iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rhiana Maidenberg

GET UPDATES FROM Rhiana Maidenberg
 

Baby Talk

Posted: 11/03/11 08:50 AM ET

Like most new parents, I carefully tracked my first born's initial attempts at communication. Around 10 months she began addressing our cat, Neko, as "Nene" and bananas as "nana". Obviously her speech wasn't so comprehensible, and often when she was hungry I would help her search for the cat.

Wanting to be the best (read hyper-vigilant) mother possible, I religiously followed the advice of parenting experts on how to foster a baby's speech. Thanks to my weekly bulletins from babycenter.com, I dutifully assumed the following tasks:

Speak to the baby. Even when she was just six weeks old, sleeping in an Ergo carrier on my chest, I would utter ridiculous statements to her while shopping for groceries. "This is an apple." "Mommy needs to buy deodorant." The passing glances of strangers concerned about my mental health never swayed my determination.

Read to the baby. Before she was out of her preemie clothing, she was hearing at least two bedtime stories each night. Her gaze may not have reached beyond six inches from the tip of her nose, but I was resolute.

Listen to the baby. Elana would babble "ba ba da da nu na." I would respond "Oh, yes Elana. I love you too!"

Limit screen time. Once the baby was brought home from the hospital I established a compulsory no TV while the baby is awake rule. This regulation was met by deep opposition and frequent rule-breaking from my husband.

In the months that followed her first attempt at speech, my daughter picked up various other words: ball, duck, up, down, mama, dada, and the all encompassing "NO!". Seeing as she was an only child at this point, she had my undivided attention and I painstakingly deciphered each syllable in an attempt meet her immediate needs and keep the toddler tantrums at bay.

When my second daughter was born, I forfeited all the careful strategies I practiced with my first. After two plus years of trying to be super-mommy I decided that I needed to relax, not only for my own sanity, but also for the welfare of my family. I did, occasionally, speak to the new baby, however, most of the words she heard were directed toward her older sister. Similarly, as an infant the second baby was read to, but only while I was concurrently reading to her sister. She had her first interaction with toddler-oriented television before she could sit up.

During the times I was alone with the baby and the toddler was at preschool, I treasured the moments of quiet, relishing in the child that could not yet talk. As Phyllis Diller so eloquently put: "We spend the first twelve months of our children's lives teaching them to walk and talk and the next twelve telling them to sit down and shut up." With my second, I thought I would just bypass the first twelve months.

Nevertheless, the new one's speech developed nearly parallel to her sister's. Even though I didn't remember to record her milestones, I'm pretty certain her first word was spoken around ten months of age. Probably as a consequence of her big sister's infatuation with all things princess, two of the baby's first five words were "Babi" (Barbie) and "Arel" (Ariel). Now at nearly two, she can sing at least one song from over six different Disney movies, and can identify each princess on sight. My husband is especially proud.

So how does speech develop? The MIT Media Lab's Human Speechome Project recorded almost every hour of a child's first two years and noted each new word and the frequency of each word spoken by both the child and his caregiver. They then plotted the words, comparing the child's age to the words learned each month. If you click on a word another graph is shown depicting when and how often the word was used by both the child and the caregiver.

Not surprisingly, the more frequently a word was used by the caregiver, the sooner the word was spoken by the child. The child's peak gain of words is accomplished at 20 months of age. After that time, the child learns fewer words per month, but begins combining his existing vocabulary into more complex statements. Using this data the researchers hope to gain an greater understanding of why children learn the words in the order they do, and how they form their first multiple word statements.

When it comes to how boys and girls develop language skills, it's not just a theory that there are differences. On average, baby girls develop the cognitive skills to acquire language nearly six months before boys. Recently, researches at Northwestern University measured the brain activity of 31 boys and 31 girls and found that different genders use different areas of their brains when performing language tasks. The girls used greater portions, and several portions simultaneously, of the brain, while the boys used one portion at a time making the tasks more difficult to process.

Whether these gender differences are due to nature or nurture, it is nearly impossible to determine. The language portion of the brain may develop earlier in girls because parents are more likely to communicate with girl babies while being more active and playful with their boys. Still, it may be biological.

At the end of the day, I have two girls that won't stop talking, even though they were raised with slightly contrasting maternal attitudes. Maybe the caregiver is less important than we parents like to believe.

 

Follow Rhiana Maidenberg on Twitter: www.twitter.com/marriedwtoddler

Like most new parents, I carefully tracked my first born's initial attempts at communication. Around 10 months she began addressing our cat, Neko, as "Nene" and bananas as "nana". Obviously her spee...
Like most new parents, I carefully tracked my first born's initial attempts at communication. Around 10 months she began addressing our cat, Neko, as "Nene" and bananas as "nana". Obviously her spee...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 31
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Melissa Irlandez
11:35 AM on 11/09/2011
This message is a bit strange to me. Speaking to your baby, reading to your baby introduces words. We communicate via words. Children who are not read to are missing crucial vocabulary words- words they will need when they are taught to read. Why promote decreased reading, decreased communication? Is that really a good message? I have a strong suspicion your 2nd child was speaking at the same clip as your first because your daughter was talking to her. Try reading nurture shock and The read aloud handbook by Jim Trelease. I volunteer at an inner city public school, 3rd garders. Trust me these kids have never been read to, their working vocabulary is dismal. They can read at 1-2nd grade level. So I guess at the end of the day you will write about how bad the teachers are? By the way the reason besides the obvious as to why you read to your babies is it creates an awesome bond. It does matter who the caregiver is. Some parents do not need an excuse to do less with their children.
10:41 PM on 11/08/2011
Everyone thinks their first is an Einstein.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Melissa Irlandez
11:36 AM on 11/09/2011
you mean they are not? :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kellybelle22
Medicine. Marriage. Motherhood.
06:28 PM on 11/08/2011
Enjoyed reading this, Rihana. It's a good reminder for me, as a first time mom of a 13-month-old, to chill a little more. I'm guilty of directing an awful lot of linguistic efforts at my baby--in two languages, I confess--and even when she's playing nearby and I'm here or on other news sites, I'm reading stories and comments to her because I know she's absorbing those words. In mornings, she hears me in Spanish, as she also does from our housekeeper. In afternoons, English.

Not all mothers naturally talk to and read to their babies or keep that TV off during the first two years. That tends to be the domain of middle-class and well-to-do moms. There are entire parental demographic groups who need to be encouraged to do more of this rather than to relax more. It's those moms and their babies whom I worry about most of all.
09:49 AM on 11/08/2011
I also think a parent should not only read and talk to their children, but they should also take their children places whenever possible. By doing this you are also stimulating their visual senses as well as their hearing senses. And a side note: How can there be "experts" in child rearing especially when each and every child is different, yet in the same society we can only "practice" in the fields of medicine and law when there are so few cases in comparison? The only true "expert" in human growth and nature to me is the Holy Bible. The moment we-as a human race-veered away from that TRUE "instruction manual" was the moment we allowed chaos to enter our lives. Just something to think about.
08:24 AM on 11/08/2011
I totally disagree that the caregiver is not that important. Your second daughter spoke at the same age as the readers older daughter because she was hearing words. No matter if they were read to her or spoken to her. If your children can communicate at an early age, they will be able to read sooner and understand math concepts. Don't give parents the idea that they don't need to talk to their kids. They do! This is a terrible article for parenting. Fyi- I have an 18 yr old (girl) who read at 4 and a 6 six year old (boy) who read by 5. And their reasoning skills are remarkable! Talk and read to your kids!
07:34 AM on 11/08/2011
I'm a father and my son of six months was able to mimic, "hello, how are you?" at an understandable level as early as 63 days (I have a youtube video of him at 70 days). It just blew people away to hear him. Being multi-lingual and an English teacher overseas I would repeat the same simple dialogue to him every day. I never imagined that so early he would be able to repeat it. I feel the repetition is key and stimulates the synapses to form those connections. I don't think he really understood what he was saying as much as he understood he just wanted to try to say it because he kept hearing it from me. Amazing as he pushed himself to get it out in what seemed some effort to please me by saying it. Genetic or not? I didn't speak my first words until I was four years old.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DontselltheUS
Keep on...
03:11 AM on 11/08/2011
This article and the comments keep reminding me of The Birth Order book. Our kids do have "different"
mothers in the same family. I remember having a 4th of July picnic. One friend with a first baby arrived with a playpen enclosed with a bug net, baby dressed from head to toe.. Another with a fifth baby, the same age, arrived with a barefoot baby in shorts and t shirt and set him in a pile of dirt with a plastic shovel. The dirt pile mom said she had had the whole playpen thing with her first baby.
StevenRussell1
Christian Pilot
12:27 AM on 11/08/2011
Scrap the so-called "Experts' " advice, and to to The Expert, the Creator Himself, the Master, King Jesus, King of kings, and Lord of lords. Read your Bible, and take it from there.
12:02 AM on 11/08/2011
By the way when you get past Goodnight moon and they get too old for those books, I found the youth horror series great for boys so read them all to them....then we discussed the books. Like Frankenstein wasn't mean at first...but he was so different looking he scared people who were then mean to him....can you think how this applies to people today.....or Dr Jeckle was a good doctor who got carried away with his drugs and became the horrible Mr Hyde....isn t that what happens to people today who take drugs? Might sound crazy to you moms, but I had fun with this and my boys both had great vocabs and reading comprehension......its all about making it fun:}
11:52 PM on 11/07/2011
I spoke to both my sons all the time and both were speaking clearly in full sentences by 2 and a half.
By 3 both knew their colors and letters and by 4 both could count to 100 and then backwards. Its easy if you make it fun...I would just say I love you 1...they would say I love you 2...then I would say I love you 3.....it was a fun time that i miss to this day:} My advice...make it fun...enjoy them cause they grow oh so fast:}
09:54 PM on 11/07/2011
Talking to young children is important when they are very young. They are learning to be communicators from the very first moment at birth. First, they learn to listen and look into your eyes. This creates a bond between mom and baby. Then they practice your language intonation as they babble. As a speech language pathologist I can attest to the fact that it is VERY important for children to hear the language of others, even if it is a sibling that they can emulate. Afterall it has been proven that children who have no introduction to any form of communication by the age of 5 will not learn to talk. So the first 5 years are very important not only for speech and language but also for socialization.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beth2216
08:30 PM on 11/07/2011
I understand exactly what you are saying. I have two boys. One that will be 2 in a couple of weeks and another that is 4 months old. I am usually talking to my oldest. While I do talk to my infant, I think that I talk to my oldest more, because he is so active and requires a lot of interactive play. I also understand the comment of "moments of quiet." I know that there are days when my oldest went to the babysitter while I took my youngest to the Drs. During the time when it was just my youngest and myself, I would usually enjoy the peace and quiet and get a chance to relax. Those who take it has neglect doesn't have two very young children. My youngest was usually playing with toys or even napping. If he cries, I attend to him, but I'm not in his face 24/7. So far he is developing just as quickly as my oldest son (and he has already had open heart surgery and so many other things that was suppose to put him behind). Of course, he hasn't started talking, but we will see how well he does. I have no desire to be super mom (although I have friends that call me that due to having a son with a major heart condition). I just desire to be what my children need whether it's to play with them, read to them, or sing to them.
08:30 PM on 11/07/2011
I have three kids...I spoke to every single one of them from birth on up, read to them, sing to them, listened to them and talked back to them. Your second daughter may very well have talked at the same rate as your older daughter...did it occur to you that maybe that is because she mimicked her sister who did what you didn't? Kids often talk to babies or at least around them and pretend to read (if they can't actually read yet) and have convos. My older kids do that sort of stuff. It's very common for younger siblings to do things faster *because* of older siblings contributing on top of the parents. Your daughter may just have picked up your slack. I don't think that talking to your baby, listening to your baby or reading to your baby are at all things which would make you a "super-mommy". They just make you a mom who loves her kid and finds joy in interacting with them.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Rhiana Maidenberg
01:06 PM on 11/04/2011
While I agree with these comments, I do strongly believe that by trying to be "super-mommy" we are putting too much pressure on the modern mother. I didn't neglect my second daughter, but I was much less vigilant about the rules. In turn, she is just as verbal as her older sister, and maybe slightly better adjusted from having a mother who understands moderation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Fran Jaime
Yo Soy 132!
09:58 PM on 11/04/2011
"I did, occasionally, speak to the new baby, however, most of the words she heard were directed toward her older sister."
"During the times I was alone with the baby and the toddler was at preschool, I treasured the moments of quiet, relishing in the child that could not yet talk."
Honestly, that sounds like you were ignoring the baby and not being moderate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kellybelle22
Medicine. Marriage. Motherhood.
06:08 PM on 11/08/2011
Sounds moderate to me. Babies can benefit from quiet time, too, just as their mothers can. As long as the child was hearing human-spoken words of all kinds, not just those directed to her, she was absorbing them and the pathways in her developing brain were expanding as a result.
05:56 PM on 11/05/2011
I do appreciate the gist of a lot of what you write- calm down as parents, don't overreact to every possible new parenting Must- because yes the pressure on mothers to be perfect and do things perfectly is ridiculous. I guess I only wish your point about moderation in parenting could maybe have come across as a little more positive about reading and speaking to your baby, since many mothers and fathers actually do struggle with conversing in a one sided way with a baby, or don't have the understanding that reading to your child even a little bit is positive and to be encouraged.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alison Carabajal
Is this a joke?
12:24 PM on 11/04/2011
I just can't get behind the conclusion of this at all. I talked to both of my older boyos and I talk to my newborn. All the time. I sing, I recite silly poems, I read to them what I am reading (they all got a very healthy dose of Stephen King very early on). As my 2 older boyos were very verbal as toddlers and even now wow their respective teachers with their vocabularies I like to think it's because my actions.