More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Richard Geldard

GET UPDATES FROM Richard Geldard
 

Mr. President, You're On Your Own

Posted: 11/08/11 04:24 PM ET

In 2008, millions of people saw the presidential election as a matter of crisis and principle. Deep into two wars and debt rising, Barack Obama was a new voice, stunning in his eloquence and a stark and welcome contrast to the aging McCain and the Crazy Lady from Alaska. Small contributions flooded in to the Obama campaign through the internet as genuine hope for change defined the contest.

This time around, as election season approaches, there's something different in the air. At least there is for this participant in the process. In 2008, as a Senior Citizen with a fixed income and a budget, I gave more than was sensible for me to the Obama campaign. It was a compromise. Not so many meals out, fewer trips to see relatives and friends, smaller gifts for Christmas.

This time, though, the President is on his own. He's running as the incumbent. According to Politico and the Huffington Post, he's got big money, even lobbying money according to the Times. In other words, he's not hurting for cash. He has a war chest.

But on this end, thanks to the European debt crisis and utter stupidity in Congress (thanks Norville), the country and its people are suffering big time. Here, in the country where we live, it's the food pantry that needs our money. It's people who can't heat their homes, kids without warm coats to wear to school. I have a neighbor who teaches first grade who has to buy books and supplies for her thirty-two kids. And she has two kids of her own and a husband working two jobs.

So, My President, sorry to say, you're on your own this time, and I wish you well. I hope you're re-elected, I really do. You've done a good job, except maybe not getting tough with Congress soon enough. Fortunately for you, the Republicans are making fools of themselves and have no one of quality to offer or any policies that make sense.

As for us. I'm sending out a check to the local food pantry tomorrow and, please, DNC, don't call anymore, especially at dinner time.

 
 
 

Follow Richard Geldard on Twitter: www.twitter.com/richgeldard

In 2008, millions of people saw the presidential election as a matter of crisis and principle. Deep into two wars and debt rising, Barack Obama was a new voice, stunning in his eloquence and a stark a...
In 2008, millions of people saw the presidential election as a matter of crisis and principle. Deep into two wars and debt rising, Barack Obama was a new voice, stunning in his eloquence and a stark a...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 56
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
02:10 PM on 11/09/2011
I understand the author, but since the Citizens United ruling, money is an even bigger factor in elections than before. I know President Obama has slipped up here and there - he needed to control the message and didn't; he needed to get tough with Congress; he needed to compromise less and fight harder and louder - but I also know that if we allow the Republicans to take over in 2012, the America where hard work and playing by the rules once paid off will never be recaptured. They will push their anti-middle class, anti-woman, anti-equality agenda and set us back to dark and sorry times. This year, more than any years past, financially supporting Obama and progressives is critically important. It's our future. It's who and what we want America to be.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SageFire
Loves Teachers, Helpers, Protectors
12:30 PM on 11/09/2011
Well, I guess the rest of us will just have to work harder then and give more money on your behalf and others who are impatient with a President who for some reason couldn't bvlly the House and Senate into doing things they didn't want to do.

Elections matter.
11:18 AM on 11/09/2011
Here is the one advantage to a Republican .
Even if he were to stack his administration with Wall St and serve the interests of the 1% while pushing austerity on a citizenry forced to bail out the 1% who crashed the economy--
We wouldn't have to pretend he was anything different than what he is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jcaunter
Profile: schizoid, INTJ, IQ145
10:10 AM on 11/09/2011
I wouldn't say that Obama's presidency has been a total failure; after all, Obama has done splendidly well at making his "savvy" Wall Street friends even richer than they already are. The fact that the lives of the American people are much more miserable today than when Obama took office in 2008 is really just an unfortunate confluence of circumstances that Obama really had no control over I bet.
QuantProgrammer
Cap welfare benefits at two kids.
09:55 AM on 11/09/2011
The best hope for Republicans and Democrats is electing a kooky but principalled old man in 2012. And he's not a Democrat.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
William Horden
Author: The Toltec I Ching & The Five Emanations
09:29 AM on 11/09/2011
Richard,

Thanks for taking what is too easily an intellectual discussion away from the head and returning it to the heart. When even the positive and constructive politicians effect no change, we all end up sharing this sense of disappointment. Perhaps this is what will inspire us to act with a common grassroots purpose and take our lives back from the machine that has grown up around politics.

Great article,
William
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
rgeldard
07:15 PM on 11/09/2011
William

Thanks for this and for writing what truly lay behind what I wrote. I feel used when the emails come pouring in and the phone rings every night asking, no, demanding that I contribute. I do trust your reactions to these pieces; don't hesitate to let me know if I go off line.
09:26 AM on 11/09/2011
This president has been terrible. He is just as beholden to special interests as Bush was. Not a penny Obama. Not a penny.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dawlishgal
09:24 AM on 11/09/2011
I, too, am giving no more money to the Democratic fund-raising committees. I feel as though I were conned the last time around The instant I saw Obama's choices for every single appointive position, I knew that he didn't really want any significant change for the better. A bunch of fusty old DLC corporate-kissing Democrats, Wall Streeters, and even a few Republicans, all invested in the status quo. Rahm Emanuel, for Gawdssake. And his replacement appointees haven't been any better...Leon Panetta griping that the Pentagon budget can't be cut.

And the thrust of the money requests has turned from "hope and change" to "At least we aren't as bad as the Republicans." And the same PR guy is heading Obama's campaign. No thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thinkingwomanmillstone
I'm nervous. My life is under a Micro-bioscope.
08:50 AM on 11/09/2011
You are certainly doing a good thing by donating to a food bank. One has only so much money and people are suffering. However, just hoping that Obama wins is the same as standing by and doing nothing. If the republicans win, food banks will have many, many more customers and your budget will be stretched even further by changes to medicare and social security. Get out and encourage your friends to vote democrat...put sweat equity into the election instead of dollars. If you've been paying attention, you know where the real blame is centered...it's not with the dems. Don't let disappointment lead you into complaisance or a belief that the republicans are not so much worse than the dems....for they are really a lot worse for seniors, poor , unemployed, disabled, or ill Americans. If you are among the 1%, then you'll be fine...if you can stomach your success on the backs of the rest of the citizens of the US.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
SageFire
Loves Teachers, Helpers, Protectors
12:29 PM on 11/09/2011
Faved from a fan, said much better what I was feeling and thinking as I read this article.
08:42 AM on 11/09/2011
Well said and couldn't agree more. I voted for him the first time with trepidation and will doubtless vote for him a second time definitely holding my nose. He is a failed president, in my opinion, who blew opportunity after opportunity. I think he's extremely lucky the Republicans have failed to find a viable candidate and that no third party has risen from the ashes of American democracy.
12:02 PM on 11/09/2011
And what have you done to help bring about change? Just sit back in your comfy chair and criticize Obama for not doing all the work for you?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
aspertame2
My other avatar is a sparkly rainbow care-bear
04:55 AM on 11/09/2011
There were a few golden years of opportunity there that a Democrat controlled Congress could have done so much -- and instead demonstrated their preference for gridlock. I'd swear I heard an audible sigh of relief when they lost seats and any chance (risk) of passing legislation reviled by their corporate patrons.

So Obama went from "Yes, we can!" to...I don't know, I think it's something like "Are you with us?" Makes me want to create a bumper sticker answering "Considering the sheer hidiousness of the alternatives, yes, I will vote for you. But please don't take that as exactly a ringing endorsement."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
vietveter
Wish ididnt know now what ididnt know then
08:03 AM on 11/09/2011
I don't wish bad things on him, I just wish he would . . .

quietly. . .

go away.
02:58 AM on 11/09/2011
If Romney gets in office you'll be writing a hell of allot more of those checks to the pantry.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
07:11 AM on 11/09/2011
What makes you think that?
JacksonJones
Absit iniuria verbis!
12:03 PM on 11/09/2011
Romney's and the GOP's economic policies, which produced the current state of affairs.
02:12 PM on 11/09/2011
Romney IS the 1%. Every policy he claims to back (this week) is anti-worker and pro letting the rich get richer.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Chris1962
NYC
01:59 AM on 11/09/2011
>>>According to Politico and the Huffington Post, he's got big money, even lobbying money according to the Times.>>> LOL. What were the chances.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LV711
Democracy for All
12:23 AM on 11/09/2011
So in essence, it's better to sit it out and allow the Republicans to control the ENTIRE congress? Both the House and the Senate, are responsible for today's economy by simply not allowing a vote to even discuss the American Jobs Act. Not only has the House blocked President Obama's jobs bill, the Republican House has not allowed any of the other 16 (I've lost count) jobs bills presented by Democratic members to be heard.

So if you think the country is bad off now, wait and see what not voting for President Obama gets you.
photo
Pavane
I pick my battles and walk from the rest.
12:47 AM on 11/09/2011
Richard - the author - is not saying he won't vote for Obama. He's just saying that, unlike last time, he won't being giving money to Obama because the President already has a good war chest.

So instead, he'll give to the local food pantry. They REALLY need it.
01:43 AM on 11/09/2011
How does choosing not to donate to a candidate distill to sitting out?

He didn't say anything about not voting for him, just not sending him his money.
photo
CenaW
Did you know AOL belongs to A L E C
12:21 AM on 11/09/2011
You are making a mistake. Your absence will aid the Republicans, do you really think things will get better if President Obama loses, If more Republicans are elected to the Senate and the House.

Don't you have even clue one about who controlls tne so called news in this nation since the de-regulation of the 1980s?

Are you one who fell for the lies/hate campaign against Jimmy Carter.
Have you fallen for the glorification of the disaster of the Reagan years?
The rehabilitation of Richard Nixon
The already begun cleaning up of the public message about Geo. W. Bush.

They do intend to do to President Obama exactly what they did to Jimmy Carter and
what they spend several hundred million of tax payer money doing to
bring the Clinton Presidency to an early end.
You continued to back Clinton even with his revolting zipper problem. \

Why are you abandoning President Obama? Is it beacuse the ultra-conservative Republicans have an even firmer grip on the national message (called news) than ever since the Great Depression.
This is far worse than even the McCarthy era.

Sure hand over the nation . . . to another Republican President/Congress and kiss your
Social Security/Medicare good-bye.
Say good-bye to the U. S. Postal Service
Say good-bye to any tax supporteed higher education and

Look at the Heritage/CATO/Heartland/AEI/ALEC & the other conservative think tank pages to see exactly what the plans are for you.
01:47 AM on 11/09/2011
Who said he was abandoning Obama? Despite the fact that the president failed to live up to his own hype, the author said nothing about abandoning him. He merely stated that he wouldn't be sending him money.

It's entirely possible that the president has lost the faith of the democrats who voted for him and the independents who didn't quite believe in him but weren't going to vote for Mccain all on his lonesome. Obama has been a disappointing president, mostly because of the hype from his own campaign, and is failure to actually BE the progressive he was presented as.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
rgeldard
07:41 AM on 11/09/2011
Since dies money equal support? I gave more than I could afford in 08. If indeed Obama loses, it will not because he's missing my meager contribution. It will be because unemployment will be sitting at 9 % on election day.
wsdave
Abusive or Insulting? I won't be responding.
11:17 AM on 11/09/2011
And we'll still have troops dying in the field.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Ann Clark
Fat cats eventually sink...
11:17 AM on 11/09/2011
Well said piece regeldard! I will not be donating any pennies in comparison to all the money he has, but I will definitely be at the polls voting for Obama and dragging along with me anyone who wants a glimmer of hope to the mess we are in. Let's be frank. We did not get into this mess in 3 years and we all know it is impossible to fix without every american pitching in. It's like asking an obese person who took years to acquire the weight to lose it in exponential speed. Bottom line: Republicans are working for their constituents--which is not anyone making less than $500,000 annually. Mitt, Perry and the rests of the millionaires have nothing in common with the backbone of this country but the air they breath. I know Obama is not the perfect choice, but in this bag of potatoes, he is the only one that doesn't stink.