More

Rep. Earl Blumenauer

Rep. Earl Blumenauer

Posted: May 7, 2009 02:32 PM

Reducing Pollution Should Not Be a Partisan Issue


The Green the Capitol Initiative undertaken last year by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Chief Administrative Officer Dan Beard has successfully demonstrated how a few common sense steps can reduce energy consumption and improve the quality of our air. Simple programs such as providing locally grown, sustainable food choices to recycling materials and composting food wastes in House cafeterias have already reduced the Capitol's carbon emissions by 72% and saved significant money through greater energy efficiency.

But the biggest step in improving the air in our nation's capitol came with Speaker Pelosi's request that the Capitol Power Plant -- the number one source of air pollution in the District of Columbia -- switch from coal to cleaner burning natural gas. When the Capitol Power Plant begins using natural gas in 2010, we will be able to reduce 95% of the sulfur monoxide and at least 50% of the carbon monoxide emitted by the Plant, making Washington DC a safer, healthier place for all residents, including many members of Congress and their staff.

Sadly, the Republican leadership has opposed, even mocked, the Speaker's determination to improve our air quality and reduce operating expenses. On Tuesday night, members of the minority party went to the House Floor one by one, accusing the Speaker of launching, "an assault on coal." Bizarrely, they chose the policies and the technologies of the past over the health of our citizens and our quality of life. Stranger still, the party that prides itself on fiscal responsibility neglected to mention that switching the Capitol Power Plant to natural gas will eliminate significant costs to transport and store coal, and to clean up coal's fly-ash and waste. Apparently, cost savings don't count if they're associated with measures that help to improve the respiratory health of the District of Columbia's children.

I applaud the efforts of Speaker Pelosi and CAO Beard to Green the Capitol. They understand the need to take financially sound and constructive action to improve the health and well being of our citizens and our planet. In fact, I believe that Americans expect the federal government and their elected officials to lead by example, demonstrating the actions that each of us can take to make our communities a better and healthier place to live: reducing our carbon footprint, eliminating waste, and saving money while we improve our air quality. I am proud that my office serves as a model of energy efficiency and carbon reduction for others, demonstrating ways to benefit our bottom line, reduce waste, and improve the quality of life for us all. I encourage all House members to commit to doing their part to create a more sustainable future for our planet and for generations of Americans to come.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:38 AM on 05/09/2009
Why not impose a trade embargo with China until they stop using coal? The soot from China blows into the U.S. every day.
photo
FormerReaganite
Government Regulations Save Lives
05:16 PM on 05/10/2009
I think that whole thing about China's air pollution blowing all the way across the Pacific Ocean is just a lame excuse for not doing enough to reduce our own air pollution, something we generate by the ton. This was probably a study paid for by Big Coal.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
quidam56
06:29 PM on 05/07/2009
Here in King Coal Country- Wise County, Virginia, coal isn't at all as much a problem as the manner coal is extracted. http://www.wisecountyissues.com/?p=138 Appalachia can't stand anymore of the prosperity thanks to mountaintop removal ! We are being bombed, blasted and bulldozed right into 3rd world America.
05:37 PM on 05/07/2009
As much as I applaud your efforts, I don't really think the Congress has the guts to pass a carbon tax or a cap and trade system. Nothing meaningful will be done until the cost of dumping into the commonwealth of air is assessed. Even my conservative city charges for dumping in the landfill. There is a way to do cap and trade while making everyone a shareholder and even giving out annual dividends. See Peter Barnes's book Capitalism 3.0.
photo
FormerReaganite
Government Regulations Save Lives
05:22 PM on 05/10/2009
The problem with charging for atmospheric dumping is that the dumping will never end, because it becomes profitable to dump. The government profits (tax) and the polluter still gets to pollute, because cap-and-trade would still be cheaper than a complete banning of airborne emissions altogether. This is similar to the government's reluctance to ban tobacco, because it is an enormous cash cow.

Forget cap-and-trade. Outlaw air pollution, period.
05:11 PM on 05/07/2009
As the population growth in the sunbelt has exploded over the last generation we continue to ignore the obvious solution of solar power. All new buildings (residentail and commercial) should have solar power required on their rooftops as this will save the planet as we get serious about real clean renewable energy. This of course should include the stipulation that the power companies buy the excess energy created by the new solar which would reduce fossil fuel use during peak periods (mid day demand). We could have the power companies buy this energy at 5% below the going price of the market to give them an incentive.
This would power up the domestic solar industry, create jobs, and slow oil imports, balance of trade, and clear the air in Los Angeles, Houston, Las Vegas, Atlanta, Pheonix, ect.. .
What are we waiting for?
photo
FormerReaganite
Government Regulations Save Lives
05:31 PM on 05/10/2009
The sun belt (Kansas, for example) would rather build a new coal plant than make use of its free wind energy. And the wind in Kansas is almost continous, the only change is in the wind direction.
03:13 PM on 05/07/2009
Rep. Blumenauer: If you really want to reduce pollution why don't you immediately double the costs of fossil fuels through tax increases?
03:41 PM on 05/07/2009
And replace them with what?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FearlessFreep
I'm actually a radical leftist
03:04 PM on 05/07/2009
But if the polluters and their allies make it a partisan issue, we shouldn't pretend it isn't.
08:20 AM on 05/08/2009
Which side is Al Gore on?

He talks about reducing pollution but his actions are the ones of a polluter.
04:05 PM on 05/08/2009
Where did this comment come from? Did you even read the piece? Can you read?