iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Reza Pahlavi

GET UPDATES FROM Reza Pahlavi
 

Holding Iran's Supreme Leader Accountable

Posted: 03/ 8/2012 8:50 am

The subject of Iran currently sits quite prominently at the forefront of foreign policy discussions. 80% of all media coverage of Iran today focuses on the covert nuclear program. The remaining 20% focuses on provocative words and actions of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. His actions might make for good television, and Iran's nuclear program might make for the stuff of brinksmanship, but the present discussion about Iran fails to focus on the root of the country's plaguing problem: the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

In late January, I submitted a report to the United Nations Security Council detailing the crimes against humanity perpetrated on the orders of Islamic Republic's Supreme Leader, Mr. Ali Khamenei. The report focuses on crimes against humanity committed during the suppression of popular dissent after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's fraudulent re-election in June 2009. It also addresses various acts of Human Rights violations against ethnic communities and religious minorities since the clerical regime's inception.

Since the Islamic revolution of 1979, Western nations have alternated between trying to isolate Iran or to engage Iran diplomatically. It makes no difference: the clerics ruling Iran -- Ali Khamenei, in particular -- have no real interest in engagement with the West, nor have they ever. In fact, animosity with the West -- for all the values it represents -- is the underlying premise on which the Islamic Republic of Iran was founded. This would ultimately explain why reasoning with them has been futile: the lack of a common sphere of rationality.

The failing diplomacy seems to have led certain voices in the West to turn bellicose, and what were once whispers of war against my homeland are now growing louder. This concerns me for three reasons. First, because I am categorically opposed to any attack on my homeland due to the fact that it is not a viable solution, neither for stopping the nuclear program nor for the peace and the stability in the region; second, because Iran's armed forces will be forced into a position of defense and will be lost as potential allies to our democratic movement; and third, because the West has overlooked the most important tool to pressure the regime: the empowerment of the Iranian people.

I have steadfastly stated in interviews and speeches that the best insurance against nuclear proliferation and securing regional peace would be to help Iranians establish a secular democracy. There has yet to be serious effort to engage the overwhelming majority of Iranians who oppose this regime, and render them assistance to rise and take back their land from their oppressors.

The chief culprit behind all the evil that occurs within and emanates from Iran is Ali Khamenei in his role as Supreme Leader with nearly absolute power. A comprehensive study of the Iranian power structure and its constitution makes it clear that President Ahmadinejad is nothing more than a marionette in a corrupt puppet show run entirely by Ali Khamenei.

Based on religious law, the constitution of the Islamic Republic gives virtually all political, military and economic power to the Supreme Leader, at the top of the regime's hierarchy. The powers Khamenei holds give him the ability to control and intervene without limitation in all aspects of the public and private life of Iranians.

Numerous protestors arrested during the post-election protests in 2009 were brought before the Islamic Republic's revolutionary courts and judged for having committed the crime of "Moharebeh," which means "war against God." This charge can be made for any act that goes against the interests of the Islamic Republic. There is in fact no statutory definition of the crime of Moharebeh. It is a powerful tool that allows the regime to accuse any person and to condemn anyone with any sentence, including the death penalty.

The charge of Moharebeh was used against numerous protestors arrested during post-election demonstrations of 2009. Their arrests, which for the most part took place when they were participating in peaceful demonstrations, subsequently led to them being brought before the courts and receiving severe sentences.

In his Friday prayer sermon of 19 June 2009, Ali Khamenei confirmed the decision of the Islamic Republic to blindly and violently repress any person opposing the results of the presidential election of 12 June 2009. Security forces, invigorated by the Supreme Leader's address, dressed in civilian clothing to infiltrate the peaceful protesters and attacked them with guns, blades and knives. The image of Neda Agha-Soltan, the young woman who was shot in cold blood by a sniper, remains etched in our collective memories. Sadly, Neda was just one of many who died for freedom in Iran.

For Neda, and for all those who have been killed, abused, raped, terrorized and sentenced in sham trials, not only since the protests of the summer of 2009, but for the entire existence of this regime in my homeland, I accuse Ali Khamenei of crimes against humanity. The record is clear and chilling; his orders and the actions that his forces have taken as a result of those orders clearly meet the definitions of crimes against humanity as defined by the Article 7 of the Rome Statute which established the International Criminal Court.

The evidence in the report I filed with the United Nations Security Council provides sufficient cause for the United Nations Security Council to take up this matter and refer it quickly to the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in The Hague. These crimes include murder, torture, rape and other sexual violence, disappearance of persons, persecution of political, religious, and ethnic groups; and denial of liberty. It is time to bring Ali Khamenei to justice for his crimes against humanity.

It is my sincere hope that whatever political motivations have previously guided nations in the past vis-à-vis Iran, they will do what is clearly right and side with the people of Iran by voting to refer this case to the International Criminal Court at once. Those of us fighting for a free Iran will remember our friends that helped us in our time of need.

Under the tyranny of Ali Khamenei, Iranians cannot currently speak freely for themselves. We can be the voice for freedom and justice by pushing for unanimous passage of this complaint in the UN Security Council and try Ali Khamenei before the International Criminal Court. The international community will send a strong signal of solidarity with the Iranian people.

 

Follow Reza Pahlavi on Twitter: www.twitter.com/PahlaviReza

 
 
  • Comments
  • 130
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Baghooli
Immortals!
06:29 PM on 03/10/2012
Majority of Iranian's grandmas do believe their offspring are from royal blood, then here and now yours truly want to be the next king!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pharcee
Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity
01:10 PM on 03/09/2012
Ham Vatan,

We escaped from Iran during the revolution, my father supported your father, and we had a picture of the Shah in our living room. Having said that, I would like to point out that it is because of the actions of your father that brought us here. I am grateful that I grew up in America so that I can see both sides.

Iranian leaders should care more about Iranians than anyone else. They have put the needs of others and their reputation in the world before the proper treatment of the Iranians. The Shah did it, and now this regime does it.

When will the Iranian people get a government that will represent ALL Iranians....oh, thats right, we had it in 1953. Since you want a truly representative government in Iran, what is your answer to 1953?

Having said all this, I will never blame you for the actions of your father, but to ignore the bad the Iranians have endured under this and the last regime is wrong. Iranians deserve better than that.

Beh Omideh Khodah, Iranians will have their day.

Salaam
photo
cyrusShami
Iranian-American interested in US foreign policy,
10:02 PM on 04/06/2012
Pharee,
your understanding of Iran history is no better than what the communists and leftists have fed you all your life!!
Here's some facts:
While the Islamic regime, the Iranian left and the anti-American or misinformed historians and authors have always tried to portray the US as an aggressor, an enemy of Iranians and a source of trouble, in reality Iran owes its independence and sovereignty to the U.S.
After the WW-II, the allied forces led by the UK and Soviet Russia invaded Iran (1) as retaliation for Iran's neutral stance during the war and allowing the Germans to transport supplies to front lines via Iran. (It was a peaceful strategy to save the country from getting into an unpredictable war, in fact Reza Shah was opposed to the Nazis racist ideology, 1000s of Jewish Polish refugees were given asylum, food and housing in Iran and during his time all ethnic and religious minorities in Iran enjoyed equality& freedom)
To avoid bloodshed and destruction, patriotic leader who is in fact the founder of modern Iran and twice saved the country from dissolution, decided to give in and was exiled to the British colony in Morris Island. Negotiation by Iranian premier Ahmad Qavam and diplomatic pressure on the Soviets by the United States eventually led to Soviet withdrawal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pharcee
Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity
05:00 AM on 04/10/2012
Cyrus, you have no idea who or what I support. I will not now, or ever support "communist" groups in regards to Iran; they have no valid info to offer me.

I never spoke of Reza Shah. He is indeed the father of modern Iran. Did you bother to read my post? I come from a family of monarchists. I was merely pointing out that I am grateful to have been raised in America, where I can see both sides of the coin.
photo
cyrusShami
Iranian-American interested in US foreign policy,
10:37 PM on 04/06/2012
I suggest you read this article http://www.aryamehr.org/eng/19august/28mordad.htm
or this one by Freydoun Hoveyda (one of Shah's critics) http://www.iranian.com/FereydounHoveyda/2003/September/Mossadegh/index.html
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Setti Anders
12:09 PM on 03/09/2012
It is heart breaking to read comments from my fellow caring liberals attacking a man known for standing up for democratic, secular ideals for 30 years against a vile & vicious regime which has raped, murdered & brutalized Iranian for 33 years for "crimes" including being Bahai, Christian, socialist, democrat, Kurd, a woman....in staggering numbers....buried in unmarked graves. Why? Because of his father? Read your history books. Nothing his father did---or you imagined his father did compares to the reality of life under this regime. US did not put his father on the throne no matter what Kermit "James Bond" Roosevelt wrote in his biography. His father came to throne years earlier when the British & Soviets & yes the US stood by while his grandfather was forced from the throne by the "allies". Shame on you for shutting your eyes on the thousands dying in Iran's jails & in refugee camps and instead playing the game the regime wants: "Blame the dead -- & their children??" Refer Ali Khamenei to the ICC for crimes against the people of Iran.
01:36 PM on 03/09/2012
You bring up too much rhetoric without substance and disclaiming a historical fact. How is the weather in Tel Avie?
07:54 PM on 03/09/2012
how's the quality of sand?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:23 PM on 03/09/2012
Fanned.
08:30 AM on 03/09/2012
Dear Mr. Pahlavi,

No Matter who you have been, and are, I think you should be proud of what Iran has Been & Is.
And if you're Critical, of the current regime, do not forget how your father ran the country, and how he ran scared, and left his nation alone. you say that he would have been killed?.... he would have been a martyr, & a hero.... think about that buddy.... and from you, I don't see any courage either. Show some back bone... maybe god would wash your dad's sin with your good deeds. Iran needs a leader, as always, as any nation. What kind of leader you call yourself, when you constantly begging other nations to help you.........
12:42 AM on 03/09/2012
This is to the people attacking Reza Pahlavi and his article. There is no comparison between the human rights abuses done by the Islamic regime and what was done by SAVAK. The Islamic regime killed dissidents by the thousands and is continuing to this day while destroying Iranian pre-Islamic heritage. There was no raping of virgin girls before execution under the name of Islam during the Pahlavi era. So let’s not go blaming Reza for what his father did, what is happening now is a lot worse. Some people don’t seem to get the fact that this is not a proclamation of kingship rather an advocacy of human rights as an ordinary Iranian for which he should be respected. Some Royalists supporters don’t seem to get that either. It is the people of Iran rotting under Islamic oppression that is the topic here.
12:01 PM on 03/09/2012
I guess you are looking at the situation with the RibEye.
The ones that do the horrible things that you're talking about, are the same as the Mohamad Reza's era. They just changed their cover. people with this kind of cruelty don't just grow on trees. it take a particular state of mind to be this evil. They grew stronger, working for Pahlavi family. Gholamreza confiscated herders and farmers land by flying in a helicopter and razing the herdes and crops with machine gun. Ashraf owned the drug traffic. The son is not to be Blamed, but better stop meddling, if he doesn't have the back bone to lead.
10:32 PM on 03/09/2012
I guess you looking at a comment with an eye which is unable to properly transmit signals to the brain, hence your reply. Nobody is defending the crimes and mistakes of the Pahlavi era. The comparison here in this thread is the topic and the actions you claim were committed still pale in comparison to what the Islamic regime has done. The Islamic regime is inherently anti-Persian, get it. You got one thing straight, the son is not to be blamed and again he is not claiming leadership here.
01:46 PM on 03/09/2012
You can make as much noise as you want. But the fact does not change. If the Shah called for people to run to streets, not many would have showed up. The present regime can still bring millions to streets. The recent election was a good example. Obviously the present regime is not the best Iran could have but it appears to have strong grassroots support specially among the poor.
07:58 PM on 03/09/2012
Well, if you think bringing people to streets through bribery and intimidation is a sign of power, I'm in total agreement with you (not denying that some actually do support the regime in its current form, but you are assuming that all who voted did out of support for the regime)
10:33 PM on 03/09/2012
The only noise here is the screams of the tortured in Iranian prisons to which your ears are covered. I do not dispute some grass root support which exists among the poor and the uneducated. They are the same ones being bussed in for money or orange flavored soft drinks. Speaking of elections, did you catch the one with people getting shot? The body count speaks for itself. I do not defend the Shah but when the people wanted him out, he left. Will these guys leave if the people demand?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
f1nesse101
freedom with peace and prosperity
10:55 PM on 03/08/2012
I keep hearing posters comment on the "abuses" committed by the Shah, but no one takes the time to include an example of maybe one abuse. Therefore I take these character assasinations of Shah Pahlavi as biased and untrue. Also, the word "abuse" used in the context of these comments is a loosely worded term that exists in every country. As for the abuses of the current regime of Khamenei, people are being condemned to death on average of 2 per day and most for crimes they never committed. If you are condemed to death by hanging for writing a blog that criticizes the government- would you want to be a martyr or would you want intervention? I will include this fact, that the two other presidential candidates that ran for president in 2009-they and their families have been missing ever since.
05:00 AM on 03/09/2012
well there was the SAVAK - the Shah's political police they would engage in torture & targeted killings of the regimes political opponents.
Not to mention that the shah only came to power with the aid of a cia backed coup which overthrew Irans fledgling democracy.
speaking of Bias - maybe Reza Pahlavi should mention in his article that he is the SON OF THE FORMER SHAH
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
f1nesse101
freedom with peace and prosperity
08:57 PM on 03/09/2012
Shah Pahlavi came to power via his father, who also was a shah. Access to the internet provides for plenty of research. I guess everybody in the world already knows Reza Pahlavi is a son of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi except you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pharcee
Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity
12:17 PM on 03/09/2012
SAVAK. If you are Iranian, you would know this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
f1nesse101
freedom with peace and prosperity
08:59 PM on 03/09/2012
Are you on Twitter? If so, would you like a follower? My email address is the same as my AOL account. Feel free to send me an email.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
07:03 PM on 03/08/2012
It is hard to believe that you missed the most important fact of today's global politics. The elephant in the room so to speak! That is, none of the big powers, primarily the Western Powers and mainly the US are absolutely and positively opposed to creation / existence of any true democratically system or regimes with grassroots support of average citizenry in the vital and rich resourced Middle East or other parts of the world for that matter. It is considered "the biggest danger to the western civilization"! As someone who can recall 12 Presidential Elections in the US, I can assure you that there was not a single election that my folks and I voted for some one who we ever believed in to be the right choice. Everyone I knew always voted for the lesser evil or not as corrupted one! One major fact is that Elections in most Western Nations and specially in the US are mainly supported by lobbyists and financially powerful entities. Corporate controlled MSM controls flow of information and misinformation that could manipulate average voters and tilt elections within final hours. Therefore, an Ideal regime for Middle East is what your father had or what exists in countries like Jordan or what used to be in Egypt. Simply put it, no democracy unless it is my way scenario.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/noam-chomsky/us-iran-israel_b_1278865.html
www.ifamericansknew.org
www.raceforiran.com
08:06 PM on 03/09/2012
The biggest danger to western civilization is the nihilist, relativist thinking, exemplified by yours, that cannot distinguish between an oriental despotism and liberal democracy. US for sure is not the perfect example of a liberal democracy, but to jump from the defects of US to the conclusion that elections in Iran are somehow closer to a Democracy is the peak of absurdity
iflew
Pro Publiae Bonae
05:53 PM on 03/08/2012
Government, doing what people can't do for themselves, should operate like a friendly parent, protecting the powerless from the wrongful acts of the powerful sibling, and protecting the family from the outside. If the operation can be done while maintaining good relations with the neighbors and other community members it is even the better. A problem is often brought into the situation when a religion like a court system imposes a harsh "forever" penalty on some concerned when only a liitle temporary pressure applied in the right location in a timely manner can carry the day. Countries once at war are now allied. An eleventh commandment appears in "The New Testament".. Failure to observe it like ignoring the law of gravity is dangerous.
04:41 PM on 03/08/2012
I think Santorum should become president of Iran. What do you think?
05:01 AM on 03/09/2012
no they are looking for someone with more moderate religious views
03:39 PM on 03/08/2012
The sins of his father should be forgiven, if his son atonement is pure. I don't think so. I am doubtful that Mr. Reza Pahlavi is sincere about his adoration of human rights. If so he can still posthumously request the ICC to investigate his father for his atrocities and crimes against humanity. I am sure that the Iranian people do not want another CIA/MI6 created Pahlavi.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bahramerad
11:52 PM on 03/08/2012
Don't you think such " atrocities and crimes against humanity" commited by the Shah does not exsit otherwise someone / Islamic Mullahs would have already brought it up in some internation forum/court to once and for all put an end to this saga ? Or maybe it is just a Black /Red propaganda - this also incudes the black op of the CIA against the Pahlavies ?
03:35 PM on 03/08/2012
It's interesting NOT to mention in his bio that he is the son of the former Shah of Iran. Could it be that people would find such out cry coming from Reza Pahlavi a clear case of the pot calling the kettle black? It's unfortunate, what he is saying is very much true and sad yet having such truths come from him diverts the attention from the point. No one will help him as the Islamic Republic of Iran would undoubtedly use his involvement with any cause/organization as "clear" case of the former regime trying to edge its way back into the country, great feed for the propaganda mill.
07:09 PM on 03/08/2012
I partly agree with you, and I partly disagree. No one has to be a prisoner of their parents' mistakes, every individual has a decision to make about their own personal and philosophical positions in their present lives. We can go forward without being prisoners of the past. Then again, it's true that if his father had embraced democracy long before 1979, then the extremists might never have gained their present foothold and control of Iran. It is a vast and complex tragedy. That much is clear at least.
03:16 PM on 03/08/2012
A solid thought piece. The world does indeed seem to be singularly focused on nuclear weapons - real or not - when the real problem are these unelected ayatollahs running the malevolent Iran show from behind the scenes. I'm going to write emails to the Security Council ambassadors today.
photo
Shebagirl
Be a superdog - protect an underdog!
06:21 PM on 03/08/2012
Are you going to write about the unelected banksters that run our show from behind the scenes. We don't live in Iran and neither does the "Crown Prince" anymore; the majority of Iranians are happy with their life - leave them alone. A few dissidents does not a majority make (ask Egypt) - when push came to shove and they had three elections, the "democratic party" came in a dismal fourth.
07:44 PM on 03/08/2012
without the dissidents, those Egyptians would still be happily starving, hmm? It's not their fault they are surrounded by fools. Neither is it the fault of the Iranian dissidents that the majority of their country is completely brainwashed into submission... would you rather be a living sheep, primed for slaughter at a moment's notice- or a rebel with a cause, however futile?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:45 PM on 03/08/2012
Maybe that's because the candidates in said election first had to be approved by the ruling regime.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
editorjuno
Musician, wordsmith, accidental mystic, etc.
02:57 PM on 03/08/2012
Feckless heir of universally despised MI6/CIA-installed "Peacock Throne" tyrant says what?
01:56 PM on 03/08/2012
I looked up his bio but there is not mention of him being the son of the disposed Shah. If he is why is it not mentioned. Perhaps he is waiting in the wings to take over where his father left off with the help of the oil industry's influence.
02:09 PM on 03/08/2012
Thank you thank you....my thought exactly
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:52 PM on 03/08/2012
Maybe they figured anyone interested in the topic should know that already.