street oil speculation. Oil companies AND Saudi Arabia have both stated that oil speculation activity is the main driver of high gasoline oil prices. Saudi Arabian oil officials have repeatedly stated that they want the price per barrel to be consistently around $70 but the oil speculator activity drives the price up and just enrichens the pocket of those wall street speculators.
If you want the price of gasoline to stay low and stabalize, outlaw oil speculation, force domestic oil to be priced lower than the world market price (or tax oil companies very high until they do), refine and distrubute domestic oil locally
or
nationalize domestic oil production and refining.

We should also highly incentize alternative energy production (wind. solar, geothermal) and appliances that use alternative energy (electric cars for example).
Create jobs by rebuilding our archaic electrical grid (transmission lines), bridges and roads.
11:29 AM on 06/02/2011
They don't call it the devil's excrement for nothing. You have to propose a viable alternative. Natural gas is one. Sugar cane and hemp are two others. Conservatism is by defintion changeless; one, long, boring rat race straight to the bottom. Bottom line is energy; where you get it is becoming tricky. Two recent catastrophic disasters, the Gulf OIl Spill and the nuclear accident post tsunami in Japan were rooted in the quest for energy. When Cuba went through Peak Oil the average Cuban lost 20 lbs and their lifespans surged past Americans. There are benefits to austerity, as there are penalties in luxury.
01:10 PM on 06/02/2011
The University of New Hampshire did a study of one variety of seaweed which is 2/3 by weight made of oil. Their conclusion was that it IS possible to supply 100% of our transportation energy needs from growing this one strain of the most rapidly growing plant on the planet.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckjr2000
been there done that & tired of it
10:56 AM on 06/02/2011
Rep. Braley, If you really cared about breaking America's dependence on foreign oil you would support getting more oil and gas from American sources. You would stop supporting regulations to make drilling and developing domestic oil and gas reserves! You would oppose new regulations that make it almost impossible to refine oil domestically. You would support the millions of jobs that go along with keeping energy costs low. You would stop this administration's attempt to increase energy costs 5 to 7 fold to justify their expenditures in the fairy tale of Green Energy.
photo
newamericanliberal
Facts don't stop being true by your disbelief
03:12 PM on 06/02/2011
Baloney. There isnt enough oil in America to feed the addiction, and we are finding out fracking is worse than oil. Gee...It is not foreign oil it is OIL period. I can picuture you as a buggy whip manufacturer lobbying against that consarn horseless carriage. Putting this aside, have to GET OFF OIL altogether and yes, it will be costly for a bit, then it will settle down. It is called evolution.

NAL
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elbrando
The dream shall never die - Ted Kennedy
09:20 AM on 06/02/2011
The congressperson is grabbing on to low hanging fruit and considering who is in power in the House that is about as far as he can currently reach. The problem is that we need BRAVE people in congress and that is not the current leadership.

Only people will be able to change the culture. We have to fight for the cars that use electric and not oil. BOTH sides have to pressure our congress people and say that this oil addiction is a CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES.
08:20 AM on 06/02/2011
Too bad this band-aid is three decades too late. Oil subsidies need to end now, so we can fund newer forms of energy.
We had the initiative in the 70's, we knew where oil was headed. But the GOP, led by President Reagan, chose to ignore the facts and keep things going the way they always had.
Innovative fuels exist and deserve government funding, since they will be the salvation of the nation.
I think it should be handled like a challenge. Any innovative fuel or technology should be able to apply for a limited amount of start-up funding. Once the results prove viable, the industry and the government can re-negotiate where the fuel or technology can be applied, and how the financing will work. But we have to start somewhere, and very, very soon.
photo
Grumpy Man
Disappointed idealist
09:42 AM on 06/02/2011
Perhaps we should start with ending oil subsidies AND subsidies for other energy sources as well. Let the free market determine what is affordable, reliable, "green" and viable.
10:16 AM on 06/02/2011
The Government should subsidize industries in their start-up phases. It helps encourage innovation, and those innovations could in-turn help the government. It's investing in the future. Once the innovations prove viable and profitable, the subsidy would stop, and be re-invested into other innovative ideas.
The oil subsidies are decades too old to be continued. Oil companies have been breaking profit records, and NOT paying taxes to the nation, a two-fer.
01:11 PM on 06/02/2011
Then we MUST repeal the ban on industrial hemp.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joe Meeker
Nos sunt legio.
02:40 AM on 06/02/2011
This is a noble effort, but it is a little misguided. Foreign oil isn't the problem. Oil period is the problem. And besides, the country we import the most oil from is Canada. I'm sure it will really shock people that their money is going to support Canada. No, what we need to do is get off of oil altogether. We need to either go electric or go hydrogen. Both are established technologies that are being prevented from coming to market by the oligarchy who wants to maintain the status quo for their own benefit.
08:56 AM on 06/02/2011
Support Canada? She now takes in $280 billion of US exports (up from the $58 billion before NAFTA), more than the entire EU, or as another benchmark, Mexico, Japan and China combined. 20% of the Obama Auto bailout came in the form of Canadian $$, her hydro keeps the lights on in the North Eastern States, her gas and oil energizes your productivity and..... Manitoba just signed a deal with Minnesota to send them 4 $ billion in hydro. Yep, cut off the trade deals with Canada you must be so tired of the "support" payments.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bio-man
An advocate for the middle class
04:03 PM on 06/02/2011
Joe, I agree with most of what you are saying and yes the US does import most of it's oil from Canada and Mexico, but OPEC still controls the market. Looking at the CIA world fact book on rankings for proven Oil reserves, the 11 member OPEC cartel controls 69%, Canada controls about 13% and the USA a mere 1.3%. Non OPEC controls only 31%. When we look at production, OPEC only produces about 40% and non OPEC produces the remaining 60%. The US produces 11%. What is basically happening is that OPEC is excercising their monopoly power by limiting what goes to market which is causing upward price pressure. As long as Oil is a primary fuel, they will continue to profit as they have much lower extraction costs than non OPEC countries. I completely agree with you that we need to go electric, but bio-fuels could help alleviate Oil's monopoly in the short term as we ramp up our electric car production as well as a renewable smart grid. I do agree with you that this effort though noble is a little misguided.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
02:19 AM on 06/02/2011
I moved to a used CNG (compressed natural gas) Honda almost 2 years ago and a Phil station for my house! It cost me $0.88/gallon of gasoline equivalent and I get 35 miles/gallon.
That's $0.025/mile. To put that in persecutive a scooter that gets 90 miles/gallon still cost about $0.04/mile!

But I get a certain satisfaction knowing I'm not supporting Hugo Chavez, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, orMuammar Muhammad al-Gaddafi!!!!!

Sometimes doing the right thing has it's own rewards!
01:26 AM on 06/02/2011
With "solutions" like that, who needs problems?
If there are any civilized people left in 100 years, they will look back at us as the most wasteful, shortsighted, delusional society in history. Conservation, altering our way of life is not even considered, just miracles of "innovation" that will keep the "motoring fiesta" (James Howard Kunstler's phrase) continuing. In light of peak oil, and, more immediately, the disruption to the world economy that ending our foreign oil "addiction" would cause, (check out "Gusher of Lies" by Robert Bryce) the proposal to label gas with the country of origin is the most ridiculous idea I've heard yet. It's like expecting factory farming to end because Whole Foods is selling free range chicken for three times the price. How's that workin' out? People will buy what's cheapest. And then buy some more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
12:12 AM on 06/02/2011
See Moving Beyond Oil for $20 barrel diesel grown here and 60c/gallon Ethanol along with it at www.aesopinstitute.org

Then read E-Cat on the same website for power promised at a penny per kilowatt hour. Imagine what that can mean for electric cars.

Both are Black Swans, highly improbable innovations with huge implications. See more in the birth canal on the same site.

Then read TRILLION DOLLAR THREAT on that website to see why and how getting off of fossil fuels may become an urgent priority.
11:48 PM on 06/01/2011
People, you have to realize oil runs the world and it will for the next several hundred years. Why not use it to our advantage and create progress and innovation along the way?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
12:17 AM on 06/02/2011
You're assuming that there's going to be another 100 years for modern civilization (let alone several hundred) if oil continues to run the world. I'm not so sure.
01:52 AM on 06/02/2011
You are very pessimistic, aren't you? Kind of depressing attitude, don't you think?
photo
MajorKong
If the pilot's good, see, I mean if he's reeeally
08:41 AM on 06/02/2011
Even the most wildly optimist projections by the oil industry themselves say that we'll hit peak production in around 30 years. Not a lot of time to start putting other solutions into play.

And that's the absolute pie-in-the-sky best case scenario.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
10:46 PM on 06/01/2011
So will the biggest exporter of oil to the US, Canada, be included in those hostile foreign oil producers? Perhaps a third category: Friendly foreign oil products.
08:23 AM on 06/02/2011
Canada is using oil sands, a filthy, costly way to extract oil. Canadians are not happy about what it is doing to their pristine wilderness areas.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdncommentator
12:44 PM on 06/02/2011
True. Too much emphasis on oil sands and not enough on alternate sources of energy. If we could commit all the R
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elbrando
The dream shall never die - Ted Kennedy
09:15 AM on 06/02/2011
People will probably be more likely to buy oil from Canada than say Saudia Arabia.
10:34 PM on 06/01/2011
At the very least, we should pay the true cost for oil and coal.

The cost of coal should reflect the true costs of global warming, pollution, mountaintop removal, childhood asthema, etc.

The price of every gallon of gas should include a dollar or two to pay for our wars in Iraq and beyond.

Yep, this'll be a bitter pill to pay. It will hurt our economy even more. But we're living on borrowed time as it is. Oil has made modern society possible yes, but it is time to move on.
10:17 PM on 06/01/2011
it is no longer addiction, it has become terminal