12/07/2011 04:18 pm ET | Updated Feb 06, 2012

Rebuking Reins: Why Members Of The House Must Oppose The Regulations From The Executive In Need Of Scrutiny Act

House Republicans are set to move on to the third piece of their anti-regulation agenda, H.R. 10, the so-called "Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny (REINS) Act." The REINS Act seeks to undermine the nation's environmental, health and safety laws by requiring Congressional approval for any major rule within 70 days of introduction.

Yes, it would require Congress, which has shown itself particularly unable to get its job done this year, to act on any major rule.

Rules ranging from those implementing the Clean Air Act, to new workplace safety and health protections, to limits on Wall Street, and to new food safety regulations would need to be approved, with no changes, by both houses of Congress within 70 days in order to take effect. If a rule is not approved within that time, it would be tabled for the next Congress.

Innocuously titled and intentionally cumbersome, the REINS Act would make it nearly impossible for federal agencies to protect Americans' health or the environment in the future. It already takes many years for federal agencies to create and get approval of the rules needed to implement new laws, given existing review and analysis processes and public comment procedures as well as Congressional intervention. H.R. 10 would make Congress the required arbiter of every technical question and business dispute over a rule and would allow a single chamber of Congress to stop any regulation, no matter what the facts showed. In so doing, the REINS Act would fundamentally change the way our government protects the environmental and public health of the American people.

While Republicans try to argue that H.R. 10 will improve regulatory oversight, the reality is that the bill merely serves as cover to effectively undo existing enforcement mechanisms that members in their party do not support. While Republicans suggest H.R. 10 will streamline government processes, the reality is that bill will make the rulemaking process more cumbersome and enable a new Congress to block the implementation of legislation passed by a previous Congress without actually having to publicly repeal popular laws. Moreover, while Republicans suggest H.R. 10 will ease the burden of small businesses, create jobs and bolster the economy, in action, the bill would bog down businesses and federal agencies in needlessly exhaustive compliance processes and litigation at the expense of American families and opportunities for American workers.

What concerns me most of all is that instead of relying on scientists and issue-area experts in federal agencies to set standards to protect our health and environment, the REINS Act will make politicians in Congress to the arbiters of what is safe for the American people. As a former teacher, I understand the importance of scientific evidence and knowledge-sharing in making wise decisions, and as a Member of Congress, I have seen all too clearly how some of my fellow politicians ignore the evidence when making important decisions. For example, we are living in an era of twenty of the hottest years in recorded history; glaciers and permafrost are vanishing, weather patterns are shifting, access to water is decreasing, and the consequences of sudden climate change, such as rising oceans, increased storm activity, and the displacement of wildlife, are a threat to the economy, our coastal cities, and possibly the very existence of humanity. Yet Republicans in Congress have blocked action on legislation to deal with the problem of climate change, despite what the evidence shows. The public policy that will protect environmental and public health must be informed by the best science, not impeded by legislative gridlock and political polarization.

The REINS Act is redundant, irresponsible and intentionally time-consuming. Far from streamlining government processes, the bill is yet another attempt in a long line of legislative initiatives presented in this Congress to undermine our nation's environmental, health and safety laws. It would effectively rewrite virtually every environmental and other regulatory statute, making existing requirements unenforceable, and it would discourage federal agencies from adapting policies to changing public needs. The goal of the REINS Act is to neglect the scientific evidence that enables us to progress and paralyze our government's ability to protect American people.

Now, more than ever, Congress must act to protect our public health, food supply, water, air quality, public lands, and financial security. We should not be enacting additional regulatory roadblocks that would erase 100 years of American progress and threaten the quality of life of generations to come.

Honda has represented the 15th Congressional District of California in the U.S. House of Representatives for a decade. He serves on the House Appropriations and Budget Committees and is Chair Emeritus of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus.

Follow Rep. Honda on Twitter
Follow Rep. Honda on Facebook