More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rev. Jesse Jackson

Rev. Jesse Jackson

Posted: June 23, 2010 03:07 PM

Obama's Decision, the Right One

What's Your Reaction:

President Obama took the correct action today. General McChrystal had left him no choice, with remarks that undermined not only the basic mission in Afghanistan, but also undermined military discipline, the entire chain of military command, and our Constitutional system of civilian control.

If the General had stayed on, it would have weakened troop morale. Such an undermining set of statements is close to mutiny. Had he stayed on, it would have only fed the President's political enemies. Instead, the President today gave us a sign of responsibility by quickly addressing this controversial issue.

There are longer-term issues as well. There is a very high risk to our Constitutional system of government and to command discipline when our high-ranking Generals become talking heads on TV, comment on current issues like pundits, give live interviews during war, and become public advocates for a point of view. Too many of our top generals are building political constituencies for their own careers, later books, and eventual corporate board memberships. There is just too much of that these days. The military spends too much time on 'spinning' and not enough time on 'winning' the two wars we are now engaged in, one of them the longest war in American history.

One haunting question remains, which should be investigated by Congress. How deep and widespread is the infection of insubordination demonstrated by General McChrystal? Does it extend to the rest of the high command? Are top commanders really clear that our Constitution means that President Obama is in charge? The decision today reaffirms that President Obama is in charge of our military command structure, as our Constitution demands.


 

Follow Rev. Jesse Jackson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/revjjackson

 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Horus45
Liberal Activist, anti-Fascist
09:47 AM on 06/24/2010
"There are longer-term issues as well. There is a very high risk to our Constitutional system of government and to command discipline when our high-ranking Generals become talking heads on TV, comment on current issues like pundits, give live interviews during war, and become public advocates for a point of view."

I have a feeling that we will not be hearing anymore from McChrystal.
09:32 AM on 06/24/2010
Of course it was the "right" decision.

Obama came into office with one over arching goal in mind: To prove that a black man could be just as bad at the office of the presidency as a white man and thereby prove that black and white were equal. Now ask yourself if he is doing a good job.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:42 PM on 06/23/2010
If Obama had FIRED Gen. McChrystal I might agree with Jackson's last sentence. Allowing him to retire was an incorrect approach. Obama will gain no respect from this among anyone. Probably least of all the military.
11:51 PM on 06/23/2010
You're wrong!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:54 PM on 06/23/2010
How?
photo
Horus45
Liberal Activist, anti-Fascist
09:49 AM on 06/24/2010
What makes you think he is retiring from the military?
His command was taken away, that does not mean he is leaving the military entirely.
11:24 PM on 06/23/2010
It's about as deep as the respect and reverence that career military have for this nations ideals and just as deep as Obama's disdain for the same.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ostrom808
Moral Contrarian
10:55 PM on 06/23/2010
Insubordination is what we'd all like the issue to be here, Reverend. That is minor compared to the real, immense, immoral, problem.

You do us all a disservice by not pointing out the complete idiocy of the wars in general.