More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Richard Brodsky

GET UPDATES FROM Richard Brodsky
 

Job Creation Is Up to the States

Posted: 10/31/11 03:55 PM ET

Whatever the dubious provenance of States' Rights, the current national economic and political paralysis is an opportunity for states to create their own jobs programs, damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead. Washington is caught in a conflict of ideas (Keynes v Hayek, stimulus v. laissez-faire) and a nasty power struggle where Republicans oppose anything that makes Obama look good. Washington is completely sidelined and out-of-work Americans are on their own.

A real alternative to Washington's inaction is raising its head in New York: A state jobs programs is being talked about. Its' elements are easy to put together. Road, bridge, mass transit and flooding infrastructure investments, small business tax credits, retaining teachers and public employees who provide essential services, youth job programs, green job stimulus, and other practical and sensible ways of putting people to work and providing needed investment and services are stirring real interest.

States do not have the luxury of deficit spending, so the problem of funding these programs looms large on both the policy and political front. There's a way to address these problems that works economically and politically. If New York funds these job-creating efforts with a state millionaire's tax, it will achieve what Washington can't.

The "No-tax, No-debt" political crowd has had the public debate about the economy by the short hairs. The "Reinvest and Stimulate" crowd has allowed itself to be nudged off center stage. While there have been strong efforts to enact a millionaire's tax, the monies raised were targeted to save important public services, which is a very good thing. But it ran into a political critique that we can't return to spending and tax levels that allegedly caused our current mess. And that political opposition remains emboldened by their read of the national mood. New York's Governor Andrew Cuomo, for example, compared his opposition to a millionaire's tax to his father's opposition to the death penalty. Such is the level of the debate on stimulating the economy.

The proposal is a "yes-able proposition" that addresses both New York's lagging job market and New York State's budget crisis. It's paid for by imposing a small, three-year income tax surcharge on those whose annual income exceeds $1 million. It was published in an Op-Ed in the New York Daily News last week. Here are the nuts and bolts of the plan:

- New York needs a $5 billion jobs infrastructure bond act to fund road, bridge, mass transportation and flooding improvements. This will directly create 25,000 well-paying jobs while rebuilding our physical infrastructure and spurring long-term economic growth.

- New York needs a $1 billion youth employment program to provide constructive employment annually for 20,000 young New Yorkers in the private and public sectors over five years. It will create 100,000 median-wage jobs.

- New York needs a $1,000-per-job small business tax credit for the creation of new jobs for three years. Where we can provide real incentives to the private sector to create real jobs, we've got to do it. This should directly create 15,000 jobs.

- New York needs a $1 billion program to avoid the layoff of 50,000 essential public- sector employees over the next three years, with a special focus on the needs of educational institutions. It does our economy no good to create new private-sector jobs and at the same time savage the ranks of public sector employees who provide essential services.

- New York needs a $500 million three-year program to subsidize the creation of green jobs, those that will move New York in the direction of energy conservation and make us the center of a new and growing source of private sector jobs. That should directly create 10,000 jobs.

- New York needs a $400 million, three-year program to ensure affordable mass transit fares across New York. Our urban areas must remain attractive to private sector employers and effective mass transit systems are crucial. It should indirectly create 1,000 jobs.

There's a real political opportunity here. The plan sidesteps the counter-attack on a millionaire's tax. It links two very popular ideas, job creation and taxing the top 1%. Give some credit to Occupy Wall Street for the change in the national conversation about a millionaire's tax. But nothing is likely to come of a change in mood without concrete, "yes-able propositions" where political leaders take the general consensus and turn it into things that Governors and Legislatures can actually enact. It's up to states to do what they must to make up for what Washington can't or won't do. States need to create jobs program. It's time.

 

Follow Richard Brodsky on Twitter: www.twitter.com/richardbrodsky

 
 
  • Comments
  • 13
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D Ballantine
Former Presidential Candidate - Amer Elect 2012
01:18 AM on 11/01/2011
There are so many impediments to state-led job creation, I don't even know where to begin. First, almost every state has to have a balanced budget by law. Creating jobs requires investment and borrowed money. Right now, the state of the municipal bond market is not very good. Voters are not going to approve state bond issues for the unemployed. Further, not every state has been hit the same by the economic crisis so it is hardest on the poorer states to implement a program.

Often times, these programs become beggar thy neighbor ones as states try to attract companies from other states. States cannot afford to build large scale infrastructure projects that create the most jobs. Giving tax incentives reduces state revenue exacerbating the cuts they need to make now.

This should be a large Federal program because the FED can borrow the money without worrying about getting specific approval through a plebiscite, contract the construction, oversee multi-state projects like highways, and provide the tax incentives without hurting state budgets for teachers and police. An infrastructure bank funded with the $2.6 trillion currently held by banks would go a long way towards creating 10 million jobs quickly and 20 million over the next 3 years.
01:01 PM on 11/01/2011
Would this all require raising taxes on anyone? It does look like a tax and spendulus would be necessary to get this going. Why not use some of that 781b that was appropriated a couple of years ago, surely there is some of that left to go around. Lets use that up first, before starting in on another progressive socialist idea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D Ballantine
Former Presidential Candidate - Amer Elect 2012
01:45 AM on 11/02/2011
The problem is too big. We need 20 million jobs. It takes $100,000 in spending to create one job, that means $2 trillion to start and another $2 trillion to keep it going. That is why Congress is ignoring the problem. The money is in the bank, we just have to find away to tap it efficiently and fairly. The free-market is going to do it or they would have.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Richard Brodsky
12:57 PM on 11/02/2011
We proposed to fund the job creation by maintaining the current rates on millionaires, in NY at least (they're scheduled for a major tax cut on January 1st). There's significant public support for both job creation and fair taxation of upper income Americans, let's link the two ideas.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Richard Brodsky
01:00 PM on 11/02/2011
Sure, there are impediments, but I don't share your absolute certainty about what voters would do. The NY proposal focuses on a roads bridge mass transit flooding infrastructure program and other concrete job creating programs (see the Daily News Op-Ed For the details http://nydn.us/uxiMwL)

There are real constituencies all over NY that want to see this done. I do share your concern about the giving of incentives, and we haven't proposed that. Yes, this should be a federal program but I don't see that happening, in the face of federal inaction we've got to go to places that an get this done and there are states that can do it.

In the end, the linkage of the Millionaires Tax to state funded jobs programs will work as a matter of policy and as a matter of politics. Let's see how things unfold.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael D Ballantine
Former Presidential Candidate - Amer Elect 2012
08:45 PM on 11/02/2011
You make some good points. The states can't wait around for the Federal Govt to take action. Unfortunately, most states are in as bad a shape as the Federal Govt. The problem is not whether govt takes action as much as the consumer debt burden on households. If your house is still falling in value and your underwater, you aren't likely to go on a spending binge. Consumer debt is what is holding us back. Until we solve that problem, no govt spending program is going to solve our problems.
08:02 PM on 10/31/2011
$500 million more down the hole for green jobs that will never exist?
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Richard Brodsky
12:57 PM on 11/02/2011
There's nothing wrong with a healthy cynicism about any proposal, including the green jobs proposal. I would just urge that you hold your concerns to just this side of cynicism. There's every prospect that a well thought through green jobs program will work but we need to be careful, learn from past mistakes, and not assume a good result just because we hope that there will be one.
05:32 PM on 10/31/2011
Is this just another admission that BO is a complete and total failure when it comes to jobs and the economy?

The federal government can't create jobs - let the states do it.

The federal government can't protect the borders - let the states do it.

Too much more of this and people are going to start wondering why they pay so much in federal taxes if the feds can't (or won't) do squat.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Richard Brodsky
12:56 PM on 11/02/2011
The Right has always focused on states doing things that the fed can't or shouldn't (see Mitt Romney's explanation for his healthcare plan). There's no reason in the world that a state can't engage in a progressive activity that improve our economic prospect. The reason for failure in Washington can be debated, the need for state action on jobs cannot wait.
04:33 PM on 10/31/2011
It is too bad that any dedicated funding for the purposes supported by Mr Bodsky cannot be put in a lock box. Rather in NYS they are summarily swept into the State General Fund to pay for whatever.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Richard Brodsky
12:56 PM on 11/02/2011
Just don't forget that a locked box can be unlocked. There's no magic bullet here, we need to make choices about how to stimulate economic activity and job growth. I think we can get that done.