iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Creamer

Robert Creamer

Posted: October 28, 2010 11:43 PM

Most of the punditry continues to assume that the die is cast -- that Republicans will win control of the House this fall. Certainly that outcome is entirely possible. But there is a Democratic path to victory next Tuesday.

Fivethirtyeight.com currently portends that there are 152 solid Democratic seats, 174 solid Republican seats, 29 seats that are leaning Democratic, 42 seats that are leaning Republican and 42 toss-ups. Fivethirtyeight.com's Nate Silver gives Democrats only 17% odds of winning 218 votes.

MSNBC and HuffPost's Pollster.com give Democrats only a 21% chance to maintain control of the House. They rate 193 seats as Democratic, 212 Republican and 30 as toss-ups.

If you believe these and other handicappers, Democrats face long odds on Tuesday. But let's remember that even if your odds of success are one in five -- they are not zero in five. People line up to play casino games with worse odds every day. Some walk away winners.

But to beat the odds and win, Democrats must be successful at four key tasks over the next five days.

1). Democrats and their allies must be successful at turning out larger than expected numbers of Latino voters. Polls show Latino voters breaking 65% to 70% Democratic, but their turnout in most Mid-terms falls well below both non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic black voters.

Democrats have made a major effort this year to increase Latino turnout, especially in California, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, Illinois and Florida. Republicans have done everything they can to suppress the Latino vote, going so far as to set up a front group to run ads to actually discourage Latinos from going to the polls.

But so far it appears the mobilization resulting from the Arizona "papers please" law and Republican talk of repealing the 14th Amendment may couple with on-the-ground GOTV efforts to increase levels of participation well in excess of 2006 turnout.

That increase would be critical in a number of key races. It is especially necessary in swing seats occupied by incumbents Raul Grajalva, Solomon Ortiz, Ciro Rodriguez, John Salazar, Dina Titus, Jerry McNerney, Bill Foster, Debbie Halvorson, Suzanne Kosmas, Alan Grayson and Allen Boyd.

2). Democrats need to successfully assure that two key issues are on the minds of the voters at the close of the race: Social Security, and outsourcing jobs.

The Republicans plan to revive the failed Bush proposal to privatize Social Security. The "Road Map" plan by would-be GOP Budget Chair Paul Ryan would also eliminate Medicare and replace it with vouchers for private insurance companies. These positions are radioactive to older voters. No wonder, the Social Security Administration's own actuarial study confirms the Ryan proposal would cut benefits by up to 58%.

Polls show that this issue has enormous traction to move swing voters and it has taken center stage especially in the many swing districts that have an abundance of older voters.

Swing voters -- especially in districts in the industrial heartland like Wisconsin, Ohio, Iowa, Pennsylvania and upstate New York have a deeply ingrained understanding that major corporations have been systematically outsourcing their jobs to countries where they can pay their workers less than a living wage. And it makes them positively furious that Republicans oppose cutting tax breaks that actually encourage these companies to export their jobs.

Both the Social Security and outsourcing issues put the Republicans on the defense and go directly to the concerns of everyday voters about their economic futures. Both also frame the debate correctly. They both define the antagonists in the narrative as Democrats and everyday Americans versus Republicans and big corporations and insurance companies.

To win next Tuesday, Democrats need to keep these two issues front of mind for swing voters as they go to the polls. That is especially true in districts defended by incumbents such as Mike Ross, Gabrielle Giffords, Jim Himes, Debbie Halvorson, Baron Hill, Mark Schauer, Tim Walz, Carol Shea-Porter, Dina Titus, Bill Owens, Kurt Schraeder, Steve Kagen, Earl Pomeroy, Chris Murphy, Pat Murphy, Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin, Kathy Dahlkemper, Charlie Wilson, Zack Space, Steve Driehaus, Tom Periello, Rick Boucher, Health Schuler, Bruce Braley, Mary Jo Kilroy, Dave Loebsack, Mike Arcuri, Chris Carney and John Hall.

In each of these seats the issue on the minds of the voters can move points on Election Day. Social Security and outsourcing must be front and center.

3). In many districts it is especially important that Democrats are successful in emphasizing the strong personal relationship of voters - especially older voters - with their Member of Congress. And they must also be successful at disqualifying the alternative.

Democrats must make the election a choice -- not a referendum on Democratic performance. In the end, people vote for people. When they get down to making their choice on the ballot, it is critical that they remember the personal qualities that they like in Democratic incumbents and feel that the alternative is risky. There are many districts where this factor can make a decisive difference.

In some districts occupied by long-time incumbents, the constituent service operation has directly helped tens of thousands of district residents. That builds loyalty.

In others, Members have developed deep networks of personal relationships with leaders of key constituencies.

To win next week, Democrats need to engage all of those relationships and all of that personal loyalty, and contrast it with the risky Republican alternative.

Districts where these factors can be especially important are defended by colorful incumbents with strong personalities such as John Spratt, Ike Skelton, Lincoln Davis, Nick Rahall, Rick Boucher, Paul Kanjorski, Baron Hill, and Barney Frank (whose seat is really not in play).

Democrat Joe Garcia has an excellent chance of winning in Florida's predominantly Cuban American 25th District on the strength of his strong relationships in the community, a flawed Republican alternative and also a robust get out the vote operation. Which gets us to the fourth point.

4). First and foremost, for Democrats to beat the odds next Tuesday, our get out the vote operations must function flawlessly. Basically, these operations must defy the "likely voter" models that have dictated the gloomy scenario in most polls.

There is little question that between the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC), the DNC's Organize for America (OFA), the individual campaigns, and Democratic allies like AFSCME, AFL-CIO, SEIU, MoveOn.org, USAction, NEA, Center for Community Change, et al, Progressives are conducting the most effective Get Out the Vote (GOTV) effort of any Mid-term in history. Many Latino, African American and women's organizations are also conducting special programs targeting their communities.

Many of the veterans of the Obama campaign -- which ran the most effective GOTV program in American history -- are deeply involved. The culture and systems developed by the Obama field structure will go a long way to creating well oiled, efficient GOTV organizations. Well organized coordinated campaigns are functioning in key states, focusing heavily on early voting and mail vote in many, and this accounts for a robust showing by Democratic-registered voters in many states. And they all plan massive 72-hour voter contact drills and Election Day operations to run votes.

Democrats are relying heavily on door-to-door contact, while Republicans use paid phone calls and mail. But studies show conclusively that door-to-door contacts are far superior to phones and mail.

Over the next five days, Democrats have to deliver in the field if they intend to upset the odds. We must make millions of door-to-door and phone contacts. We must repeatedly contact voters who would vote Democratic, but our unlikely to vote. We need to explain to these voters how critical it is that they vote. And we need to deliver that very effective Election Day message: "I won't get off your porch until you vote!"

Everyone, no matter where you live can increase Democratic effectiveness in getting out the vote. Pick up the phone and call your local campaign, Democratic Party, your union, or MoveOn.org. Volunteer to go door to door or get on the phones.

We know from research that the more we contact mobilizable voters, the more likely they are to vote. You don't have to "persuade" them, you just have to contact them. You just have to get their attention, and the likelihood they'll vote goes way up.

And if you don't live where there is a critical campaign, you can still get involved. OFA and MoveOn both have programs that allow you to call voters in swing states from the comfort of your own home.

To volunteer, go to OFA.BO/GOTV

To call swing districts: Call.BarackObama.com. That will automatically give you a targeted list of voters in a swing district.

To volunteer with MoveON with a campaign near your home, go here: www.moveon.org/2010

If you want to call from home, go here: pol.moveon.org/2010

If you want to go to a MoveOn campaign event, go here: pol.moveon.org/event/lastchance

So there is no excuse. YOU can personally affect the outcome of these elections.

Still don't believe you can make a difference?

In 2000, our consulting firm was doing the field program for Democrat Elaine Blum for Congress in South Florida. We had an excellent operation. But we lost the race by 500 votes. That was roughly one vote per precinct.

That was the same 500 votes that cost Al Gore the Presidency -- and gave us the nightmare of George Bush's presidency -- the Iraq War -- massive deficits -- and the 2008 economic disaster.

If our field program had gotten out one extra vote per precinct, none of that would have happened. Frankly, that keeps me up nights.

Wednesday morning, don't say to yourself, "wow, we only lost the House by one seat - and only by a few votes - and I could have changed that."

There is a pathway for Democratic victory, but it requires we hit on all four of these key cylinders. Too much is at stake to allow any stone to remain unturned. Pick up the phone as soon as you finish reading this. We have five days to change history.

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist, and author of the recent book: "Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win," available on amazon.com.

 
 
 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 417
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
04:34 PM on 11/01/2010
Why Doesn't Everyone Know Jan Schakowsky's Husband, Robert Creamer, Wrote ObamaCare in Jail?

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/10/why_doesnt_everyone_know_jan_s.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
06:26 PM on 10/30/2010
It could happen Bob. Just to be on the safe side, maybe all Democrats should nail copies of The Nation over their lintels and hope for a "Black Mist" Ten Commandments style.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mikyung Lim
06:13 PM on 10/30/2010
Thanks. It's very informative.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:26 PM on 10/30/2010
Despite the republicans obvious desire to essentially wipe out social security and medicare, a majority of senior citizens are still expected to vote republican. Both sad and unbelievable.
03:05 PM on 10/30/2010
"The Democratic Path to Victory in the House"

The surest way to fire up the enthusiasm of true Democrats (not the Wall Street fakes) is to announce the resignations of Obama and Geithner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Contact1972
BigGayInc
04:33 PM on 10/30/2010
Sure...that'll happen.
02:13 PM on 10/30/2010
Yes, you union guys and gals make sure that your members vote the way your unions wants you to vote! If you don't, you may lose your place in line for jobs and other benefits.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
4midable
04:05 AM on 11/01/2010
Hate to break it to you, Bev but we now live in age with a thing called a secret ballot. Sorry to burst your bubble.
11:12 AM on 11/01/2010
Yes, but only because we will have saved the country from Card Check legislation on Nov. 2.
11:55 AM on 10/30/2010
Robert Creamer has gone from saying that the democrats would hold the house to admitting that you have a better chance of winning in a casino than the democrats have of retaining the house. I suspect that all along he has known in his heart that the dems were in for a bad rout. That would explain why he has never taken up my repeated offers to match any amount in a cash wager that he would care to make. That makes me ask then if he knew all along that the dems would lose, why has he been lying about it to HP readers? If he has been lying to us about this, what else does he lie about here on the HP? Like so many other left wing idealouges, he will try to hedge his prediction of a democratic victory very close to the end so that he can claim he was "honest" with his predictions. Only those not following his posts will be mislead by that effort. It is just days away Robert. You know who you have to thank for us having Speaker of the house John Boehner, Barack Hussein Obama MMM,MMM,MMM!
photo
intolleft
ObamaTAX...getting you shovel ready
11:22 AM on 10/31/2010
Reality doesn't go well over on these threads dude.
10:54 AM on 10/30/2010
"Democrats have made a major effort this year to increase Latino turnout"

And here is how Obama has tried to do it: Obama 10/25/2010 "If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, 'We're going to punish our enemies and we're going to reward our friends...."

So this is what it comes down to. The great community organizer now calls some Americans the enemy. All along I thought that al quaeda were the bad guys, but now it appears that Caucasians are the enemies of the state in Obama-land.

Disgusting.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
dimplesmile7
09:09 AM on 10/30/2010
"Go back 100 years and every time the president lost a Congress two years into the first term, he got re-elected" Mitch McConnell, October 7, 2010
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2010-10-07-Obama-then-now_N.htm?csp=34news
10:26 AM on 10/30/2010
Yes but Clinton and Reagan for example moved to the Center. Obama thinks he's too ideologically pure to do so. All his pragmatic advisors like Emmanuel are leaving replaced by purists. He's done .
03:29 AM on 10/31/2010
This doesn't even qualify as nonsense. Obama too ideologically pure? He's consistently moved to the center-- on healthcare reform, financial reform, shrinking the size of the stimulus, backing off climate change, waffling on DADT.... He ran using inspirational language and a message of change, but he's always been more of a pragamatist than an ideologue, and he's never been more than a bit left of center. If he was, he'd have the enthusiastic support of the left in this campaign.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Beyrak
09:09 AM on 10/30/2010
There no path to victory for Democrats in the House. None.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:29 PM on 10/30/2010
Not this late in the game, that's for sure. They squandered one opportunity after another to actually stand up for working Americans. Time to pay the piper.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
4midable
04:17 AM on 11/01/2010
Don't bet on it.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
viko
Aim high, allow for the wind, land on target.
09:04 AM on 10/30/2010
The Dem's must do it again and bring down a land slide or the Repubs will start again dimple chadding and nitpicking.
Obama made red become blue and ten million flowed in from sea to shining sea.
Bill clinton's words still ring loud and clear from the Dem's Convention in Phoenix. When will you people learn to be on the right side of history".
If the polls were 50/50 they would not campaign to have you stay away from voting.
Money and ads cant vote people do.
We are the people eighty percent.
We are not wanting to be incharge but we want to continue unraveling the debacle of the previous administration. We will not sacrifice our Country for position and power. We will not trow our position away on the bankers of Wall St.
They accuse us of what they are guilty of and try to pin the blame . Imagine if Banks invested in our Country after we bailed them out imagine if The Repubs said yes to a few things and did not obstruct everything. Imagine if The TARTP and The Stim Pak were in platy together .
It would be a different scenario. Obama is seen to be waisting time in seeing a more perfect union . He has integrity and that's why we voted for him . That's The American way.
Unity ,cooperation,mutual respect and Human Decency.
Do or values now make people suffer. Lets unite America with love.Humility is a key.
08:46 AM on 10/30/2010
Let's don't forget the Muslim population is being urged to vote. Let's hope they go to the polls, since they're the ones that are crucified by the Republicans.
07:32 AM on 10/30/2010
Funny how there is nothing about running on your record...Oh I forgot. A failed Heath Plan...A failed Banking plan...10% unemployment...14 trillion in debt hmmmm your right lets make the issue SS and Outsourcing Jobs something a Democratic controlled congress for 4 years has done nothing about.
10:56 AM on 10/30/2010
Good post. And let's not forget -

The federal budget deficit was 1.14% of GDP in 2007 when the Democrats took control of Congress. Four short years later it is now 10.64% of GDP
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
4midable
04:30 AM on 11/01/2010
Let's not forget that Bush blew a huge surplus, then proceeded to dig a hole we're still in. As for the Dem majority in Congress, give it a rest. By 2007 the hole was dug. Bush's power of veto and a the negative GOP minority ensured that it stayed dug..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
katersmc
03:42 PM on 10/30/2010
How exactly is the health plan a failure? Just because you don't want people to have the basic human right of having health insurance?
RealistBC
Micro-bios must pass muster.
06:30 AM on 10/30/2010
So sorry that this post is a day late and a dollar short. Had the administration done a better job of dealing with the issues that affect Main Street instead of catering to Wall Street crooks, this article would be completely unnecessary. As it is now, this article is very untimely and smacks of preventable desperation. This isn't to say that the points offered are incorrect, but they should have been effected months ago. Now, there are active voter suppression plans being made by the Republicans to counter what Hispanic and Black voters do turn out, and it isn't much of a stretch to expect that these tactics will include illegal activities. Holder's "Justice" Department is too busy threatening California over Prop 19 to even care about protecting the voting rights of the non-white citizen, which demonstrates once again that the Obama administration doesn't have a clue - and that it's the nation that will suffer for their misfeasance.
08:49 AM on 10/30/2010
HUH? You don't think the administration dealt with Wallstreet by passing Wall Street reforms and setting up a consumer agency? Where have you been?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
viko
Aim high, allow for the wind, land on target.
09:19 AM on 10/30/2010
They told Obama not to rock the boat.
Obama replied ,I'm trying to get the boat off the rocks.
10:58 AM on 10/30/2010
You have to read more than the title of the legislation to understand what's in the bill.

One of the culprits in collapsing the economy was unregualted trading if derivative products like credit default swaps. Yet when it came time to craft this very important bill, Obama lobbied against regulating this very activity that caused Lehman to fail.

The Wall Street reform was a farce and the consumer agency has done nothing.

Read a little, learn a little.
02:19 PM on 10/30/2010
Please be specific with your accusation of "active voter suppression being made by the Republicans".
02:58 AM on 10/30/2010
Recall "keep government hands off my Medicare" tea rallies? Medicare is a key issue for middle-aged and older voters. Even though they'd love to dramatically cut or eliminate the program, Repubs frequently remind voters of their opposition to the Obamacare $500 million cuts to Medicare. This has more impact than the deficit and Social Security. These age groups have legitimate fear regarding politicians toying with their medical safety net. Dems must broadcast explanation for cuts and guarantee and broadcast Obamacare does not endanger, but will improve, medical coverage.
08:51 AM on 10/30/2010
The Repubs are promising $100Bill in budget cuts....guess where they're going to cut? Social programs like Social Security...Medicare/Medicaid....health care....all social programs and they'll probably try to keep us in Iraq and pump up the military budget.
12:41 PM on 10/30/2010
Obama's the one who cut foodstamps to bail out the teachers unions...
02:25 PM on 10/30/2010
Obama is the one who is cutting Medicare/Medicaid by $500billion. That's how he plans to pay for part of it. He said it himself. That's part of the new healthcare legislation or didn't you read either. Cuts to payments to doctors which in turn force doctors to stop taking patients on Medicare. And the Health and Human Services Czar will decide what treatments will be acceptable and which won't.