More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rev. Douglas A. Greenaway

GET UPDATES FROM Rev. Douglas A. Greenaway
 

Falling Through the Cracks in the Deficit Debate

Posted: 11/08/11 08:52 PM ET

Has the quest to solve the nation's deficit problem caused some in Congress to lose common sense? It would seem that way, when the nation's food and nutrition programs are threatened with potentially huge budget cuts affecting the lives of millions of vulnerable, struggling American families as Congress wrestles with deficit reduction recommendations.

Take WIC, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, for example. If you're not familiar with WIC, you should be -- it is without a doubt one of our country's most important, impactful, and successful public health programs. It serves nearly 9 million mothers and young children monthly, including 53% of all infants and 25% of all pregnant women in the U.S.! WIC has a proven track record over more than 35 years of improving healthy pregnancies, birth outcomes, reducing infant mortality, and preparing kids ready to learn. The fact that all of this has ultimately led to savings for taxpayers, and that now this program would be eyed for drastic cuts shows just how far off course these discussions can go.

Numerous studies have shown that pregnant women who participate in WIC have longer pregnancies leading to fewer premature births; fewer low and very low birth-weight babies; experience fewer fetal and infant deaths; seek prenatal care earlier in pregnancy; and consume more of such key nutrients as iron, protein, calcium, and Vitamins A and C. Investing in WIC for the sake of healthy babies and to achieve health care savings is exactly the kind of thing a rational approach to long-term deficits would be looking to focus on, not cut.

Five straight Administrations have cited WIC as an effective, cost-efficient federal program. WIC achieved the highest rating possible among federal programs from the US Office of Management and Budget's (OMB's) Program Assessment Rating Tool in 2006 and 2010. Why would anyone in Congress consider cutting such a successful preventative, public health nutrition program?

WIC is a short-term preventative public health nutrition program designed to influence lifetime nutrition and health behaviors in a targeted, high-risk population. WIC-approved foods are selected for their nutritional value to supplement the nutrients found lacking in the diets of low-income populations. As one WIC participant in Scott County, IA stated, WIC's nutrition education has, "laid the foundation for healthy eating habits for years to come."

With the nation's obesity rates continuing to rise, and two-thirds of adults and nearly one-third of children and teens currently obese or overweight and at increased risk for over 20 major diseases, including type 2 diabetes and heart disease, according to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, now is not the time for Congress to consider funding cuts to WIC.

Should Congress fail to successfully meet its agreed upon deficit reduction target of $1.2 trillion, WIC could be hit with dramatic funding cuts resulting in more than 700,000 vulnerable mothers and young children being cut off from critical WIC nutrition services, depriving young children the opportunity of a healthy start on life, taking away purchasing power in local economies, and increasing the nation's long-term healthcare costs. Moreover, deficit reduction targets for future years could see further dramatic cuts to WIC.

And if that argument alone is not sufficiently compelling, with nearly one in four American children (22%) living in poverty, indeed over 46 million Americans living in poverty - an increase of 2.6 million people since 2009 -- the highest number on record, and with sustained high rates of unemployment and marginal employment, Americans in need should not be penalized for their circumstances or forced to make even more difficult choices because Congress forces cuts to programs for low-income families. These are our neighbors. And there is not a faith or humanist tradition in the land that does not call us to care for the least amongst us, feed the hungry, care for the sick, and work for justice.

A serious attempt to grapple with deficit reduction begins with sound investments in the health and well-being of our nation's families and communities, not with slashing vital food and nutrition programs, like WIC, that contribute to long-term health savings, workforce productivity, the nation's competitiveness in a global economy, and national security.

If you want Congress to know that essential programs must be protected for the millions of Americans living in poverty, now is the time to let them know.

The National WIC Association, NWA, is a non-profit representing the nearly 9 million mothers and young children participating in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children - known as WIC - and the nation's 12,200 dedicated WIC service provider agencies.

For further information contact the National WIC Association on 202/232-5492 or visit our web site at www.nwica.org.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 7
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
06:10 PM on 11/11/2011
Providing basic healthy food for pregnant women and their young children is the

best investment our nation can make in it's future.

Hands off WIC !!!!!
11:01 AM on 11/09/2011
WIC is one of the few government programs that works. It is effective and efficient. It is not like food stamps where participants can buy anything they want. WIC foods are "prescribed" by a Nutritionist for the participant's optimal health outcomes. Participants cannot get money from WIC. The food checks state specific food items. The checks can only be redeemed for food. WIC really works. It teached good health habits that last a lifetime. WIC has been studied numerous times anad all the outcomes are positive. Why are we willing to sacrifice the health of the young families in this country? Do not cut WIC funding.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Briteleaf
09:03 AM on 11/09/2011
How can this be? According to our congress, it's actually more important for Exxon, GE and other megacorporations to pay ZERO TAXES AND RECEIVE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN SUBSIDIES. It's more important for corporate execs to be able to write off their private jets. It's more important to continue record long wars in the mideast that NEVER SHOULD HAVE BEGUN. With all that expensive warring going on, the military needs it's 240 golf courses much more than those moms and kids need food.
Wake up America! Class warfare ended decades ago and was won by wealthy and corporate interests. They are the ones pulling strings in congress and not the will of the people. They funnel billions of dollars through 25,000 lobbyists who make or break elections with their secret "Friends of ......" groups paying for campaign ads and mailers. We now have a government of the wealthy, by the wealthy and for the wealthy. Food for mothers and kids? That's socialism..
08:26 AM on 11/09/2011
The GOP also has a bill in the House to cut $12.7 billion from food stamps, and at a time there are more people in desperate need of that help than ever before. This Congress has truly lost its way.
07:25 AM on 11/09/2011
This kind of program should get broad support for its investments in health and welfare that pays dividends by investing in nutrition at high leverage times during pregnancy, infancy, and early childhood. It's a poster child for government programs. We need to support it.
07:17 AM on 11/09/2011
Thanks for the article. It should have full support from all sides on the Deficit Committee with those kinds of returns on the investment in nutrition as high leverage times such as pregnancy, infantcy and early childhood.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Secrist
those who forget are condemned to repeat
11:04 PM on 11/08/2011
Cutting 700,000 people from the welfare rolls would please a good many of our illustrious extremists in Congress. And why count on the threat of massive automatic defense cuts to slow them down. The same powers who gave us the Super Committee could easily change the rules and find a way to spare defense. They haven't lost their minds at all. Many of them are completely amoral.