More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Richard Trumka

Richard Trumka

Posted: June 21, 2010 04:17 PM

Who Are You Calling Names?

What's Your Reaction:

"Wop." "Hunkie." "Polack." "Kike."

When I was a kid growing up in Nemacolin, Pa., those are some of the slurs people used for us.

Why? Because our parents or grandparents came to this country from somewhere else, fleeing poverty and war, seeking opportunity and hope. As a kid, every person I knew who was older than 50 spoke broken English.

Those names hurt. But they also determined almost everything about us -- where we would live, where we would worship, where we would go to school, where we could work.

It wasn't easy. We were the last hired and first fired, the people who did the hardest and most dangerous work, the people accused of taking jobs away from others who had been here longer, the people whose pay got shorted because we didn't know the language and were afraid to complain.

But from the mines and the mills, the immigrants of my parents' and grandparents' generation built America.

Today, we have a new generation of immigrants. And the names and accusations are just as ugly. I hear it all the time. I even hear it from people close to me. "Those immigrants are taking our jobs. They can't speak English. They're taking over the country."

I couldn't disagree more, but I know where they're coming from -- an American economy in tatters, rampant unemployment, foreclosures, disappearance of health and retirement benefits.

They're anxious and angry. I'm angry, too.

There's justifiable anger at seeing our economy, our way of life, our security trashed. And it's being used by people who have a real stake in maintaining our economic disaster to turn working people against one another.

Many working men and women -- including union members -- were pretty confused that I would be speaking out on behalf of today's immigrant workers, as I did last week at the Cleveland City Club. But I can honestly say to them: An immigrant worker did not move your plant overseas. An immigrant did not take away your pension. A Mexican or Salvadoran or Guatemalan worker did not cut off your health care. His wife didn't foreclose your home. Her children did not crash our financial system.

Blaming immigrant workers for our economic catastrophe is like blaming shrimpers for the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

BP was too greedy to drill that well safely. And many U.S. employers are too greedy to pay workers a living wage, or comply with health, safety and labor laws. They've got exactly the immigration system they want -- plenty of workers living and toiling in the shadows, borders that are closed enough to turn immigrants into second-class citizens and criminals but open enough to ensure an endless supply of socially and legally powerless cheap labor.

Gripped by our own economic insecurity, it's often hard to see immigrants as mothers and fathers who are just trying to make a living and take care of their families -- people pursuing the same goals and dreams the rest of us have. Maybe it's easier to identify with or side with the rich and powerful.

I'm afraid too many working people are forgetting the painful legacy of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). It destroyed jobs and industries in this country. It destroyed jobs and industries in Mexico. It increased inequality and eroded workers' rights on both sides of the Rio Grande. Except for the people who are still profiting from cheap plants with low-wage labor and weak environmental and labor protections, it hurt us all. But Mexican workers are being blamed for the results.

We're not going to fix the U.S. jobs and economic crisis as long as we permit a two-tiered workforce and a two-tiered society, with recent immigrants who are easy to abuse, easy to underpay and too intimidated by our broken immigration system to demand better.

Border fences, military patrols and un-American laws like Arizona's aren't going to fix that.

We need a new national economic strategy for a global economy that focuses on creating good jobs and making trade fair, not just "free." But part of that strategy must be comprehensive immigration reform that brings workers out of the shadow economy, provides a path to legalization for hard-working, tax-paying immigrants, determines society's genuine need for more immigrants so corporations who just want cheap labor aren't calling all the shots and extends legal protections -- including the freedom to form unions and to be paid fair wages -- to every person employed in this country.

That will get us much closer to a healthy economy than calling names ever will.

 
"Wop." "Hunkie." "Polack." "Kike." When I was a kid growing up in Nemacolin, Pa., those are some of the slurs people used for us. Why? Because our parents or grandparents came to this country from s...
"Wop." "Hunkie." "Polack." "Kike." When I was a kid growing up in Nemacolin, Pa., those are some of the slurs people used for us. Why? Because our parents or grandparents came to this country from s...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 805
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
06:52 PM on 06/24/2010
It's not an IMMIGRANT problem. It's an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT problem.

Its the fact that their not paying taxes for our schools, hospitals, roads, etc - and that their sending their earnings back to their country. Yet their overfilling the schools and hospitals, driving on the roads (most of the time illegally) - and most importantly STEALING other IDENTITIES and Social Security numbers to fake their legality. This needs to stop.

You cannot compare the times of our ancestors with today, it makes no sense. No one has a problem with LEGAL immigrants, we're all immigrants - It's the ILLEGAL ones.

Arizona is doing the right thing! They're doing something about it - a lot of people are saying it's against their rights, but THEY HAVE NO RIGHTS, THEIR NOT LEGAL!

I'd like to see you go into another country and try to do the same thing - They'll ask you for your papers or permit to work. America needs to stop allowing this to happen. They need to tighten ship.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
08:29 AM on 06/24/2010
This is a superficial emotional article ignoring a couple of significant aspects: 1) illegal and 2) labor pool flooding. I'm neither rich nor powerful, but I am an interviewer who sees our recent grads and experienced workers bypassed for captive cheap labor when the actual hiring happens. True, legal/illegal immigrants personally did not kill our pension or foreclose on houses, our government's poor handling of the labor market with excessive legal and illegal immigration does. Hence the hostility and victimization of immigrants. Arizona laws are not un-American, they're trying to compensate for the federal government not doing their job - enforcing the national law. This whole argument is bizarre - equating legal immigrants with illegal and let's ignore the national law. Free pass here for breaking the law?!?! Again, because it worked so well last time?!?!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
waynesmyer
08:19 AM on 06/24/2010
How about my family! "Breed, Greaser, Mick, Krout, and the most demeaning of all: Texican
05:34 PM on 06/23/2010
Immigration is just another wedge issue--like gay marriage or abortion or flag-burning or welfare or school prayer--that have no importance in the real world, but which are used by disingenuous rightwing politicians to enflame prejudice--the most effective tool for getting elected, ask Schnickelgruber--whereupon they A. Do nothing about the wedge issue, and B. Proceed to funnel money to their rich friends. In other words, immigration means Republicans make their rich friends richer.
03:04 PM on 06/23/2010
Arizona's Un-American law? The law is the same as the U.S. law. So the American law is Un-American? HuffPost columnists for some reason like to muddle the distinction between legal immigration (good) and sneaking across the border (bad). What other country allows open borders? If illegals from Mexico are given a pass because they are poor and only seeking a better life, why not every poor person from every other country? Is there any border enforcement that you would support?
Illegals are not the cause of this country's problems, but they are emblematic of America's limp resolve to attack any problem for fear of appearing racist, as with Mexicans, or anti-Islamic, as with terrorists. America has a right to border security and defense against its enemies.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnJacobJingleheimer
05:16 PM on 06/23/2010
They exist from Mexico, as well as many central and southern American nations, in large part because we are bordered with them. If we were bordered with Bangladesh, guess what we would see. People from Mexico are not illegals, a term that probably makes you feel better about what you believe. They are individuals who have not yet had an linear opportunity to legalize themselves as opportunistic immigrants in a nation such as ours that has the most densely difficult and pain-staking processes than most others to become a legal resident. America has the right to protect itself against its enemies - okay. But, identifying who those enemies are, and are not, was the central thesis of the article, which I assume you read first. The problem with terminologies like 'the illegals' and such is that the modern culture war media is able to feed the public nonsensical ideologies about who is, and who is not, a threat to us. Yes, Arizona's law is Un-American. The laws 'we' currently have ( I question whether you know them, or ever pondered enough to vote for one of them), are laws which focus on determining who, how, when, where, and why people may immigrate, and that the federal government oversees the removal of offenders, after due process. Not your local cop who stops you for turning left in a no-turn zone. You can't draw good and bad distinctions about immigration if you don't have an inkling on how it works.
10:52 PM on 06/23/2010
The FACT is that breaking and entering into the US is a CRIME! It is punishable by prison time, and in most cases is a FELONY. THAT is why they are called illegals, just as we call burglars who are caught in our homes, BURGLARS, even though they may not have been convicted yet. They are ALL CROOKS! In the case of illegals, they have committed MANY OTHER crimes as well. To list just a few of them, ID theft, SS fraud, fraud, perjury, forgery, falsification of US documents, failure to register for the draft with Selective Service, welfare fraud, in short, is there ANY law that an illegal should obey? Do you think that we should have two systems of justice, one for Americans, and a more forgiving one for illegals?

I see that most pro-illegals think it is WRONG for illegals to be arrested for driving without a license, insurance, or car registration and having no ID on them. They don't even go to the trouble of getting a passport before illegally entering the US. There is a GOOD reason for that, so that if they are caught, they can use false names and ID to avoid prosecution. So they are mostly typical crooks. They are only law abiding when the laws don't conflict with their desires. If they don't like the law, they feel no need to obey it. THAT is NOT a law abiding citizen of any kind.
photo
voyager48
Illegitimi Non Carborundum
10:00 AM on 06/24/2010
you obviously have not read SB1070. Under federal law (and this is spelled out in SB1070) it is the exclusive right of the Fed to regulate immigration policy (decide who may be here) and to determine the legal status of an immigrant.

Under existing legislation it is the well established right of states to concurrenly enforce federal immigration statutes, and thia has been tested to the highest level of the country's courts . SB1070 merely reiterates this right and makes it a law at state level to do so.
12:54 PM on 06/23/2010
Great post, but I disagree with you on several points. What legal and illegal immigration have done is depress wages driving American citizens out of those industries. Meat packing is one such industry; it used to provide excellent wages but no longer does. And when the wages dropped American citizens left. We see the same thing in high tech too. Immigrants get visas because they have the skills needed and employers are able to pay them half of what a U.S. citizen makes. The Chamber of Commerce and big business worked together to make this happen because they don't like organized labor and they want to drive wages down.

As for NAFTA it is only one of many trade agreements that hurt our manufacturing and agribusiness sectors. Before that was granting most favored nation status to China.

I understand why people from Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean come here. Their countries do not offer the same economic opportunities. What's troubling is our porous borders and lax enforcement provide them a safety valve but also keep them from reforming what's wrong.
I'm for reform and amnesty and mandating wages and benefits are the same regardless of citizenship. Unfortunately I don't think Democrats are any different than Republicans; they both support policies that offshore jobs or drive down wages.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abbyrose86
02:43 PM on 06/23/2010
Actually it is much more complex than what you are suggesting.

The reason for the depressed wages, is more due to the following factors: CEO and executives taking a larger piece of the pie, supply and demand that increased supply of labor through outsourcing to other countries, technological advances which made many jobs obsolete, competition for jobs with 3rd world nations with lower standards of living, the power of unions and collective bargaining being lessened, the "supply side" economic theory's long term consequences, and many more, immigration is but one small factor. It's the combination of ALL these factors, which led to our current situation.
12:52 PM on 06/23/2010
I think we are all missing something here. Let's break down who are "illegal aliens". I think the consensus if that all illegal aliens are of some Mexican decent. I think that is a stereotype that is wrong.

Where is all the mention of the "rich elite" in our country who have become citizens that now have brought their families here, bought, because they can, their "citizenship." Guess what - they have no income, they've never paid into our system, and they are collecting medicaid and social security.

#2 - most of the "illegal aliens" are here on expired visas. Those people come here with work or student visas and never go home. And they never become "legal" citizens - who knows why - maybe the cost, maybe the fear of not passing the tests, etc....

Where's all the hoopla about them. Oh yeah, that's right, they are some form of "white", not brown and uneducated.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnJacobJingleheimer
05:21 PM on 06/23/2010
No, most people who are here are not here on expired visas. That group makes up only a fraction of those who entered the country illegally. People who are here on expired visas can, and often do, eventually become residents legally. If they receive employment offers, or family connections, they are legally able to process themselves. 12 million people (or so) would generally not remain in the shadows if they had that opportunity. If you enter illegally, or use fake documents to enter, you are not eligible under current law to later legalize yourself. The same is not true for the latter group.
12:44 PM on 06/23/2010
Well said Richard! Someone finally gets it besides me.
11:28 AM on 06/23/2010
It is illegal to hire someone who is in the US illegally. Why is it that no one complains about those who hire the illegals? The employers are breaking the law too, but apparently there are different standards for different law breakers -- its OK if you are rich and gready, but its not OK if you are poor and hungry. Demand creates the supply of illegal workers, not the other way around.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:52 AM on 06/23/2010
Let's say you want to build a fence in your back yard. You plan to do the most of it yourself, but you could use a little help digging the post holes - and maybe pulling out concrete where the old ones rotted away. A few blocks away there are a few hispanicos on the sidewalk willing to work like pack mules for half the pay and with a better attitude than the kid who used to mow your lawn. Do you say to yourself "those guys are probably here illegally - I think I'll put an ad in the paper looking for grunt labor" - or do you just get in the car and bring one over for the afternoon?

There's a reason you see these laborers gathering in most every town - they will do what others won't - and for less.

There's also a reason you don't see local young and not-so-young people standing there with them - even knowing that folks would hire them first because they are legal, local, and speak the language.

It's because they can't compete with folks who truly burn to make better lives for themselves through hard work...
photo
cyclone70
if there was a time to reach for the pitchfork
08:44 AM on 06/24/2010
There's that pesky "jobs americans won't do" meme again

you need to finish the sentence with "at the price employers are willing to pay"

Offer $30 bucks an hour and watch people line up.

As long as there are day labors willing to work for less and off the books, there will be downward pressure on wages for the legitimately employed worker
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:58 AM on 06/23/2010
Christians( that's what I call conservatives, since in general they are christians, just like illegals are in general mexicans, right?). Their bitterness/anger towards other people amazes me. Own up to your mistakes and the choices you've made in life, don't blame others for your failures in life.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:55 AM on 06/23/2010
Bottom line on the illegal immigration issue is that ANYONE who wants a better life for themselves or their loved ones would do the very same thing they do. It is almost impossible for poor people from ANYWHERE to legally migrate to the US - the process itself is expensive (and guess what - poor people don't have the money), and can take as long as fifteen years. If you lived in grinding poverty and knew for certain there was no hope for improvement, opportunity, employment or education for yourself or your family - you would pack it up and head on down the road. You would work like a dog at whatever job you could find, live six or eight in a room if you had to, and send whatever ever you could to your family until the day you could all be together again.

If you say you wouldn't - either you are a liar, a coward, or you don't love your family nearly as much as you let folks believe.

There is much about immigration that needs to be addressed - but demonizing those but for the grace of God could be you isn't one of them...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnJacobJingleheimer
05:23 PM on 06/23/2010
Nicely said, and FANNED.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nuyorican21
MALDEF Law Clerk
12:49 PM on 06/24/2010
In fact. I think Ayn Rand would be inspired by illegal immigrants.

Good post.
photo
cyclone70
if there was a time to reach for the pitchfork
10:23 AM on 06/23/2010
Mr Trumka's basic premise is correct. Many make the mistake of saying illegal immigration is a cause of economic trouble. the reality is that it is a symptom of failed trade and economic policy.

I have very mixed feelings on this issue, on one hand I have sympathy for a poor person trying to make a better life for himself and his family. Found in the desperate straits many of these folks find themselves in, I most likely would do the same.

However, we are a nation of laws, and to enter the country illegally when there are legal methods of doing so, shows a basic disrespect for the laws of our country, laws that are far less draconian than Mexico's. Plus it does represent a security risk as well

I doubt you would find anyone but the most bigotted that is against legal immigration, however it is the illegal part most people have a problem with, and I fear Mr Trumka, with whom I most always agree with, has fallen into the MSM trap of blurring the distinction between legal and illegal immigration.
photo
cyclone70
if there was a time to reach for the pitchfork
11:12 AM on 06/23/2010
So in conclusion, if you really want to address illegal immigration you need to treat the cause, - fix broken economic and trade policy.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnJacobJingleheimer
05:33 PM on 06/23/2010
Most people actually SAY that their problem is the difference between the legality of the situation and the illegality of it, but quite often, and I'm not saying that this is necessarily true of you, most people don't really know what the rules are, they just assume that because we have them, it must follow that they exemplify righteousness and everyone's up-to-date best interests. There is such a thing as regulations and processes becoming outdated and ineffectual. Sometimes, in order for a 'nation of laws' (does law always equal correctness?) to become aware of its need for improvement there must be a catalyst that indicates this need. When the catalyst comes in the form of people who seemingly have 'no respect' for the current process, we often justify ourselves by saying that they are simply and plainly breaking the law. But in fact, they are presenting us with the case that our laws need to be more closely looked at, because they were designed for use within a different era of immigration and economic realities. Change can occur both ways. It happens to be occurring now because the inflow of people overrides the current legal framework. That doesn't follow that those who represent the flow are criminals, and lack respect for law. Not any more than anyone who ever challenged status quo in order to achieve their own self-actualization. Look at history, and see that that has made America great as much as anything else.
photo
cyclone70
if there was a time to reach for the pitchfork
08:49 AM on 06/24/2010
OK - I hear what you are saying, and don't diagree there needs to be reform of the immigration laws.

However reforming immigration laws treats the symptom, it does little to cure the disease - which is as stated is bad economic and trade policy on both sides of the border.

Mexico needs to use its tremendous wealth of resources, arable land, tourism, mfg to make right for their own people, and we need to stop our reckless offshoring of inudstry
stateretiree
Yes, I know my micro-bio is empty!
10:06 AM on 06/23/2010
It is always easier to make someone the boogey man than accept personal responsibility. Greed has been the major downfall of our country.
09:55 AM on 06/23/2010
You say it right and so cleear. There are other factors. Of what I have seen, big companies use to make up financial nunbers and lie to their invetors to tell about growth and profits and working plans for next year. I know what I am talking about.
In the other side, the american companies look for lowing operatinal costs, so they hire services in foreign countries, that before were services performed by american people.
We cannot forget the issue that some economic interest have driven entire countries form a good position to the worst caos in the name of "freedom", as we have so many examples all aroun the world. And in my humble oppinion, is the main couse of inmigration.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tinyrainbows
09:37 AM on 06/23/2010
I grew up near Trumka and remember his early days with the miners and respect him. He's off base this time. He let his union dogma get the best of him on this one. His forefathers came here legally.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:37 AM on 06/23/2010
You are not the one to talk dogma - anyone who reads your archived comments will see that you carry water for those who have dismantled American prosperity and social mobility - with both arms, and in the biggest buckets you can heft...
12:46 PM on 06/23/2010
Well are you saying legally - just because there weren't many laws then????? I think it's a lot different now.