iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rev. Wil Gafney, Ph.D.

GET UPDATES FROM Rev. Wil Gafney, Ph.D.
 

Messianic Judaism Beyond the Eddie Long Debacle

Posted: 02/10/2012 11:13 am

By now, many readers are aware of the sorry, sad and blasphemous spectacle of the disgraced bishop of New Birth Baptist Church in Atlanta, GA being wrapped in a Torah scroll and proclaimed "king" as a restoration ritual after he negotiated a financial settlement with at least four men who accused him of using his pastoral authority to coerce them into a sexual relationship. (If any of this is new to you, please see my previous post.) The key player in the unholy ritual, Ralph Messer, claimed to be a Messianic Jewish rabbi. His claims to s'micha, ordination in -- and for that matter, membership in -- any Messianic Jewish community has been vehemently rejected by the Union of Messianic Jewish Congregations (UMJC) and the Messianic Jewish Alliance of America (MJAA):

"Messer is not recognized by any major branch of Messianic Judaism and, under the standards of the UMJC and the MJAA, is not even considered part of our community, let alone a rabbi... We condemn Messer's flagrant disrespect of the Sefer Torah in this ritual and his misrepresentation of Jewish tradition, an abuse which must stem either from ignorance or great presumption."

These unfortunate events provide an opportunity to look at the Messianic Jewish community, sitting -- uncomfortably for some -- at the intersection of Judaism and Christianity. Messianic Jews are believers in Yeshua l'Natzeret -- the Hebrew name of Jesus of Nazareth -- as the Son of God and, they identify as Jews. The overwhelming majority of (other) Jews, whether Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, Reconstructionist, Renewal or unaffiliated, reject this identification. The tension between these two communities' understandings of who is and is not a Jew is not unlike the tension between Mormons and the wider Christian community on who is a Christian. Each community has the right to assert its own religious identity and draw boundaries around who is included and who is excluded, even if (and when) it conflicts with another community's self-articulation. I respect the right of each community to self-definition. I cannot say who is and who is not a Jew, because I am not a Jew. I can and do reflect on the implications of that discussion for Christians.

The question of who identifies as a Jew is complicated by, or perhaps better, enriched by, the great diversity within Judaism: There are Jewish communities in which Jews are only those whose mothers are Jews or who have undergone conversion by a specific subset of the broader Jewish community, others in which Jewish paternity or conversion in a wider circle of rabbinic authority is definitive, Jews who observe traditional halacha, ritual laws, scrupulously, religious Jews who don't keep kosher, those whose kashrut is vegetarianism or veganism, those who use their iPhones on Shabbat and those who don't, communities in which women are rabbis and cantors and lay-readers of Torah and those in which they are not, communities in which same-gender couples are wed and welcomed along with their children and those where they are not, and there are Jews of all hues and of all ethnicities.

The contestation of intersecting and overlapping identities between Christians and Jews is not a modern phenomenon. The early church emerged in that interstitial and fertile space. For me, Miriam -- Mary -- of Nazareth, mother of Yeshua, Jesus, represents this space at its most fecund. The earliest followers of Jesus, were Jews as was he, integrating his messianic claims into their own (first century proto-rabbinic) Judaism while other Jews rejected them. There would be significant overlap between the two communities for the first 800 years of the Church and a lingering somewhat permeable boundary between the communities for perhaps two more centuries. There were Gentiles who followed Christ who converted to Judaism, some who left the Church to do so. There were questions about which ancient Israelite and Jewish practices and commitments Jewish and Gentile disciples needed to follow. The issue was so important that it became the topic of the first of the great Church councils. In Acts chapter 15 there is no small matter of debate over the issue of circumcision for Christians. The elders in Jerusalem decide that it is unnecessary, however in a strong dissent the Apostle Paul has his traveling companion Timothy circumcised as an adult in the next chapter, rejecting their ruling.

The theological claims of contemporary Messianic Jews are a potent reminder to (other) contemporary Christians that Jesus of Nazareth cannot be properly understood outside of his own Jewish identity and context, which permeate the emergence and development of the Church. That context can be difficult to access because of the subsequent Western ascendency in Christianity obfuscating its Eastern, Jewish origins. In particular, the Westernized New Testament tradition intentionally obscures the Jewish context of the Christian Scriptures, for example by marginalizing the Jewish names and therefore identities of the founders of the church so that Miriam becomes "Mary," Yeshua becomes "Jesus" and Ya'akov, Jacob, becomes "James." This is not an issue in some Eastern Christian traditions such as the Ethiopian and Syrian Orthodox Churches, Coptic Church and Arabic-speaking Eastern and Western Rite Churches.

As I seminary professor I encourage my students and others interested in the emergence of the Church from its Jewish origins to encounter the Christian Scriptures through the scholarship of the Messianic Jewish community; David Stern's translation of the New Testament is a good place to begin, and its name, The Complete Jewish Bible (with the Tanakh or Old Testament) engenders a new round of completing, conflicting claims and conversation.

 
 
 

Follow Rev. Wil Gafney, Ph.D. on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@WilGafney

 
 
  • Comments
  • 28
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
stewart mark
09:56 PM on 02/20/2012
a very nice article indeed. the problem with all this conjecture is that you can not understand our bible(what you all refer to as the old testament) and be Jewish and believe that jesus was the messiah as he did not fullfill any of the biblical prophesis for the Jewish messiah. jesus was not a direct descendent of king david. Jesus did not build the third temple. There was clearly no world peace. all Jews were not in Israel. just to name a few of the requirements oh and also the messiah doesnt get to come back and do all this a second time. Judaism does not accept jesus as the messiah therefore being a messianic Jew who believes in jesus is an oxymoron.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
gal416
is a Bible verse † † †
11:39 AM on 02/20/2012
"Westernized New Testament tradition intentionally obscures the Jewish context of the Christian Scriptures, for example by marginalizing the Jewish names and therefore identities of the founders of the church so that Miriam becomes "Mary," Yeshua becomes "Jesus" and Ya'akov, Jacob, becomes "James."

Wouldn't a rose by any other name smell just as sweet?
03:58 PM on 02/15/2012
good thing jesus wasn't real.
06:34 AM on 02/13/2012
Here's an alternative understanding of Paul's circumcision of Timothy: he agreed with the Jerusalem council that circumcision was not required of Gentile followers of Yeshua, but he considered Timothy Jewish. In this way, Paul is showing that he also valued Timothy's matrilineal descent - a point he explicitly makes in his writings. And Paul is explicitly asserting the idea that Timothy is a Jew who has faith in Yeshua, and thus appropriate, even necessary, for Timothy to embrace fully his Jewish identity.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbertaud
Je ne regrette rien, rien de rien
08:02 PM on 02/12/2012
Being a Jew and believing that Jesus is the son of God is pure cognitive dissonance ...it´s like being an Atheist who believes in God...

Shema Yisrael, Adonai eloheinu, Adonai echad

As simple as that
11:53 PM on 02/12/2012
It's not that simple, especially when the name for G-d, "Elohim", is plural in Hebrew.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bbertaud
Je ne regrette rien, rien de rien
04:56 PM on 02/13/2012
True, but if you have actually read the Torah you will realize that reaching Monotheism was a process, it did not happened overtime, neither the Jewish scriptures were written all at once by just one author. Besides, even if "elohim" is a plural noun it always uses a verb in singular (which denotes ONE) when it makes reference to the Hebrew deity, and plural verb when it applies to pagan deities...so is not that simple, like you said..it requires a knowledge of the Hebrew language of the time...and knowledge of Jewish history.

Nice try, though
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Claude Hosch
A single bracelet does not jingle
03:14 PM on 02/12/2012
"In a strong dissent the Apostle Paul has ... Timothy circumcised"

Acts 16:3 - "Him would Paul have to go forth with him; and took and circumcised him because of the Jews which were in those quarters: For they all knew that his father was a Greek."

I seems to me Paul circumcised Timothy out of concern for Jews knowing Timothy's father was Greek, failing to stand his ground rather than "a strong dissent."
10:20 AM on 02/12/2012
The followers of Yeshua (Jesus) were a sect of Judaism for the first four centuries, until the Roman church forced a split between Jesus' followers and Judaism. During those years the followers of Jesus were the new kids on the block. That has changed and whether you call yourself a Messianic Jew or Christian, it is doubtful the movement will cave in to pressures from modern organized religious groups (Jewish or Christian) who try and make up rules for how G-d should run His Kingdom.
12:39 AM on 02/12/2012
Reverend Dr. Gafney,

Thank you for your article.

Rabbi Joshua Brumbach
Ahavat Zion Messianic Synagogue
Beverly Hills, CA
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bones Rhodes
08:24 PM on 02/11/2012
The author,. Wil Gafney, is a reverend, a Ph.D, and an Associate Professor of Biblical Hebrew and Jewish and Christian Scripture yet writes : "In Acts chapter 15 there is no small matter of debate over the issue of circumcision for Christians. The elders in Jerusalem decide that it is unnecessary, however in a strong dissent the Apostle Paul has his traveling companion Timothy circumcised as an adult in the next chapter, rejecting their ruling." ??

Paul was the renegade who declared the Law to be obsolete, and had huge clashes with the early church in Jerusalem under James and Peter over circumcision: Paul declaring that Gentiles didn't need it , the early leaders adamant that they did. The incident to which he refers has always been a unexplainable glitch. It is precisely circumcision that divided the early church, leading to the death of Christianity after the destruction of Jerusalem and the rise of Paulianity.
02:08 PM on 02/12/2012
Although the conflict between Paul (and his teachings) and James/Peter (and their teachings) is clearly evident in the confrontation in Acts 20 (where Jewish followers of Jesus, which James said numbered in the tens of thousands, seek to stone Paul for his teaching about the uselessness of the law), the book itself (Acts) and the rest of the NT has been "Catholicized" by interpolations of the works of Paul (bringing them more into line with the teachings of James/Peter), the later writings attributed to Paul by those who wished to make him sound more like James/Peter, and the writings of those who wrote in the name of James/Peter in order to make them sound more like Paul.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bones Rhodes
05:59 PM on 02/12/2012
Exactly: you get a "GOLD STAR" and a buncha "atta-boys". Much as the revisionists have tried to write out the conflict, the echos are still plainly to be seen in Acts and in Paul's letters. Sadly, virtually no "Christians" realize this or that they are actually Paulians. I'd fan you but I already have sometimes in the past.
photo
phal4875
The world is run by cats; we just feed them.
03:18 PM on 02/12/2012
After reading the full Bible four times in 2011, it became abundantly clear that there was a Jew named Jesus who came to reclaim lapsed Jews. There was also a budding Christianity, before Saul/Paul usurped the religion.

I would fan you, but I have been unable to "Fan" for about five days. I guess "Favorite" is the other choice; that still works.
06:45 AM on 02/13/2012
Here's another viewpoint to consider: Paul wasn't the villain. Rather an ermerging Gentile tradition gained power and misinterpreted Paul. Paul can be understood as sympathetic to the Jerusalem Council, and in essential agreement. His later interpreters were not, nor were the traditions which they forcefully imposed.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
messy
artist, writer, adventurer
03:52 PM on 02/10/2012
is in fact not Judaism at all. It's an antisemitic parody inflicted on the world by a number of protestant sects. I have noticed that in recent years, the people going around handing out leaflets for "Jews for Jesus" had no Jewish blood in them at all.

If you're a christian Jewish apostate, you have that right. However, you're not doing anyone a favor by the parody/insult of "Messianic Judaism" .
04:02 AM on 02/12/2012
Jews for Jesus are not Messianic Jews, and the majority of the Messianic community dissaproves how Jews for Jesus often "christianizes" Jews.
04:19 PM on 02/12/2012
Messianic Judaism does not preach Biblical Supersessionism, otherwise called Replacement Theology. Jews for Jesus does.

This theology is the understanding passively or actively taught that the Jesus of the New Testament came to abolish Torah and nullify the Mosaic covenant.

This is why Jews 4 Jesus teaches Jews to disregard observance, while Messianic Judaism requires it.

They are not the same organization by any stretch. In fact, much of the Christian Church proper is starting to reconsider Replacement Theology as a belief altogether.
05:34 PM on 02/12/2012
Excellent comments explaining Messianic Judaism (Though J4J on Youtube has recently become involved in introducing Christians to Jewish Holy Days). I might add that I recently listened to an interview with a man from Holland talking about replacement theology. He lived during WWII and said that many people from his country had no problem handing over Jews to the Germans because Replacement Theology indicated that Jews no longer had a purpose.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
messy
artist, writer, adventurer
06:04 PM on 02/12/2012
However, it still claims that Jesus was the messaigh, there is a trume god, and that the oppression of the Jews by the christians was a good thing.