More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rev. Dr. Katrina D. Foster

GET UPDATES FROM Rev. Dr. Katrina D. Foster
 

Yes, Anti-LGBT Religious Groups Are Hate Groups

Posted: 10/06/11 12:24 PM ET

On Sept. 25, The New York Times ran an article entitled "Retailers Are Put on the Spot Over Anti-Gay Aid." This excerpt sums up the article nicely:

The advocates are demanding that the retailers end their association with an Internet marketer that gets a commission from the retailers for each online customer it gives them. It is a routine arrangement on hundreds of e-commerce sites, but with a twist here: a share of the commission that retailers pay is donated to a Christian charity of the buyer's choice, from a list that includes prominent conservative evangelical groups like the Family Research Council and Focus on the Family.

In response to this article and the increasingly articulated position that Focus on the Family and groups like them who oppose gay marriage and have worked to create public policy like the Defense of Marriage Act are actually hate groups, Jim Daly, president of Focus on the Family, wrote a response entitled "My Take: 'Hate' is too big a word to be used with such little restraint."

Mr. Daly claims gay activists have abandoned reasoned dialogue in favor of name-calling, primarily calling leaders like him hateful. He justifies his work to enshrine one-man-and-one-woman-equals-marriage policy as the result of a Biblical mandate. He conveniently forgets that David, one of God's favorites, had multiple wives and concubines and still had the time and energy to commit adultery. Solomon had 700 wives and concubines. One-man-plus-one-woman is not the only Biblical witness for marriage. Mr. Daly may claim that the Bible is the infallible, inspired Word, with no contradictions or mistakes, but he especially thinks that about the texts he likes, not the ones that might contradict what he already believes.

A standard of using a Biblical witness to dictate public policy is troubling. As a Lutheran, we have a strong tradition of interpreting scripture and bringing the best of science, reason and public conversation to bear on our understanding of how God continues to speak to us today. For instance, God seems to have a lot to say about how we should use our wealth and other resources to assist the least and the last among us, but Jesus never did say anything against gay folks. But, read in a proof text manner, anyone can find verses and rip them out of the larger narrative to prove any preexisting point.

This has been a shameful part of our history. Christians used scripture to justify slavery. Christians used scripture to justify and further Jim Crow and the miscegenation laws of the past. Christians use scripture to justify why a husband could beat his wife and the wife should just take it. The Bible, used as a tool to prove our preexisting points, becomes a blunt object used to beat others who are different from us.

Mr. Daly also claims that "study after study" has proven children are best reared in a married, heterosexual household, a result he already held. What studies? Cite them, put them alongside the 2010 study by Nanette Gartrell and Henry Bos that found that the children lesbian parents "scored higher than kids in straight families on some psychological measures of self-esteem and confidence, did better academically and were less likely to have behavioral problems, such as rule-breaking and aggression."

As a devout, orthodox Christian and Jesus freak, I do not think using the word "hate" to describe what Mr. Daly and the people at Focus on the Family and other organizations are trying to do is too strong. 1 John 4:20 puts it this way:"Those who say, 'I love God,' and hate their brothers or sisters are liars."

Mr. Daly, you do hate gay people. You just hate to admit it.

It is worth remembering that the effort to kill Jesus really picked up steam after he disrupted the temple's monetary system when he cleansed the temple. It is worth remembering that Dr. King was killed when he began focusing on issues of poverty, which would have disturbed our financial systems. It is worth remembering that we have in place an expanded lobbying system paid for by banks and hedge funds to make sure that we do not regulate our monetary systems to assure financial practices are fair, transparent and won't result in the near collapse of the world's economy.

It is worth remembering that when we mess with someone's income stream, from the corner drug dealer who slings to make bank, to Jim Daly, who receives substantial income from the commissions retailers pay that is channeled to his group, there will be a substantial pushback, not always resulting in death but always in some form of self-justifying outrage.

Mr. Daly may not liked to be called hateful, but he dislikes his funds to be taken away from him even more.

 
On Sept. 25, The New York Times ran an article entitled "Retailers Are Put on the Spot Over Anti-Gay Aid." This excerpt sums up the article nicely: The advocates are demanding that the retailers end ...
On Sept. 25, The New York Times ran an article entitled "Retailers Are Put on the Spot Over Anti-Gay Aid." This excerpt sums up the article nicely: The advocates are demanding that the retailers end ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
03:48 PM on 10/16/2011
Why don't you move to china if you don't like freedom of religion?
Easy cop out to lable everyone who disagrees with you as a hater. Just because there are people who believe that homosexual behavior is a sin does not mean they hate people who engage in it. And who is this pastor lady to judge the very heart of every evangelical to say that? She should close her mouth! She speaks lies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
talkstocoyotes
10:34 AM on 11/22/2011
Freedom of religion is directly related in our Constitution to freedom of speech. If you disapprove of that, perhaps you're the one who should move to China. Or, if you're an advocate of severely limited government, Somalia.
11:47 AM on 10/07/2011
Number 2: She quoted Bachmann's brother Dr. Paul Amble, without specifying that Amble is being used as a campaign spokesman. Amble works in Connecticut, including for the state government as a forensic psychiatrist. He gave the Times quotes about Bachmann's political gay bashing that constitute an appearing psychiatric endorsement of the political gay bashing. I attempted to investigate the matter - and found witnesses who say that in his private practice, Amble engages in "pray away the Gay" therapy. He would not give me a yes or no answer as to whether that is true, and instead attacked me for posing the question. Meanwhile, he is working as a forensic expert for the CT state government; he obviously can not be impartial when LGBTers are involved, nor does he create and maintain a workplace environment for LGBTers (he told the New York Times that his sister Michele Bachmann's political gay-bashing stems from good intentions). Then, I contacted Stolberg who was extremely defensive about her reporting. The bottom line was that, especially as long as Bachmann appeared to be a lead candidate, the Times wanted access to her campaign.
11:46 AM on 10/07/2011
Number 3: As Bachmann had designated her brother Dr. Amble to be the official campaign spokesperson to the Times, the Times did not want to endanger their access to the Bachmann campaign by digging into the back story on Amble. That is to say that the New York Times was not ethical in its reporting on the Bachmann campaign, favoring continued access over doing a newspaper's truest duty - to reveal what politicians want hidden from the public. Now again, the Times has lent the prestige of its platform to a political gay-basher, Daly. There should have been critical context to his propagandistic remarks, if the Times wanted to report on them at all. His same group's Tom Minnery was called out for perjuring himself in front of a Senate hearing on DOMA repeal. I then contacted dozens of researchers Minnery cited in his written testimony. All of them said they do not approve of Focus on the Family using their research against LGBTer's inalienable human rights. Where is the New York Times feature article on that topic? It would be one thing if there were no imaginable fund-raising use for Daly to make of his letter published in the Times, but there is, and the Times is guilty of carrying out a public relations service for him with it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Proud Father of a gay son.
10:39 PM on 10/06/2011
Yes they are. They are hate groups. and should be outlawed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thebearclaw007
Is your conscience functioning properly?
03:52 PM on 10/06/2011
When will Christians ever learn to focus on the miracles and all the goodness Jesus did. If anything that's what God is calling Christians to be an example of. If God wants to get rid of gays, He doesn't need hating Christian folks to do it for Him..
01:09 PM on 10/06/2011
I guess God "hates" for destroying sodom amd gamoorah, yes he hates sin. Yes he hates sinful behavior, stop trying to water him down until he fits your lifestyle and confrom to the holiness he has called us to
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lacrosselamore
My micro-bio is half full.
04:16 PM on 10/06/2011
I have to laugh at you christians. Not only do you not know the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah, you don't even know how to spell it.
The most extensive judgment found anywhere in the Bible outside of the book of Revelation actually for the sin of inhospitality, not homosexuality.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
talkstocoyotes
10:36 AM on 11/22/2011
The Bible also says that these cities were destroyed because they were arrogant and greedy. By that standard, most of the GOP would be fried.

But this is an evil god those people worship regardless. In the S&G myth, even infants and animals were killed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Atwill
Proud Father of a gay son.
10:40 PM on 10/06/2011
The sin was inhospitality. that was the sin of those fictional towns.
03:59 PM on 10/16/2011
It was inhospitality. I actually studied the bible. Imagine that? A "Christian" who studies the bible? And Sodom was not fictional. Bottom line, God judged them because of sin. Sin is sin whether it's heterosexual sex outside of marriage or homosexual sex or telling a lie.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
practiceempathy
Tolerance need not yield to willful ignorance.
12:17 PM on 10/06/2011
(...cont from previous)

It is ironic for ANY of the religious folks to lecture gays on abandoning reason. There is nothing reasonable about eschewing contemporary reality in favor of fairy tales written by the representatives of a primitive patriarchy thousands of years ago.