iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors

We write on behalf of dedicated individuals who believe that a large number of America's most urgent problems can be solved by simply electing candidates on November 2 who have the guts to do one simple thing...

Commit to making America Energy Independent on clean, American energy by the end of this decade.

That's it.

A commitment to Clean Energy Independence will:

  1. Create millions of new jobs, almost overnight
  2. Create new industries and a new, vibrant economy where we actually make things again,
  3. Stop the funding of foreign terrorists, prevent the ability of one dictator or one country to unilaterally choke off our energy supply and vastly increase America's National Security and Sovereignty
  4. Create a sustainable planet for our children
  5. Allow us to keep trillions of dollars circulating within the U.S.
  6. Be a heroic investment in America and generate the largest return on any investment in the history of our country, ultimately supplying virtually free energy for the rest of our lives and our children's lives
  7. Allow America to successfully compete with China and remain the world's #1 economic power into the 21st Century.


It's time!

This is not a partisan issue. It is an American issue and one that is critical for our very survival as a nation. Republican presidents Nixon, Reagan, Bush and Bush as well as Democratic presidents Carter, Clinton and Obama have, for over 40 years, warned us about our addiction to foreign oil, our pandering to dangerous dictators and regimes, the economic insanity of sending a billion dollars per day out of the country! In fact, way back in 1973 Richard Nixon created "Project Independence" and set a national goal for The United States to develop "the potential to meet our own energy needs without depending on any foreign energy sources" by 1980. It is embarrassing that we haven't reached that goal today, 30 years later, shameful that we haven't really even tried and more important now than ever before.

But, crippled and drunken on special interest money like a pathetic beggar with a bottle of whiskey and a tin cup, our Congress has failed to stand up to Big Oil and their lobbyists and make any significant progress to bring Energy Independence to America.

Accordingly, there is really only one issue in this election ... GUTS.

Does America have the guts to really -- no kidding -- create new jobs by investing in and building new infrastructure that will allow us to get off of foreign oil and become Clean Energy Independent?

Do we have the guts to think like Dwight Eisenhower or JFK? Can we be visionaries who plan beyond this fiscal quarter and build the modern day equivalent of a national highway system or a bold new space program, and create an energy system that can power America, on American Energy, through the rest of The 21st Century?

Do the 472 candidates we will vote for on November 2 have the courage to be real leaders?

We have come together to ask America to think beyond the lobbyists, the millions of dollars of special interest attack ads, the political bickering and also beyond party or political philosophy. American sovereignty is not a political or a partisan issue. Being held hostage to the whims of oil dictators half way around the world should never be an option for a country as ours. Sending at least $360 Billion out of the country every year for something we could produce here with American jobs is a travesty and spending an additional $50 Billion every year to send our young men and women in the military to protect those countries and supply routes that provide our addiction to foreign oil adds to the insanity.

We are better than that. We are The United States of America.

And yet we are slowly becoming a 2nd or even a 3rd world country, as Arianna Huffington writes, as our infrastructure crumbles and China, (while boldly employing 6 million of her people in new, clean energy technology jobs), heads towards their complete economic domination of this country, and the world, for the rest of The 21st Century.

Yes We Can manufacture and install solar panels and solar mirrors on our homes and in our vast deserts across this great land.

Yes We Can manufacture and install even more windmills that capture the great winds that sweep through our plains.

Yes We Can build a permanent infrastructure that utilizes Geothermal energy for cooling and heating our homes, energy efficiency technologies that lower the need for heating and cooling, tidal energy that taps the great forces of the oceans that kiss our shores, even more efficient internal combustion and a seismic move to electric cars including the conversion of all Government vehicles, conversion to LEDs, biodiesel and algae farms that can produce the liquid fuels of the future, piezoelectricity and smart grids that efficiently distribute power when and where it is needed and other amazing, creative solutions.

The technology is here. Now. We can certainly have conversations about more oil drilling and nuclear energy but these are not clean, are not renewable, are many years away from making us energy independent and are not our future or the future of the 21st Century.

If everyone who wanted America to become clean energy independent by the end of this decade went to the polls on November 2 and voted for candidates that would make this happen, it would happen. That's the beauty of Democracy. We have the power. WE the people elect EVERY one of the 435 members of The House of Representatives and a determinative number of United States Senators on November 2.

We stand together for this vision and, in collaboration with three great clean energy pioneers - The League of Conservation Voters, The Sierra Club and The National Wildlife Foundation Action Fund -- have compiled a bipartisan list of those candidates who these organizations believe have the guts to do what is necessary for a 21st Century America.

It's up to you. The media will hardly talk about this issue, but we must because we can become Energy Independent on clean, American energy by the end of this decade. Join us and Maroon 5, Jason Mraz, Rosario Dawson, Jason Alexander, Michelle Rodriguez, Peter Coyote, James Cromwell, Noah Wyle, Ed Begley, Valerie Harper, Brenda Strong, Rosanna Arquette, Felicity Huffman, Richard Belzer, Tate Donovan, Richard Schiff, Melissa Fitzgerald, Deidre Hall and foreign friends of the campaign, Sting, Trudie Styler and Graham Nash, in supporting the bipartisan clean energy candidates listed at www.EnergyIndependentCongress.US so we can, in THIS election, get off of foreign oil, put our people back to work and finally solve some of the deepest, most profound problems facing this great country!

Richard Greene is an attorney, political and communication strategist, author of the Prentice Hall coffee table book, "Words That Shook The World: 100 Years of Unforgettable Speeches and Events"

Marshall Herskovitz has helped shaped American culture with his Emmy Award winning television series, "30 Something" and many movies including "The Last Samurai" and "Dangerous Beauty". He is immediate past President of The Producer's Guild.

Paul Haggis is an Academy Award winning writer and director ("Crash", "Million Dollar Baby") and co-founder of Artists for Peace and Justice. Richard Greene is author of "Words That Shook The World: 100 Years of Unforgettable Speeches and Events" and ran for Congress on the Green Party, on this very issue, back in 1992. Richard@WordsThatShookTheWorld.com

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 51
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
05:26 AM on 10/30/2010
excellent article. thanks for the link.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:44 AM on 10/28/2010
"We the people" have the power to change this country. If you don't show up to vote, you can't complain. JUST DO IT
08:56 AM on 10/27/2010
I'm with you, but you haven't mentioned any of the ramifications--in addition to the "new" industries, old ones will have to come down and there will be a period of transition. nothing can happen "overnight"--that sounds a little naive. It's going to be hard.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
05:27 AM on 10/30/2010
don't trip on disbelief before you even begin to walk. it's happening now. the article is about supporting the effort.
06:33 AM on 10/27/2010
Regarding point number 7.
This is the 21st century.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
03:06 AM on 10/27/2010
Energy choices carry more weight than any other subject. Military goals and budgets, employment, pollution and health care costs, national security, all are improved by clean energy implementation.
miloiki
sweet as can be
12:49 AM on 10/27/2010
Gee. I'm sure our Federal Government in Washington DC can do all of this and more. But why take 10 years. We should only elect leaders who will promise to accomplish all of these things in...10 minutes. Yes, 10 minutes. If we can send a man to the Moon and return him safely to Earth, then we surely can solve all our energy problems in 10 minutes. Why, the Federal Government works so well! And it really does a good job at everything it tries. Let's demand a whole stable of "Tsars" who can direct juicy contracts to all their favorite pals. I mean to oversee all the good works. And the several hundred thousand folks who work in the Oil Industry? Screw them. They shouldn't have taken jobs there in the first place.
03:28 AM on 10/27/2010
Cute. Oil jobs here in the US would be as they are. And, oh by the way, the Federal Government gives the oil industry about $75 Billion of our tax dollars every year.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:06 AM on 10/27/2010
yeah, and how dare people try to stop the wars. think of the tens of thousand of private contracting jobs (or mercenaries, whichever term you wish) would be lost. How dare!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MerryW
12:47 AM on 10/27/2010
There is alot of whining going on in some of the comments. We do need to start seriously building clean energy. Yes, it will be hard and, yes, it will take time but we must start. Oil and gas jobs will transition away slowly as the process will take much time but we must start. Not much will change suddenly. It will not be "the death" of the big oil companies they are still needed But we must start with choices. That is critical. The jobs market "green" makes will absorb the unemployed. Heaven knows we have loads!!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
05:31 AM on 10/30/2010
faved for being rationale.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
The other mike
10:10 PM on 10/26/2010
I couldn't agree more, but you're preaching to the choir. Whenever a candidate, such as Robin Carnahan, proposes any tax on fossil fuels in order to promote renewable sources of energy, she gets hit with an ad that goes something like this:

"Robin Carnahan is in favor of job killing energy taxes."

The folks in Branson or Ozark hear this and say "Can't vot for her. She wants to raise taxes."

Until we have $5 gas or long lines at the pumps, how can you get ordinary people to understand how important energy independence is? How can you compete with the millions of dollars the oil and coal industry spends on lobbying congress?
10:56 PM on 10/26/2010
Spot on. Fanned.
03:45 PM on 10/26/2010
those three guys that wrote the article are pretty silly... it is ALL ABOUT POWER.. not jobs.. the GOP would burn the country down to the ground to get that power.. the dems will have to do the same to keep up.. or be considered a joke.. well,, they are more than half way there.
photo
Dredd
Our government is a wartocracy.
03:28 PM on 10/26/2010
What do you say to the argument and the evidence that Carol Browner is the evidence that shoots down your assertion?

http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2010/10/youre-doin-heckuva-job-browner.html
06:36 AM on 10/27/2010
Appears to be written by people who think 'ballistic' must be used in every sentence.
photo
Dredd
Our government is a wartocracy.
03:25 PM on 10/26/2010
Not likely.

Politicians say one thing during the campaign then do another thing when sworn in.

Try reading the history of environmental law vs. oil baron profits.

http://blogdredd.blogspot.com/2010/10/glorious-addictions-war-oil-2.html
06:37 AM on 10/27/2010
'Addicted' to the word 'addiction' here. Not much else.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:20 PM on 10/26/2010
Jerry Brown is the only person running who GETS IT. It's not "independence" if it's the same Big Energy pigs running the show! Big Solar and Big Wind are just as bad for America as Big Oil because they kill wilderness for money, and stand between US and OUR tax dollars, OUR rate dollars, OUR sunshine and OUR public land.

What the people want is INDEPENDENCE FROM ALL BIG ENERGY, that means a serious, generous feed in tariff that supports CLEAN ENERGY AND EFFICIENCY SITED IN OUR BUILT ENVIRONMENT, not another Chevron project destroying our healthy, fragile desert ecosystems.

Stop being so THEORETICAL and start thinking deeper. Democracy depends on US decentralizing and cleaning the grid. Ask George Schultz and James Woolsey - 2 of Reagan's top guys - both of them SUPPORT FITS and do not want to see the new era be one of centralized, remote, vulnerable power plants, shooting electrons long distances.

They understand that sunshine is ubiquitous, that local grids are more secure and reliable, and that LOCAL ECONOMIC BENEFITS will flow from LOCAL CLEAN POWER production. We can't afford another "kill wilderness for money" period on this planet. The built environment is plenty big to supply all the renewable energy we need. Let's start there, pay PEOPLE not Big Energy for producing clean power while creating twice as many jobs as Big Solar and improving property values.

We can't do this wrong again, just to cave into Big Energy. THINK GLOBALLY, INSTALL LOCALLY!
photo
artleads
Let's have a national retreat.
04:51 PM on 10/26/2010
God bless you, Sheila. I'm SO grateful for your insight. With a little infusion of cash I'm expecting, I plan to use solar on my roof to supply all my energy needs. I don't klnow the technicalities, but I'm hopin'. From watching HG TV station (229) I discern a quiet revolution in home design that will make your vision a reality. Down with big energy!!!!! More power to Jerry Brown!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:02 PM on 10/26/2010
right back at you, artleads!

be sure to sign up at www.1BOG.org so you can consolidate your installation with others in your area and receive 15-20% discounts (because one bidder gets all the jobs). i am not affiliated with them, but i have seen them in action - it's incredible! they will help you size your system properly and answer all your questions, and it is no obligation at all to actually use their service or install solar at all, although i hope you will!

we are working hard to get programs going called feed in tariffs so WE can be paid fair rates for producing clean energy on our own rooftops. you may have heard that Germany is having a solar renaissance, and it's 100% due to their (very generous) FITs. We have a lot more sunshine than they do, and many more rooftops, so this could make a real difference here!

we are also working to get PACE loans back on track, so that people can install solar with no money down, repay it through a special assessment on property taxes (and you will save enough each year to make those payments), and the loan stays with the house if you sell, making it much easier to buy and sell property (which will immediately be worth more if you install solar!)...

Thanks for your support, and please keep up the fight for TRUE energy independence, which means independence from ALL Big Energy parasites!
03:01 PM on 10/26/2010
"...We can certainly have conversations about more oil drilling and nuclear energy but these are not clean, are not renewable, are many years away from making us energy independent and are not our future or the future of the 21st Century."

Why do writers on the Huffington Post group nuclear and oil together in the same sentence? There is plenty of uranium-238 and 10 times as much thorium-232, both of which are fertile isotopes which can used to breed fuel for reactors. Nuclear power in the US has virtually eliminated oil used in electric power generation and replaced many oil burning ships in the US Navy. Nuclear went from zero to 20% of US electricity generation in just a few decades, and that was when our economy was substantially smaller than it is today. Nuclear power is very clean; containing its waste products in a volume that's just 1% the volume of the Great Pyramid Giza.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
Cut on the bias
03:13 AM on 10/27/2010
More false statements and concealed facts about nuclear power. Not clean, not renewable, not safe, not cheap , not interested.
02:13 PM on 10/27/2010
In the space allotted for comments it could be written the number of reactors, amount of fuel, tons of ore mined, and total activity/volume of spent fuel that would be needed to meet US base load electrical needs (~75% of total electricity consumption). Could you do that for your preferred energy source that meets your figure of merit (FOM) for Clean, Renewable, Safe, and Cheap? What exactly is your FOM, and why doesn't nuclear power meet it?
08:06 AM on 10/28/2010
Thoughtful response, PoloniumMan. Here's why?
1. Regardless of how much of the resource is available now, nuclear is not renewable energy. It is finite and, as such, wars (maybe 10 or 50 years from now) could be fought for it if and when it does become scarce. Not true for solar or wind.
2. The waste is still an issue. Not true for solar or wind.
3. American taxpayers must subsidize this source of energy forever by having government insure the plants as a meltdown would melt down any private insurance company, and maybe even the country's resources. Not true with solar or wind - build the infrastructure and it is virtually free and will not be a target for terrorists.
4. It takes very long to build nuclear plants and they are enormously expensive.
04:48 PM on 10/28/2010
My response:
1. Assuming that US electricity use doesn't grow much more (achievable with efficiency improvements), there's enough energy accessible in the uranium already mined out of the ground to meet this country's energy needs for several centuries. Not renewable, but certainly on a time horizon that enables other technologies to mature. Load balancing for wind and solar require natural gas; a finite source.
2. Radioactive waste is not an issue for solar or wind, but there's still a waste stream with the manufacture, installation and maintenance of these systems. The waste stream from nuclear can be reused if we choose to (see response #1).
3. Nuclear power companies buy into insurance worth $15B. This is to cover an accident that involves the complete release of the fission product inventory, which at over 100 tons per core, would be a very difficult task. US reactors won't explode and burn like Chernobyl. The government funding is after the private insurance is used. Bring on the terrorists; I'd rather they waste their time and lives trying to attack a nuclear power facility than kill me with a backpack bomb in the DC metro. I'll take a 30-year cancer risk over a prompt explosive death any day.
4. We built over 100 reactors in just over two decades in an economy that is smaller than what we have today. If we as a country decide to build more plants, we are certainly capable of doing it in an affordable manner.
02:50 PM on 10/26/2010
I'm not an energy expert, but I am an engineer and as an engineer I've looked closely at most of the "alternatives". Long story short, if you really want an alternative to foreign oil, the only decent ones are Nuclear and Natural Gas.

Unless you want to pave over every endangered habit in the country with solar farms, that's out as a major player. Wind has the same issue. Solar has the different issue of needing significant amounts of highly toxic chemicals in a VERY energy intensive process. If you want an eye opener on the viability of solar, do the research on the amount of watts needed to make a panel versus the watts that panel gives over its useful life.

More speculatively, I am betting that if you start sucking major amounts of power from wind and wave, you will find fish, fowl, and forest will soon be deprived of what they need that we didn't understand.

Except for nuclear and geothermal energy, ALL energy on earth is solar. Petrochemicals are solar energy stored up from the past. All presently incoming solar energy is already needed by animal and plant species we have decided are critically important. There is no untapped ready source.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:30 PM on 10/26/2010
According to the DOE, PV energy payback is ~2 years for a 40 year product. Polycrystalline panels produced in the US, Germany and Japan all RECYCLE all toxic materials.

Rooftop solar is the first undertaking we need. WE can own it, and the sun shines everywhere in this country. Agreed about paving over wilderness, but it's simply not necessary. There are more than enough rooftops, parking lots and in-city brownfields to fully power this country during daylight hours, and to fully power it 24/7 once better storage solutions come online. Prices are dropping and capacity factors are increasing all the time on PV, too.

No moving parts, no wasted water, no drilling and poisoning, no dead deserts, no Big Energy mercenaries, no new transmission, no construction emissions which increase global warming, no hackers or terrorists, no weather or pricing/supply manipulation blackouts, and no additional cost to ratepayers (if we implement feed in tariffs properly).

Local solar is a total win.
09:30 PM on 10/26/2010
Solar power certainly has it's benefits, but I think you overstate them a bit. The DOE did not say that the payback is 2 years* and the 40-year life is an exaggeration. If solar panels are installed on a new home, over the 30-year life of the loan, the system will fall to 58% of their installed output, with at least 10% of all cells failing completely.

* 2016 Levelized Cost of New Generation Resources from the Annual Energy Outlook 2010
[2008 $/Megawatt hour]
Conventional coal........................................100.40
Natural gas, conventional combined cycle......83.10
Wind...........................................................149.30
Advanced Nuclear........................................119.00
Solar PV......................................................396.10
Solar thermal...............................................256.60

full table can be viewed at - http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/aeo/electricity_generation.html
03:32 PM on 10/26/2010
Thanks for the thoughtful comment. By the way, the $6 Billion solar facility that has just been approved in the California desert uses mirrors not panels and is a great step forward. When JFK commited to going to the moon by the end of the '60s there was nowhere near the appropriate technology to accomplish that task. My first computer, in 1984, had 400K of memory. Today it has 200G. If we make the committment, Jgourtay, resources and innovative brilliance will flood in to solve all of the challenges you raise.
photo
paddio
We are men of honor..lies do not become us.
01:23 PM on 10/26/2010
The United States is the only nation that has not built nor has any plans to build "Real" High Speed Rail."Real" means 200mph or higher...not like the Accela 150mph for 30 miles or so .This gigantic hole in our economy could very well be our salvation. Industry in every state would benefit from a project on such an enormous scale. Roadsand bridges , at the end of the day employ no one after wards. HSR would through service and maintenance employ many once it is built. To the skeptics...Robert Moses built Jones Beach with 10 parking lots for a thousand cars each when there weren't 10,000 cars in the country. Put Americans back to work in America... good honest working men and women are desperate. Many...(and you can see them on the road) are scrounging for scrap metal, just to make ends meet. College graduates...not in their twenties but in their 40',50's and 60's are taking any jobs they can find. 3 trillion for Iraq...2 bill a week for Afghanistan and Fox duped fools think 50 or a 150 billion is gonna break us,and call it "Socialism"! What about Socialism for the Military Industrial Complex and Wall Street? That's OK? Real HSR connected to commuter rail systems would make alternative fuel vehicles relevant, employ millions, spur new , greener technologies. Unless you put people back to work they will turn a deaf ear to new ideas.
02:57 PM on 10/26/2010
The reason for this is pretty simple to understand: it will be a massive financial sink hole. It will be a massive financial sinkhole for two reasons. First, the process will be IMMEDIATELY co-opted by progressive politicians who insist it benefit the "disadvantaged and underserved". What this means on the ground is that instead of charging fees to the rider sufficient to cover the cost (aka Delta Airlines), it will be subsidized. It also means that instead going from points to points where those able to pay for it (aka, Delta Airlines Business Travellers) want to go, such as Wall Street to the Chicago Board of Trade, it will be routed from Harlem to South Chicago and stop at every third podunk town in between.

Second, it will fail to offer any advantage. Guaranteed in the first 6 months of operation there will be a shooting or stabbing, at which point TSA cavity search security will be in effect. At this point, you've got the same misery as you do at the airport. What would be the point? Show up 2 hours early so you can travel at 200mph versus showing up 2 hours early so you can travel 600mph?

You want to make it work? Eminent domain the route between places business travelers go, make the stations in the office parks, with a policy of showing up 5 minutes before departure.
photo
paddio
We are men of honor..lies do not become us.
03:31 PM on 10/26/2010
GIVE me a massive financial sinkhole that actually CREATES something....the last three economic bubbles,Junk Bond,Tech and Real Estate were about churning existing wealth. Add to that the two Cheney Contractor wars with unlimited money pouring overseas. OF COURSE there will be massive theft, graft and regulation....but at least it would be HERE and for the most part working men and women would have job opportunities (and not in some High Tech fairyland of the future requiring massive educational training). and by the way...I guess your last venture into Harlem was in the 60's....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vetxcl
05:43 AM on 10/30/2010
if you're talking financial sinkhole, then you should already know that completely describes airlines. airlines, themselves report and acknowledge losses, particularly on relatively shorten hops from city to city - where most hsr trains are to be installed and used in this country.
fails to offer an advantage in your mind, but noone else's. uses less fuel (according to airline reported avgas usage in short hops), improves environmental quality and offers faster commutes on city to city routes. (guess you've never spent any time in an airport, waiting , and waiting, and... never been bumped off a flight, etc.)
it's clear you don't want to make it work (hsr) , but that's ok. it'll work just fine without you.