iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
GET UPDATES FROM Rep. Joe Courtney
 
GET UPDATES FROM Sen. Jack Reed
 

Don't Let Student Loan Rates Double

Posted: 02/ 3/2012 10:47 am

Education should not be the province of the lucky few, but the right of every American with skill and determination. Given the opportunity to better themselves through higher education, individuals can provide for their families and strengthen our nation.

A college degree is becoming more essential than ever. In 1980, the gap between the lifetime earnings of a college graduate and a high school graduate was 40 percent. In 2010, it was 74 percent. By 2025, it is projected to be 96 percent.

But with college tuition skyrocketing and the purchasing power of federal financial aid receding, the doors of opportunity are closing on more of today's students. This is driving young Americans to assume historically high levels of student debt and impeding their climb up the income ladder.

To put this in perspective, tuition rates at four-year colleges and universities have risen over 32 percent in the last decade, and last year Americans took out more than $100 billion in student loans for the first time in our history. Student loan debt now exceeds credit card debt in the United States, creating an immense burden that will last years after graduation.

The problem will only get worse if Congress does not act soon. On July 1, 2012, interest rates on subsidized Stafford student loans -- one of the few programs that is affordable for students and families -- will double, from 3.4 to 6.8 percent. In no uncertain terms, this would be another hit to middle-class and working-families, and a de facto tax increase on as many as 10 million people.

According to the non-partisan U.S. Public Interest Research Groups (PIRG), if Congress does nothing, borrowers taking out the maximum $23,000 in subsidized student loans will see their interest balloon by an estimated $5,000 over a 10-year repayment period and $11,000 over a 20-year repayment period.

Now, students who took out loans have a responsibility to pay them back. But the government shouldn't balloon payments at a time when our economy is still struggling to climb back from the worst recession in generations.

To ease the financial challenge of paying for college, we have introduced legislation in the House and the Senate to prevent interest rates on these student loans from doubling this year. Our bill would permanently cap Stafford student loan interest rates at a reasonable and consistent 3.4 percent for low-and moderate-income students.

Student loans should be an investment that pays off, and can be reasonably paid off. Failing to pass this legislation will make it harder for smart, hard-working Americans to join and stay in the middle-class.

Making college more affordable is key to unlocking America's economic competitiveness. Business leaders know it is vital for young Americans to get an education beyond high school. If today's students cannot afford college, businesses will not have the workers with the education and training they need to keep our economy competitive and dynamic far into the future.

Under President Obama's leadership, Congress overhauled the college student loan program -- ending a flawed system that gave away billions in federal subsidies to private banks that simply acted as middle-men and putting those taxpayer dollars directly in the hands of students to pay for their education.

Now we need to take the next step and prevent this looming rate hike.

Nothing contributes to America's economy or helps people overcome economic hardship and fulfill their promise more than a good education.

Making college more affordable is one of the best investments our nation can make in America's economic future.

Lets stop this rate hike and ensure financial aid opportunities afforded today will also be available to future students. Please join us in this effort by contacting your Congressman or Senator and asking them to stop the student loan rate hike.

 

Follow Rep. Joe Courtney on Twitter: www.twitter.com/connecticutjoe

Education should not be the province of the lucky few, but the right of every American with skill and determination. Given the opportunity to better themselves through higher education, individuals ca...
Education should not be the province of the lucky few, but the right of every American with skill and determination. Given the opportunity to better themselves through higher education, individuals ca...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 27
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
12:36 PM on 02/07/2012
Let me get this straight. Jon Corzine and Wall Street banks can borrow billions at zero to 1% interest rates, but students get hammered for 6.8%. Yeah, that'll work. This should be a non-partisan cause. Don;t let the rates double on student loans. Instead, roll back the bureaucracy at the Department of ED. Get rid of crazy regulations like gainful employment and the hundreds of government drones hired the last three years.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bugweed
09:15 AM on 02/06/2012
Why in gods name does the government allow banks to borrow at nearly 0% at the fed window, and students to get stuck in the back side with above market rate interest rates? Student loans, a despicable form of voluntary servitude, cannot be discharged in bankruptcy, are immune from all forms of consumer protection laws, and represent as close to risk free as banks could possibly pray for. One more example of the banking industry getting the cream, while the middle class gets the curd. The Mitts of the world don't and won't have a clue about what we are talking about.
senseandnonsense
Trapeze artist
08:21 AM on 02/06/2012
Given that student loans are nondischargeable in bankruptcy, they represent one of the surer kinds of investments for lenders. Why, then, should interest rates on these loans be higher? Higher interest rates should be charged to borrowers of money that is at risk, like credit card loans. Student loan interest rates should be kept low.
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
03:33 PM on 02/03/2012
Public colleges must be free and include room and board for all who need it.

The republic should not subsidize private schools.
T-Haight
What was wrong with federalism?
03:25 PM on 02/03/2012
3.4% may sounds like a good rate to cap student loans at now, but what about in 5 or 10 years? Would it have been a good rate during the early 80s, when rates were near 20%?

If the government is going to lend money to students to get them through college (while effectively banning private institutions from doing the same via imposing onerous rules), it had better not be wasting taxpayer money by having an unreasonably low rate. Pegging us to an interest rate right now, with historically low rates, sets us up to do exactly that.

This bill needs to go back to comittee for improvements to protect the taxpayer.
senseandnonsense
Trapeze artist
08:22 AM on 02/06/2012
Private institutions are not banned from lending money to students.
T-Haight
What was wrong with federalism?
05:00 PM on 02/06/2012
You're right, they're not banned. However, with the revisions to the federal requirements for student loans that are scheduled to go into effect in the coming years (which the Obama administration wants to ignore and start early in a paean to OWS), it has the same effect. Tucked away in Obamacare was a new provision that prohibited private institutions from making federally-insured student loans. That leaves privately-insured loans, but there is not much collateral on those. On top of new restrictions in the years prior, the government is becoming the only lender in the business.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bugweed
09:34 AM on 02/06/2012
Protect the tax payer from what? Can't discharge a student loan in bankruptcy, they are immune from oversight by any consumer protection agency, law or operation. They are not subject to basic protections of due process guaranteed debtors by every state. So what's the protection that the taxpayer needs? Every corporation can default on its obligations with impunity, every bond sold in the US with the exception of US Treasury obligations can be the subject of a massive bankruptcy and discharged with a payment of pennies on the dollar to the holders. So why make student loans a profit center? Why do we always have to make money off those who can least afford it?

One more proof positive that we really could care less about higher education in this country unless the student can throw a football or dribble a basketball.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
02:41 PM on 02/03/2012
Anyone who takes out a student loan is brain dead. Community college, GI Bill, living at home, are all options that are FAR better than indebting yourself.
10:47 PM on 02/04/2012
a. Not everyone lives near a college.
b. Last I checked community colleges don't award bachelors degree's and associates are useless, but yes I agree for the first two years everyone should go to community college.
c. GI Bill? If I wanted to join the military I wouldn't have gone to school
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Bourbon
11:45 AM on 02/05/2012
Of course. The military is beneath you, and you should therefore be subsidized by the 53%.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chad Wheeler
12:08 PM on 02/06/2012
What do you suggest for adults going back to school who already own their own home and are too old to join the military?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jorge Escondido
01:37 PM on 02/03/2012
It's time to socialize the University system. No loans, no fat paychecks for professors. Let those who profess so much for socialism live what preach!
senseandnonsense
Trapeze artist
08:25 AM on 02/06/2012
Fat paychecks for professors! Haha! You are one funny guy! Teaching at a university is more like a Mormon mission. Professors teach because they like to, not to get some imaginary fat paycheck.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:48 PM on 02/03/2012
2/3/12
12:49pm
NYC

I have $70,000 in student loan debt and no degree yet but now I'm cut off. How about that?
senseandnonsense
Trapeze artist
08:26 AM on 02/06/2012
How were your grades?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:34 AM on 02/06/2012
2/6/12
10:34am
NYC

When they cut me off I had straight A's in all upper division psychology coursework, my major, and an offer to join the honor society (which I couldn't afford---they wanted money from me.)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LouGots
11:16 AM on 02/03/2012
The article uses the word "balloon" twice in connection with student loans. This is confusing, and may even be intentionally misleading.

"Balloon" in connection with lending has a specific meaning. In a Balloon loan, a large final payment is needed to pay off the loan.

The is not the same thing as an adjustable rate loan, but may be even more of an embarrassment to a borrower who has miscalculated.

We don't really know what the writer is trying to say here. I doubt he means that college loans are being set up as either Balloon or adjustable rate contracts. It is more likely that he means that college loans written in the future will be written at significantly higher rates than before, but by misusing a financial term of art, he is leaving us to guess at his true meaning.

Very sneaky--a polemic and not an informative economic article. .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Viable Way
Common sense is so unusual.
11:59 AM on 02/03/2012
I wanted them to say whether or not the increase in interest rates would rise on existing loans. That would be a true disaster! I know some loans are variable rates.
04:15 PM on 02/06/2012
It will not, your current loans have the same interest rate during the year that you took them out, here is a link (http://www.finaid.org/loans/historicalrates.phtml).

Subsidized Fed Loans originated starting 2012-13 will be subject to a 6.8% fixed interest. These loans will also not have a 6 month grace period that is interest free.
El Justiciero
HP mods have NO sense of humor, obviously
01:09 PM on 02/03/2012
There's a lot of sloppy writing here. I appreciate anyone calling them out on it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timothy Kuntz
Trying to be sane
01:40 PM on 02/03/2012
Hey! He's a Congressman not a writer. Clarity is not a prerequisite for law-making. I think (but am not sure) that the guy is trying to do a good thing. Maybe he could have a writer write his blogs...