The country is currently immersed in a wide-ranging (let's call it healthy) discussion about health care. This overhaul of the for-profit system we use is alarmingly overdue so the debate is on in every city and town.
Without going into detail for days, some Democrats, including our leader, are trying to enact a plan that would revamp the entire industry. Part of it would mean Americans could essentially purchase low-cost insurance from the government. This is called the "public-insurance option." Whereas people can be turned down by private insurers for a myriad of preexisting conditions, a public option would be available as a service to all citizens, subject to the contours of the law Congress will one day pass.
Opponents of the White House plan are quick to break out the s-word: Ah, socialism. This is a funny label, considering that we use it almost exclusively as a pejorative term in the United States. Users trot out names like "Stalin" and "Chavez" in an effort to align their political opponents with these figures. You know -- "HUGO CHAVEZ IS ALSO FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE! BE SCARED!"
.jpg)
As usual, context is king. S-word users conveniently pay no attention to the fact (and are hoping we are to dumb to notice) that in America, all of the following things are provided by the government, yet for some reason are not decried as "socialist" initiatives:

Let's not debate the features and bugs of the public option. There are better (and plenty of) places for that, and such a robust discussion deserves more than an entry in a fabulous blog. It is worth noting, though, that public options available in foreign wildernesses like Canada and England and South Africa (just now) are at least passable, if not successful and efficient.

I want all parties on both sides of "the aisle" to take a deep breath and think: A public option is not socialist. It isn't rooted in evil. It isn't even anti-capitalist. It is public.
Yeah, I get the fight is too lucrative for the big insurance companies to lose so dirty tricks will abound. But for once in the new America could our politicians have an honest debate without fear-mongering to score political points? I know hyperbole is the order of the day every day in DC, but I beseech you, Men and Women of Congress, to give it a rest. Name calling isn't helping 50 million uninsured brothers and sisters.
One thought: Dial it down for the good of the public or expect the fight of your lives, Representatives.
[For more chatter on the good trends, see blog Laermer.com
Follow Richard Laermer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/laermer
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Many conservatives are stuck in the cold war era. They're stuck in the McCarthy Era, and still obsessed with with socialism. Yet at the same time they know nothing about the political and economic aspects of socialism.
tube.com/w atch?v=4h3 cJQJkc_o
This video clip sums up what many conservatives THINK they know about socialism.
http://you
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with