iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rev. Al Sharpton

Rev. Al Sharpton

GET UPDATES FROM Rev. Al Sharpton

Obama, the Black Agenda & Reality

Posted: 05/20/11 10:24 AM ET

In 1994, during the first democratic elections in South Africa, I joined other international observers as we witnessed the historic victory of the ANC. I'll never forget how a woman from Soweto emphatically professed that she was going to the suburbs to claim her mansion now that apartheid was over and the ANC was in power. This poor woman seemed perplexed as everyone around her began laughing at her unrealistic expectations. Today, in the United States as African Americans continue to bear the brunt of socio-economic hardship, there are some who similarly have unviable expectations of our first Black president. But instead of innocent naiveté as the root cause of their questioning, sadly, many of these individuals' objections towards the president are based in a much more vain agenda like publicity.

Prior to President Obama releasing his long-form birth certificate, polls indicated that some 40% of Republicans doubted his American citizenship status. When nearly half of the electorate on the right vilifies you by implying that you are not even one of us, how can we begin to expect the president to continuously address only the Black community and only issues affecting us? Do we really believe that if he made a major policy speech on the Black agenda, these same people on the right would somehow be swayed with our struggles and our concerns? Before we provide ammunition for his adversaries salivating at any opportunity to undermine his authority, we must maintain practical goals for our 44th president.

I will be the first one to say that there are very real, very troubling and very complex obstacles facing the Black community in the United States. From health care disparity to unequal access to education, to high incarceration rates and more than double the national average unemployment percentages in many areas, we as a whole have every right to question policy and government. The need for President Obama to address these issues and more cannot be underscored, nor should it be. But what we cannot begin to do is blame Obama for many institutional barriers that were in place long before his presidential aspirations were even a thought. We cannot deal with them in a way that unfairly targets him or our concerns. These issues must be undeniably dealt with -- but they must be dealt with strategically.

My colleagues in the civil rights community and I focus on many of these dilemmas on a day-to-day basis. For example, last year we orchestrated a massive demonstration in Arizona against a draconian immigration bill, and in the nation's capital tens of thousands marched with us as we held a 'Reclaim the Dream' rally to commemorate Dr. King and counter Glenn Beck's distortion of his legacy. And throughout the decades, we've successfully conducted countless protests against police brutality, unemployment, gun violence and more. It is absolutely fascinating however, that the president's most vocal critics at this juncture were not present with us during those rallies and were not in the trenches with the people. They want to assign the masses to do the tough work so that they may go to the halls of power themselves.

Early last year, leaders from the National Urban League, the NAACP and National Action Network (represented by myself) met with the president. Some weeks later, members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) did the same, and this year, our commander-in-chief addressed National Action Network's 20th anniversary gala awards dinner in NY. A few weeks following our convention, the president met again with the CBC. The message has been unanimous: we need more jobs, more opportunities and equality across the board.

Throughout my years in the civil rights struggle, I have had my conflicts and will continue to have them, but at the end of the day I take solace in the fact that we have diligently fought to end police misconduct and discrimination in all facets of society, while pushing for an increase in diversity in the corporate and business world. And it's a fight we will continue regardless of who is in the White House. But as we call attention to inequities, we must be careful in ensuring we are not impractical in our demands. And we must be equally as weary of those that will attack the president on anything and everything for their own self-gain.

It's interesting that both the CBC and civil rights groups agreed on many of the same principles and much of the same agenda. Perhaps it's because we were all in the trenches trying to resolve the problem, and not sell a book.

 

Follow Rev. Al Sharpton on Twitter: www.twitter.com/TheRevAl

In 1994, during the first democratic elections in South Africa, I joined other international observers as we witnessed the historic victory of the ANC. I'll never forget how a woman from Soweto empha...
In 1994, during the first democratic elections in South Africa, I joined other international observers as we witnessed the historic victory of the ANC. I'll never forget how a woman from Soweto empha...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 534
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
10:14 PM on 05/22/2011
Obama's election effectivel­y shut down any and all attention to black issues! Racism has been declared OVER.

And that was the that was the point.... to shut down any and all struggle for economic and social equality,
photo
todaysjustus
Vlog: http://todaysjustus.wordpress.com/
04:59 PM on 05/24/2011
I agree with that, actually. Once President Obama was in office, people started to play the, "but we have a black president!" card.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Oates
Country Loving Democrat
02:55 PM on 05/22/2011
Sorry for mispelling proverbial...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Oates
Country Loving Democrat
02:53 PM on 05/22/2011
I think that Mr. West and many of the ‘elite’ class in the African American community have got it wrong. This statement applies to Jesse Jackson and Tavis Smiley too. In my opinion, their expectations are unrealistic and childish.

The president IS the ‘Jackie Robinson’ of American politics. For us to expect him to pump the preverbial ‘Black Power’ fist up in the air, and concentrate just on African American issues would make him the most popular one term president in Harlem. No, he’s got to get us ALL back to work.
Frankly, that generation’s behavior from the beginning has sickened me. I guess Newt isn’t the only politician from the 90’s who needs to sit down and retire… or at least shut up already!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
07:11 PM on 05/23/2011
"Obama should do more for black people—not because he is black but because black people are the citizens suffering most. Black people have every right to make demands on Obama—not because he’s black but because they gave him a greater percentage of their votes than any other group, and he owes his presidency to them." - The Nation
08:48 PM on 05/23/2011
That pretty much sums it up...
photo
todaysjustus
Vlog: http://todaysjustus.wordpress.com/
05:01 PM on 05/24/2011
I hate to say it, but I see this happening more if he is elected for a second term. Not that I am saying that it WILL happen if he is elected, but the best way to not get reelected is to let the public know that you are trying to do something for the black community. It's just reality.
12:42 PM on 06/24/2011
You may call them outdated elitist, but you certainly reap the benefits of their efforts, and tragically you take them for granted. Was it unrealistic for you to be able to vote, to walk into a public building's front door, or drink from a non segregated water fountain? Also take into account this, the gay community wanted to end don't ask don't tell, they got what they wanted. The rich wanted tax cuts, they got what they wanted. The auto industry and banks wanted a bailout, they got what they wanted. Several other groups of people got what they wanted, so what's wrong with the black community getting some of the things they want. What we want usually benefits all people, we wanted equal voting rights and equal pay, it benefited women's voting rights. As have many of the issues that affect the black community, they affect all communities, so their request aren't unreasonable. Give the black community better access to jobs and education, that means more money being spent in our economy. So what part do you so strongly object to when it comes to these so called "elitist"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Paul Oates
Country Loving Democrat
06:17 PM on 06/24/2011
Let me put it to you this way. Yes! I benefit greatly and stand on the shoulders of these still great people.
In 1971 when I was 6, my family moved to an area in Detroit called Sherwood Forest / Palmer Woods. We’re all grown and gone but Mom still lives there. It is an upper class African American community were Detroit’s Cornell West / Tavis Smiley, Doctors, Lawyers, blah, blah, blah live. Many were active forces in Detroit’s civil rights era. I grew up loving to listen and learn from these guys… they were the parents of my buddies etc, etc, etc.
I now live in Chicago, and I’m a member to Trinity United Church of Christ. Yep, Reverend Jeremiah Wright and My Man, Reverend Otis Moss. Now that I’ve laid that all out, that’s enough history.
I went home during the Jessie Jackson ‘Talking Down to Black People’ incident that happened shortly after the Rev. Wright ‘I’m still relevant and upset caused I didn’t swear him in’ incident. All these guys from my mom and dad’s generation that I grew up around who I respect still to this day feel that the president needs to in my opinion, fall on his sword… accept 1 term… and push a high profile black agenda cause “He probably won’t be reelected so we better get it while we can”.
Yep, I’m quoting here…
If Cornell West had his way, Obama would lose in 2012. Hence… Shut Up!
02:45 PM on 05/22/2011
Keep up the "Good Work" Rev Sharpton.
02:33 PM on 05/22/2011
If Prres Obama can pander to jo os, gay. S, and white women, he can resp ond to the interests of black people.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meinmd2
Obama/Biden 2012 - Let's Stay Together!!
06:04 PM on 05/22/2011
What are our interests? I haven't heard a one that will not benefit the rest of the country, so which specific interests are you referring to?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
10:19 PM on 05/22/2011
Lets talk about double the employment rate of whites and the inequitible incarceration of poor black men for the exact same drugs enjoyed by middle class and rich whites behind surburban doors
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:58 PM on 05/22/2011
Seem like the only time he is the president of all the people is when it comes to the interests and needs of Black people. You are absolutely right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
meinmd2
Obama/Biden 2012 - Let's Stay Together!!
11:36 PM on 05/22/2011
Like I asked the op, what can the President specifically do for the black community? Even my 17 year old niece would like to know. She will be eligible to vote next year, FYI.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biznesschic
12:51 PM on 05/22/2011
Dr. West has socialist ideals, as many on this board, in which, is his right, however, what he fails to realize is the political reality: We will have colonies on the moon before this country will ever turn into Europe. Period.

The problem is that these socialist mined people have aliened themselves with liberals, and in turn, bash us for not being socialist enough.

I applaud Bernie Sander for claiming his political affiliations, but yet, works in the realm of what is possible. He needs to teach his followers this fact, because, fascism, as what the republicans want to turn America into, is more likely.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
The Lone Stranger
Yes, I am a lousy typist. OK!
12:13 PM on 05/22/2011
The way I see it is that we have a sysstem that is becoming less just everyday as more welath is transferred from the limited resources of the middle class and poor into the lready bulging pockets of the rich. While there are few Black Americans who make it into the ranks of the wealthy, the fact remains that the majority of people living in dire poverty are white Americans, simply because there are far more white Americans.

The goal as I see it should not be to elevate a few more blacks into the ranks of the rich, and Mr. Sharpton is not calling for that, I realize. He wants to improve conditions for all Black Americans. While this is an admirable goal, it does not seem likely to succeed because it does not go far enough. The problem is that it singles out a select group for special relief of their particular suffering, when the suffering of all the poor and downtrodden is in my view the much larger and more important problem.

If people here have not read the Autobiography of Malcolm X I strongly recommend you do. In this book it X reveals that towards the end of his life he reappraised his own position and came to understand that our problems were not centered on race as he had long thought. Instead his view enlarged to be concerned for all people of all colors.

Framing things as black versus white divides us all.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
12:49 PM on 05/22/2011
Things are bad for everyone but lets don't pretend things are equally bad !

The black employment rate is almost double that of whites :
Among white people, the unemployment rate dropped in December to 8.5 percent -- hardly acceptable, but manageable
For black Americans, the unemployment rate was 15.8 percent.
That would be termed a catastrophe if it was so for whites!

Whites with less than a high school diploma had a 13.9% unemployme­nt rate in 2010.
Blacks with less than a high school diploma had a 22.5% unemployme­nt rate in 2010.

Whites with a Bachelor's degree or higher had a 4.3% unemployme­nt rate in 2010.
Blacks with a Bachelor's degree or higher had a 7.9% unemployme­nt rate in 2010.

In addition whites have double the number of Bachelors degrees , and many times more financial assets ( housing , stocks, cars, and families with money ) than blacks do , meaning they are much less hard hit by this depression
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biznesschic
01:16 PM on 05/22/2011
And when has this not been a fact. You would think after 45 years since the civil rights act has been enacted, some would figure out waiting around for a Messiah has got you nowhere?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
The Lone Stranger
Yes, I am a lousy typist. OK!
10:51 PM on 05/22/2011
Yes I do not dispute this but consider this: those figures also reflect the fact that most of the super rich are whites.

No doubt there is racism and lack of opportunity that disproportionately hurts blacks. I do not dispute that. The thing is that this racism is also part of a bigger scam, a divide and conquer scam that encourages racism as a way of preventing all of the poor and down trodden from working together to improve our lot.

My point is that blacks and whites are being oppressed to keep rich elites on top. This is more glaringly apparent to blacks because their numbers in the rich elites are smaller.

So long as the rich elites manage to divide the poor into separate factions that fight against each other, these factions will remain weak and nothing will change. What I am suggesting is not that blacks feel no pain, but that there are others who are not black who have also known this pain more than you might imagine and its time we stopped blaming each other or debasing each other or despising each other and focus on how to change the big picture that would prefer to keep us all down.

I think that the problem of racism will only really start to go away when we stop seeing people as deserving different treatment due to their race. What is needed is a massive enlargement of opportunity that corrects the larger immbalance in the system.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jamal Spencer
just me being myself
09:49 AM on 05/22/2011
What I am seeing and hearing is some people on the right are afraid of Obama because he isn't one of them. I would tell him to grow up and support this President because he hasn't done anything to harm you or me,I mean seriously,this is a President that goes out and actually talks to the American People face to face and talk about his vision and plan for the future,unlike the last President,who pronounce words from a teleprompter and was hesitant to talk to all Americans about his plan and vision for the future. We,as Americans,have to come together as one entity to make this country strong again. What the GOP is doing in signing bills against unions,women's rights,immigration,Medicare,jobs,etc,etc. I wonder if the people who support and love the GOP and the Tea Party actually realize that your lives are affected as well,but you are oblivious to the fact that it could happen to you as well. In 2012,change is coming again and I just hope that we will have people in office who will listen and work for the American People and will bring this great nation back to its rightful place-on top.
researcher
researcher
02:58 AM on 05/22/2011
obama has turned out to be a weak president.

he used his jr senator approach to the presidents job.

it did not work. plus the leader in the senate was weaker than obama. two weak ones and change has come to america ended up being more of the same.

the demos have great fear of the repubs, this can only mean the repubs have something on them or they the demos are in bed with the same corp america as the repubs. maybe both.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jamal Spencer
just me being myself
09:30 AM on 05/22/2011
if Obama is a weak preesident,then GW Bush was even weaker and clueless.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
The Lone Stranger
Yes, I am a lousy typist. OK!
12:18 PM on 05/22/2011
If you think Bush was weak or clueless then you really have been fooled. Bush was the front man for a gang of crooks who quite skillfully and intentionally lead our nation down a path to disaster, disaster that they fully intended.

Part of the deal was that putting an inarticulate rube in the Oval office made it seem like the perpetual disasters were accidental.

Go track down PNAC, the pre 9/11 draft. this document was before Bush ran for office by the people who put him there and it explcitly lays out the blueprint that the Bush administration pursued.
10:31 AM on 05/23/2011
Back to Bush-
Three worst presidents in Order
Obama Hussein
Carter
Bush

Deal with it
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
glorysong
Talk a good talk.
09:53 AM on 05/22/2011
If President Obama is a weak President than Bush must have broke every link in the chain from lying to 2 wars.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
The Lone Stranger
Yes, I am a lousy typist. OK!
12:26 PM on 05/22/2011
see you are being illogical in the extreme. You assume that because Bush was a disaster that this disaster was acidental or the result of ineptitude. Cheney had laid out a plan to go after the mid east oil back in 1997, His plan called for initating a series of wars begining in Iraq. He also suggested that a new Pearl Harbor would make it easier to change American culture in ways that made us all comfortable with living in a state of perpetual war.

What is most amazing of all is that this plan was published. Go track down PNAC, but made sure you read the pre-9/11 draft because Cheney and his friends revised the later version to try and downplay certain aspects of their plan.

Bush was an incredibly effective President if you judge him by how well he achieved the goals he set out to achieve. Evil, disastrous and destructive, but also effective.

Thius distinction is crucial because if you by into the myth that his problem was incompetence, then you ignore the reality that another GOP presdient would do something different. Bush gave them precisely what they wanted.

Does Obama even have an agenda? The fact that we are left guessing when I ask this is evidence that he is weak indeed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bombadillo22
Not all who wander are lost...
01:57 AM on 05/22/2011
Inequities abound, for many.. and so I like how the Reverend cautions against being ' impractical in our demands' for equality as we struggle to find balance, and a level playing field of opportunity.

Advances in relief for which the president has worked in the realm of Health Insurance reform and school loan reconfiguration, plus stimulus money to save teachers and schools--not just for blacks or Latinos--(not just red states or blue states) but for every class citizen--these cannot be discounted-- form a foundation later administrations and organizers can build upon, and should be mentioned in the same breath with every faltering initiative you can bet is caused by GOP-embraced corporatism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
09:33 PM on 05/21/2011
Blacks were cynically used by Obama and the DLC

Blacks and other minorities have been the canary in the American coal mine forever. They have always first paid the the price of Constitutional deficits and showed where it's promise is lacking.Their ongoing economic struggle for survival in a country hardwired against them has forced them to be the vanguard of those who fight for economic justice and racial equality. That struggle provided one of the few places where white and blacks could interact and has been seen as extremely threatening to the dominant power structure, no matter how small.

Obama's campaign effectively silenced black criticism of the shredding of Constitutional guarantees as well as muting their voice against the economic war being waged on all but the most rich,in order to advance their own racial progress.

The left has been fractured by the accusations of racism whenever Obama was criticized.Obama and the Corprate Democratic Party depend on black silence to further the agenda of the plutocracy.
because the left depends on black leadership to help point out where the cracks are
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndyFem
12:04 PM on 05/21/2011
I am confused about this:

"....last year we orchestrated a massive demonstration in Arizona against a draconian immigration bill, and in the nation's capital tens of thousands marched with us..."

I think that "ILLEGAL Immigration" has had a negative impact on Black Communities/Black Americans in particular.
All the money being spent on Schooling, Health Care, Social Services, Incarceration....for ILLEGALS.....is money that would have been better spent on Re-vitalizing Black Communities, Neighborhood Schools,Providing Job Opportunities, etc.
Americans are Americans...regardless of color. I wish we could concentrate on taking care of our own first. Just because I am a Caucasian American...does not mean that I have a "disconnect" from issues that concern my fellow Citizens and Neighbors of Color.

I do not understand how Sharpton's support for Illegal Immigration is a thing for him to brag about.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biznesschic
12:18 PM on 05/21/2011
You do have a point. Sharpton had to defend himself on that one, even with African Americans.
01:52 PM on 05/21/2011
You do not speak for all African Americans. The problem with America is some people try to make everything about race and nationality. I am sure when people were fighting for black people civil rights there were those that thought it would have a negative impact on the white community. Stop with the racism.
01:47 PM on 05/21/2011
You're confused because you make the assumption that al sharpton cares about the "black community."

Illegal aliens vote democratic.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
02:36 PM on 05/21/2011
People here illegaly do not have voting priviliges .

Perhaps you can show me proof otherwise ?
02:30 AM on 05/23/2011
Illegal aliens don't vote at all, do they? LOL...... I certainly hope not!
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
1088
12:04 PM on 05/21/2011
I will like to cut to the chase! Cornell West and Travis Smiley are PUMA's, and that movement is to destroy President Obama. Black and white progressives, who voted for Hillary, are determined, to destroy President Obama, no matter what. They would rather have a Republican in office, who would destroy the poor and middle class, so that they can continue to make monies, from the black communities. Clinton behind the scenes, destroyed the black families, by putting more black men in jail, than any other President. Clinton put in place racial profiling, NAFTA and welfare reform. But yet, no one held him accountable for any of this. In fact they loved him more than ever, for in their eyes, he was their first black American President. Bush didn't do anything for blacks, so there fore monies would be made from that attitude against Bush. Now here comes President Obama, who didn't need those black folks to get him elected as President in the first place. Matter of fact, West and Smiley didn't hide their hatred of President Obama during the campaign, and now are determine to double down on their hate against this man. Follow the money, and see who is really behind the campaign to destroy the President. You may be very surprise to discovered that is the big Corporations that are paying them for their destruction.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biznesschic
12:14 PM on 05/21/2011
Wow. No wonder you have over 800 fans. Could not have said it better.
photo
CCverve
And where are those Iraqi Oil Revenues again?
02:28 PM on 05/21/2011
Well stated but you left out in 2000, the Clinton administration gave us the Futures Commodities Modernization Act of 2000, which repealed the Commodities Exchange Act from 1936 and the Glass Steagall Act of 1933.
11:42 AM on 05/21/2011
I don't know why everyone here is talking about reparations and entitlements. Al's column said nothing about these things. He's pretty much talking about the opposite: don't expect Obama to save you; work to improve your lot.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
11:38 AM on 05/21/2011
NOBODY is asking Obama to address concerns that affect only black people !

But his continuation of Bush civil right and corporatist policies affect them inordinately , as poverty is racialiized in the U.S .That does not mean people of all color do not suffer from poverty and injustice - but that black people suffer it at a much higher rate.... in fact it is basically the status quo.

The problem is Obama has eliminated the word poverty from his vocabulary and jobs as a priority
This should be everyones concern and for Sharpton to chide black people for demanding special treatment is disingenuous. The truth is black people have excused Obama for way too long,in his disregard of Main ST issues in preference to help out Wall ST because they understand the racist challenges he faces. But someone can only stand on your foot so long before you can't ignore the pain and say OUCH!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biznesschic
12:01 PM on 05/21/2011
Right. What you are talking about is institutional change, things that were happening way before the president took office. You are the new progressive instead of the old liberal. You want your elected officials to be more liberal, instead of working to make the voters more liberal. Lets see you do this by continuously trashing the people who want 75% of what you want, with President Sarah Palin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
12:22 PM on 05/21/2011
One thing people who have the media's spotlight can do is to influence people- so that voters can consider another veiwpoint

Obama has failed to stand up for progressive positions time after and time and in fact AGREEs with conservatives over and over that their premises are legitimate and worth working for.

And the truth is I have come to believe that he wants much more than 75% of what Republicans want!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
biznesschic
12:36 PM on 05/21/2011
Notice how new progressives always put the blame on someone or something else? When the republicans says Obama is a terrible president, and the progressives say he is a terrible president, what does the average American, who doesn't follow politics do? They stay home, as they did in the mid-terms.

Look at the health care debate. You people whined about a public option, as the be all. The goal was universal health care, not a government run public option. President Obama didn't take the route of Clinton, in which gave the republicans enough wiggle room to kill it. Never mind that it opened up a venue that 30 million more people would have health insurance, or now you can't be kicked off when you actually need it. You progressives screamed that it wasn't enough. How liberal of you.

Most of the voters in this country are not liberal, or conservative, they are somewhere in between, and without them, you lose elections, period. We liberals understand this, and frankly, after the 2000 election debacle, are tired of listening to your tirade.
01:44 PM on 05/21/2011
During Obama campaign he always talked about the middle class. Poverty and poor people concern were John Edward campaign. So to be fair, President Obama did not make any special promises or commitment to black people. It seems that some people assumed (and u know what they say about assuming) they would get special attention.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tbone99
cruisin' duality
01:56 PM on 05/21/2011
Unfortunately millions of people who were Obama's mddle class of all color have entered long term poverty due to the economy.
Obviously to him that means they are no longer his concern. Their mistake - assuming he represented them , not their class.