iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rev. Jim Ball

GET UPDATES FROM Rev. Jim Ball
 

The Avengers: Missing Their Chance to Be Heroes On Climate Change

Posted: 06/06/2012 5:15 pm

Recently my wife and I took in a 10:15 a.m. showing of "The Avengers." (At our local theater the first show on Saturday's and holidays is even cheaper than the matinee. For the rare times we actually go to the movies, I simply can't enjoy it if we pay full price.)

The movie has received good reviews and has raked in a whole lot of cash, setting records in the process. As the Wikipedia article notes:

The Avengers has earned $552,950,398 in North America, as of June 3, 2012, and $806,500,000 in other countries, as of June 3, 2012, for a worldwide total of $1,359,450,398. It is the third highest-grossing film worldwide and the highest-grossing 2012 film. It is also the highest-grossing film based on comics, the highest grossing superhero film and the highest-grossing film released by Walt Disney Studios.

The highest grossing film released by Disney? Now that's saying something. To state the obvious, it's a monster hit, and the sequel is already in development.

One of the things I was pleasantly surprised to find was that sustainable energy is a major part of the plot. Not only is Tony Stark, aka Ironman, a big-time investor in clean energy, but more importantly for the plot, something called "the Tesseract" holds the possibility of providing an unlimited supply of clean power.

The Wiki for The Avengers movie describes it thusly: "The Tesseract is an ancient Asgardian artifact of unimaginable power. It was kept in Odin's artifact chamber but came to Earth by accident."

Once on earth the Tesseract was placed under "the Tree of Life" in a Viking church in Norway. During WWII an evil villain invaded the church and stole the Tesseract, using it for all sorts of bad stuff. But then...

"The cube fell in to the Arctic ocean and was found by S.H.I.E.L.D.'s creator Howard Stark some time later. The Tesseract was kept under guard by S.H.I.E.L.D. to make sure that it didn't fall in to the wrong hands. In 2011 Nick Fury called in Erik Selvig and asked him whether he would help S.H.I.E.L.D. with making the Tessesract an unlimited power source."

Holy Smokes!

Even Energy Secretary Steve Chu, himself a Nobel prize-winning physicist, has taken note of "The Avengers" and clean energy:

While the "Tesseract" may be fictional, the real-life global competition over clean energy is growing increasingly intense, as countries around the world sense a huge economic opportunity AND the opportunity for cleaner air, water, and a healthier planet. This is now a $260 billion global market, a sum that would impress even Tony Stark. According to the International Energy Agency, last year -- for the first time -- more money was invested worldwide in clean, renewable power plants than in fossil fuel power plants ... The good news is that we have an advantage every bit as powerful as the Incredible Hulk: Americans' talent for entrepreneurship and innovation is unrivalled by any other country in the world. We have world-leading scientific facilities that would make Bruce Banner green with envy, and the investments we're making today in groundbreaking new technologies can help American businesses stay ahead of the curve. Ultimately, however, the clean energy prize is still up for grabs and countries like China are competing aggressively.

But in drawing attention to our desire for clean, sustainable energy, the film begs the question "Why?" Why do we want clean energy?

And so while I was watching "The Avengers" I assumed their answer would include the most important reason of all: to help overcome global warming. Since overcoming global warming is the great moral cause of our time and the next great cause of freedom, it would be quite apt for Superheroes to get in on the action.

Unfortunately, I waited in vain for "The Avengers" to mention climate change.

After the movie, while my wife and I were discussing it over brunch at IHOP, I wondered whether the efforts by conservative climate skeptics to intimidate the entertainment industry had its desired effect with the creators of "The Avengers" movie.

Did "The Avengers" have their punches pulled in this great cause of fighting global warming? Did these Superheroes -- gulp -- wimp out on climate action?

Great Scott! I hope not!

As has been documented by others, conservative critics have been going after films with a positive message about caring for God's creation and overcoming global warming. Wholesome fare like "Happy Feet" and "The Muppets" have been bashed and trashed by the deniers. There's even a website devoted to trashing movies with creation-friendly and climate-friendly messages.

(Beating up on "The Muppets" and "Happy Feet." Geez! What will the deniers do next, steal our lunch money?)

So were "The Avengers" cowed by climate-denier trash-talking into taking a pass on the greatest moral cause of our time and the next great cause of freedom?

Or was it fear of the loss of ticket sales? After noting that there are "about 123 million adult conservatives" in the U.S., an article in The Hollywood Reporter observed that the movie industry, "risks alienating a huge chunk of its potential audience" if it includes climate-friendly messages.

Could it be that the movie industry cares more about ticket sales than allowing its Superheros to help in the fight to overcome global warming?

Say it ain't so, Joe!

One thing about blockbusters, you have a second chance with the sequel. So the creators can get it right the next time and have "The Avengers" be true Superheroes by helping the world to overcome global warming.

As Robin might say today, "Holy climate action, Batman!"

The Rev. Jim Ball, Ph.D., is author of 'Global Warming and the Risen LORD.'

 
 
 
FOLLOW ENTERTAINMENT
 
 
  • Comments
  • 14
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:49 PM on 06/09/2012
...Seriously? People can come up with the weirdest conclusions... Avengers didn't tackle global warming! What does it all meeeean?!?!

Look, it's a movie. Watch it and enjoy. Just because a film based on comic books doesn't tackle climate change doesn't have to equate to the studio being bullied into submission. Geez.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grappler1987
Heaven is a gift, not a reward
01:13 PM on 06/08/2012
'"The Avengers" I assumed their answer would include the most important reason of all: to help overcome global warming.'

Funny. Save the earth from global warming ... instead of Loki and his army.
09:20 PM on 06/07/2012
judging by the comments I read....(which I shamelessly admit I DIDN'T read before posting)...I am NOT alone in my sentiments.

There may be hope for us ALL yet....
09:17 PM on 06/07/2012
ahhh...as important as dealing with climate change IS....am I the ONLY person tired of dejected comments from someone pissed that what what is essentially rousing entertainment doesn't kow-tow to the letter whatever (no matter how worthy) agenda they have?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:51 PM on 06/07/2012
It's a comic bookm movie. They included clean energy because it's trendy and we all want to get less dependent on the Islamic regimes in the middle east. Global warming is controversial. That is not. Happy Feet was a fine movie until the end when it beat you over the head with its message so strongly, it lost the movie. Its sequel, made half the dough.
photo
BlackJAC
It's better to be a black king than a white knight
03:59 PM on 06/07/2012
It's kind of ironic that this article comes on the heels of Ray Bradbury's death, for I remember reading something where he said that his editor was concerned that Fahrenheit 451 didn't address women's issues.

Seriously, it's just a comic book movie.  It's not meant to be anything other than supremely fun.
02:32 PM on 06/07/2012
It's the man! he's keeping our superhero movies from mentioning global warming, even though the plot of the film had nothing to do with climate change! But really, in what way did you want them to address climate change? Have Loki's goal be to heat the earth? secret government agendas to warm the earth so that....? They didn't mention global warming and climate change because there was no place for it. DEAL WITH IT. on a side note, claiming that "overcoming global warming is the great moral cause of our time and the next great cause of freedom" is ridiculous. Yes, the climate is changing. Yes, we should do all in our power to take care of the earth. But we also must acknowledge that THE CLIMATE HAS ALWAYS BEEN CHANGING, from the dawn of the planet. It got really warm. Then there was an ice age. Then it warmed back up. Then it got a bit chilly again. That's how it works. Do humans have an effect on the climate? we probably do. But it is minor compared to what the planet does on its own. Yes we should take care of the earth, but some people kind of over do it.
11:04 AM on 06/07/2012
Ball's statement, "I wondered whether the efforts by conservative climate skeptics to intimidate the entertainment industry had its desired effect with the creators of 'The Avengers' movie." is laughable on so many levels. Is he trying to tell us that Hollywood, an overwhelmingly liberal group, is somehow now a back-door conservative pundit? Are we to say that Hollywood, which has pushed every progressive position into public culture for the last century is now somehow restraining itself? Is Ball suggesting that while The Heartland Institute received a whopping $25,000 from Koch Industries, which isn't half as "evil" as the fictional good-guy business, Stark Industries (from the movie), is to somehow compare to the $11 million or so to be received by the World Wildlife Fund from Coca-Cola, while Coca-Cola advertises for WWF? Frankly it sounds almost like a hostage situation. The WWF is getting paid by Coca-Cola for Coca-Cola to advertise for the WWF. What's the benefit to Coca-Cola? I dare say it's not cheaper aluminum cans. And the climate skeptics are terrorizing big business?!

The answer toe Ball's question, "So were 'The Avengers' cowed by climate-denier trash-talking into taking a pass on the greatest moral cause of our time and the next great cause of freedom?" is a resounding "No."
photo
The Mighty Pathos
Every day I thank god I'm an atheist
09:24 AM on 06/07/2012
I can pretty much guarantee they didn't spend one single second worrying about whether or not to include a global warming "message."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsimpy
Be curious and full of wonder
08:32 AM on 06/07/2012
I agree with your stance on climate change. But placing the cause on a comic book movie? Please.
photo
ILoveFiction
That's unbelievable!
04:14 AM on 06/07/2012
In my humble opinion, a lot of people go to the movies to escape reality for a while.

It's fiction.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Overtone
See bio on the Aesop Institute website
02:02 AM on 06/07/2012
You might enjoy Moving Beyond Oil and Cheap Green at www.aesopinstitute.org

They describe several Black Swans - highly improbable energy innovations that have huge implications.

And the opening pages of that website describe Three Ticking Time Bombs that all might be stopped with sufficiently wise, bold, action.

Ironically, that would also sharply boost the economy and generate jobs.

Even better, it might allow humans to survive on planet Earth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cdub1991
Seek first to understand, then to be understood
01:59 AM on 06/07/2012
I'm pretty sure there wasn't that much thought involved. The Tesseract/unlimited energy thing was a plot adjustment from the original comics. I guess they figured the viewing public wouldn't go for a Cosmic Cube which gives it's wielder complete control over all material reality, effectively making him or her a god. Unlimited, free and clean energy is SO much more realistic...
photo
thorrsman
Why should I define myself by quoting others?
07:12 PM on 06/06/2012
By now you are aware of the Little Ice Age and the fact that it ended about the middle of the nineteenth century. The SLIGHT increase in average global temperatures since then can be credited to the nature end of that long cool period without bringing unproven and hysterical theories into it.