- BIG NEWS:
- Barack Obama
- |
- Sarah Palin
- |
- Future Fuel
- |
- FISA
- |
A government who educates its people serves to sharpen a blade that may ultimately do it in, while the government who under-educates their population seeks to create a docile flock that is easily misled and controlled. They want people smart, but not too smart. Ignorance breeds hate, which we're seeing plenty of at Palin rallies these days. But when we talk about educational reform, it is important to consider things from the government's point of view. In the eyes of John McCain and the Republicans, if they make the public school system as dysfunctional as possible, then they can push vouchers and "choice" so that parents can send their children to private schools on the governments dime. Most often, those are religious (read: Christian) schools and they don't have the accountability issues (or separation of Church and State issue) that the Public School System has. This is a backhanded way of bridging that church-state divide and having government (read: taxpayers) fund religious education. Barack Obama wants to actually reform the public school system so that every child in America can get a world class education becoming of the richest country in the world. By raising our standards of what we expect from our students and preparing them to be globally competitive, we make our best investment in America's future. Obama's concentration on science and math is especially important as we have fallen farther and farther behind the rest of the developing world in both of those categories. But here's the rub: science, more so than math, doesn't always jibe with what religion teaches.
The "War on Science," as Hillary Clinton called it, includes the Creationism/Intelligent Design movement and has cost us dearly in global competitiveness. There is no room for superstition when we are turning out a sub-par working class whose outsourced jobs are being filled by better qualified candidates in India and points elsewhere who understand and adhere to the empirical basis of scientific fact. It is unfortunate for those of blind faith that their beliefs keep butting heads with things like logic, reason and reality. Sarah Palin's views on dinosaurs are a symptom of the endemic irrationality that has gripped our nations discourse during the "Culture Wars." We must firmly grasp empirical truth to lift ourselves from this quagmire of stupidity. This is not meant to be a blanket generalization; there are some people who let their feelings of faith guide their moral behavior but still understand that the world is billions of years old and not the center of the universe. That dinosaur bones weren't hidden all over the earth by a God who just wants to test our faith in him. The idea of a big practical joker in the sky screwing with people's heads by planting false evidence of large reptilian beings is as absurd as imagining that he/she is listening to every individual prayer made by the faithful or intervening in football touchdowns and Alaskan gubernatorial races. And if, like George W. Bush indicated, God has had the ear of the most powerful man on earth and has given him all the advice that has led us down this dark 8 year path, that doesn't exactly give me faith in God's advice, let alone His teachings being used in private schools funded by school vouchers. If God's advice led George W. Bush to his decisions, perhaps we should subpoena God and see what he told our president to do in His name. We'll need some mighty big handcuffs for a deity perp walk...
This is really about who educates our children and ultimately, why. Blind faith must be left at the doorsteps (or trash bins) of our schools and our students must be taught by competent (and well-paid) teachers who understand that we as a nation and people have fallen behind and that our children are our future. To give one example, India is a very spiritual country but Hinduism hasn't stopped their growing economy, their emphasis on education or their ability to anticipate and adapt to coming trends in the world economy. Science isn't the enemy of their religion, but it is the enemy of illogical, unfounded dogmatic belief systems that cling to "facts" that can never be proved. Can American Fundevangelical Christianity ever accept that evolution is real? That the world and universe are billions of years old? That The Bible is not the "word of God" but a heavily edited book written by mortal men who had no concept of physics or science? Whether or not Christianity does or does not accept these things should have no more bearing on our Educational System than whether Aesop's Fables do. Sending our children to religious schools to avoid science is antithetical to giving them the proper tools to compete in the global economy. You can be assured that in the laboratories and factories of India, China, South Korea and Japan, they are no more concerned with being guided by the teachings of Jesus than they are by the phone book. And they are excelling in those areas most crucial to the new economy, while we stagnate and fall ever farther behind.
It is time to rescue our Educational System and give our children a better understanding of the world we live in and their place in it. If our public schools are competitive with other countries at every level, parents will have no need for vouchers to send them elsewhere. Leave the religious teachings to Sunday school and give our children the foundation for a better and brighter future by making our public schools second to none. There is no greater investment we can make in our country than in its people, especially the youngest among us. Let us truly leave no child behind so that America can move ahead!
Ghanaians are planning to welcome President Obama and his...
I'm pleased to announce the launch today of two new HuffPost...
After a three-night stay in Moscow, the Obamas touched down in Rome on Wednesday so Papa President...
On Thursday, the first ladies of the G8 were given a tour of earthquake damage in L'Aquila by...
UPDATE: Paris Jackson also spoke. Watch her moving...
I was sorry to watch, live on CNN, Edward R. Murrow and Emmy Award-winning broadcaster and...
The following post...
It was with interest that I read Dr. Soram Khalsa's post on The Huffington Post...
Yesterday evening, Greg Sargent reported on The Plum Line that one of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin's key reasons...
OH NOES! What happened on Fox and Friends today, people?
Hermione herself, Emma Watson, charmed David Letterman and...
As our own Jason Linkins pointed out, Letterman is one of the few comedians...
I'm liveblogging the latest Iran election fallout. Email me with any news or thoughts, or follow me...
MADISON, Wis. (AP) -- Oscar G. Mayer, retired chairman of the Wisconsin-based meat processing company that bears his name,...
It's summer, the time for weddings! A few of my friends are getting married this summer and fall, so lately...
SYDNEY — Residents of a rural Australian town hoping to protect the earth and their wallets...
I get many letters like this from readers...
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
This has been my thoughts exactly. First of all, I had questioned why the GOP seems to encourage ignorance and fear among its people. The answer came to me - of course - they want a gullible flock, eager to believe messages containing words like "country first", "real Americans", "socialist", "victory in Iraq", "pals around with terrorists". They DO NOT, repeat, DO NOT, want a public who can actually sift through garbage like this and find it wanting. They probably would prefer a public who doesn't really read, at least nothing longer than the Republican phrases mentioned above. It's a little like Germany before Hitler. The way to create a people ripe for tyranny is religiosity, ignorance, superstition, and fear. Wow. Sounds scarily like our GOP.
Another point about public education in America, and various professions, is the increasing specialization. Particularly the hordes of business majors who know nothing about anything else. Niche training is training for slavery, religion-based or secular. No Shakespeare required, no foreign language required, just the mechanics of whatever job the masters can pay you less for, justifying it partly by pointing out that the employee only performs a small sliver of the operation.
The educated "elite" have always been targeted by despots, of course. Partly code for "Jewish." Critical thinking is seen as revolutionary. It hardly seems necessary for the masters to be so concerned, though, in view of the extreme compartmentalization of which even the more broadly educated mind is capable. I am staggered daily by the passion with which my Master's Degreed, old-time, broadly educated mother can defend two completely conflicting ideas at any given moment, one at least of which will be based on blatantly questionable facts. Shakespeare and Jesus both spinning in their graves, for all the good they do her.
Our tax dollars are already given to religous Universities when students with grants or the GI Bill use that money to attend those schools. Would you stop this as well?
I believe that vouchers are the best bet to getting children a quality education. The free market is the best system ever devised. Most parents are going to want their children taught an education that prepares them to be competiive in the world and sadly our schools in their present state don't do that. I believe that our schools spend too much time lamenting about how the white man stole this land from the Indians and all the injustices the black man has suffered. We spend too much time learning about Earth day and being concerned about feelings to the extent that we don't use red markers in grading anymore.
Currently if a parent doesn't like the school their kid is assigned to they can contniue to pay their property tax and then also pay for a private school. Giving parents vouchers creates competitivness among schools for those vouchers. If a parent believes their kid isn't being taught useful information they can pull their kid out and send them to a school that teaches more in line with what the parents want. Will some parents send their kids to schools that teach things you don't agree with? Sure, but it isn't your kid so why is it your concern?
The issue is really that you don't want to pay to educate children other than you own, isn't it? Through the voucher system, as has been proposed, for each 'voucher dollar' given to a parent to spend as they choose - a 'voucher dollar' would be subtracted from the school district the 'dollar' originated. Where you send a child for their primary education is a matter of choice for each parent, and the responsibility to provide the best education resides withh the community.
Bush's 'No Child Left Behind' act mandated resonding to a measurement that many schools did not have the resources to provide. It required that students meet literacy levels in math and reading comphehension, without funding the classical education required to meet the challenges of a global economy. Neither critical thinking nor economics are taught in my local high school. Is it any wonder the students who do manage to enroll in college saddle themselves with credit card debt, or need a year of classes jsut to reach a freshman level?
Educate your child where you wish, and continue to pay for your neighbor's children education. It's the American way.
You must be logged in to reply to this comment. Log in or