More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Rob Kutner

Rob Kutner

Posted: April 12, 2010 02:10 PM

Obama's Unacceptable Replacement for Justice Stevens: Jesus Christ (esq.)

What's Your Reaction:

Believe it or not, Obama has done it yet again.

The shoulder pads in outgoing Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens' robe haven't even cooled yet, but the President has already managed to find a replacement nominee with even more divisive and liberal credentials:

Jesus H. Christ.

No, I didn't just stub my toe. I mean the one and only. God Jr.

Look, we grudgingly allowed Sonia Sotomayor onto the Court, to satisfy the Hispanic community (or "Technically-Documented-Americans"), and see what that got us? A centrist who asks a lot of questions of solicitors (hey, who's supposed to be the "solicitor" here anyway?). Now the "White" House is trying to change the Court's color palette again with this unmistakably Middle Eastern-looking fellow.

Mr. President, despite its perky youthful look, the Supreme Court is not a Benetton ad!

More to the point, consider Jesus Christ's fitness as a candidate. According to multiple witnesses who lived hundreds of years after him, He has no record of employment, and no relevant American judical experience.

But what He does have is a simply appalling trail of legal writings on some of the critical issues likely to come before the Court. To wit:

Constitutional Originalism

"Think not that I am come to destroy the Law...I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill." (Matthew 5:17)

Excuse us, to fulfill? For a paragon of humility, it takes a lot of gall to insinuate that anything in the Founding Fathers' text was left unfulfilled.

This reeks of activism of the kind not seen since "Black People" were rendered legally equal to "People." Speaking of which...

Civil Rights

"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female." (Galatians 3:28)

While we'll concede it can be hard to tell Jews and Greeks apart, the simple fact is, category distinctions are a critical part of jurisprudence. We all want impartiality from a Justice, but there is such a thing as being too impartial. Also, seriously, "no male nor female?" If this isn't a coded message about a transgender agenda (or "trans-genda"), I don't know what is.

Property Rights

"Blessed are the poor...meek... who hunger and thirst, yadda yadda yadda." (Mattthew 5:3-10, yaddas mine)

Here we go again, with that "empathy" canard Obama referenced while nominating Sotomayor. Can we really afford a second Justice who, by His own Divinely transmitted admission, is clearly in the (no doubt filthy and booze-scented) pocket of Big Poverty?

Abortion

"And the dragon stood before the woman which was ready to be delivered, for to devour her child as soon as it was born." (Revelation 12:4)

Wake-up call, America! Not only does this Guy, by His own admission, advocate a fourth-trimester abortion, He wants it to be conducted by a dragon. Even the so-called "Pro-Choice" crowd wouldn't go so far as to cry, "Keep your hands - or claws - off my body."

2nd Amendment

"And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloak forbid not to take thy coat also." (Luke 6:29)

Whoa whoa whoa, Mister. Over our cold dead cheeks.

 

Follow Rob Kutner on Twitter: www.twitter.com/ApocalypseHow

Believe it or not, Obama has done it yet again. The shoulder pads in outgoing Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens' robe haven't even cooled yet, but the President has already managed to find a r...
Believe it or not, Obama has done it yet again. The shoulder pads in outgoing Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens' robe haven't even cooled yet, but the President has already managed to find a r...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theitcrowd3
04:03 AM on 04/16/2010
Mock the lord at your own peril!
photo
loufarrelli
Look Upon Me! I'll Show You The Life Of The Mind!
10:18 PM on 04/15/2010
I don't think he was a very good, lawyer, remember, he lost that one case...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gypsysailor
Things that might have been never were.
09:21 PM on 04/15/2010
I can here the refrain from the repubs now as JC casts a deciding vote...Jesus Christ, super star; who in the He!! do you think you are? Taken from the old rock song back in the late 60's and early 70's.
09:46 AM on 04/15/2010
Wait a minute here. This Jesus guy is from the Middle East, right? How can we be sure he isn't a MUSLIM?!
01:41 PM on 04/14/2010
A terrific candidate for a difficult job! Has anyone conducted a face to face interview yet? Has the congressional houses met with him for approval? I would love to watch that on satellite TV!
12:41 PM on 04/14/2010
Oh, c'mon. You're being too hard on the guy. There's plenty there for the teabaggers' taste too. What about Jesus' obsession with eternal damnation? He was the only one who talked about that - not even the genocidal, pestilance-lovin' god of the Old Testament talked about punishment FOREVER - and this eternal torment is not for murder, rape, or pillage, but for lack of faith (or belief, depending on where you look ). And speaking of the OT god, didn't jesus say that he and god are one? Wouldn't that make jesus at least partially responsible for all the god-commanded murders in the bible? And didn't jesus say he came with a sword? (Modern republicans would perhaps prefer to update this to mean Uzi's at political rallies). And god wasn't only JUST pro-abortion - he was strongly attached to infanticide as well. http://www.evilbible.com/god's%20not%20pro-life.htm This should go over well with the right-wingers who believe in protecting children until they are born, and then all bets are off (no, it's not just the catholics, people). And check out that book of revelations - plenty of fodder for those who don't appreciate wimpy liberalism.....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KingKrub
12:19 PM on 04/14/2010
Funny Junior G0dDa&^d S#!t!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ergon
Man From Atlan
02:31 PM on 04/13/2010
Nominate Jesus Christ and the serious folk respond with well, how about a religious or a constitutional law scholar? Sheesh.
I suggest that being God incarnate and his recent opinion "Render onto Caesar what is Caesar's and render unto God what is God's" should trump any other contender!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chlai88
Change is the only constant
05:19 AM on 04/13/2010
I'm dying to see the Repubs filibuster that !
04:11 PM on 04/12/2010
"Jesus H. Christ"??? What does the "H" stand for? Maybe Hussein?
photo
paulabflat
activate the omega-13!!
09:48 AM on 04/13/2010
hop on the side car. s'what i was told.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
doctor4kids
Incite civility and reason
11:46 AM on 04/13/2010
Love it!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Joe The Nerd Ferraro
Group IQ is inversely proportional to group size.
03:28 PM on 04/12/2010
why not a religious scholar?

Dr, Cornel West...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joe-the-nerd-ferraro/dr-cornel-west---scotus_b_533456.html
03:40 PM on 04/12/2010
Cornel West would be an excellent Justice. I admire this fella!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Joe The Nerd Ferraro
Group IQ is inversely proportional to group size.
03:51 PM on 04/12/2010
ty
04:59 PM on 04/12/2010
How about a constitutional law scholar.
moldndecay
Only that day dawns to which you are awake
09:03 PM on 04/12/2010
Yes Please.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Joe The Nerd Ferraro
Group IQ is inversely proportional to group size.
10:48 PM on 04/12/2010
we got 9 of them there now.

5 of them gave the presidency to bush in 2000...