iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Richard T. Hughes

GET UPDATES FROM Richard T. Hughes
 

The Christian Right in Context, Part 3: Politics Over Persuasion

Posted: 11/25/10 07:55 PM ET

Fundamentalisms, wherever they appear around the globe, typically emerge in response to crises that throw the world out of joint.

In the previous installment of this four-part series, we noted how a wide variety of cultural crises threw the world out of joint for conservative American Christians in the early 20th century and prompted the rise of the Fundamentalist Movement.

The Rise of the Christian Right

By the 1960s, the world was out of joint again, prompting the rise of the Christian Right.

During that period, the United States experienced another great wave of immigration. While many of these newer immigrants were Hispanic Catholics and Pentecostals, many others were foreign to any kind of Christian agenda whatsoever. They came from places like Thailand, Cambodia and South Vietnam; India, Pakistan and Nepal; and Lebanon, Iran and Egypt. And they brought their religions with them: Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism and many other religious traditions largely alien to most Americans at that time.

While this new wave of immigration was not the immediate catalyst for the revival of American fundamentalism, it formed an important backdrop to that revival. At the very least, it spoke loudly to fundamentalists that the diversity they found so objectionable 50 years before had now come to their shores in ways they could never have imagined. And it alerted them to the fact that any hope they may have had for the renewal of Christian America was now at risk. If they intended to recreate the Christian nation their forebears from the 19th century had constructed, time was running out.

Against that backdrop, several factors threw the world out of joint in radical and disturbing ways: the War in Vietnam, the countercultural revolution that engulfed so many young Americans and the Civil Rights Movement.

It was not so much the Vietnam War as the massive and vehement rejection of that war that frightened conservative Americans since the anti-war movement rejected so much of the glue that had bound the nation together for so many years. Patriotism, Christianity and virtually all the foundations for traditional American culture were now under assault.

In that context, traditional morality also fell on hard times since the countercultural revolution morphed into a sexual revolution and a culture devoted to psychotropic drugs.

But in many ways, the most important seismic shock that threw the world out of joint for so many conservative Americans was the Civil Rights Movement. For a hundred years, Americans had lived in a nation segregated by race, and many whites, both North and South, found any attempt to change those racial patterns profoundly threatening.

These were the forces that prompted the rise of America's Christian Right.

What permitted the rise of that movement is the fact that fundamentalism had not gone away in 1925. Fundamentalists had simply retreated from the public square into their churches and there, in these underground silos, they nurtured their dreams of a Christian America.

No one understood this better than Jerry Falwell, pastor of one of those silos, the Thomas Road Baptist Church in Lynchburg, Va. And in 1969, playing off language popularized by President Richard Nixon, Falwell pointed to a great "silent majority" of Americans who supported the war in Vietnam, who had deep reservations about Martin Luther King Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement, and who rejected what they regarded as the growing countercultural radicalism of the Left.

And then in 1979, Falwell launched his "Moral Majority," the vanguard of the Christian Right.

The extent to which the Christian Right is unthinkable apart from the seismic shifts that jolted the American cultural landscape in the 1960s is obvious from Falwell's own response to Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Movement.

In 1958, four years after the Supreme Court handed down its landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision, outlawing racial segregation in America's public schools, Falwell thundered from his Thomas Road Baptist Church pulpit, "If Chief Justice Warren and his associates had known God's word and had desired to do the Lord's will, I am quite confident that the 1954 decision would never have been made. ... The facilities should be separate. When God has drawn a line of distinction, we should not attempt to cross that line."

Later, he rejected the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as "civil wrongs," distributed FBI-generated propaganda defaming the character of Martin Luther King Jr., and attacked King as a Communist in a sermon he preached from the pulpit of his Thomas Road Baptist Church in 1964.

Then, in 1966, he side-stepped Brown v. Board of Education by establishing Lynchburg Christian Academy which the Lynchburg News described as "a private school for white students."

Falwell's school was one of literally thousands of segregationist academies established by white Christians in the American South to avoid compliance with federal law regarding racial integration. The vast reservoir of opposition to Brown v. Board of Education among those Christians helps us understand that the potential pool of support for the Christian Right was extraordinarily large and was only waiting for someone to sound the call to battle.

While one cannot imagine the rise of the Christian Right apart from all the seismic jolts that shook the American cultural landscape in the 1960s, it was opposition to racial integration that finally galvanized that movement and prompted the formal emergence of the Christian Right in 1979.

Paul Weyrich, a Falwell ally, had tried for years to create a conservative, faith-based political movement with national cache. He had proposed numerous issues as potential rallying point -- abortion, school prayer and the Equal Rights Amendment, for example -- but had failed in every instance.

Weyrich later recalled that what prompted conservative Christians to coalesce into a national political force was their strong reaction against an attempt by the federal government to rescind the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University for its violations of Brown v. Board of Education. Falwell later complained, "In some states it's easier to open a massage parlor than to open a Christian school."

And so, in 1979, Falwell and his colleagues created the first visible expression of fundamentalism in America's public square since the Fundamentalist Movement retreated from public view in the aftermath of the Scopes-Monkey Trial in 1925.

They called it the Moral Majority.

Within the next few years, other fundamentalist leaders created similar organizations. James Dobson, a well-known Christian psychologist and radio personality, launched his Family Research Council in 1981. And in 1989, Pat Robertson organized his Christian Coalition.

The Christian Right in Historical Context: Persuasion vs. Politics

Obviously, the Christian Right, at least at the time of its inception, resisted the core, seminal values that the Founders framed for this nation -- the values found in the conviction that "all men are created equal" and endowed with the "unalienable rights" of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

And it resisted as well the defining spirit of its age -- a spirit that would move inexorably toward the expansion of freedom and equal rights for blacks, Hispanics, women, gays and all minorities within the borders of the United States.

Of course, at the time, no one knew that the spirit of the age was moving in that direction. At the time, the future of the nation seemed up for grabs. The religious "glue" that would define the nation for the third century of its existence and beyond was hotly contested ground in the 1960s and 70s. And that is precisely why Robert Bellah has called that period "America's third time of trial."

When we compare the Christian Right with the two other major attempts to Christianize the nation -- the Second Great Awakening of the early 19th century and the Fundamentalist Movement of the early 20th century -- the differences are stunning.

Obviously, the Christian Right stood shoulder to shoulder with the earlier Fundamentalist Movement -- and parted company with the Second Great Awakening -- with its lack of interest in social justice and its rejection of equal rights for African Americans.

But the Christian Right parted company with both the Second Great Awakening and the Fundamentalist Movement with one immensely far-reaching decision. If those two earlier movements had limited themselves to persuasion in their respective bids to shape the soul of the nation, the Christian Right combined persuasion with raw political power and sought to force its agenda on the nation by controlling the nation's political structures.

Because they were bent on controlling the nation, they clearly had no other choice, since their agenda stood so completely opposed to the religious "glue" that had bound the nation together for so many years -- the "glue" that had been forged in the partial agreement between the Founders and the Second Great Awakening.

Leaders of the Christian Right therefore pressured senators and representatives at every level of government for legislation favorable to prayer in America's public schools, for legislation that would ban abortion under all circumstances and for legislation that would substitute the Genesis account of creation for evolutionary science in public classrooms. At the same time, they sought to use the political process to undermine measures favorable to diversity and pluralism: the Equal Rights Amendment, gay rights and even the U.S.-Soviet SALT treaties.

Since the 1980s, they have sought to elect to office at the federal, state, and local levels candidates who would pass legislation in sync with their vision for a "Christian America." They therefore drew up "report cards" on both candidates and actual officeholders, grading them on their compliance with a host of measures they wished to see enacted into law. They then distributed those "report cards" through fundamentalist churches throughout the United States, thereby transforming their constituency into a significant power bloc in American politics.

By 2004, it became obvious that their efforts had been extraordinarily successful. By 2004, the Christian Right effectively controlled the Republican Party, the House of Representatives and the Senate. That fact became evident in the "report cards" -- technically called Congressional Scorecards -- issued by one Christian Right advocacy group, the Christian Coalition.

Those report cards graded members of the House on 13 issues and members of the Senate on six. Forty-two members of the Senate earned an A+, a 100 percent score on all six issues, and 163 members of the House earned an A-, a 90 percent score on all 13 issues on which they were graded. And the Christian Coalition gave 45 senators and 186 congressional members a rating of 80 percent or better.

But four years later, in 2008, the election of Barack Obama as the first African American president of the United States suggests that the Christian Right -- at least as defined and shaped by leaders like Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson, James D. Kennedy, Paul Weyrich and James Dobson -- was falling into disarray.

In the final installment of this four-part series, we will ask how the Christian Right, in the midst of its disarray, emerged in new forms and structures during the presidency of Barack Obama, and how -- in those new forms and structures -- it continues to undermine Christian values on the one hand and American values on the other.

This four-part series is based on Richard Hughes' book, Christian America and the Kingdom of God (University of Illinois Press, 2009), and will continue with one more installment. Hughes is Distinguished Professor of Religion at Messiah College.

 
Fundamentalisms, wherever they appear around the globe, typically emerge in response to crises that throw the world out of joint. In the previous installment of this four-part series, we noted how a ...
Fundamentalisms, wherever they appear around the globe, typically emerge in response to crises that throw the world out of joint. In the previous installment of this four-part series, we noted how a ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 364
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Linda Williams
08:42 AM on 12/03/2010
Falwell criticized the Teletubbies; said one was 'gay' because the baby carried a purse. Falwell was supposed to be a man of "Family Values"; had this been true he would have known why the baby carried a purse. Coming out of and after the diapers are gone, one of the faves of toddlers is mum's purse. It replaces the diaper bag. It contains comfort, kleenex, bottle, and entertainment, keys, lipstick or anything from mum's purse. Had Falwell spent time with his kids he would have known that regardless of the gender children go through this stage. He was spending too much time at the casinos in Vegas, $10,000,000 in ten years, down the drain. He was a human being, true, but his finger pointing was despicable.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rainkitty
Lively up yourself.
08:01 AM on 12/03/2010
THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT AND THE RISE OF AMERICAN FASCISM
"This image of Christ as warrior is appealing to many within the movement. The loss of manufacturing jobs, lack of affordable health care, negligible opportunities for education and poor job security has left many millions of Americans locked out. This ideology is attractive because it offers them the hope of power and revenge. It sanctifies their rage. It stokes the paranoia about the outside world maintained through bizarre conspiracy theories.... The abandonment of the working class has been crucial to the success of the movement. Only by reintegrating the working class into society through job creation, access to good education and health care can the Christian Right be effectively blunted. Revolutionary movements are built on the backs of an angry, disenfranchised laboring class."
"This movement will not stop until we are ruled by Biblical Law, an authoritarian church intrudes in every aspect of our life, women stay at home and rear children, gays agree to be cured, abortion is considered murder, the press and the schools promote "positive" Christian values, the federal government is gutted, war becomes our primary form of communication with the rest of the world..."
http://www.theocracywatch.org/chris_hedges_nov24_04.htm
The Rise of the Religious Right in the Republican Party
http://www.theocracywatch.org/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mattjoe3
Once snowmobiled over open water
09:04 PM on 12/02/2010
You have to consider the possibility that God does not like you, he probably doesn't, in all likelihood he hates you, but we don't need him. --Tyler Durden
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jnw147
05:25 PM on 12/01/2010
Jerry Falwell was not a man from God! I didn't wish him any harm, nor did I rejoice when he died. However, the world is a better place without him and those like him!
10:32 AM on 12/05/2010
I think that he was actually most representative of the religion. It's tough to be completely representative when there are over 38,000 DIFFERENT versions available for purchase in America alone.
photo
farmilyman
everything is illusion
05:10 PM on 12/01/2010
What does a church contribute to society?
photo
alterego55
Flash your citations or leave!
08:34 PM on 12/02/2010
Tax deductions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vere15
Vero nihil verious (nothing truer than truth)
10:13 PM on 12/02/2010
Universal health care in Canada - Rev Tommy Douglas - but of course he was a traditional Baptist while Fallwell abandoned most of core Baptist doctrine and polity and fashioned his belief after Rev Ian Paisley and the evangelical frees (radical presbyterianism)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SocBeat
Bald and proud
03:37 PM on 12/03/2010
No, the CCF proposed universal health care, and the Conservatives eventually passed it. The fact that Tommy Douglas had a reverend n front of his name does not make health care a church contribution. I think you do a huge disservice to a lot of people by claiming otherwise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rich3324
Likes: Chasing villagers. Dislikes: Fire
03:21 PM on 12/01/2010
Tax the church.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Eric Shun
Pro-kids (adopted, foster, born and unborn)
01:03 PM on 12/01/2010
Wow - there is a lot of hate speech toward Christianity on here. I thought Libs were supposed to be a tolerant bunch - guess only when it fits with your views - huh?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
02:08 PM on 12/01/2010
Your post is at the top of the page as i write this.  I read down the thread to see what you mean.... and it does indeed read as though the subject of religion is close to many hurts.  Makes one wonder how that could be considering the actual words of most religions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Wood
A.T.C.G...(sigh)
10:48 AM on 12/01/2010
Our ancient mythologies and superstitions will, one day, bring about the mass suicide of Homo Sapiens.

" Man is the religious animal. He is the only religious animal. He is the only animal that has the true religion, several of them. He is the only animal that loves his neighbor as himself and cuts his throat if his theology isn't straight. He has made a graveyard of the globe in trying his honest best to smooth his brothers path to happiness and heaven ", Mark Twain

The religious right amplifies the need for separation of church an state...The religious right...ain't right...(sigh)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tulka2
Solidarity. Courage. Humor.
02:16 PM on 12/01/2010
It's just too easy to hone spiritual ideologies into hard edged political tools.   All the air would go out of organized religion if there were a spell that made religion impossible to talk about.  Then the only thing to be done about spirituality would be to live it.

Psychological studies demonstrate the more "dramatic" an individual's personal story, the less that individual is able to entertain or consider any other point of view.   Perhaps the whole messed up world comes down to post traumatic stress syndrome. ....?  All those people who have "come to" an organized religion usually have a really dramatic story to tell.  Ever notice that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Wood
A.T.C.G...(sigh)
02:25 PM on 12/01/2010
Yep...I've noticed. You make good points...(sigh)
08:14 AM on 12/01/2010
No one OWNS God and no church OWNS Christ. Read what God says to the 7 churches not pleased with any of them, is HE?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:33 PM on 12/01/2010
Then again without the bible's existence the Christian God wouldn't exist. It's no wonder Christians cling to their bible as a work of God.
10:33 AM on 12/05/2010
Now there are over 38,000 different versions of Christianity available for purchase.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vere15
Vero nihil verious (nothing truer than truth)
08:57 PM on 12/07/2010
Interesting stat - any particular reference?
08:04 AM on 12/01/2010
Trust no mere mortal man trust only in God and God alone, like Christ did taught us and showed us all. Christ bowed down to no organized religion, or organized Government on earth, what got him crucified and who came non violent. Christ showed us all God is not a violent punishing God, but a merciful God, of great Love and mercy Christ offered to ALL on earth. It is finished once and for ALL. Accept or not. Participate by letting Christ live in you and in helping to build God's world on earth.
07:59 AM on 12/01/2010
Christ proved that God is non violent on the cross. Christ ask and offers to ALL God's Grace of great infinite mercy knowing all have fallen under the Laws of Moses, all are sinners, by what we have freely chosen, by our free will given to all of us by God. The laws of Moses given where given to teach us what not to do, understanding in knowing right from wrong. Moses do not save us, Moses laws condem us all. Why Christ came, for there was NO one on earth to save us. For all were sinners. A rotten apple cannot make a rotten apple good can it. NO.

Christ came non violent, a righteous man, who distributed equality rights to all, and for all to share in. It is finished once and for ALL, it was offered to all sinners, all skin tones, all races, all human beings from all walks of life. Not till all the gentles have heard this offer given to all. 

Christ bowed to no one on earth, no organized religion on earth, no organized Government on earth. Christ served and bowed only to God and what Christ whole message was about. We  need no one to teach us understanding, to be OK with God, for God are true Divined Authority, creator of all, owns all, and has placed within every heart to understand, right from wrong. We are only to judge for ourselves, for our OWN salvation, to do always what is right and good, for the equality rights of all, and share in all that God, has given freely to all on earths, so no one can boast. For even the Pope will be judged. Why the saying those who have been given much will answer for much. Feed My Sheep. Not feed your own self interest of greed.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
03:20 PM on 11/30/2010
The "antogonism" between science and religion that many accept as fact is false. Both science and religion are about truth and understanding. True religion welcomes truth as much as true science, and both science and religion can be, and often are, misused to bolster personal prejudices.
The difference is that the methodology of science acknowledges the distorting influence of bias and builds in protocols to identify and minimize it. Scientists understand that bias may sneak in, no matter hard we try to avoid it, and scientists are taught to be open to the possibility of paradigm shifts.
That is not to say that scientists are able to entirely eliminate bias, or that no one in religion trys to identify and cope with bias. True religion and true science are very much alike in that both try to seek the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth; however, scientists are more likely to see their own failing than religionists.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bob Wood
A.T.C.G...(sigh)
10:39 AM on 12/01/2010
Absolute truth...was not...is not...ain't gonna be. ( Well...gravity gets pretty close )...(sigh)
11:13 AM on 11/30/2010
"Christian values" were not invented by the "Christian right." They go back to the founding of Christianity 2000+ years ago. Read the New Testament if you wish to discover Christian values. Here are some of its basic teachings: "Be not drunk with wine." Marriage is for a man and woman for life. All sex outside of marriage is forbidden. "Let no corrupt communication proceed from your mouth." No "filthy jesting." Children, obey your parents. Husbands, love your wives. Wives, respect your husbands. Hatred is the same as murder. Lusting in your heart for a woman is the same as having committed sin with her in reality. Give of your own means to help the poor, but most especially in the "household of faith." Nothing in there about turning that job over to the government. Do not lie, cheat, steal, defame, abuse. Obey the law as far as possible, unless it causes you to disobey God. Christ comes first in your life. All else in your life is to be submitted to Him. All of this is found in the New Testament. They are not inventions by modern Christians. Society's ignorance regarding the New Testament is at fault here. If you think "fundamentalist Christians" are strict in their views today, read up on America's earlilest Christians to see how much stricter THEY were. Morals have plummeted since that time. Our society has so severely devolved into intense amorality that it's just a bad joke.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:33 AM on 12/01/2010
Thats why Jesus prefered to spend his time with sinners and not those self-righteous

Love does no harm to your neighbor, it dwells inward and flows outward

Rules are external and forced inward, without end, fear or guilt of violation

Keep It Simple ...... Love God and Love Others
photo
alterego55
Flash your citations or leave!
08:36 PM on 12/02/2010
Love doesn't do any harm. But, Christian activism can destroy our society.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Joseph J Schuler
Sic semper theocratus
11:15 AM on 12/01/2010
A Truly sad and small minded philosophy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karen McCaughan
"Cogita ante salis."
10:11 AM on 11/30/2010
I am hoping the last installment will incorporate a section about how to combat their nonsense, and how to bring them out of their "cult."
11:39 PM on 11/29/2010
Very interesting post. I felt almost sick reading it....these people are opposed to everything I stand for. Respect for equality, compassion for the less fortunate, freedom of thought, embracing of new scientific truth and knowledge. It feels almost evil to me. My parents were ardent supporters of the "moral majority", and financially supported James Dobson and Focus on the Family. His advice on child-rearing in the 70's was about as destructive and backward as the movement's treatment of women and people of other races. Who knows how many children in christian families suffered terribly under this movement. We all continue to suffer from it, as the hateful and backward lies continue to influence public policy in the United States. I am hoping that the new generation will have a little more wisdom.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Karen McCaughan
"Cogita ante salis."
10:09 AM on 11/30/2010
I feel much the same as you and have similar family experience. I continue to hope that somehow the "christian right" will actually become Christian.

F&F
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Eric Shun
Pro-kids (adopted, foster, born and unborn)
01:06 PM on 12/01/2010
you expouse freedom of thought as one of your values... Why are you trying to discourage freedom of thought and the right of free speech from fundemental christians. Does that not make you a hypocrite?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
TBera12
Happy Pagan
04:20 AM on 12/03/2010
I don't see where she is doing that. There is such a thing as appropriate civilized behavior, though, and the fundamentalists have breached that, IMO. It is okay to offer criticism. As a matter of fact, Christians are commanded to police one another and to face off against those that breach the true mission of the Church (ambassadors). Athena is fulfilling the appropriate role of a Christian--to oppose what she sees wrong with what people in the church are doing. Blessings, Athena--I am #325.