When African Americans and other disenfranchised groups were still vying for an opportunity to have their voices heard and participate in the social and political process of the nation they helped construct, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enacted to legally push forward this ability. When folks like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. were entrenched in the struggle for civil rights, they achieved a victory with passage of the Voting Rights Act. And when states failed to comply with equal voting opportunities for all by creating literacy tests and other subliminal discriminatory practices, the federal Voting Rights Act superseded individual state's attempts at bigotry and marginalization. Now, more than 40 years after the success of this historic legislation, many Republicans would like to slowly and covertly repeal the practice by establishing voter ID requirements in an effort to restrict individuals participating in the process. My message to them: don't think you're fooling anyone; we see your attempts at stealing the 2012 election and you will not get away with it.
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder delivered a poignant message this week when he addressed an audience on this very issue at the Lyndon Johnson presidential library in Austin, Texas. Holder said he was calling on political parties to "resist the temptation to suppress certain votes in the hope of attaining electoral success" and stated that voting itself must be viewed "not only as a legal issue but as a moral imperative". As someone who has been extremely concerned and vocal about this subject, I commend AG Holder and the administration for stepping in and tackling this pressing issue head on. We must support the AG in his efforts for not only are the most vulnerable among us at risk, but so too is our entire political structure as we know it.
The biggest (and most laughable) excuse proponents of voter ID laws like to use is the notion that they are somehow preventing 'voter fraud'. When only some 38 cases of 'voter fraud' have actually been found to exist, the idea that this is somehow an inherent and urgent dilemma should be insulting to anyone with a semblance of intelligence. When other, more problematic issues like voter restriction have been proven to discriminate and hinder fair voting, the real focus should instead be on how we can allow for more citizens to cast their ballots - not less. If an elderly 80-year-old has been voting for decades with proof of a utility bill or other documentation, how can we ask him/her to go through a lengthy process of obtaining a copy of their birth certificate, going to the DMV, etc? Who will assist this person in wrangling through the bureaucracy?
The draconian ID requirements don't only target the elderly. Many states are now prohibiting college students from voting in the state where they attend school. Next fall, when many of these students are entrenched in their studies, they will tragically find out that they are not eligible to vote. And how many of them will be able to leave school to travel out-of-state just to vote? Think we all know the answer to that. And of course, it should come as no surprise that Black and Latino citizens will suffer the greatest with these new ID laws. It's estimated that millions and millions of minority voters will be excluded from the process as many either don't have the money, time or means to obtain new identification.
President Obama rode into office with massive support from both young people and minorities. When record numbers of Blacks, Latinos and the youth voted in the 2008 election, it's blatantly clear why the right-wing is attempting to create these new ID requirements. Instead of trying to find ways to cheat the elections, perhaps they should understand why their antiquated policies are so disliked by the majority. They are attempting to change the rules because they realize they are doomed for failure -- the nation is not on your side. And we, the people, will not allow you to block anyone's right to vote; we've fought too hard and too long for justice
Follow Rev. Al Sharpton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TheRevAl
Curtis Gans: A Proposed Solution to Voter ID Controversy
Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman: Has America's Stolen Election Process Finally Hit Prime Time?
You are a victim and don't know it.
"Scalia, favoring a broader ruling in defense of voter ID laws, said, "The universally applicable requirements of Indiana's voter-identification law are eminently reasonable. The burden of acquiring, possessing and showing a free photo identification is simply not severe, because it does not 'even represent a significant increase over the usual burdens of voting.'"
"The law "is amply justified by the valid interest in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process,'" Justice John Paul Stevens said"
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24351798/ns/politics/t/supreme-court-upholds-voter-id-law/
Take the ''pore college kids'' routine for one instance.
By Als lights, the same college ID that should allow them to vote is the same ID that should allow them to binge drink at a club downtown.
Yet states, quite reasonably, codify within their laws that if you need one form of ID to perform a function which must be regulated, you require the same for everything else. Al dishonestly makes the case whereby students, who were required to provide proof of citizenship upon registering, cannot simply go to a DMV to obtain a legal ID which does not even have to be a DL and is accepted at polling places. He thus subsidizes laziness instead of participatory action.
www.hotair.com whose archive for Dec.13,2011 shows this sign upon a Seattle union hall door placed there by the Machinists Union.[ BOEING workers]:
''VALID ID WITH PICTURE REQUIRED TO VOTE''.
Platitudes are what we consistently get from Eric Holder's DOJ, like all pro attorney bureaucrats he deals in rhetoric & talks a good game but where's the delivery? Takes this issue head-on? C'mon Rev. Sharpton, the whole thesis of your article was that voter fraud is a phony issue. I'll believe Holder & Obama's DOJ when they start doing the I-words, investigating these states committing voter fraud, followed by indicting them. That's what is expected from the Federal govt. when the electoral press is truly violated. I'm old enough to remember when LBJ sent the 101st Airborne into Mississippi to register black voters.
And BTW, how about the same treatment for the Wall St. con men who sank our whole economy? Wasn't that the paramount election promise of 08? Don't just make speeches about it, Obama & Holder, put the handcuffs on these fraudster oligarchs & send them to Club Feds, otherwise everyone will continue to believe the 1% is untouchable.
Likewise, the titles "Father" (most people only have one - or maybe two if they count God) and "Pastor" (people are not sheep) are, to me, off-putting, although they don't seem quite as bad as "Reverend". I think the Catholic Dominicans are on to something when using the title "Brother".