History will record that on September 19, 2011, the Republicans made a huge political miscalculation -- a miscalculation that could potentially doom their chances for victory next year.
If I were a Republican, the last thing I'd want to talk about is "class warfare."
For 30 years -- whenever they have been in power -- Republicans and their Wall Street/CEO allies have conducted a sustained, effective war on the American middle class.
Much of the success of their war has resulted from their insistence that it didn't exist. They have talked instead about how the economy needs to reward all those "job creators" whose beneficence will rain down economic prosperity on the rest of us.
They fund right-wing organizations that divert our attention by whipping up worry that gay marriage will somehow undermine heterosexual relationships. They start wars that help pad the bottom lines of defense contractors but do nothing to make us safer.
And all the while they quietly rig the economic game so that all of the growth in the Gross Domestic Product goes into the hands of the top two percent of the population -- while they cut our pay, destroy our unions and do their level best to cut our Social Security and Medicare.
There has been a "class war" all right -- a war on the middle class. And the middle class has been on the losing end.
Today the truly rich control a higher percent of our wealth and income than at any other time in generations. Income inequality is higher than at any time since 1928 -- right before the Great Depression.
According to the Economic Policy Institute, "the richest five percent of households obtained roughly 82 percent of all the nation's gains in wealth between 1983 and 2009. The bottom 60 percent of households actually had less wealth in 2009 than in 1983... "
Today, 400 families control more wealth than 150 million Americans -- almost half of our population.
American workers have become more and more productive -- but they haven't shared in the income generated by that increased productivity, so now they can't afford to buy the products and services they produce.
The success of the Wall Street/CEO/Republican war on the middle class rests, in part, in the old frog in boiling water story. If you put a frog in a pot of boiling water, they say, the frog will jump right out. But if you put a frog in a pot and gradually turn up the heat until it boils you end up with a cooked frog.
Republican policies have gradually shifted wealth, income and power from the middle class -- and those who aspire to be middle class -- into their own hands and for obvious reasons they haven't wanted to focus too much attention on "class warfare."
So now if the Republicans want to talk about "class warfare" -- in the words of George Bush -- "bring 'em on."
In fact, President Obama isn't proposing to start a "class war" -- he wants to end the war on the middle class.
Among other things, he has proposed that America live by the "Buffett Rule" -- by Warren Buffett's suggestion that he and his fellow billionaires should have to pay effective tax rates at least as high as their own secretary's.
Obama pointed out yesterday that requiring hedge fund managers to pay effective tax rates as high as plumbers and teachers was not "class warfare." The choice is clear: either you increase taxes on the wealthy -- or dramatically cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security benefits. It is, as the President said, "simple math."
Whereas Republican proposals to rein in the deficit by cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid benefits are intended to continue this war on the middle class, the President's plan -- in stark contrast -- addresses the three factors that actually caused the deficit in the first place.
From 1993 until 2000, Bill Clinton had successfully pushed back much of the Republican anti-middle class agenda. When he left office, America had a prosperous, growing economy, increasing middle class incomes, and budget surpluses as far as the eye could see.
Bush changed all that. The anti-middle class warriors were back in power, and they took the offensive. They passed massive new tax breaks for the rich, and set out to break unions.
Three Bush/Republican policies led directly to today's deficit:
• Giant tax cuts for the wealthy;
• Two unpaid-for wars that will ultimately cost trillions;
• Trickle-down economic policies that did not create one net private sector job and ultimately caused the financial collapse that led to the Great Recession.
The Obama deficit proposal reduces the deficit by directly addressing these three factors -- that actually caused the deficit -- rather than demanding that the budget be balanced by taking even more out of the pockets of ordinary Americans.
A trillion dollars -- 1.2 trillion with interest -- is cut by ending the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Those who argue that you shouldn't count these reductions toward deficit reduction, because Obama already planned to end these wars, are ignoring the fact that they were a big reason why we have a deficit in the first place.
Second, Obama's proposal eliminates the Bush tax cuts for the rich -- and demands that millionaires, billionaires, oil companies, and CEO's who fly around in corporate jets, pay their fair share.
Finally, the Obama plan includes a robust jobs package to jumpstart the economy and put America back to work. The Republicans have no jobs plan at all -- none whatsoever. In fact, their plan is to simply let the Wall Street bankers and CEO's continue to siphon as much as possible from the pockets of ordinary Americans.
The combination of Obama's jobs and budget plans have set the stage for a clear, sharp battle for the soul of America. They have posed a stark contrast that is not framed as a battle over conflicting policies and programs -- but as a struggle between right and wrong.
That battle will continue throughout this fall -- and into next year's elections.
These proposals, coupled with the President's urgent, passionate advocacy, have transformed the political landscape.
The major iconic fights that will dominate American politics over the next 14 months will be the President's jobs proposal, his call on millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share, and the Democratic defense of Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.
Democrats and Progressives have the high political ground on every one of these defining issues -- and I don't just mean slightly higher political ground -- I mean political ground like Mount Everest.
By huge margins, Americans prefer to raise taxes on millionaires and billionaires rather than cut Social Security and Medicare. The choice is not even close -- in most polls something like 8 to 1.
And who can possibly question that the number one priority of voters everywhere in America is jobs?
The Republican policies that led to the Great Recession did more damage than anyone knew. Many Republicans actually thought they would benefit politically by the long, slow economic slog that ensued in its aftermath. After all, no sitting President had won re-election in a century when the economy was not good or materially improving -- except one.
Harry Truman won re-election in the midst of a bad economy in 1948 by running against the "Do-nothing Republican Congress."
President Obama's jobs and budget proposals have set the stage for just that kind of battle.
His proposals have simultaneously energized the progressive base and appealed to middle class swing voters -- especially seniors -- who agree entirely that the government should keep its hands off the Social Security and Medicare benefits they have earned, and turn instead to taxes on millionaires and billionaires to close the budget deficit that the Republican "class warfare" policies have created.
And it won't hurt that these proposals have prompted the Republicans to turn the spotlight on the subject of "class warfare" itself. They should be careful what they wish for.
Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist, and author of the book: Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win, available on Amazon.com. He is a partner in Democracy Partners and a Strategist for Americans United for Change. Follow him on Twitter @rbcreamer.
Follow Robert Creamer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rbcreamer
Chuck Collins: A Tax Plan to Rally Around: The Buffett Rule
David Briggs: Believers Keep Faith in American Dream Despite Recession
Semper fi
Perhaps we could think about changing the basic economic setup of our country, and emphasize sharing and a just, equal society? How about ditching capitalism altogether?
We are always aware of the Repubs bent to overreach, but it seemed to not matter to the public anymore. Finally, now it seems they may have gone too far, and that they are ripe for a severe backlash. Between stepping into this class warfare quagmire and all of their bold pledges to cuddle the rich, they have boxed themselves in, with no easy retreat.
And now the President is finally standing up to the Repbus. The combination of these two things makes things look a bit brighter than they did up until about a week ago.
Conservatives tout that they believe in God. In times of despair, faith in God provides courage. Whether or not God is a fantasy is your own opinion.
Liberals/Progressives believe in themselves and government. Creating the fantasy that the conservatives will fail must provide immense relief to the seismic shift of ideological change occurring in America (and across the western hemisphere).
If I were left leaning, I too would create such fantasy. But as an empathic human - I urge you to consider the dangerous difference in believing your own fantasy and believing in a God whose rules are no covenants. It's for your own health.
Psychologically, the situation is very similar to an alcoholic family - there is an enabler (government) and an addict (poor). The enabler ends up as sick as the alcoholic. Most don't understand that it is easier in general to treat the alcoholic. The enabler has deeper problems of behavioral dependance. Most importantly, to fix the household (America), both must stop.
Obviously many are in need and don't fall into this situation. Regardless, the more government enables, the worse it gets. Missing in today's dialog is the fact that the dependent, very often, when forced to fend for themselves, actually become successful.
I hope that answers the first question.
WRT second question, my point is that in every brain there is the need for faith. Faith can revolve around believing what you want (like republicans destroying the middle class) OR some magical person in the sky. Imagining a magical person in the sky is healthier than believing your own BS (republicans have destroyed the middle class).
The religious know their limits. Progressives don't. Most religious do not believe in "deals" or "covenants" with God so the act of believing in God is less damaging than believing only in yourself.
Now we find the poison pill for the Post Office, funding their healthcare benefits for the next 75 years in 10 - 5Billion a year for the administration to steal. One comment I heard was we are putting aside funds for workers not yet born!
DC is after every loose dollar they can find. They are picking off pension funds and social security at an alarming rate. Any agency that has any pool of funds is going to be looted until these people get it all.
That is what the voters need to know.
Best
Jan
They talk about a "transfer of wealth;" a "redistribution" like it's why "we're broke." They talk about it a lot. It's relentless, really.
But where is this "redistribution?" Where is it? The poor are getting poorer. The working/middle classes are becoming poor -- while the rich get richer. There has been and continues to be a transfer of wealth TO the already wealthy FROM the pockets of people who vote to help them take it (along with the rest of ours).
It's hard, sometimes, to grasp how middle/working class people who drink the false "redistribution" brew and other Republican (plutocratic) kool-aide can keep drinking in the face of overwhelming evidence that it's poison.
He spoke of "the invisible hand of the market" as though the Great Depression of the 1930's had never happened. How could an economist of his education still believe that?
It's as though someone told the Presidents that "the invisible hand of conscience" will control murder and other crimes, and they believed them and stopped prosecuting criminals!
Actually, it's worse than that. It's as if our courts released the man who burglarized our home and took our valuables, let him keep our valuables and then made us pay his bail and court costs after he was found guilty!
What really is disturbing is that Prs. Obama still has at least 2 of Greenspans' disciples in charge of our economy today.
Some economists have some very alarming (to people that depend on government entities for their psychological comfort) data regarding the invisible hand.
Notably -check out Russel Roberts' work. He is a brilliant economist whose ideas are solidly based on fact.
Don't fall for the control mechanism of Democrats vs Republicans because it is designed to herd you into supporting one camp or the other, making you believe that you are exercising a real democratic option. But in reality all you are doing is providing a thin gloss of legitimacy to a underlying tyranny.