More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rep. Jan Schakowsky

Rep. Jan Schakowsky

Posted: March 17, 2011 01:04 PM

Fairness in Taxation


We have a growing crisis of income inequality in this country. We are at levels of income disparity that we have not seen since right before the Great Depression in 1928. Over the last 30 years, the failed GOP policies of Reaganomics and weakening regulation have led to a situation where the middle class has shrunk and the richest 1% of Americans now own 34% of our nation's wealth -- that's more than the bottom 90% of American, who own just 29% of our nation's wealth.

Now the Republicans -- the same ones who squandered our nation's surplus by giving tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans, and who engineered the policies that allowed Wall Street to drive our economy off the cliff -- are demanding sacrifice from the middle and low-income earners.

The Republicans also want to slash the bedrock safety net programs by promoting deep cuts to Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and other vital domestic spending programs. Not only would these cuts punish those who have suffered the worst under the failed GOP policies, but they would put an additional 600,000 to 800,000 people out of work. Despite GOP cries for austerity and fiscal restraint, they continue to defend corporate subsidies like tax breaks for big oil companies and more tax breaks for the wealthiest.

Enough is enough! It's time to bring some common sense to this debate. There is a fair solution to balancing the budget without harming those who are most vulnerable. Yesterday I introduced the Fairness in Taxation Act, a bill that would create new tax brackets for the wealthiest Americans. Currently, the top tax bracket begins at $373,000 in annual income and fails to distinguish the merely "well-off," from the "super-duper rich."

By introducing new tax brackets, we ensure a basic principal of fairness: those who have benefited the most from the opportunities that our great country provides should also invest in making those opportunities a reality for all Americans.

The Fairness in Taxation Act asks the very rich to pay their fair share by enacting tax brackets for income starting at $1 million and ending with a $1 billion bracket. The new brackets would be:

• $1-10 million: 45%
• $10-20 million: 46%
• $20-100 million: 47%
• $100 million to $1 billion: 48%
• $1 billion and over: 49%

The bill would also tax capital gains and dividend income as ordinary income for those taxpayers with income over $1 million. If implemented in 2011, the Fairness in Taxation Act would raise more than $78 billion, according to the Center for Tax Justice.

I ask you stand with me for fairness in taxation.

 

Follow Rep. Jan Schakowsky on Twitter: www.twitter.com/janschakowsky

 
 
  • Comments
  • 117
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
03:56 PM on 03/31/2011
If you are so worried about Fairness, why not reduce your salary and office expenses to start?

With Democrats Taxation is never a problem it's always their solution. The problem is it's never enough, first learn to live within your means.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MasterfullyInept
US Army veteran, progressive and opinionated
12:48 PM on 03/26/2011
Works for me but whats the chance this legislation will ever be enacted?
ChangeAgent007
Changing the world everyday
12:04 AM on 03/25/2011
Lovely sentiment, but a bit simplified for me. I'm not sold on the tax bracket solution.

I do, however, agree with you on the continued increase between the haves and have nots. The Republican policies are the wrong direction right now. We need to be looking at what was done during the Great Depression and learn some of those rules. We also need to put into place the regulations that were removed by Bush and Clinton. The systemic dismantling of these regulations allowed banks to blur the lines. If they were scrupulous, which we know they aren't, then we wouldn't need regs, but here we are again.

Also, I would like to know what is being done to bring bankers to justice? Now there's your problem. They just keep doing what they are doing. Time to break them apart so they won't be too big to fail. Investments, Insurance, and Banking industries need to be separated once again.
apiazza
There is no such thing as a fiscal conservative.
03:21 PM on 03/20/2011
Jan Schakowsky just wrote the Democratic 2012 campaign platform!
10:47 PM on 03/19/2011
Gotta love Jan!
FoundersFan
right = correct
08:33 PM on 03/19/2011
The ONLY "fair" individual income tax is the one that we had federally for the majority of our country's history--which is NO individual income tax. In fact, the IIT should be unConstitutional as it was for the majority of our nation's history.

In other words, the only "fair" is the FAIR TAX.

http://www.fairtax.org/site/PageServer
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:47 PM on 03/18/2011
Make the KOCHS PAY THEIR SHARE, like ALL of us!!! Support Schakowsky's FAIRNESS IN TAXATION bill, call or contact your representative!
03:24 PM on 03/30/2011
she is my representative.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:36 PM on 03/18/2011
SUPPORT REP SCHAKOWSYS FAIRNESS IN TAXATION!!!Contact House of Represtentatives http://www.house.gov/
01:33 PM on 03/18/2011
This would be a practical way to put taxation in its proper form for all citizens.
10:13 AM on 03/18/2011
Right on!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackraisin
Life, Liberty, Property.
09:46 AM on 03/18/2011
The only "fair" tax is a flat tax. Everyone pays the same percent on their income.
01:07 PM on 03/18/2011
No a flat tax is not a fair tax. Those who need every penny will pay the same rate as those who have extra billions
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blackraisin
Life, Liberty, Property.
08:05 PM on 03/18/2011
Exactly. Why should the government be discriminating on basis of income. Everyone is treated equal under a flat tax. Thus the only "fair tax" is a flat tax.
apiazza
There is no such thing as a fiscal conservative.
03:22 PM on 03/20/2011
It would only be fair if say the first 60 thousand dollars per person was tax free.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:46 AM on 03/18/2011
I ask you stand with me for fairness in taxation.

Only if you adopt my fair tax rate:

$0-$∞: 0%
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
docwindprod
My micro-bio is empty, but my life isn't.
01:16 PM on 03/18/2011
another "patriot" heard from. funny how the ones who promote themselves most loudly are the ones least likely to do anything for their country, and the most likely to want all of its benefits for free.
photo
drwtsn
Could I please get an upgrade to a macro-bio?
05:36 PM on 03/18/2011
Fine, Patriot. Just don't expect any of the luxuries you've gotten used to, like running water, roads, electricity, etc. Oh, and if any Mexican or Canadian walks across the border with a semiautomatic weapon, you can kiss the U.S. goodbye.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TN60
I Hope You'll Dance
09:28 AM on 03/18/2011
http://thinkprogress.org/2011/03/16/gop-state-corporate-tax-cuts/

Tax the hell out of the richest 2 % or those making a million or more. I figure we can go to the year 2999 and never make up what their share of sacrifice, the Republicans are so big for.
07:10 AM on 03/18/2011
It is almost laughable that someone can call for "Fairness" in taxation and defines it as increasing the discrepancies in tax rates. It takes a brave person to propose raising someone else's taxes. And the 78 billion raised? What proportion of the deficit gap would that cover?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Trepasky
Sanity is neither free nor easy
07:24 AM on 03/18/2011
Consider now that many wealthy pay an effective tax rate of 0-15%.
That is less than most middle class income earners.
How is that 'fair'?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chuckles71
My micro-bio says O-Tay!
02:29 PM on 03/19/2011
Get a better accountant.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jim Pasterczyk
Banned!
03:15 AM on 03/18/2011
Decreasing the number of tax brackets never made any sense to me since so few people actually had to calculate as opposed to simply looking up the tax they owed and those at the upper income levels would have used an accountant or tax attorney to do their taxes anyway. It was just another one of Reagan's strawman arguments that sounded good in poll testing and got people's anger up without bothering to edify them in the least.