Richard L. Revesz and Michael A. Livermore
GET UPDATES FROM Richard L. Revesz and Michael A. Livermore
 
Richard L. Revesz is Dean and Lawrence King Professor of Law at New York University School of Law. Following judicial clerkships with Chief Judge Wilfred Feinberg of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, and Justice Thurgood Marshall of the Supreme Court of the United States, Dean Revesz joined the NYU Law faculty in 1985, and was appointed dean in 2002. He has published over 50 articles and books on environmental and administrative law. His work on environmental regulation, the use of cost-benefit analysis, and more has set the agenda for legal scholars for the past decade.



Michael A. Livermore is the Executive Director of the Institute for Policy Integrity. He is the author, along with Richard L. Revesz, of Retaking Rationality: How Cost-Benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health (Oxford University Press, 2008). Livermore has been a postdoctoral fellow at NYU’s Law Center for Environmental and Land Use Law and has served as a judicial clerk for the Honorable Harry T. Edwards at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. He has published several pieces of legal scholarship on topics including environmental regulation and international food safety standards.

Blog Entries by Richard L. Revesz and Michael A. Livermore

Questionable Economics From The Economist

Posted February 28, 2012 | 02/28/12 07:57 PM ET

When the Obama administration moves forward with stronger environmental protection, some see a "phony theology" at work. But most thoughtful observers see a moderate administration steering a middle course, irritating businesses with increased protections when they are cost-benefit justified, but also frustrating environmentalists with a relatively slow pace...

Read Post

A Year of Rethinking Regulations

16 Comments | Posted January 17, 2012 | 01/17/12 11:22 AM ET

Imagine you're the CEO of a major national corporation with two million employees and 312 million customers. Now imagine having no consistent plan to revisit past decisions to determine what worked and what didn't.

That's how our government behaved until a year ago when President Obama put new rules...

Read Post

Questionable Conclusions About Bias at White House Regulatory Review Office

Posted December 2, 2011 | 12/02/11 03:42 PM ET

The office in the White House that considers the costs and benefits of new regulations is being accused of bias in a recent report report by the Center for Progressive Reform (CPR). Concerned that the Obama administration is using its political compass to reduce public protections, the...

Read Post

Clearing Up Health Care Choices

Posted July 7, 2011 | 07/07/11 07:01 PM ET

Anyone who's shopped for health insurance knows what a headache the process can be. The disorienting maze of features, benefits, and coverage options can leave consumers under-protected even when they've overpaid.

The federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is trying to create a clearer, better menu for policy...

Read Post

Mortgage Counseling: HUD Should Do More Than "Incorporate by Reference"

Posted June 22, 2011 | 06/22/11 03:49 PM ET

According to some, the housing bubble came crashing down in the fall of 2008 partially due to the predatory lending practices of mortgage banks. Part of the problem may have been consumer confusion when it came to the fine print of complex financing arrangements. Unknowingly, homebuyers might have signed on...

Read Post

Thirty Years of Regulatory Review

Posted March 29, 2011 | 03/29/11 03:13 PM ET

Thirty years ago, President Reagan put cost-benefit analysis at the heart of how agencies like the EPA and OSHA do business and initiated one of the most important recent developments in how the federal government works.

In a 1981 executive order, Reagan instructed the Office of Information and...

Read Post

Who Benefits from Regulation?

Posted February 23, 2011 | 02/23/11 02:10 PM ET

Regulation has become a hot topic in recent weeks. There have been executive orders to reform them, hearings to scrutinize them and budgets to defund them. But in all these forums, one side of the balance sheet is often absent -- the fact that regulations create significant economic benefits.

Read Post

Obama's Executive Order: Olive Branch to Whom?

Posted January 20, 2011 | 01/20/11 04:37 PM ET

Tuesday's news of a new executive order on regulatory review was not welcomed by some progressives. President Obama announced his move in a Wall Street Journal op-ed, and it was widely perceived as an olive branch to regulated businesses.

But in its substance, the

Read Post

Hold the REINS: Regulations Generate Major Economic Benefits

Posted January 4, 2011 | 01/04/11 12:48 PM ET

When human health and safety are at risk, Americans expect their government to protect them. We assume we are guarded against risks like lead in children's toys or poisons in our drinking water. And for the most part, these protections deliver benefits well beyond what they cost.

A proposal...

Read Post

The EPA's Dangerous Delay

Posted December 20, 2010 | 12/20/10 10:38 AM ET

A mini-firestorm erupted recently in response to the EPA's attempt to stall on a regulation to clean up mercury pollution from industrial plants; environmentalists see the move as a political cave in the face of a newly empowered congressional opposition.

The political case for stalling may be...

Read Post

Scrutinizing Inaction

Posted July 15, 2010 | 07/15/10 01:21 PM ET

With the announcement earlier this week that President Obama will nominate Jacob Lew to replace Peter Orszag at the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), it is worth taking a fresh look at how decisions are made within that agency. When the Environmental Protection Agendy (EPA), or any other federal...

Read Post

Cap and Trade Was Republicans' Good Idea

Posted March 8, 2010 | 03/08/10 10:04 AM ET

Cap-and-trade is business' best friend.

Though lawmakers are contemplating scrapping cap-and-trade on carbon as "political poison" its flexible market-based structure makes it the most efficient and business-friendly way to reduce pollution.

That is why Republicans proposed the idea in the 1980s.

None of the climate change bills...

Read Post

Last Best Chance for Climate Legislation Before 2013?

Posted February 17, 2010 | 02/17/10 11:34 AM ET

The climate change bill that passed the House last summer looks likely to die in the Senate. So, with the political machinery in Washington grinding to a halt, and an upcoming mid-term election cycle that looks bad for Democrats, is climate change legislation dead for the foreseeable future?

Maybe not....

Read Post

Sotomayor's "Green" Decision

Posted May 28, 2009 | 05/28/09 08:56 AM ET

Both Enviros and Industry May Be Reading Too Much Into Riverkeeper v. EPA

Judge Sonia Sotomayor's paper trail on the environment is slim, but one decision has drawn praise from environmentalists, and some concerns from business. In Riverkeeper v. EPA, Sotomayor wrote the opinion for the court of appeals. She...

Read Post

If Boehner is worried about the cost of cap-and-trade, he should support 100% auctions and refund.

Posted May 6, 2009 | 05/06/09 02:51 PM ET

Last month, MIT economics professor John Reilly was surprised to learn that his April 2007 report was in the news two years after its release.

His research on the costs of cap-and-trade systems found only a modest cost for American families under the plan. But, some members of...

Read Post

Two years after Mass v. EPA, Van Hollen comes through with a winning solution

Posted April 2, 2009 | 04/02/09 07:49 AM ET

Two years ago today, the Supreme Court ruled that the EPA must regulate greenhouse gases as pollution. It was a decision that should have set off a landslide of action that would begin to rein in carbon emissions in America. But in the nearly 22 months before he left office,...

Read Post

No Free Lunch for Millionaires

Posted March 16, 2009 | 03/16/09 07:38 AM ET

Obama wants to stop energy companies from eating our lunch - we shouldn't fight him.

In our backwards political climate, President Obama's sensible carbon cap proposal has gotten him in hot water with everyone from utilities to members of the green movement. While other plans give away pollution permits to...

Read Post