More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

Enough Is Enough -- Put Elizabeth Warren in Charge

What's Your Reaction:

The last time I was this angry I was sitting in front of the TV in my bathrobe and slippers, watching the confirmation hearing for Clarence Thomas and listening to Senators interrogating Anita Hill as if she were a criminal. I vividly remember kicking a slipper off and throwing it at the TV. Why am I angry today? Now the powerful and the pundits have their eye on making sure the respected visionary Elizabeth Warren is kept in her place. Enough is enough!

Three years ago Professor Warren was clear in issuing warnings about the financial risks associated with sub-prime and no-doc mortgages and the shell games that were being masked as risk-free investments. She told us what would happen and it did. Isn't this insight worth something?

Professor Warren didn't limit herself to warnings, she laid out the foundation of what, with Congressional approval, is now the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Isn't this kind of creative thinking worth something?

The Wall Street bankers who got the benefits of a massive government bailout weren't able to kill the CFPB and they certainly don't like Warren. Some say she's ruffled feathers. The good old boy network of investors is uncomfortable around her. Is this because she is a woman in a male-dominated "sport," or is it that she's an advocate for middle-class families who sees nothing amusing about winning and losing with people's life savings?

Elizabeth Warren's detractors view her as a risky regulatory investment. She might do too much. They are essentially arguing that she needs Wall Street grooming, more time in the clubrooms, at least those that allow women. Frankly it is time to slam the door on the profiteers. Let them ramble on while we finally get some sane regulatory protections working for the men and women by calling on the President to put Elizabeth Warren in charge.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 196
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
08:21 PM on 07/25/2010
I am strong for Warren, but even if she gets the job, she may not be able to do as much as we hope. The whole system will be opposed to her. I hope she gets a chance to try; and I hope that enough of us will be loud enough in her support that she can do the job right.
photo
janie@atthelake
Keep Austin Weird
09:05 PM on 07/25/2010
But hope is a good thing. John this comes from a gal living in Austin and under the government of Rick Perry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NCEngineer
06:25 PM on 07/25/2010
It is Elizabeth's Warren lack of desire to want to have anything to do with all those "boys clubs" that she is running into so much resistance. She would run a serious agency and do what is right for consumers. And that scares the hell out of the corporations. Without someone as strong as Elizabeth Warren in there, it will be just one more crappy regulatory agency that does no real work, certainly not for consumers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Enock Zamora
KARMA
06:05 PM on 07/25/2010
We should not [flat-line]. Let us close our eyes. In the morn, we will be lavished by what we wish for. :)
05:12 PM on 07/25/2010
Thank you so much for supporting her. Every time I hear Elizabeth Warren speak I think she is the smartest person in the room. No wonder these guys are scared of her. She is on to them and their games. Please fight on. I am proud to have you as my representative.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
02:31 PM on 07/25/2010
I imagine the reason that the White House perhaps fears Warren is that she has this nasty habit, at least for the Beltway crowd, of calling a spade a space, telling it in plain language that everyone can understand. Oooo! We certainly don't want that. We want to slice and dice, spin, and make happy faces.

On the one hand, I would like to see Warren appointed to that post, but on the other perhaps she will be muzzled by those above her (the SEC has not been the greatest friend of the consumer). In some ways, it may will be better to have her on the outside of the tent pi$$ing in.
03:33 PM on 07/25/2010
True, but at least there would be one trustworthy voice in Washington. That's worth its weight in gold to me.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
05:17 PM on 07/25/2010
Agreed. But the Washington Beltway is notorious for its back-biting and politics that would put Machiavelli to shame. Many go with the best of intentions but soon are ground down. Maybe Warren will be different, I hope so. Again, it will all depend on exactly how much power she will have. The power of Persuasion is OK, but every now and then you need a very big club.
08:27 PM on 07/25/2010
Doubt anyone could muzzle Ms. Warren. She might resign or she might get fired, but I'll bet she won't be muzzled. She would blow any whistles that need blowing, so the President needs to appoint her regardless, and then keep the Good Ole Boys off her back.
01:05 PM on 07/25/2010
If the president does not take this opportunity to appoint Warren the head of this regulatory body he will clearly illustrate to those, few of us left who support him, that he has not worked, with integrity, to rectify the very real problems facing all of us who do invest. The choicee is clearly up to him, and him alone.
01:53 PM on 07/25/2010
That would be after he grows a backbone, right?
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
02:32 PM on 07/25/2010
Yeah, right after he checks in with Beck, Hannity, and Rush.
12:48 PM on 07/25/2010
the last thing we need is yet another federal agency
01:35 PM on 07/25/2010
We need this one. I agree that there are probably too many federal agencies, if they did their job. It will take a long time to under the disservice that Republicans have done by putting in incompetent or maliciously "do nothing" regulators into agencies because they couldn't undo the regulations.
02:10 PM on 07/25/2010
No, truly the last thing we need is another mindless repetition of Dittohead-think. If you could POSSIBLY come up with a valid reason why this particular agency and Elizabeth Warren in particuar are not needed, then comment. Otherwise, go back to memorizing Fox News talking points and go back to their comment board. We don't need you here where we're practicing intelligent thinking.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
02:37 PM on 07/25/2010
While I too share my doubts about creating another agency, it does appear that this might help. But at the same time, keep in mind that there are still a lot of regulations on the books that can and do work; however, you need an agency head and Administration to actually enforce what you do have. Look, FDA has plenty of regulations in place that could have protected us from food and drug contamination but the Bush Administration put weak kneed hacks in charge. We also have had Congresses who have emasculated the regulatory agencies by cutting budgets and manpower. You may well have a bright-eyed agency head, e.g., Elizabeth Warren, but if she is given no manpower and budget, she can do very little. The failure of regulatory agencies has two parents, Congress and whatever the current Administration might be.
peowlemeow
Democrat,non-military,undereducated,overworked
12:43 PM on 07/25/2010
"Good old boy network" is too nice.Bankers and brokers are operating a criminal cartel.Personally,I think about the MBAs in America should be in prison.
12:36 PM on 07/25/2010
From at least a dozen interviews and watching C-Span coverage of her congressional oversight committee, I've never seen Dr. Warren give anything but solid, commonsense support for the average American's interests in financial matters and clear, stringent scrutiny of the financial industry without rancor or unfairness.

There's no other public person who's as well-respected and trusted -- I would even say by both sides of the voting political spectrum -- because she's honest, unelected and virtually apolitical. She's not been bought and probably can't be. This administration won't have a better opportunity to appoint a true, competent, broadly populist person who is only opposed by BigBusiness interests.

Geithner may have problems with her appointment, but who cares? The majority of Americans have a big problem with his appointment and subsequent actions, as well as his actions before appointment. We know whose side he's on.

Elizabeth Warren hasn't suggested any radical anti-business policies, only tweaks to restore and insure a basic level of consumer protections. She's not interested in crippling commerce for the sake of some hidden ideological agenda and I've no doubt she'd lead the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was created at her suggestion, wisely and with fairness to consumers and business.

President Obama, for once just do the right thing!
02:11 PM on 07/25/2010
Fan'd and Fav'd. Warren is the perfect choice.
04:04 PM on 07/25/2010
Yep, and back at ya, Leslib. You know, I've just realized my admiration for Warren comes from the same place my admiration for Barack Obama once originated during his presidential campaign: the advocacy for the interests of the middle-class and those less fortunate and powerful. The difference is that she's not a politician and has a track record that predates the Obama administration and has since shown her mettle in action without compromise.

That desire to find the last honest public servant hasn't been killed by my own creeping cynicism; at least not yet. Elizabeth Warren is one of the few people who gets through those filters anymore.
photo
RedRat
Ignorance is fixable, stupidty is forever
02:39 PM on 07/25/2010
Sadly, Obama seems to be demonstrating an alliance with Wall Street and the financial sector. Warren speaks in plain language, to the point, and doesn't spin the facts. That is why the Administration, particularly Geithner fears her.
05:06 PM on 07/25/2010
Agreed.
12:34 PM on 07/25/2010
I'm not angry yet .... because no one has been appointed yet. I will be angry if Obama doesn't appoint her. If Obama doesn't appoint her this week and waits until the groundswell is so large that he can't not appoint her, I will be happy he appointed her, but disappointed in Obama (again), because it will be plainly seen that he was forced into it. She is the best candidate and certainly the best one to make fools of the Republicans that will ask their questions and concerns.
11:40 AM on 07/25/2010
It's pure sexism. She'll never be appointed.
11:06 AM on 07/25/2010
The last time I got really PO'd watching TV was when Bush was playing Wyatt Earp and threatening Iraq. I think Warren would be a far more effective sheriff than that Texas Bozzo ever was. I've watched Obama make some really questionable choices and if he doesn't choose Warren,then my vote in 2012 will be very questionable.
10:42 AM on 07/25/2010
I remember feeling the same way during the Hill/Thomas hearings. Yet today he is a Supreme Court Justice. It makes me feel dirty just revisiting his appointment. And nothing he has done since his appointment has changed my view of him.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/26/us/politics/26scotus.html

I don't think there's any hope that Elizabeth Warren will be appointed. Each day seems to bring a new disappointment. At one time I was full of hope for a change for the better.
11:38 AM on 07/25/2010
I too was angry during the Thomas hearings. And during the march to war. And during the financial crash. And the bailouts. and the bonuses.

I don't think there is any hope for Elizabeth Warren's appointment either.

I too have lost all hope for positive change.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cathy Sample
07:16 AM on 07/25/2010
the way for ms. warren's appointment needs to be made open. she has shown an ability to forsee just the type of dysfunction that was the financial meltdown. that looks to me to be a good thing. let us all of us americans be allowed to be protected by this woman's obvious ability to oversee consumer protection. let's all of us be allowed to fairly profit
04:25 AM on 07/25/2010
MC Speier -- I've never lived in your district, but I spent about 35 years near it. I admired Leo, and I've admired you. And I think you are correct to advance the appointment of Dr. Warren.

To me, the public option was strike one, and Dawn Johnsen was strike two. If Warren is not appointed, that will be strike three.

I'm not an idiot -- I will still vote for Democrats. (Consider the alternatives). But failure to appoint Warren will certainly mean the end of my enthusiasm for this administration.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PTAOfficerforObama
A micro bio is a terrrible thing to waste.
09:25 AM on 07/25/2010
Fanned and Faved.You took the words right out of my mouth!
12:06 PM on 07/25/2010
Perfectly put. My sentiments exactly.