More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer

Posted: March 4, 2010 08:38 AM

The Coming Battle of the Ritz Carlton

What's Your Reaction:

President Obama's announcement yesterday began the final chapter in the 14-month war over health care reform. The decisive battle will obviously take place on the floor of Congress. But the most symbolically powerful battle may take place next week some miles from the Capitol, at the Ritz Carlton Hotel on the edge of Washington's tony Georgetown neighborhood.

That's where executives from America's health care industry will gather under the banner of AHIP (America's Health Insurance Plans) to plot - and then execute - a last-ditch attempt to defeat health insurance reform.

That's also where, on Tuesday, March 9th, thousands of demonstrators from Health Care for America Now (HCAN) and allied groups will mass to confront the insurance executives - and their attempts to effectively deny quality health care to millions of Americans.

The term "battle" is entirely appropriate. The insurance executives who run America's health insurance companies are, in fact, waging war on the American public. Their goal is the continued domination of the American health care system. They want to be able to continue to raise their rates more than three times faster than wages - and twice as fast as the underlying cost of health care - so they can continue to gorge themselves with record profits. They want to continue to siphon off the healthiest, wealthiest customers and deny access to insurance for anyone with a "pre-existing condition" or illness.

Just like all wars, their war on the American family costs tens of thousands of lives and untold suffering. Each year, the lack of health insurance costs 45,000 lives. In other words, each year we lose 80% as many Americas to insurance industry greed as died in the entire Vietnam War.

What's worse, these insurance executives don't get a first-hand look at the suffering and death that results from their policies, or their attempts to block reform. They manage their war from pristine office towers. They don't have to look into the eyes of a husband whose wife has just died of cancer that could have been cured if it were caught early - but went undetected because for financial reasons she had no insurance and kept putting off a routine check up.

They don't have to face the family who lost their home -- and everything else -- to bankruptcy because an uninsured medical emergency wiped out the fruits of decades of hard work.

They don't have to explain themselves to the millions of Americas who worry they are just one pink slip away from losing their insurance coverage and know that a spouse's history of cancer or heart disease or diabetes will prevent them from ever getting insurance again.

On next Tuesday, thousands of those Americans will demand to confront those executives in the lovely halls and conference rooms of the Ritz.

Like the mythical mobster Tony Soprano, the kids of these insurance executives think their parents have respectable jobs. In fact, just like Tony Soprano, they traffic in lives and suffering in order to make more and more money for themselves.

Time to rip off the patina of respectability.

Take people like Ed Hanway, the former CIGNA CEO who retired at the end of last year with a $73 million golden parachute - money he earned by denying coverage to people like Nataline Sarkisian. Nataline died in 2007, just before Christmas. She was 17. She died because CIGNA wouldn't pay for Nataline's liver transplant - even though she had health insurance.

The average transplant operation and hospital stay costs about $250,000. Ed Hanway's $73 million golden parachute would have bought 292 liver transplants. Nataline only needed one.

Or people like Wellpoint's CEO Angela Braly - who last year took down almost $10 million in compensation. Wellpoint's Anthem Blue Cross division just announced a 39% premium increase; it says it needs more money to meet its expenses - like Angela's $10 million salary. And by the way, Wellpoint's profits for the fourth quarter of 2009 skyrocketed to $2.7 billion - accomplished by actually providing health insurance to 185,000 fewer policy holders.

Or people like AHIP chief lobbyist, Karen Ignagni, who once worked to promote health care for average people at the AFL-CIO. She took her thirty pieces of silver and switched sides.

These people are coming to Washington to use their enormous economic power to prevent their fellow Americans from having secure, affordable health care. They cannot be allowed to succeed.

In fact, they should be greeted with the same enthusiasm with which we would greet the forces of an invading army. They should be met at National Airport and Union Station with signs declaring they are unwelcome in the nation's capital.

HCAN has sent letters asking the dozen speakers listed on their agenda to cancel their appearances. HCAN has demanded that these academics and consultants stop giving aid and comfort to the enemy - stop giving them the cover of respectability.

These insurance executives are not here to negotiate. They are not here to shape legislation. They are here to stop health care reform dead in its tracks. They will not be "convinced" to allow health care reform to pass the Congress. They must be defeated.


Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist, and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on Amazon.com.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 141
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
10:16 PM on 03/06/2010
Thank you for writing this essay. This significance of abolishing the filibuster and restoring majority rule can't be overstated. If you keep writing on this issue, people will keep pushing for change.
08:47 PM on 03/06/2010
The administration itself has already defeated any real health-care reform by assiduously keeping discussion of a single-payer solution off the table and working behind the scenes to ensure that no meaningful 'public option' or price controls over prescription drugs would appear in the eventual bill. So while the insurance industry might mildly prefer the status quo over the few constraints that the current proposal enacts, they'll be very well off regardless (and the taxpayer and consumer will wind up paying the price, as usual).

Of course, if the Democrats can pass off this sham as 'reform', then passing it might benefit them next November - but only those who for some reason are still loyal to the party after its treachery of the past year will actually care. For the rest of us, the epic 'battle' which you describe is about as meaningful as watching Survivor.
02:40 PM on 03/05/2010
The thing that amazes me is that so-called conservatives, self-professed patriots, and those that think they are the true Americans aren't fighting for Americans. Why not stand for something that benefits America. Why aren't you fighting against relaxing the laws that let corporations screw-over Americans.

Why aren't you screaming 'BUY AMERICAN', 'FOR AMERICA', 'FOR AMERICANS'.

We are one nation divided by the corporations so that they can steal the country away. Let's face it a corporations whole purpose is profit not for America or for Americans.

But of course if you listen to $20mil a year Glen Beck (if that's his real name), it's the eradication of liberals (other Americans) that's important, not the restriction of multinational corporations that pay him and move our jobs to foreign countries. Wake Up!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bayard Waterbury
social philosopher
09:41 AM on 03/05/2010
Sad that they feel so strongly about such a bogus bill, because they view that ANY CHANGE could be harmful to THEIR health. Maybe they are right, but I believe that, on balance, the greatest loss they'll suffer will be the cost of attorneys to figure out how to do the cheating modifications they'll have to make to keep their absurd profits in the reformed business environment. Of course, what should be happening is that they should all be drawing unemployment for losing their jobs because they got too greedy to be kept.
01:17 AM on 03/05/2010
First, Social Security is NOT bankrupt. Google and read the information from the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. Second, if there were no cap on FICA, Social Security would be solvent well into the next Century. Third, would anyone really want to bring back the "good old days" before the Federal Government required automakers to place stickers on new cars with these stickers indicating the MAXIMUM price for which the automobile could be sold?

Big Business, including insurance companies, are in business to make money - not to provide a product or a service. To condemn them for doing their job is like blaming a rattle snake for striking any warm-bodied object. Federal regulation helps to provide a level playing field for us, the American Public. This regulation, with due diligence on the part of the consumer, also helps level the playing field. I would not dream of buying a car without looking up its NADA value.

Oil companies "compete." As Ralph Nader once said, they always raise prices to keep up with the competition. Health Insurance companies also "compete" in he same way. One insurance company raises rates and all of the others raise theirs the keep up with the competition. Selling insurance across state lines to increase competition is a red herring. and it smells, too. AARP sells its Medicare Supplement Insurance across state lines. But the cost of this insurance to the consumer depends upon the state in which the consumer lives.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1tourist
01:18 PM on 03/05/2010
Clearly, these insurance industry CEOs are doing their jobs very well, and being compensated for it. If you read the article, you should know just how fair and equitable the system is. I have to be amazed that this country, reputed to be the home of truth and justice, entertains arguments against doing anything to deal with the massive inequities of our health care system, the only one in the civilized world where care can be denied based upon lack of coverage, while sitting by and accepting that our financial troubles include wars, bail outs and multiple pork projects dumped on the public, but benefitting the few, while arguing that doing something for the many, in fact all, is too costly. Admittedly, the bill(s) that are around are convuluted, but, at some point, one has to concede that it is past time to take on this issue and do it right, or is that just a pipe dream?
12:43 AM on 03/05/2010
To start with, the federal government i.e. the United States has no business trying to regulate o fund health care for the American people. There is no authority granted in the Constitution for them to do so. If health care needs to be reformed it is up to the American people, by way of the individual States to set the agenda.

This is true for most of what goes on in Congress, NO AUTHORITY. Read the law i.e. the Constitution.
/s/ Jim
07:33 AM on 03/05/2010
Tell me how the 'American People' reform insurance? The government we have is a representative government the problem is that it is not representing 'We The People'.

BTW corporations are not persons in the constitution yet the supreme court, the republicans and our government has been treating them as if they are.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
1tourist
01:20 PM on 03/05/2010
Right- concentrate on war and defense spending as is our constitutional duty.
02:52 PM on 03/05/2010
C'mon that's not all it says.............
photo
William1950
everything I say could be wrong
10:40 PM on 03/04/2010
it's time for americans to "move their insurance" .. just as the move your money campaign is working... move your insurance. you can't do it you say?? it will be inconvenient... and you might have to resort to emergency room medical care just as millions of our fellow citizens already do.. but cancel your policies ... fluck em... move your insurance...
photo
dargray
I never bet money I can't afford to lose
10:11 PM on 03/04/2010
I don't understand the idea that attacking insurance companies will bring down health care cost.The primary cost are the hospital radiology and labs insurance premiums increase because of these hikes.How does the proposed health care bill do any thing to control the real cost? Any ideas?
10:39 PM on 03/04/2010
The Healthcare Insurance Industry (HII) DOES NOT provide Healthcare.
The HII is a high-priced middleman, attempting to maximize profits by minimizing
costs. Guess what? ANY benefits paid by the HII are COSTS. Your (hypothetical)
late onset Diabetes is a high, long-term COST. So, if there is a way to thow you and
your costly disease off of their rolls, they will do so. All the rest is a veneer of B.S.

Why is that so difficult for people to understand? Are other facets of the Healthcare
Industry (i.e.-Pharmaceuticals, Lab Testing, Malpractice Insurance) out of whack? Of course
they are. But the Healthcare Insurance Industry ADDS ON overhead to all of these already
inflated costs.
10:52 PM on 03/04/2010
25% to 30% overhead tact on by insurance companies that don't even provide any healthcare service is hardly a benign aspect of this debate. Add to that government requirements for physicians to buy the equipment and software to access centralized records databases, yet another unfunded mandate that forces doctors to pass the costs on to their patients. If you want to control the real costs, get the government and the free market profiteers out of the way so doctors can once again practice medicine and save lives !
09:58 PM on 03/04/2010
Good luck passing any substantial changes to the existing system. It will never happen considering the incestual relationship that both political parties have with the insurance industry. Any thing other than Single Payer Healthcare is promoting the status quo !
09:49 PM on 03/04/2010
I've read so many articles like this...they're good...we know who the enemy is...but many of these give us, the populace no real practical ways to fight back. I'd like to see some activism and some ways we could "move our money" out of these monster's pockets. I think they'd start listening to us if their stock or profits plummeted.
08:56 PM on 03/04/2010
At this point, I'm more concerned that passing a healthcare bill will insure the matter won't be addressed again for generations. Without a public option, the biggest boon will be to insurance companies from which millions of customers will be FORCED BY LAW to purchase health insurance.

Remember, Clinton tried (barely) to reform healthcare and failed; but the issue returned to the spotlight - albeit 16 years later. It returned, however, with an energy far greater than it had during Clinton's tenure. If it fails this time, it will be addressed again and perhaps a plan will be developed that will actually help people more than (or at least as much as) large, for-profit corporations.
10:05 PM on 03/04/2010
Also, you might consider the fact that the Obama healthcare plan, if approved by Congress, won't even go into effect for four more years. Considering the growing rage against the current White House occupant, he may not even be around to see the devestation and hear the complaints when this horrific legislation is finally put into action !
photo
Heartlight3
Every act is an act of self-definition.
11:06 PM on 03/04/2010
Or they may vote him out before they have a chance to realize what a good thing he did. More chance of that if there was a public option, though.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:32 PM on 03/04/2010
Republicans want to sabotage health reform. They are on the insurance industry's side!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chelliza
07:19 PM on 03/04/2010
Unfortuantely, many will not push for this until they are in the same boat. More and more companys are dropping their health insurance option, even some states are talking about not insuring their workers. As more people lose their insurance, more will look at it a different way. Actually, here in Reno, NV, where it is very red, one local station has a poll about using reconciliation. More than 60% are in favor of using it. I would be surprised, but many here in Reno who have lost insurance, or are about to, are Republicans. That suddenly changes their outlook.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wrabbitt
Soylent Green IS People.
06:27 PM on 03/04/2010
Anyone who works for a Health insurance company does not want reform of any type. The American people supply congress and the senate with free health care, with no co pays at all, if congress and the senate would join Blue Cross, blue whatever and pay thesame price I do, then I would be perfectly willing to let health care reform start over,Look there's a flying pig with lipstick on,not here color too red.
06:20 PM on 03/04/2010
Somebody needs to get the photos and addresses of these people (health insurance executives) who are ripping us off and then watching us die......We need to start making "house calls" like doctors use to....
11:38 PM on 03/04/2010
Love it!