Van Helsing: "The strength of the vampire is that nobody will believe in him."
America's debt to Wall Street has soared since 1945 -- and although the banks were rescued at the public's expense, the public's been left holding the bag for the recent drop in housing prices:
Hmm... How many times has the word "vampire" appeared in books during the same period [1]?
What does this mean? Does it reflect the public's subconscious response to predatory banking? Or is it just some guy having nerdy fun with data sets by juxtaposing two trend lines that have nothing to do with one another? We report, you decide.
Here's what we do know: Like their fictional counterparts, America's banks are revenants, re-animated creatures who were brought back from the dead through the public's generosity. Now they're feasting on the rest of us again, while politicians in Washington work to rob us of the few tools we can use to defend ourselves. With some Democratic complicity, Republicans are fulfilling the promise of Rep. Spencer Bachus, who said that "Washington and the regulators are there to serve the banks."
And what they're serving them is you.
The Count: "Listen to them! The creatures of the night. What music they make... "
The rap sheet against America's banks grows longer and longer. They keep stringing people along with phony foreclosure negotiations, and then foreclose anyway. And we're hearing more and more stories about bank agents who, as they're invading and padlocking illegally foreclosed homes, also steal the private property inside them. In a recent ghoulish case, they stole a box containing the ashes of the homeowner's husband -- ironically enough, from a woman named Ms. Ash. Even vampires don't do that.
The states of Arizona and Nevada are suing Bank of America, one of corporate America's worst offenders, for repeatedly breaking the law as it forecloses on homeowners. The Arizona suit says that the bank has "consistently misled homeowners about its home loan modification process."
Foreclosure fraud isn't the only kind of bank criminality, of course. Deutsche Bank just plea-bargained its way out of criminal charges for helping people get out of paying their taxes. There's that matter of laundering drug money, and countless other crimes, large and small. But the widespread criminality surrounding foreclosures strikes the closest to home, but literally and metaphorically. After their taxpayer-funded bailout, these revenants are literally biting the hand that fed them.
The financial reform bill passed this year was less than the public wanted, according to polls, and less than it needed, according to experts. But it was a start, and Wall Street didn't like it.
Renfield: "I'm loyal to you, Master! I didn't betray you!"
Fortunately for them, the bankers have friends in low places. First the GOP killed the omnibus spending bill that funded many of the financial reform bill's provisions for protecting the public against predatory bank policies. Senate Democrats are trying to avoid a shutdown of government by introducing a continuing resolution but, as Pat Garafolo points out, it doesn't include any of the additional money needed to enforce the financial reform bill.
The Democratic resolution adopts the classic right-wing, budget-cutting notion that government should avoid spending increases and keep its budget numbers flat -- or, as their resolution puts it, "funding would continue at FY 2010 enacted levels for most programs." That's a terrible mistake, both tactically and practically.
The SEC would be particularly hard-hit by this resolution, just when it's starting to pursue foreclosure fraud more aggressively by issuing subpoenas to the big banks and loan servicers. (Is that a coincidence, too?)
One of the reforms blocked by this funding move include the appointment of an "investor advocate" to assist stockholders who have been misled by corporations. Apparently these "conservatives" are more than happy to interfere with a free market, even the stock market, if their paymasters direct them to do it. The broad category of "investors" includes pension plans and other plebeian organizations, after all -- and private investors are merely wealthy, rather than the extremely wealthy they live to serve.
The Bacchanalians have also stalled the funding of a whistleblower's office. That action will ensure that bank criminals aren't interrupted in their wrongdoing just because some underling is struck with an excess of conscience. They've also blocked the Office for Credit Ratings,, so we're still stuck with the corrupt, rigged ratings game that led to the last economic collapse.
Our elected leaders aren't the only ones baring our necks to the predators' fangs. The Federal Reserve's also getting into the act. As the National Consumer Law Center puts it, the Fed has "proposed new rules that make it much harder for homeowners to escape abusive loans, avoid foreclosure or obtain refinancing." The timing's not coincidental. They're rushing to put this rule into place before responsibility for mortgages is transferred to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. In this vampire story, Elizabeth Warren is Professor Van Helsing and the Federal Reserve is Renfield, Dracula's eager human servant.
Van Helsing: "We are dealing with the undead."
We know what needs to be done. A roster of banking and economics professionals has signed an open letter to regulators asking them to step in and correct these systemic flaws and abuses. But they couldn't do that without money, even if they wanted to. The head of the Commodities Futures Trading Commission says he can't implement financial reform without these funds.
We realize that comparing bankers to vampires is harsh, excessive, and unfair... to vampires. Vampires only target one victim at a time, after all. Vampires have the common decency not to show themselves in broad daylight. And as we all know from the movies, they're charming, polite, elegant -- and terrific dancers. (I used to work on Wall Street and believe me: Bankers aren't a pretty sight when they dance.)
What's more, vampires won't enter your house without an invitation. As Ms. Ash learned to her horror, bankers aren't that civilized.
[1] Created with Google's nifty new NGram tool.
Richard (RJ) Eskow, a consultant and writer (and former insurance/finance executive), is a Senior Fellow with the Campaign for America's Future. This post was produced as part of the Curbing Wall Street project. Richard also blogs at A Night Light.
He can be reached at "rjeskow@ourfuture.org."
Website: Eskow and Associates
Follow Richard (RJ) Eskow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rjeskow
Unfortunately Americans don't read for education or self improvement so they will never know they can resist and win and they can truly take part in government .
Just because a person has more money than you doesn't mean they don't suck.
If *We the People* really want to take back our country, we have to start by getting corporate money out of politics.
I think that has to start with a Constitutional Amendment that reserves the right of political free speech exclusively to the citizens, both natural born and naturalized. It is a simple matter of sovereignty. If we are to retain a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, then only the people should be involved in the process of electing their political representatives.
Without the ability to buy influence or control with campaign contributions, it becomes harder for "artificial persons" and foreign interests to reciprocate for legislative favors. The lobbyists would still be there - but without the bags of money, they would have to rely more on legitimate arguments.
Nor would they have an inherent right to political advertising. Overriding "Citizens United" is critical.
This country was founded for the benefit of it's citizens, on the premise that people could govern themselves without king, clergy, or the likes of the East India Company - who's predatory behavior helped provoke the Boston Tea Party. Yet non-citizens hold enormous power in our government. We must return that power to the living, breathing citizens who ARE this country, as the Founding Fathers intended.
While you are correct that the country was founded on equal protection and equal benefit, there has been (since the 1930's) a slow take over in which massive transfers of wealth have occurred (in each depression) and which continue today. The end result will be the privatization of the public resources (as soon as all the state governments start to fail) and then the take over will be complete - the majority of Americans will be owned (as debt slaves) by the small 1% of Americans who own all the wealth and all the resources. And corporations will continue to be the only parties capable of buying the prostitutes who are our government. If all this is not clear based upon the bailouts and the enterprise corporate corruption than I don't know when it will be clear.
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article24581.html
Why doesn't congress cut it? Let's get out of Iraq and Afghanistan now.
Any questions?
Aside from that point, Eskow is correct that Congress has restored to life the big banks that would have failed (and still would be likely to fail if the accounting rule requiring banks to value their assets at the true market value rather than their original "value" or some other made up number) at our expense, only to enable them to continue feeding off of us.
Vampires understand that they are lifeless, bloodsuckers.