iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Richard Schiffman

GET UPDATES FROM Richard Schiffman
 

North Carolina Legislature Prepares to Ban Sea From Rising

Posted: 06/06/2012 11:15 am

Once upon a time, the great King Canute, strolling on a beach with his courtiers, ordered the waves to halt. Yet they kept on coming. It was a lesson intended for the monarch's fawning sycophants. Canute was showing them that there are limits to power. Even a king can't stop the sea!

This lesson seems to have been lost on the members of North Carolina's legislature. They are getting ready to vote on a bill that would prohibit government agencies from preparing for the estimated three feet rise in coastal sea levels which a state-appointed science panel has predicted will occur before the end of the current century. In fact, this forecast may soon be stricken from the public record -- because it takes into account the impact of global warming. And global warming isn't happening, right?

Sounds like something you would read in the satirical weekly, the Onion. But no, it's right there in the Charlotte Observer, North Carolina's leading newspaper. The headline reads: "Coastal N.C. counties fighting sea-level rise prediction." These counties have banded together, the paper says, to pressure the state lawmakers to cut the bad news about the ocean from the report of the N.C. Coastal Resources Commission.

If the Republican-dominated legislature votes as expected, scientists will be prohibited from factoring in the anticipated impact of climate change and the accelerating melting of the polar icecaps on Carolina's low-lying coastal communities. By legislative decree, the state's own researchers will be forced to base their predictions solely on historical climate data, rather than the acceleration of global warming that climatologists expect to occur in the coming decades.

Why are these politicos forcing the hand of the scientists? That's simple! Because North Carolina, home to Cape Hatteras and roughly two thousand square miles of low-lying coastlands, could stand to lose untold millions in developer dollars if the news about rising sea levels got out.

Never mind that the news already is out. Never mind that continuing to build up this hurricane and storm-surge alley is inviting disaster -- even at current sea-levels.

What's proposed is just crazy for a state that used to be a leader in marine science," East Carolina University geologist Stan Riggs who studies the evolution of the coast told the Observer. "You can't legislate the ocean, and you can't legislate storms."

But apparently you can in North Carolina, which is bent burying its head in the sand, as far as climate change is concerned. If you don't admit that you have a problem, maybe it will just go away. That seems to be the idea in North Carolina. The Observer reports that several local governments on the coast are not waiting for the legislature to act. They have already passed their own resolutions against sea-level rise policies.

Yet increasing beach erosion on the Outer Bank is evidence that higher seas are already taking their toll in the Tarheel state:

"As a result of the acceleration of outlet glaciers over large regions, the ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica are already contributing more and faster to sea level rise than anticipated," according to Eric Rignot of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. "If this trend continues, we are likely to witness sea level rise 1 meter or more by year 2100," he adds, citing a figure which -- while alarming enough -- is regarded as being rather conservative in some scientific circles.

Based on the growing consensus of scientific opinion, other coastal states are now dealing more realistically with climate change in their contingency planning. Maine is preparing for a two-meter sea level rise by 2100, Delaware anticipates 1.5 meters, Louisiana one meter and California 1.4 meters. Southeastern Florida is looking for a two-foot rise by 2060. North Carolina, by contrast, expects to be exempt from the sea's advance, and plans for only an 8 inches rise by the end of the present century.

Good luck, North Carolina in your goofy tilting at the climate change windmill. But when your emergency preparedness plans come up disastrously short, your insurance costs shoot through the roof, and your brand new coastal developments get swept out to sea, don't come crying to the rest of us to bail you out!

 
 
 
FOLLOW GREEN
 
 
  • Comments
  • 23
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:20 PM on 06/16/2012
"If I just close my eyes, the train won't hit me" - North Carolina Lawmaker
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Elijah Greenleaf
antidisestablishmentarianista
05:04 PM on 06/12/2012
Eight is as high as North Carolina republicans can count without taking off their shoes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Metcalfe
Caught at 1st. slip trying to cut
08:53 PM on 07/08/2012
I think I've missed the point here :-). Why 8? Just askin'.
09:13 AM on 06/11/2012
A couple of minor scientific quibbles. It's not the melting of ice that is the major contributor to the rise of average sea level, it's thermal expansion of ocean water. Water levels will rise even if no land ice melts. Of course, if the great ice sheets of Greenland and Antarctica melt faster than predicted, that's an extra 10 metres, but that's likely to be an issue for next century, no the next few decades. Also, the rise in sea level will not be the same everywhere. It varies by latitude and according to the geography of the ocean, the land, and currents. It happens that North Carolina isn't getting as big a sea level rise as other areas. I assume that the forecasters are taking this into account. Unfortunately, North Carolina's coast is more vulnerable than other areas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reynoljh
04:49 PM on 06/10/2012
What planet do you live on?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
reynoljh
04:48 PM on 06/10/2012
North Carolina is home to three outstanding coastal geologists, Stan Riggs, Orrin Pilkey, and Rob Young, all of whom have published about rising sea levels. It's a shame our state legislature does not have the brains to consult with them.
03:01 PM on 06/08/2012
I do appreciate them going on the record as climate change deniers. It will make the histories a little easier to document. Otherwise these clowns and everyone else trying so hard to deny global warming will be easily forgotten as they try to find a way to blame it on the President of the United States in the same manner they already deny that it was under the eight-year watch of Bush that our economy was driven into the tank by the Republican greed machine.
04:12 PM on 06/07/2012
Frankly, I would think twice before investing in any low-lying coastal community. After all, we don't know when sea water will seep into fresh-water wetlands and into ground water. So the nutting politicos in North Carolina are not really solving the problem. They are ignoring it. I definitely would not want to underwrite 20 or 30 year mortgages on the Outer Banks. And as a tax-payer, I don't want to bail out banks that do.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:46 AM on 06/07/2012
The temperatures have increased just 1 degree in the last 100 years. Clearly the state is doing the wise and prudent thing here and not wasting tax dollars in studies that have no effect or likely never happen.
02:28 PM on 06/07/2012
Dana1982: While the air temperature during the daylight hours have not increased by much more than one degree Farenhait, the nighttime temperatures have increased by more than that at your latitude. Even more significantly, the ocean temperatures have increased significantly, perhaps by as much as 4 degrees in the tropics, and more in the arctic. Also the loss of ice in the Arctic Ocean, Antarctica, and Greenland reflects the absorbtion of enough heat to have raised the ocean temperature by another 3-4 degrees, and the amount of change in the albedo of the earth is adding to that rapidly. I think you're right about wasting tax dollars though. Let's confine our studies of surviving sea level increase to the West coast. Let North Carolina sink.
02:56 AM on 06/07/2012
Let's get terrified about something over which we have no contro , so we can ignore the things we might be able to stop...like the war machine
http://notrickszone.com/2011/09/17/slowing-sea-levels/
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
windwolf
09:54 PM on 06/06/2012
Legislate away scientific truths! What a farce, which only reveals how corrupt these developer paid off legislators are. Well seems to me they are leaving themselves open to law suits/damage claims from preventing common protective and disaster preparedness procedures from taking place. When the Republicans are running the show, anyone with enough money can gain their cooperation, even to the point of endangering the populace that they were elected to serve.
08:35 PM on 06/06/2012
"What, me worry"? Alfred E. Newman. These yoyos won't be alive to worry about it anyway. Why should they worry? Ignorance is our biggest danger and this just proves it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
GhostOfFDR
Your micro-bio is too brilliant to be approved
08:28 PM on 06/06/2012
North Carolina is the new South Carolina, as global warming predicts. Could rising temperatures be directly responsible for the stupification of North Carolina? Or are South Carolinians simply migrating northward as temperatures rise?
06:17 PM on 06/06/2012
Please check the four stations in North Carolina
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_states.shtml?region=nc
Not one is above 1 foot in 100 years.
Mean Sea Level Trend
8652587 Oregon Inlet Marina, North Carolina
"The mean sea level trend is 2.82 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence
interval of +/- 1.76 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from
1977 to 2006 which is equivalent to a change of 0.93 feet in 100 years"

Can't you rant about a real danger, like the microwaves from the smart meters/smart grid?.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
windwolf
10:03 PM on 06/06/2012
Which 100 year period are we talking about. The 100 years past, or the 100 years from now? I do believe that the science community is predicting sea level rises over the coming 100 years. A big difference when all indications reveal a continuing dramatic increase in both glacial and ice shelf melt, and predicted massive ice shelf break off, as predictors of the rise in ocean levels over the long term.
02:33 AM on 06/07/2012
Give it up. The warming was over 15 years ago and CO2 is plant food.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:17 PM on 06/06/2012
Finally someone came up with a way to stop climate change! Who knew it could be this easy?
06:02 PM on 06/06/2012
Sorry, the rate of sea level rise on the whole East Coast has been steady for years. There are four stations in North Carolina and the highest rise shown is less than 1 ft in 100 years
.Mean Sea Level Trend
8652587 Oregon Inlet Marina, North Carolina
The mean sea level trend is 2.82 millimeters/year with a 95% confidence
interval of +/- 1.76 mm/yr based on monthly mean sea level data from
1977 to 2006 which is equivalent to a change of 0.93 feet in 100 years.
http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends_station.shtml?stnid=8652587