More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Richard Geldard

GET UPDATES FROM Richard Geldard

Obama Asks Court to Decide Election

Posted: 09/28/11 06:33 PM ET

Does anyone doubt that the Obama administration's request for the Supreme Court to rule on the health care law ASAP is designed to decide the next election? If the court nixes the insurance mandate section of the law -- its crucial requirement -- then the law won't survive, except perhaps in pieces. If the court affirms the law in all its parts, then the Republicans have lost a crucial attack on the president and their constituency will be without its cause celebre.

The request from the administration is risky, of course, because if the law is struck down, Obama will have lost his signature piece of legislation and he will be left adrift without a major accomplishment to bolster claims that he deserves a second term.

The Republicans with their Tea Party allies in the driver's seat have been screaming about Obamacare ever since it was passed. The recent debates have highlighted the Far Right theme of Freedom from the mandate and illustrated the anger many feel for having to buy insurance, or else face fines or worse.

By asking the high court to decide the constitutionality of the law, the right will either be silenced or they will take to the streets, a doubtful reaction. What is more likely is that protest will come in the form of refusal to respect the mandate, to test the government's resolve to deal fairly with scoff laws.

It certainly appears that the administration has responded to the shouts and cries from audience members in the recent debates, not to mention the obvious refusal of any of the candidates to speak out against such audience reactions. It could well be that President Obama fears that without a final court decision, the issue could very well turn violent during the fall campaign.

Let's see if the court sees that possibility as well and moves quickly to decide the fate of the law.


 
 
 

Follow Richard Geldard on Twitter: www.twitter.com/richgeldard

 
 
  • Comments
  • 110
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
06:55 PM on 09/29/2011
It's not health care reform. It's a corporate feedbag and I for one have no intention to respect it.
06:14 PM on 09/29/2011
The reason why he wants this approved by SCOTUS us that he knows his time as POTUS is short.
It has nothing to do with reelection, as the majority of the voters don't want the pay for the 100 agencies to man this behemoth of a mess. Didn't he admit that if this bill causes him to be a one-termer, that he would be willing to accept that trade? Obama knows that all he can do is spit on the people, the majority who were against this bill, before his brand of Marxism fades into oblivion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
steve siravo
05:13 PM on 09/29/2011
When the federal gov't can mandate a citizen to buy anything it is no longer a free society.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ron Maede
All the World's a stage, Huffpo's my mic check
10:27 AM on 09/29/2011
I'm an American and have the right...

To be a free-loader.

Let the liberal suckers pay for my health care.
09:44 AM on 09/29/2011
The Republican voters I know aren't focused on the constitutionality of the law, they just want it repealed. Whichever candidate seems most likely to push for repeal is the one they want. Seems to me if the Supremes uphold the law, those voters will be even more motivated to vote for the Presidential and Congressional candidates that will ensure repeal of the law.
09:22 AM on 09/29/2011
This article ignores the fact that Obamacare is hugely unpopular with the American people. If the Supreme Court upholds its constitutionality that won't change-- in fact the Court might do Obama a favor by finding it unconstitutional, since he then would not have to defend it. The main reason people oppose it is not that it's unconstitutional, it is that it is exorbitantly expensive and will further explode the deficet.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ron Maede
All the World's a stage, Huffpo's my mic check
10:21 AM on 09/29/2011
Most polls show a 50 - 50 split on the law.

Additionally, the more people learn about the law, the more they like it.
10:57 AM on 09/29/2011
Most polls show a 60-40 split against it, and the antis have grown steadily since its passage.
11:44 AM on 09/29/2011
Where do you get the hugely unpopular part ? The public is split 50/50 and in Republican number interpretation ,that would be that it is hugely popular.
justobserve
Not left nor right or center. Just a free thinker!
08:25 AM on 09/29/2011
It's a very good move! There is nothing more destabilizing than a piece of reform laws already passed by the two Houses and is still being challenged in court by the other party for political reason just to derail this government's signature achievement. If the American people want to pay for the escalating health care costs and line the private health insurance's pockets then let them be. Health care should be about people's affordable health care, not profits. A sure way to let more Americans fall off the cliff to become uninsured sick people. The employer-subsidied workers will continue to enjoy the delusion that their health premium is not that bad, due to their employers paying the most part for them. They also continue to pay for people in emergency rooms. They themselves will only recognize what a rotten system we are having when they are unemployed or self-employed and have to pay all by themselves. They are either too arrogant to ask why other first world countries have it successfully. They only want to look at the faults of such system and ignore our own faults even ours only insure part of the population. Let's settle it once and for all either way to take it out of the political contests.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
peaceonearth
08:10 AM on 09/29/2011
I would far prefer being forced to pay for health insurance than for the stupid wars I am required to help fund. What's not fair is being forced to pick up the bill for those who can afford it but who choose not to pay for health insurance and then end up in the emergency room.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dinosaur David B
07:41 AM on 09/29/2011
Obama will be quite lucky if this conservative court -- the majority of judges who are owned by big business and decided that "businesses (like insurance companies) are people" doesn't scuttle healthcare.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ron Maede
All the World's a stage, Huffpo's my mic check
10:25 AM on 09/29/2011
I thought the same thing.

Don't you think he has weighed the risks and decided he has a good chance to get it approved?
06:40 AM on 09/29/2011
Sure beats the way Bush & Co. used the Supreme Court to get elected.
frank1946
Tell the Truth
04:34 AM on 09/29/2011
The Lady OR the Tiger......................Freedom or Slavery.......................the Supremes have a
Black or White Paradox.........................Obamacare is so much more than Healthcare, it is laced
with many other Laws which enslave a Free Society !

We have to Pass It in order to know What's In It....................now we know !

The LADY or the TIGER ?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
DiogenesOfAlaska
Mitt Romney for president - of the Cayman islands!
04:08 AM on 09/29/2011
Are you saying that Obama should not appeal to justice because there's a mob who isn't going to like it?
03:17 AM on 09/29/2011
Republican plan: Get sick, die quick
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dadw5boys
Disabled Vietnam Vet
03:12 AM on 09/29/2011
Why didn't Conservatives fight the $30,000 per school per test payment required by No Child Left Behind MANDATE that Bush shoved down out throats ?
All it turned out to be was a TRANSFER OF WEALTH to the Publishing Industry and Dumbing down American Kids by taking away Art and Music from most schools !
zinxeb
Empathy ends cruelty
02:17 AM on 09/29/2011
Why anyone would object to having to buy health insurance is inexplicable to me! I just don't get it!! As Obama said, with all people having to get insurance, rates would go down...and you can shop around different companies to get a deal that you could afford.

Is it because young people feel that they don't need it? Young people DON'T get sick?? Young people DON'T have accidents? Of course, since Obama said that insurance companies can't turn you away if you have a preexisting condition, maybe those people will wait to get insurance until they get REALLY sick...insurance companies will love that...and will charge accordingly to make up for the expense of having to take care of these cheapskates...so we'll ALL wind up paying more because of them.

I just don't get it! Is the consensus of the American people that right is wrong and wrong is right? Republican neocons and teabaggers will be dancing in the streets if the neocon influenced Supreme Court declares "Obamacare" unconstitutional. But what will they be dancing ABOUT? So they'll be free to pay higher premiums? Or not pay any insurance, and pay $100,000. to $500,00. out of their pockets for an operation? I just don't get it!
03:28 AM on 09/29/2011
I object to buying it because I CAN"T AFFORD TO PAY THE PREMIUMS, AND MY DEDUCTIBLE WAS $7000. Any more questions? And I'm NOT a conservative... far from it. The mandate without a public option is unconscionable.
zinxeb
Empathy ends cruelty
03:56 AM on 09/29/2011
Is that what "Obamacare" is charging?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ron Maede
All the World's a stage, Huffpo's my mic check
10:31 AM on 09/29/2011
The Affordable Care Act inlcudes provisions to assist people (up to 100%) that can't afford premiums.

Plus, $7000 deductibles are illegal under the new law.

The law mandates that anybody selling insurance in America can only offer policies that meet certain requirements for coverage, cost, and exclusions.

No more ripoffs!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Thaag Tidestalker
Axial Tilt: the Reason for the Season!
07:22 AM on 09/29/2011
Exactly. In anticipation of the mandate, insurance companies are squeezing out of us as much as they can. I can offer an example from personal experience: Three years ago, I was a smoker and paid $75/mo for my health insurance. I quit smoking, got a new job and they have exactly the same insurance provider. Nothing else has changed in my health except I QUIT smoking. I now pay $210/mo for health insurance. I was informed that, were I still smoking, I'd be paying over $400/mo. That is a 500% increase in the rates in 3 years!
justobserve
Not left nor right or center. Just a free thinker!
08:31 AM on 09/29/2011
People don't realize that your rate increased is not due to the health care reform. It's the trend for decades that's why we need the reform.
zinxeb
Empathy ends cruelty
01:46 PM on 09/29/2011
Maakes you want to start smoking again...or start drinking!!