iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Richard (RJ) Eskow

GET UPDATES FROM Richard (RJ) Eskow
 

Letter From Charlotte: How Bank of America Silenced a Whole Town

Posted: 05/09/2012 11:49 pm

You don't have to be good at your job to earn seven million dollars in a year. All you need is a few friends in the right places -- places like the Federal Reserve, the Justice Department and the Treasury Department.

As the song says: "If I had a friend like Ben..." (Bernanke, that is.)

As we've learned here in Charlotte, with friends like these covering your back, the protests of people into the street -- and of your own shareholders -- soon fade into blissful silence.

Love and Heat

Today was a very good day for Brian Moynihan, the Bank of America CEO whose 2011 compensation package was just approved. As they were preparing to formally approve his lavish remuneration, I stood outside in a line of shareholders with a letter naming me the official representative for an investor who owns 82,000 BofA shares. Around me were about forty investors, each of whom was about to contribute in some small way to Mr. Moynihan's payday. But our little band of investors were haughtily dismissed by bank executives after waiting, some for hours, in the wilting Carolina heat.

The protesters chanted in the street as a PR executive told us we would not be admitted into the meeting -- and then asked us to get off the bank's property.

All around us, in what officials acknowledged was a dry run for the Democratic Convention, city authorities had given everyone's constitutional rights the day off by declaring the protest an "extraordinary event."

As we wrote in The Nation, bank execs continued to enjoy their full constitutional protections despite working for an institution with the worst rap sheet in town. The rest of us were guilty until proven innocent. But I'll say this: It had to be the most courteous suspension of civil liberties ever, the nicest police state you'd ever want to see. But then, that's Charlotte for you: a great town filled with friendly people. They overrule the Constitution more politely than folks up North write a parking ticket.

Given the state of North Carolina's economy, you'd have thought a lot more people might take to the streets. But they'd spent the previous night thinking about love.

Love, that is, and how to ban the wrong kind of it. On the eve of the protests state residents overwhelmingly voted against same-sex marriage. There's nothing quite as good as social divisions to distract people from the hand in their pockets. In what might have been considered a bitter irony, they rejected gay marriage as protesters gathered in the town they call the "Queen City."

For the time being, only straight marrieds will have the privilege of being foreclosed uon in North Carolina by the Bank of America.

Brian's Song

What was was truly "extraordinary" was the spectacle of watching shareholders stand by helplessly as the CEO was given what, under any objective measure, was an excessively generous chunk of change. Try to imagine this happening in any corporation except a too-big-to-fail bank:

A senior executive joins a corporation as General Counsel, and soon afterwards becomes the head of its retail division. While he's serving as the company's top lawyer and then as its top product manager the company acquires a subsidiary. According to massive lawsuits filed later by investors and the Federal government, the company illegally conceals more than one hundred million dollars in expected losses related to the acquisition.

While this individual is serving as his company's chief lawyer, which is to say the person responsible for vetting business deals for soundness and legality, the company also acquires another subsidiary for more than $4 billion. It turns out to be worthless -

No, scratch that. "Worthless" would have been better than what it turned out to be - billions of dollars better, in fact. This acquisition triggers a series of massive settlements: An $8.4 billion deal with states to settle illegal behavior. $600 million to settle a class action suit. $335 million to settle a discrimination suit. $50 to $55 million for its part of lawsuits against the acquired company's former CEO.

Oh, and billions of dollars more in complex buyback transactions.

When the corporation's CEO - the person who hired our unnamed individual - is forced to step down amid accusations of impropriety and incompetence, he takes the top spot. And as his first year in that office draws to a close the company "ends the year in a flurry of lawsuits."

After our individual has served two years as CEO, Federal investigators take action against it while saying that its business practices have actually been worse under his leadership than they were in that notorious $4 billion acquisition.

Our friend tells investors the bank doesn't need additional capital -- and then, in a move that severely damages his credibility, accepts $5 billion in outside funding under less than ideal terms less than two weeks later.

The Seven Million Dollar Man

Sounds bad, you say. But how's the share price? Asked like a true investor. In this, a modern executive's most crucial performance meansurement, our friend also fails badly. The corporation's stock - which had been trading at $52 per share when our protagonist joined the senior management team - has fallen from $15 to somewhere between $7 and $8 today.

Can you imagine any corporation but a big bank that would reward this individual with continued employment as CEO, much less with a seven million dollar compensation package?

But then, Brian Moynihan doesn't run any corporation. He runs a too-big-to-fail bank. And running a too-big-to-fail bank means never having to say you're sorry. One of the acquisitions described above is Merrill Lynch. The other's Countrywide. And Federal investigators said that Moynihan's Bank of America is outdoing Angelo Mozilo's Countrywide in malfeasance and rascality.

That's right: Worse than Mozilo. How'd you like to have that engraved on your business card?

What It's About

Not that this is about Brian Moynihan. It isn't - really it isn't. It's about Ben Bernanke, and Tim Geithner, and Eric Holder. Ben Bernanke's Federal Reserve is moving aggressively to squash investor uprisings against incompetent or greedy bank executives. As Stephen Davidoff explains, that's not just shocking and baffling. It's also destructive and directly contravenes the goals the Federal Reserve should be pursuing.

(We would also add that it's morally reprehensible.)

For all of Tim Geithner's claims that TARP "made a profit," the American people actually spent plenty of money on big banks - and on Bank of America in particular. An analysis by Bloomberg estimates that the bank netted $1.5 billion from taxpayer aid. (We'd come up with a higher figure, but we'll accept the lower estimate - for now.)

Bank of America has profited greatly from taxpayer largesse. Yet, despite the billions of dollars it's paid out for illegal behavior, no one employed by the bank has been charged with any crime. Attorney General Eric Holder has yet to explain how it's possible for billions of dollars worth of crimes to commit themselves.

Hush, Hush

No wonder things went so well for Mr. Moynihan today. Activists told their stories inside the shareholders' meeting, and Moynihan and his team pretended to listen. But despite the stories they heard, despite the grumbling from their investors and the chanting in the streets, there was an eerie hush over Charlotte today.

They're Bank of America. They don't have to hear anything they don't want to hear. Their friends in Washington have built an impermeable bubble around their executive suite, and that of every big bank in the country.

Activists broke the silence on the streets, and they did it well. But only the long arm of the law can break the silence inside the bubble-world of today's too-big-to-fail bankers.

 

Follow Richard (RJ) Eskow on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rjeskow

FOLLOW BUSINESS
 
 
  • Comments
  • 58
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cowbore
08:41 PM on 05/10/2012
Remember that option out there where a corporation's Charter can be revoked? One would think that after a certain amount of criminal behavior that one or maybe two corporations would lose them, but no. None of them have.
Zip Zinzel
If a Nation expects to be both Ignorant & Free . .
05:16 PM on 05/10/2012
I HATE TO SAY THIS, but IMHO, neither you, nor Matt Tiabi(who I normally like) have made what I would call, a convincing case against BoA.

IMHO, BofA is not much worse, or better than most of the large corporations.
What we need is a cleanup of the LAWS that impact ALL of these Business Entities.

That effort will require a HUGE mandate, one that won't materialize when large blocks of our citizens are too stupid to know what's going on, and/or happily content to tilt-at-windmills.
05:49 AM on 05/11/2012
Where is your rebuttal?
photo
disporting
Weapons not food, not homes, not shoes
04:55 PM on 05/10/2012
Corporations and government in bed with each other to ruin the middle and lower class ameicans. The biggest joke in this country is the belief that we are a Democracy and our voice and votes count.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
nherent
Subversivist.
10:45 AM on 05/11/2012
Sounds like something the late George Carlin would say.
02:21 PM on 05/10/2012
I am a Democrat. I don't vote a straight ticket but it is usually the Democratic candidate who represents my values so I mostly vote for Democratic candidates. This is a scary story. I believe all of it except the part about banks supporting the Democratic candidates over Republican candidates. They may be buying lots of politicians of all parties - but not Democrats over Republicans.

I ask my elected Democrats to address this (Republicans too) and to aggressively question, investigate and tax multimillion dollar salaries. I also expect that elected representatives will not support Federal Reserve, or any other federal agency action to quell investor demonstration of dissatisfaction with the company in which they own shares.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kvanness
Follow the money and the rest will make sense
02:19 PM on 05/10/2012
"and then asked us to get off the bank's property."

If that is true, you need to sue that bank. As a duly appointed representative of a shareholder of record you have the RIGHT to attend that meeting. Denying your entry was a flagrant and willful violation of that right.
photo
oldgrizzledvet
Let your words heal, not wound
01:54 PM on 05/10/2012
Bravo, RJ Eskow. Great blog. "Rascality," beautiful. This is a true American tragedy that no one has done anything to counter the "unchecked excesses" of Wall Street's bankers.
01:37 PM on 05/10/2012
Great article Mr. Eskrow. I too am confident that this Mafia's day of reckoning will come. People want justice. Unlike us that seem to be guilty until proven innocent, Bank of America "pays" for it's freedom from justice with briberies and the sort. The average American cannot "pay" for their freedom, we have to fight for it. This freedom is from the oppression of criminal enterprises such as Bank of America.
01:10 PM on 05/10/2012
Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan a true master of financial greed! Ken Lewis must be proud
http://www.thenakedemperor.com/oligarch/brian-moynihan

and on Bank of America and Merrill Lynch:

Bank of America's Genius Strategy: Offload $55 Trillion Dollar risk from Merrill Lynch to the Taxpayers!
http://www.thenakedemperor.com/oligarch/bank-of-america
01:07 PM on 05/10/2012
Off with their heads.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:49 AM on 05/10/2012
Perhaps China will eventually purchase Bank of America ;-)

http://money.cnn.com/2012/05/09/markets/china-banks-us-expansion/index.htm
Fed approves US expansion of three Chinese banks - May. 9, 2012

"NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- The Federal Reserve gave three state-owned Chinese banks its stamp of approval Thursday to expand their presence in the United States.

The central bank accepted an application from Industrial and Commerce Bank of China Ltd. (IDCBY) (ICBC), along with China Investment Corporation and Central Huijin Investment, to become bank holding companies by purchasing up to an 80% stake in New York-based Bank of East Asia U.S.A.

The approval marks the first time the Fed has allowed any large Chinese bank to purchase a U.S. bank, and it could boost merger and acquisition activity "as Chinese banks may look to acquire regional banks in order to establish a U.S. footprint," said Guggenheim senior policy analyst Jaret Seiberg, in a research note..."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
cats530
16 Trillion To Banksters Per GAO Audit
03:56 PM on 05/10/2012
I hope so. China doesn't deal with corrupt bankers by giving them free rein and taxpayer funds. Nope. Off with their heads.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:16 PM on 05/10/2012
I was thinking the same thing. :-)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SaburoHakaida
I am a Decepticon
07:12 PM on 05/12/2012
Unless China's banks decide to take over China.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:51 AM on 05/13/2012
Wal-mart wil take over China :-)

http://www.wal-martchina.com/english/index.htm
Welcome to Walmart China!
botazefa
Sounds like Bodhisattva
11:45 AM on 05/10/2012
"All around us, in what officials acknowledged was a dry run for the Democratic Convention, city authorities had given everyone's constitutional rights the day off by declaring the protest an "extraordinary event." "

I'm much more interested in how an 'extraordinary event' is somehow outside the domain of the Constitution. Hope you'll post more on that soon.
PROGRESSISGOOD
Without Economic Justice, There Is No Justice!
11:40 AM on 05/10/2012
We Americans can stand up to the Filthy Rich CEO's one by one, excoriating them for extorting so much value from the organizations that employ them. Protesting in the streets and at the Corporate Stock Holders Meetings. Attempting to reduce the obscene pay packages approved by their cronies the CEO's appointed to the board of directors.

Or, we can pass tax laws to tax away all of the obscene wealth these people extort from our American Businesses. 75% top marginal tax rate on anything over $5 million per year. Maybe corporations will go back to paying their CEO's more in line with the rest of the employees and the companies overall long-term performance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Superb1
Marine Viet-Vet.
11:26 AM on 05/10/2012
Perhaps if the Carolinians would stay out of other peoples bedrooms...............
11:22 AM on 05/10/2012
Big publicity and a prosecution announcement Sept/Oct just in time for the elections. "Bank" on it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Jpl100
Keep your badges, this isn't the Boy Scouts!
11:05 AM on 05/10/2012
"What was was truly "extraordinary" was the spectacle of watching shareholders stand by helplessly as the CEO . . . . "

Hey helpless RJ, here's what you do. You pick up your phone and call your broker and say "sell my B of A stock". Problem solved.

The true spectacle here is your complete lack of inititive to solve a make beleive problem.

Look for my bill and pay it.
12:22 PM on 05/10/2012
I truly dread what would happen if BofA stock hit 0.

Would it even be delisted from the NYSE?

Would it go bankrupt?

Would the CEO have to step down? give back pay?

What I truly dread is that share price is the fig leaf of banks these days. They exist but they don't matter.

The banks own everything and can run huge deficits without any consequences.

The plutocracy has their sinecure.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ultrawiz
Holding the Middle Ground
12:24 PM on 05/10/2012
Hey JPL, get a clue. People buy stock as an investment to make money. When a clearly incompetent executive makes that investment's value drop over 10 fold you have every right to question the compensation package that executive gets. And I wouldn't pay a bill for BS advice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Jpl100
Keep your badges, this isn't the Boy Scouts!
01:49 PM on 05/10/2012
If your investment is now worth 10%, you should have sold along time ago. You deserve each other. Any advise you get is better that what you are doing on your own.