The Schott foundation study showing that less than 50 percent of black males are graduating from high school is astounding and depressing - but not a revelation to many in the African American community.
We've known for years that our public school systems are failing to meet the needs of young black males. Unfortunately, instead of sparking an important dialogue this news has started the old finger pointing blame game. Blame the teachers, torch the unions and throw social justice organizations under the bus.
This tired argument misses a huge point which is revealed in the study - the fact that our communities are also failing these young men. But talking heads would like to hijack this commendable study to instead galvanize the community against teachers.
African Americans know anecdotally, and this study confirms, that there are a host of other social factors that affect young black males who disproportionately come from single parent homes, are more likely to live in poverty and are predisposed to inner city violence from gangs and drugs. And too often these young men lack role models to show them another path.
I know because I was one of those young men. I came from a family where being gang-affiliated was more prized than being on the honor roll. There was a history of drugs and violence in my neighborhood and frankly a lot of the conditions in my house left me so distracted that often school was the last thing on my mind.
Because of my unstable home environment I moved in and out of schools - attending nearly 10 different schools during my elementary years. Were the teachers to blame for my early failures? Not at all, but my community and my home life were huge factors.
During my years in school there were a lot of great teachers who tried to get through to me. Teachers who stayed late when they weren't paid overtime. Teachers who bought me food, gave me bus fare with their own money and used their paychecks to provide classroom supplies for other students.
Too often these teachers get swept up in the anti-teacher rhetoric that's become common in our public policy debates. Dangerous rhetoric that leads Americans to think that teachers are ineffective, overpaid, part of the problem and should be fired on a whim; an instant recipe for dissuading talented people who are thinking of pursuing a profession in this unappreciated field.
I agree that our education system should focus on the children but I also believe that we need to protect teachers from critics who want to scapegoat them as the sole source of the problem while ignoring other factors.
Children should have good teachers to protect their future and teachers should have a voice on the job to protect them when they are not the source of the problem.
I work closely with many individuals and groups who are committed to using an integrated approach to improving our public school systems--including teachers unions. Together, we are working to provide teachers with the supports they need to help students succeed, to strengthen teachers' skills and to develop ways to accurately identify teachers who are not cut out for the profession. I believe in the work that I do because frankly it's just too easy to think that firing all the teachers is going to solve our education problem. And it's way too easy to throw out the public schools and the kids in them and start with whole new model that's only available to some kids.
But that won't solve the problem for many urban communities who are waiting for us to work together to find a solution that allows all schools and communities to succeed.
Improving education outcomes for black males is an urgent priority, but the blame game will only move us in the wrong direction. Only when parents, administrators, teachers, and the community come together to find solutions can we truly address all the factors in making a child a success. Meanwhile let's stop finger pointing and begin to share solutions because there are too many kids - kids who are growing up like I did - who are waiting for us to get our act together.
Follow Rev. Romal J. Tune on Twitter: www.twitter.com/romaltune
Rant over.
This is exactly right. I would just like to be a little more specific. When we say 'community' in this context the most important members are the children themselves, not their parents, not their mentors, leaders, role models or whoever. They key to breaking this endless process of life destruction of the lower classes is immediate and direct institutional and organisational empowerment of the young. In other words - democratise the schools of the poor.
__________
I hope that you'll be happy to know that this is still the norm for most of us. We do care. Personally, I have over 150 children a year, and yes, they are MY kids. I am also blessed that most are still in touch.
_____________
I agree that our education system should focus on the children but I also believe that we need to protect teachers from critics who want to scapegoat them as the sole source of the problem while ignoring other factors.
_________
Thank you. This is the only positive thing I've heard about teachers in a long time. I have been growing highly demoralized - leading to depression instead of excitement before a new school year begins (I work for LAUSD). Your post made me cry. Someone actually might think we are worthy. Thank you again.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-teachers-value-20100815,0,2695044.story?page=1
http://californiawatch.org/watchblog/test-scores-and-ethics-outing-teachers-1097
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2010/0817/A-right-way-and-a-wrong-way-to-link-teachers-and-student-test-scores
http://blog.coreknowledge.org/2010/08/17/value-added-when-being-right-isnt-enough/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/13/AR2010081303197.html (re: Obama policies)
Offense is truly the best form of defense - and we have a lot to feel defensive about.
I believe you are using the assumption that success or failure is dependent solely on the student, or that it is only the prior conditioning of the student, or their family circumstance, which determines whether or not they will succeed or fail. But this has been disproved completely from all angles (read "Freakonomics" for examples). As parents and as responsible citizens we would WANT this to remain disproved, because otherwise it would become (or remain) a primary source of prejudice and bias toward a child before he or she even walked into a classroom. Do you see that? It's not even a social commentary as much as a fundamental aspect of proper sampling in scientific data research.
Non-compliant black kids have good reasons for being non-compliant. To force or seduce them into compliance is manipulative oppression. Move from compliance to consent systems. Democratise.