More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Richard (RJ) Eskow

Richard (RJ) Eskow

Posted: December 23, 2010 01:19 PM

Peter J. Wallison has a bright future...as a surrealist author. He and the other Republicans on the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission tried to undermine that group's work by attempting to ban phrases like "Wall Street" from its final report. Now he's trying to rebut news reports about their behavior. His response is a brilliant example of what might be called "uninentional literature," a hallucinogenic mashup of Lewis Carroll and George Orwell that belongs on everyone's shelf.

News reports said that Wallison and his fellow Republicans on the Commission also wanted to ban the words "shadow banking," "interconnection," and "deregulation" from a report on the Great Recession and its causes. That's like banning the phrase "plastic surgery" from a story about the Kardashians.

Not true, insists Wallison. "Only in the fever-swamps of the left could anyone believe that," he writes. For example, Wallison says he and his colleagues merely objected to the Commission's use of "Wall Street" as "a general term for the financial system." Wallison says it's unacceptable, politically motivated, and imprecise to use the phrase "Wall Street" as if it referred to the controlling financial interests of the United States.

Wall Street: n. The controlling financial interests of the United States.
- American Heritage Dictionary

What do dictionaries matter when you're rewriting reality? Wallison says he and his fellow Republicans were only willing to use the phrase "Wall Street" to mean "the major commercial and investment banks that were underwriters for the private label securities that the commission majority's report discusses."

That's like defining "Republicans" as "the people who tried to block health care for 9/11 responders." While it's true, it's only one, very narrow aspect of a much larger reality.

Wallison also ridicules the Commission's inclusion of Countrywide as part of "Wall Street" because its main office wasn't physically located on Wall Street. My old employer, AIG, wasn't on Wall Street either. We were a whole block away, on Pine Street. (There was a second building on Wall Street, with a connecting bridge between the two, but the main office address was 70 Pine Street.)

The Goldman Sachs main office is on West Street, so by Wallison's reckoning they're not part of "Wall Street" either. JPMorgan Chase is on Park Avenue. Morgan Stanley's on Broadway. Citigroup's on Greenwich Street. And Bank of America's way down in Charlotte, North Carolina. (Countrywide's headquarters was in California. That's not even in America.)

No wonder Wallison and his fellow Republicans were upset by the term "Wall Street." In their world, Wall Street doesn't even exist! That would explain the outrage. Imagine: The other members of the Commission, debased by political motives and lacking Wallison's mental precision, were actually prepared to use the phrase "Wall Street" as if it meant "the influential financial interests of the U. S. economy!"

Wall Street (noun). The influential financial interests of the U. S. economy.
- Merriam-Webster Dictionary

Wallison also objects to the fact that each of the four Republicans (call 'em the Fantastic Four) was to be given "only" nine pages in the final reports - 4,050 words, as he says - for their response. I'll spare you the math: That's 36 pages and over 16,000 words. That should be an especially easy target to reach now that they've trimmed so many words from the English language. (As Robert Borosage points out, none of the "forbidden words" appear in their minority... whatever it is... despite Wallison's statement that they didn't ban them.)

Sadly, Wallison doesn't explain the Fantastic Four's specific objections to the use of the terms "shadow banking," "deregulation," and "interconnection." That's a tragic loss for the world of literature. Here's a line from Wallison's official FCIC bio: "(H)e was General Counsel of the (Reagan) Treasury Department, where he had a significant role in the development of the Reagan Administration's proposals for deregulation in the financial services industry."

(Amusingly, the word "deregulation" was apparently scrubbed from Wallison's American Enterprise Institute bio after this flap became public. )

As for that disingenuous "minority"... er, something... Wallison won't call it a "report"... it simply parrots what Yves Smith rightly called "urban legends" about the causes of the crash. (More about that "minority non-report" here.)

Those false "legends" spun by Wallison and his friends conveniently hide Wall Street's culpability in our recent economic train wreck. That's good for Wall Street and Wallison. As an employee of the American Enterprise Institute, Wallison receives his paycheck from an organization that was created by New York business executives, and whose board includes senior officers from TPG Capital, Clearview Capital, Crow Holdings, the Carlyle Group, Harrison Street Capital, American Express, Hanna Capital, KKR, State Farm Insurance, and CIGNA.

Why, a person would almost consider this roster a who's who of influential Wall Street types... that is, if Wall Street existed.

***

"The question is," said Alice, "whether you can make words mean so many different things."
- Lewis Carroll, Alice Through the Looking Glass

"Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought? In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it."
- George Orwell, 1984

"What we were asking for was precision in the use of these words, so that when the words "Wall Street" were used they referred to the major commercial and investment banks that were underwriters for the private label securities that the commission majority's report discusses. What we were told, in the case of "Wall Street" is that it's a general term for the financial system and thus could in fact include a subprime lender like Countrywide, based in California. Maybe this was changed in subsequent drafts of the report, maybe it was not, but using the term Wall Street to describe the financial system generally is -- most objective observers would conclude -- a political statement rather than an accurate one. You decide."
- Peter J. Wallison, The Huffington Post


Richard (RJ) Eskow, a consultant and writer (and former insurance/finance executive), is a Senior Fellow with the Campaign for America's Future. This post was produced as part of the Curbing Wall Street project. Richard also blogs at A Night Light.

He can be reached at "rjeskow@ourfuture.org."

Website: Eskow and Associates

 

Follow Richard (RJ) Eskow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rjeskow

 
 
  • Comments
  • 154
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skatscan
07:16 AM on 12/25/2010
This coming from a group of people who ALWAYS refers to the film industry and its loose connections by the term "Hollywood" even when a movie is made in England.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reno Fickler
Head Lifeguard/Dead Sea Marina
06:26 PM on 12/24/2010
I hope the writer realizes one of the Fantastic Four dies in the next issue. We can only wish that his article is not omenish. (Sarah said that's a word, so back-off.)
More to the point, it is like debating whether it was a 'war' or a 'conflict'. The dead guys don't care!
photo
68Namvet
Sioux, French, German, Jew, American mutt
12:17 PM on 12/26/2010
F & F'd for great use of a "Palinism" and for understanding "the dead guys don't care!"

It's like entire idea of "preemptiv­­e war" - a philosophy akin to killing your neighbor and claiming he was a gathering threat and you engaged in "preemptiv­e self defense"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JuanCarlosysofia
05:30 PM on 12/26/2010
i wonder how that would play out in a REAL court
photo
unionave
Old Codger
03:56 PM on 12/24/2010
In the world of Republicanism lying , deceiving , and cheating are part of the game . They saw the enormous amount of money in illegal drugs so they invented the DEA to fight in the "war" on drugs which has turned out to be more government expansion and billions of tax payer dollars to profiteers than anything else . They invented Homeland Security which is the largest of all government expansions and more billions of tax payer money than all to their profiteering friends . Say nothing of their Afghanistan and Iraq occupations and the profiteering . And when they throw in the word "WAR" the funding starts big time . Drugs and now Terrorism . All to get the paranoia syndrome working in the public with the help of the media with the lying pundits . In the early 1930's someone in Europe , referring to a growing political group , said "they will accuse others of what they intend to do" . The Republican party is heir to the intentions of that remark . For a party that hates government and deficits they are masters at creating and growing both .
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
03:50 PM on 12/24/2010
So, in what universe of language does Mr. Wallison live? In the financial oligarch's universe, which, judging from everything that has happened AND everything that hasn't (see HAMP, criminalization of financial fraud and obfuscation, etc.), is completely outside the sphere of normal governmental protections for average citizens). In truth, Mr. Wallison can object to the use of any words he wants. Words don't establish reality, reality establishes reality. However he wishes to describe what happened and solutions to be applied, he must account for reality or become a laughing stock for those who actually have paid attention to reality (to spite his corrupted views of it).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
littleolwinemakerme
Put A Cork In It!
04:50 PM on 12/24/2010
Having a fellow from AEI on this commission is worse than the Simpson/Bowles cat food commission.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Raphi
08:40 PM on 12/24/2010
AEI... so reliable for economic determinism. And that fetishism of The Market-- take an abstraction and reify it. What Whitehead called "the fallacy of misplaced concreteness." Then ascribe to it all sorts of characteristic behavior, like being able to decide and judge what's best.

That thing is also invisible and omniscient. The biggest buildings in any city are centers of its worship. Its advocates are mostly older white men who urge obedience and claim that unbelief leads to horrible punishments. It's simply really bad theology.

So let's assent to walling off our critical faculties. Forget that Wall Street means anything more than an address. Buy into (pun intended) having the econopaths rewrite reality. Yep, Newspeak. Double plus good.
03:45 PM on 12/24/2010
It is hard to comment on such actions and thinking
This is what we have for politicos, bankers and investment advisors the greed is unending
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sanityisneeded
No one said it was going to be easy.
03:06 PM on 12/24/2010
Just tell us - are they going to find fault with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and then place legislation on them. Shouldn't we be specific as to who caused the financial mess rather than business as a whole. Or, is it ok to use glittering generalities to classify an entire group as greedy. Something we dare not do within the rest of society. What about those who were to oversee the entire regulatory system and never gave a glance at what was going on and in fact, helped encourage bad business practices.
03:34 PM on 12/24/2010
Fannie and Freddie were brought down intentionally by the Bush administration not because they were in trouble but because the Bushies thought they might be in trouble at some point down the road--just as they thought there were WMD in Iraq and that Saddam had bought uranium in Niger. Government sponsored enterprises like Fannie and Freddie are anathema to neocons. Remember, it was the federal government that took them over, the same bunch of Republicans who now cannot even say the word "stimulus" without "failed" and "Obama" attached and who blame Obama for a budget deficit creadted by Dubya's failed economic policies and unnecessary war. The invented "failure" of Fannie and Freddie started the stampede. And Fannie and Freddie had nothing to do with the real reason for the crash, which was all those "designed to fail" bond issues that were created by Wall Street, rated AAA by Moody's and S & P though they consisted of risky sub-prime mortgages. Those on Wall Street who made huge profits did so by buying insurance on bonds that were doomed to crash and burn. Hence the term "credit default swap." Create a bond out of junk, split it into 14 or 15 tranches, get Moody's to rate it AAA (virtually risk free), sell it in huge volumes to your clients, then buy insurance so you get paid off big time when it fails. The free market at work . . . .
12:26 AM on 12/25/2010
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are minor and incidental players in this mess. To point fingers at them is to misunderstand the problem--which is probably true of you as it is for a lot of others who comment on this site--or obfuscate as is the case with Mr. Wallison. What brought the system down was the betting made with derivatives, CDOs, and CDSs. The players of consequence were Goldman Sach, AIG, Lehman Brothers, the Royal Bank of Scotland, WAMU, and other big commercial banks, investment banks, hedge funds, pension funds, state treasuries, etc. selling and buying those bets. Rating agencies such as Moody's were also players of consequence as their compliance with the sellers wishes facilitated the fraud. Pointing the finger at Fannie and Freddie ensures that the problem won't be understood and the status quo will continue until the next blowup which is inevitable. Mr. Wallison et. al. are not really interested in fixing the problems: salaries and bonuses on Wall Street are just too sweet.
02:55 PM on 12/24/2010
Silly enough, and I hear tell there's an effort from the other side to disuse the term "illegal immigrant," though "drunk/en driver" remains acceptable.
01:56 PM on 12/24/2010
After the Republicans commented on the Special Committee to Investigate the Fox Being Voted Back into Control of the Hen House: Everyone knows it was the chicken's fault for stuffing themselves down the poor, defenseless fox's throat. Those foul fowls! T
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Merritt old car guy
Loves Nostalgia Dragsters
12:33 PM on 12/24/2010
We can talk until we are blue in the face but until some people reverse what has happened with Wall Street and the whole financial sector we will continue to decline as a nation. This great wealth concentration harks back to the days of Kings and Monarchies. We have made it legal to steal money because we allow the Financial industry to set its own rules and the Fed backs them up and supplies them with the money to steal. Money is power and we have 94 families that control more wealth than the rest of the 307 million people of the U.S. If you think that they will do the right thing by being benevolent with their wealth to make life better for the rest of America I have some swamp land I want to sell. THeir main idea for life is accumilate as much wealth as possible and to continue that line through inheritance forever. They believe that they earned that right and they spend their wealth to buy power plus convince those below them that it is patriotic to defend their wealth and power. You listen to the blathering of any Fox News pundit and you would swear that if you don't defend these people then you are a socialist, God hater, who is undermining the U.S. THe U.S. was founded on the rights and happiness of all the people not just the wealthy.
12:33 PM on 12/24/2010
Richard,

Having given it some thought, I have to take issue with you on two points:

1. I believe "Wall Street led criminal financial fraud conspiracy" would have been materially more "precise".

and

2. Mr. Wallison is really not a very good writer.

Other than that, well said.

JM
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:46 AM on 12/24/2010
Is it time for us to select a book to memorize? I'll do "America's 60 Families." That's an accounting of Wall Street's monetary perfidity from the late 1800s until the last time we got a rope around their necks in 1937. Ferdianand Lundberg's so good, several folks are reprinting this out of print masterpiece...

"The United States is owned and dominated by a heirarchy of its sixty richest families, buttressed by no more than ninety families of lesser wealth...These families are the living center of the modern industrial oligarchy which dominates the United States, functioning descreetly under a de jure democratic form of government behind which a de facto government, absolutist and plutocratic in its lineaments, has gradually taken form since the Civil War. This de facto government is actually the government of the United States - - informal, invisable, shadowy. It is the government of money in a dollar democracy."

What book would you memorize?
photo
BetterDeadthanRedState
Speech isn't free when only the rich can afford it
11:56 AM on 12/24/2010
That's too hard. I'll memorize "One Fish, Two Fish, Red Fish, Blue Fish."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JuanCarlosysofia
05:10 PM on 12/24/2010
i memorised Jeff Dunham's "achmed the terrist" ventroliquist act.
WilliamBudd
Be obscure clearly.
12:12 PM on 12/24/2010
I'd like to memorize "300 Years of German Humor".
It's only seven pages.
photo
BetterDeadthanRedState
Speech isn't free when only the rich can afford it
11:44 AM on 12/24/2010
It's fascinating to see the attempted rewrite of history right before your eyes. We've all heard the rumblings already. No the near collapse of the financial system wasn't brought on by greed and deregulation, it was brought on by generosity and overregulation.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skatscan
07:23 AM on 12/25/2010
and poor people trying to buy houses!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onnyang
11:35 AM on 12/24/2010
..."Wall Street" to mean "the major commercial and investment banks that were underwriters for the private label securities that the commission majority's report discusses."

Hey Websters'...get to work!!!
photo
BetterDeadthanRedState
Speech isn't free when only the rich can afford it
11:45 AM on 12/24/2010
Soon to be eight volumes, like the OED.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
skatscan
07:26 AM on 12/25/2010
Eskow uses the American Heritage dictionary for the Wall Street definition Wallison objects to, which is funny enough because it's the right wing version of Webster's.
11:29 AM on 12/24/2010
wall street is a vague term
photo
BetterDeadthanRedState
Speech isn't free when only the rich can afford it
11:48 AM on 12/24/2010
Everything is vague to you.
WilliamBudd
Be obscure clearly.
12:09 PM on 12/24/2010
Not really.
Uncertain, indefinite, unclear, unfocused, imprecise and vague are vague terms.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cayuse
Soaring Eagle, soaring to Spirit from the ego self
11:26 AM on 12/24/2010
Secondary Stock Traders should not be allowed to collect DIVIDENDS