iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rey Ramsey

Rey Ramsey

Posted: March 26, 2010 01:46 PM

Tech Leaders to Obama & Congress: Innovation Plans Key to U.S. Job Creation

What's Your Reaction:

This week dozens of executives from top technology companies and VC funds trekked to D.C. from around the country to deliver a plea to President Obama, Administration cabinet officials and our elected leaders on both sides of the aisle.

Topping our TechNet wish list are improvements in the nation's education system and stronger support for our human capital; fostering a globally competitive business climate; and driving investment for clean technology and 21st century energy solutions.

Besides this wish list, the tech leaders ranging from Oracle, Cisco, Solazyme, Bloom Energy and others also delivered something loved by all D.C. denizens...new polling data of likely U.S. voters.

Key findings from our new Zogby survey* found an American public that understands technology is central to our future growth. The results also show that voters understand that our lead in technology will wither unless we provide the proper ingredients.

Highlights from the survey provide good insight into Americans' views on our future competitiveness:

• U.S. voters believe our students are not competitive. Fully 78% of likely voters surveyed agreed that America's schools are failing to adequately prepare our children for the high-skilled jobs of the future. Thus, we need to do everything we can to better train our kids.

• Americans strongly support high skilled legal immigration. Roughly two-thirds of likely voters (66%) believe that it's acceptable to bring in highly-skilled individuals from other nations through the nation's legal immigration process if an American is not available to fill jobs that require high-level engineering or science skills. One-fifth (20%) think that the job should be left open indefinitely. This is good news as Duke University research shows that one-quarter of U.S. tech companies were founded by foreigners. In Silicon Valley, it's 52% of startups founded or co-founded by people born outside our borders so we must not close our borders to innovation as very smart people will create these companies (and jobs) elsewhere if we're not careful.

• Broadband is essential. An overwhelming number of respondents (91%) believe that broadband access is somewhat or very important in their lives. Additionally, 43% would be more likely to vote for their member of Congress if they supported investing in broadband improvements (27% were less likely). The power of broadband was brought to life for us by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski about how telemedicine enabled broadband can successfully treat a rare eye disease causing blindness in newborn children. Because of broadband, doctors can do remote diagnostics and don't have to send handwritten drawings by fax of babies' eyes miles away as a course of treatment. With broadband enable telemedicine, those treatments can be diagnosed remotely and treated fast locally.

• The tech sector and clean tech can create jobs. When asked what industries have the most potential to create good-paying, long-term jobs, the technology sector (28%) and green energy (28%) tied for top billing. Manufacturing was the third highest response with 18%.

• Americans would pay a bit more for clean technologies. 62% of likely voters would support short-term, small increases in their monthly energy bill if it would lead to new innovations that would ultimately lower their bills, reduce reliance on imported fossil fuels and create more high-paying jobs in the U.S. One-fifth (21%) of Americans would be less likely to support such an increase.

• Foreign competitors may lead innovation if we're not careful. The majority (58%) of likely voters believe a foreign country will drive the most technological innovation in the next decade. Only 33% of those polled think the U.S. will drive the most innovation in this period. To us, this number just reflects the fact that we need to re-double our efforts for the U.S. to have a strong innovation plan. The Chinese act on 5 year innovation plans - and so should America.

On one hand, the data shows that Americans have real concerns about our ability to innovate and grow. But overall, it shows that the Obama administration and Congress will have plenty of support on improving education and technology as keys to our nation's economic success.

TechNet's executives understand that having access to highly educated talent is one critical component for future growth. Fortunately, there is increasingly a desire in Washington to improve student's facilities and update our nation's visa laws. These fixes combined with intelligent investments in broadband, clean tech and R&D will all contribute to a stronger environment of success and innovation in America.

* Methodology: The Zogby-463 survey of 4,143 likely U.S. voters was conducted from March 12-15 with a margin of error of +/- 1.6 percentage points.

Rey Ramsey is the President and CEO of TechNet, a national, bipartisan network of CEOs that promotes the growth of technology industries and the economy by building long-term relationships between technology leaders and policymakers and by advocating a targeted policy agenda. TechNet has offices in Washington, DC, Palo Alto, Sacramento, Seattle, Boston and Austin. Web address: www.technet.org.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
03:47 PM on 03/26/2010
There is very little economic incentive for US citizen college students to major in any of the science or engineering fields at this time. This needs to change for the benefit of the US economy. I believe that most students today want to study business and/or economics in order to become one of the wealthy Wall Street (master criminal) business tycoons. No person in his or her right mind would major in science or engineering since the pay scale has eroded so much in the last few decades and the study is so demanding compared to several other less demanding and more rewarding fields of study.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
03:35 PM on 03/26/2010
The USA is no longer the scientific and technical world leader that it once was just a few decades ago. There is very little economic incentive for US citizen college students to major in any of the science or engineering fields at this time. This needs to change for the benefit of the US economy. I believe that most students today want to study business and/or economics in order to become one of the wealthy Wall Street (master criminal) business tycoons. No person in his or her right mind would major in science or engineering since the pay scale has eroded so much in the last few decades and the study is so demanding compared to several other less demanding and more rewarding fields of study.

According to the National Science Foundation and the National Society of Professional Engineers, less than 5% of the current undergraduate college students in the USA studying for a degree in science, medicine, mathematics or engineering are US citizens. In the Asia the vast majority of the college students are majoring in science or engineering. We need to increase the percentage of USA citizen college students studying science and engineering from 5% to more than 70%, in order to emulate the economic industrial successes of the Asian countries. We must emulate the educational systems of China, India, Pakistan, and other Asian countries or the USA will die economically.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
03:10 PM on 03/26/2010
China is going to achieve tremendous progress in the world science and technology in the next 30-40 years." This is a remark by eminent scientist and Nobel laureate Chen Ning Yang in his speech on "Science and Technology of the 21st Century" delivered at the opening ceremony of the 6th World Chinese Entrepreneurs Convention in Nanjing on September 17, 2008. In his speech, Yang said that modern science and technology were introduced into China only in the 20th century. Within a time span of just one century with efforts by merely several generations, China has started from scratch to having attained the level of being able to launch and recover its Shenzhou Spaceship, an incredibly rapid development with no precedence in history. So he believes China's scientific and technical level will surely reach the foremost front of the world advanced level by the year 2030 or 2040.

Chinese nuclear technology and capabilities will soon surpass the USA scientific technology.
The USA must fight and then win the war for Scientific and Technological Superiority! If we lose the scientific and technology lead to China or any other country, the USA will rapidly decline into a third world nation, and our citizens will have to work for the Yuan equivalent of US pennies per hour after the total economic collapse of the USA and the buying power of the US dollar goes to zero.
02:55 PM on 03/26/2010
Well I am an intelligent American and I do not recommend bringing in intelligent immigrants to help lead us back to the top. We have very intelligent people here who have been pushed out and need to be brought back. I also do not accept that green technology should be more expensive. If done correctly it should be cheaper. I don't want to pay for harnessing our own natural resources. We have the technology to do a lot now but the way the corporations work they do not want any cheap competition. If I wanted to, for under a thousand dollars, I could put solar panels on my own home bypassing the big corps. There are small garages that turn cars into hybrids for a fraction of the cost the big corps would charge and you do not have to buy a brand new car. The list goes on... Let's bypass the big corps who want more government subsidies for Research and Development and start letting the stuff we have now out of the cage. We need new direction from new players. Ready, set, go!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gerald4
licensed mechanical and electrical engineer
03:42 PM on 03/26/2010
Do I Agree. My daughter and my son both started college as Mechanical Engineering students. My daughter was anm IB cannidate in High School and then made almost straight A's at University of Texas Austin in Mechanical Engineering for the first three semesters. She came home during her Sophomore Christmas break and then declared that there was no economic future in engineering, so she changed to liberal arts. (I think that her sorority sisters also made fun of her for studying.) I also remember that she told the family that she needed to "learn how to party"!

My son, 4 years younger, also saw no reason to study hard and changed his major in the first semester of his freshman year at Texas A&M from Mechanical Engineering to General Studies, and now to History. They want to become lawyers. Law is now a much more financially rewarding field. My daughter is now in her last year of law school instead of being an engineer. Whatever, I tried. Maybe this country needs more lawyers. She would be much more employable with a higher pay grade as a lawyer if she had an engineering undergraduate degree.

I went to a freshman parents orientation seminar for parents of liberal arts freshmen at the University of Texas at Austin, and the head of the department said "this is a wonderful education for your children, but this education will not help them find employment upon graduation." (Dec 2004 or Jan 2005)