It's hard to imagine what America would be like today without Democrats who, over the years, refused to surrender their core principles.
In times of political turmoil, when difficult decisions were required, Democrats stood their ground and fought hard for the Civil Rights Act, Social Security, Medicaid, Head Start, campaign finance reform, and other critical legislation. It would have been easy to compromise our values and cave to political pressures. Instead, courageous Democrats left our party a proud legacy built on principle.
Today, however, the Democratic Party is at risk of losing its way and tarnishing that legacy. In November, House Democrats yielded to the demands of a small but vocal anti-choice wing of the party, approving a health reform bill that includes unprecedented anti-choice measures. I was among the millions of American women shocked to learn that a majority of pro-choice Democrats in the House had voted to take away my reproductive rights.
As a Democratic representative of New York's 14th District, I would have done everything in my power to oppose the Stupak amendment. As a leader of one of the most progressive districts in the nation, the representative of the 14th should always stand up and fight for core Democratic principles, such as reproductive choice. But last November, instead of a fight, all we got was silence. Women in New York, and across America, deserve better.
I am a strong advocate of health care reform. My parents lacked health care when they first arrived in the United States as political refugees in the 1970s. But I am also a staunch defender of women's rights. The health care bill as passed by the House is one step closer to affordable health care for most Americans, but it is also one step closer to eliminating reproductive health services for most women.
Deal making is part of the political process. But a core Democratic principle like a woman's right to choose should have never been on the table for negotiation. And it shouldn't be on the table during the final stages of legislative action on health care reform this week. Now is the time to fight hard, not to compromise further. Democrats in the House should beat back any attempt to impinge women's rights as Congress moves toward a final vote on health care reform.
Let's be honest. If there's one thing that separates the two parties, it's that Democrats are the party of principle. And when we stick to our principles, our party wins, and our nation wins. History has shown that, time and again, the rise of the right is a direct result of the Democratic Party's failure to stand up and fight for what we believe.
It's worth taking a moment, then, to remember what makes a Democrat a Democrat.
We are the party of equal rights. That's why we cannot continue to delay on reversing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
We are the party of opportunity. That's why cannot wait any longer for comprehensive immigration reform that increases opportunity, prosperity, and safety in America.
We are the party of hard working families and entrepreneurs. That's why we have to empower our small businesses, and provide assistance to women- and minority-owned firms in particular.
(I spoke at event recently on the need to focus on job creation. Someone asked me if I was really a Republican. It's clear our party has lost its way when New York Democrats think job creation is the sole territory of the GOP.)
Democrats need to provide strong, principled leadership in Washington. We need to stop "legislating in haste and repenting at leisure." We need to stop "voting against the bill before we vote for it." We need to stop being afraid to make moral judgments. We need to stop the hypocritical equivocating that might just strip away the rights of women for which our party has long and proudly fought.
Most of all, Democrats need to stop surrendering our core principles.
Follow Reshma Saujani on Twitter: www.twitter.com/reshma2010
More women need to enter politics to change things on either side of the isle.
At risk? Under Obama the Democrats have finally lost the "Lite" from their nickname of "GOP Lite". They are the full fledged party of corporatists and the "health care reform" bill is their flag. They will gleefully kill Americans in the name of corporate profits.
It's over. If you want a party that represents people then start or join a third party.
Women will still have the choice of abortion. You just have to find a provider and pay for the procedure. What? You want your cake and eat it all to? I agree, with conservatives in America, that money that they pay (along with liberals) should not pay for abortions.
Abortion is legal. Should be legal. And should be accessible. States should not attempt to restrict abortion beyond what is reasonable. Conservatives should accept that abortion is here to stay. In return, pro-choice proponents should accept that they will have to pay for their own abortions.
This is called compromise. This article demonstrates that liberals want a free lunch and will resort to hysterics to get it.
Now, let us get health care reform passed with a public option. Without free-for-all abortions.
Because this bill is NOT the proper tool for any kind of abortion legislation, it leads to a very convoluted accounting system for insurance companies which will create a lot of pressure to drop coverage of abortions. It could potentially reduce women's choices for health providers greatly and given that most of us are still going to be with work-based insurance, that could be serious.
That said, it's not worth sinking health care for. It's just another thing we'll have to fix later.
It's not worth it to keep people uninsured and the most unhealthy people uninsurable so that abortions can be paid for with insurance.
People really need to keep their heads in reality. The left is not a powerful and unified bloc like the right is, and never has been. As a result it shares a major party with moderate conservatives.
Until we see a massive change in demographics, liberals are on loss control.
We have to prioritize.
More choices of insurance coverage for abortion... or any choice whatsoever for life-saving health care for the most unhealthy?