iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Creamer

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Creamer

Where Do Progressives Go From Here?

Posted: 08/02/11 10:16 AM ET

No doubt about it. There is widespread disappointment among progressives at the outcome of the debt ceiling deal. So where do progressives go from here?

Right now in Europe politicians are struggling to avoid default that would lead their economies to collapse. In the United States, radical right Republicans manufactured the same kind of crisis that Europeans are desperately trying to avoid, and threatened to blow the entire economy to smithereens if they didn't get their way.

Their tactic worked. Turns out in a game of chicken the guy who is most reckless has a huge advantage.

The president and Democratic leadership did a valiant job ameliorating the worst features the deal. But in the end the negotiation was only about the size of the ransom.

The deficit reduction deal that Ronald Regan negotiated with Democrat House Speaker Tip O'Neal in 1984 was 82% new revenue and only 18% cuts in expenditures. Clinton's deal that lead to surpluses as far as the eye could see in the 1990's was 62% new taxes -- mainly on the wealthy -- and 38% cuts. This deal was 100% cuts.

The general consensus among economists is that the impact of the cuts will be to damage the already-weak economic recovery. The deal included no short-term stimulus.

There were four bright spots.

First, for the first time in many years many of the cuts in spending came from the Department of Defense -- although the final plan did not count the $1.2 trillion in reduced spending that will happen as America ends its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. These, of course, are actual cuts in spending that were included in Senator Reid's plan that Republicans refused to embrace.

Second, the "trigger" that creates automatic cuts if the new bipartisan joint committee fails to agree on additional ways to reduce the deficit, exempts Medicaid, low income programs, Social Security and Medicare benefits.

Third, most of the cuts in important Federal programs don't go into effect until 2013. That means they won't have as much negative short-term impact on the economy. But just as importantly, it means that a new Democratic Congress could roll them back before they do long-term damage.

Finally, of course, the deal did -- at least partially -- disarm the right wing econo- terrorists for the balance of this congress. It not only extends the debt limit beyond 2012, it also includes agreement on spending levels for the 2012 and 2013 fiscal years. That last point will likely prevent their once-again threatening to shut down the government if their demands aren't met.

Unfortunately the deal leaves them with one final weapon: the bi-partisan joint committee process. Under the terms of the legislation, a group of twelve Members of Congress -- equally split between the two parties -- will try to come up with a package that would cut the deficit by another $1.2 to $1.5 trillion over the next decade. If it can muster a majority, then its proposals would be "fast tracked" to votes in the House and Senate with no amendments and no filibuster in the Senate.

That would mean that if one Democratic member of the committee agrees to support, say, serious cuts in Medicare and Social Security -- with or without new revenue -- that proposal would go for an up or down vote. If the Democratic majority -- of only 53 votes in the Senate -- didn't hold, then the President would have to veto the measure or it would become law. There is clearly danger here.

Some have argued that the "trigger" that would impose automatic cuts (but not in Social Security, low income programs, Medicaid or Medicare benefits) would be onerous enough to force Republicans to deal -- and to agree on more revenue. I suppose I could be wrong -- but I think that the odds that the Republican House will agree to new revenue are about million to one.

In any case, the existence of this new joint committee creates the necessity for the first of three major progressive priorities coming out of the borrowing limit battle:

Priority #1: As the joint committee begins its process, progressives must organize a determined, relentless campaign to prevent Congress from making cuts in Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare.

We know exactly where the Republicans are going here. The Republican budget would eliminate Medicare and replace it with a system of vouchers for private insurance that raises the out of pocket health care expenses of seniors by $6,000 per year. They would raise the retirement age for Social Security, and turn Medicaid into block grants that would eliminate the guarantee of health care for the poor, and nursing home care for seniors and the disabled. And they would do it all to prevent millionaires and billionaires from having to contribute a dime to deficit reduction.

Progressives need to be just as determined and unmovable in our defense of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security as the Republicans were in defending millionaires and billionaires from tax increases. Let's face it, their tough advocacy for the rich worked. We need to mount a national campaign to demand that Congress "just say no" to cuts in the "big three."

And let's remember we absolutely have the high political ground. Over 70% of Americans oppose cuts in Socials Security, Medicare and Medicaid -- including a huge chunk of Republicans.

Priority #2: We have to refocus the political conversation directly to the issue that the vast majority of Americans really care about: jobs.

To do that we have to organize a campaign to promote an emergency jobs bill that will rapidly put millions of Americans to work -- doing work that critically needs to be done.

And let's be clear. Putting people to work is not an intractable problem that is mysterious. For about $220 billion you could put over two million Americans to work for two years -- and massively lower the unemployment rate.

I'm not talking about "incentivizing" companies, or cutting tax rates, or providing "stimulus." I'm talking about funding specific job slots at state and local governments and the National Parks. I'm talking about hiring people directly, the way Roosevelt did it during the last great American jobs emergency.

You'd fund specific jobs -- the same way that Clinton did for the 100,000 cops in the COPS program in the 1990's. You'd have a teacher corps, a school improvement corps, a parks improvement corps. You'd fund slots for fire fighters, and home health care workers.

You would create jobs by actually creating jobs. And you could fund it by raising the tax rates on millionaires and billionaires.

But, you're saying, the Republican House won't pass that.

We need to propose a concrete, practical jobs program that is completely understandable and directly addresses the number one issue on the minds of ordinary Americans -- and then we need to make our case to the American people.

It's what they care most about, and it's what we must do now to get out of the Republican "deficits are all that matters" frame and back into the "all that really matters is what will create jobs an economic growth" frame. That's the ground where progressives win -- we have to take the debate there -- now.

Priority #3: Elections matter.

Progressives took a great deal of ground during the first two years of the Obama Administration. Then the empire struck back and we have been defending that turf ever since. We cannot be deflected from preparing the most robust counter offensive in the history of American politics next November.

If you are unhappy with the results of the deficit ceiling fight, just think of what the right would do to America with Mitt Romney, Michelle Bachmann or Rick Perry as President and a Republican House and Senate. That would be just the appetizer for a right wing orgy.

They would destroy Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and the EPA. They would go after women's rights, continue the assault on science, and legitimate intolerance.

They would outsource what remains of our manufacturing jobs, repeal health care for all, eliminate any restraint on Wall Street's greed, destroy unions and allow millionaires and billionaires to plunder what is left of America's middle class.

And if you think they won't -- that they will show any restraint -- just remember how they threatened to throw America into default if they didn't get their way.

The debit ceiling battle must serve as a warning -- a wake up call. There is time to stop them. Americans oppose cuts in Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid. They support increasing taxes on the wealthiest Americans. They support a government that actually produces new jobs. They support collective bargaining. They oppose economic terrorism. But we have to stand up straight and prepare for battle.

The only way to deal with people like these is to defeat them at the polls. As Ed Schultz says every night: "Let's get to work."

Robert Creamer is a long-time political organizer and strategist, and author of the book: Stand Up Straight: How Progressives Can Win, available on Amazon.com. He is a partner in Democracy Partners. Follow him on Twitter @rbcreamer.

 
 
 

Follow Robert Creamer on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rbcreamer

 
 
  • Comments
  • 333
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
11:20 AM on 08/03/2011
Now how do we get a strong Democratic Liberal to run for President and have Mr. Obama ride off into the sunset. Can you say Bernie Sanders in 2012? I can't bring myself to vote for Obama again, fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me!!! Not gonna happen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DCmykl
A long seemingly endless edge...
10:18 AM on 08/03/2011
To say that there is " widespread disappointment' is like saying there was some dismay when the Titanic sank.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dennisdelia
Injustice anywhere-Threat to justice everywhere!
09:02 AM on 08/03/2011
I am encouraged by the positive detailed solution approach in this article!
Its easy to be depressed and give up to the dark side of the republicans......I did that in 1980 and we got Reagan/Bush/Bush which nearly destroyed the middle class and justice for women and workers!!

I will continue to support the progressives and try to win back congress in 2012 one seat at a time!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dweav
12:46 PM on 08/03/2011
It should be Reagan/Bus­h/Clinton/Bush since it was Clinton that dismantled the regulations on so much that has now bitten us in the a$$. NAFTA, repeal of Glass/Stegal, media consolidation, the Dirivative Modernization Act, etc. The DLC also should recieve much blame too. They threw labor under the bus in the late 80's to suck up to corp $$. America has had right wing policies since Reagan.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Timothy Chiacchira
02:25 AM on 08/03/2011
Obama is nothing but a rehtoric bag. He says one thing but does another.. I am not voting for him this time.. I worked on his campaign in Fl last time but not this time.. He does not deserve a vote from me. Here is my list of reasons why:

1. abrogation of the 4th amendment
2 Rendition and torture contineus under his administrtation
3. tax cuts for the wealthy
4. lack of regulation to wall street
5. Debt ceiling compromise
6. Gautonomo cuba
7. Taking single payer off the table for helth care reform (he loves those corps)
8. 4 undeclared wars and no end in sight even Iraq pullout is a lie.
9. His War on Drugs
10. i am sure I am musing something oh his administrtions defense of Doma
11. Secrecy and allowing the state depeertment to cover up child rape and prostitiion in Afgahnistan by American corporations.

Obama I am ashamed I voted for you, worked on the phones and went door to door for you.. Your hope was nothing but words.. I WILL NEVER TRUST YOU AGAIN. EVER.
CognitoErgoSum
CogitoErgoSum was taken when I signed up.
02:55 AM on 08/03/2011
From the painstaking collection of lies you listed, it doesn't sound like you ever trusted him... or voted for him.
09:51 AM on 08/03/2011
Right. Why should Democrats be in charge of all the torture and hate. The Repugs are so much better at it.
12:44 AM on 08/03/2011
When you have to keep changing what you call yourself due to the negative perception by the other 90% of people, you may have a more fundamental problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tazirai
Society is not your friend.
12:02 AM on 08/03/2011
Progressives need to tighten up and get their acts together. We need to have a MUCH louder voice. See progressives tend to be civil and not at all like those Tea Partiers. Progressives don't try to force their will on EVERY American. I hope the tea Party get's taught a good leson next election.
photo
Alwayspissedoffatsomeone
Liberalism = Stultification of the Brain
11:25 PM on 08/02/2011
Progressives should go the way of the horse-drawn carriage, home ice deliveries and beepers. At least the businesses I mentioned had a purpose...
CognitoErgoSum
CogitoErgoSum was taken when I signed up.
02:13 AM on 08/03/2011
It's the Tea Partiers who have no pupose other to bring Americva to some kind of nightmare Ayn-Rand-worshiping Objectivist dystopia.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dweav
12:52 PM on 08/03/2011
Your name suggests you should simply look in the mirror 24/7. Therein you will find the real problem
10:45 PM on 08/02/2011
We live in the most technologically advanced media and information super highway culture. The People need to simply outline what we want, what each party has done and continues to support. No demonization. No Brain Washing lies. No distractions from that which is important. Those behind the Tea party movement and each candidate should be revealed as well as their underlying expectations when their person is elected. The record on voting and support of each congressional Representative should be condensed and posted for all Americans to inspect. Each and every time the people are not represented-- NOT only the elite wealthy, but the everyday working class teacher, police officer, etc. should be represented and cared for the elected person should be removed from office. Eventually, election law should be ammended to ensure money/lobby and big business plays no part in the process. Until then, only by God's Grace will we survive.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LBA7895
09:57 PM on 08/02/2011
It would make a world of difference if the Progressive movement in the US had a leader with a spine and a voice.
Unfortunately, the person on whom we heaped all our frustrations and hopes has turned out to be spineless and silent when the chips are down and he is needed the most.
The Neo Facists know that "government" represents WEALTH, the wealth of the nation, and they are all about seizing WEALTH where ever they can, regardless of the cost to anyone else.
As soon as you realize there are no boundaries on the Neo Facists' lust for WEALTH, you can realize there are no boundaries on what they will do, or who they will screw, to get with they crave.
Like an addict stealing for drugs, these people are addicted to MONEY AND POWER.
CognitoErgoSum
CogitoErgoSum was taken when I signed up.
02:16 AM on 08/03/2011
>>"Unfortunat­ely, the person on whom we heaped all our frustratio­ns and hopes has turned out to be spineless and silent when the chips are down and he is needed the most."
----------------------------------------------------------------

Your problem was that you expected the ONE person on whom you heaped "all our frustrations and hopes" to lift and carry them by himself instead of making sure a Congress was elected who could support the load with him.
09:57 AM on 08/03/2011
Exactly. Those "progressives" not voting in 2010 killed any chance he had to lead.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wayne the pain
08:33 PM on 08/02/2011
Today the President talked about jobs. It was the same old tired retoric. It was another empty campaign speech. It was the same old tired phrases like, can't build recovery on the backs of the poor, etc.,etc. He appears to have learned nothing in this debt ceiling "debate"! He just negotiated a deal that will cut Medicare, Social Security, and in all likelihood extend the billionaires tax cuts! His super congress will deadlock and there will be no tax increases only more cuts from middle class programs. Great job Mr. President!!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
capitaldysfunction
White male never voted Republican
08:43 PM on 08/02/2011
Agreement on all your points. Great speech, I say, Mr. President, but you are one lousy leader.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LBA7895
09:58 PM on 08/02/2011
ACTIONS speak louder than WORDS.....
CognitoErgoSum
CogitoErgoSum was taken when I signed up.
02:23 AM on 08/03/2011
It's not HIS Super Congress. There's this little thing in the Constitution we call the Separation of Powers. One branch doesn't own another.

HE did NOT negotiate a deal that would cut Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security. The article said as much. The Bush tax cuts will expire at the end of 2012, AFTER the elections. If we elect an unassailable Democratic majority, they won't extend them in 2013, nor would a lame duck Democratic-majority we now have Senate approve the extention prior to that.

If the "trigger" isn't activated, further cuts don't happen. If the Super Congress' recomendations aren't approved, the authomatic cuts don't touch the big three.
photo
stingjim
Conservative
08:11 PM on 08/02/2011
The solution to the debt crisis is “simple,”. “You cannot spend more than you earn. You cannot run up the largest credit card bill in human history. You want more revenue? Stop chasing income earners overseas by threatening them with higher taxes, stop inflating their energy costs and stop punishing them with never-ending regulations. Mr. President, put down your socialist mop!
Then balance the budget, cut back the spending and reform entitlements.”

The next thing that's going to happen is that President Obama is going to ask for more stimulus spending as part of his reelection campaign. You watch. More stimulus spending and the Federal Reserve will probably print more money. There probably will be a QE3. These next months leading into the presidential campaign, the president is going to do what all presidents do. He's going to use every bit of presidential power at his disposal to orient the government toward buying votes, doing things for people, without regard to the budget, without regard to any fiscal sense or sanity whatsoever, it doesn't matter. Particularly we know it doesn't matter to Barack Obama because he's gotten us here in the first place.
Javalation
Laughing in a Daydream
08:18 PM on 08/02/2011
The rich aren't fleeing overseas. They are doing better here than they would almost anywhere, and after their huge investment in buying congress, why leave. They have it made right here.
photo
stingjim
Conservative
08:31 PM on 08/02/2011
You Liberals never read or look at what is happening around you. Stop listening to Liberal Lies and open your eyes. >> Look it up on the internet. Business are leaving the USA by droves. We even have a unemployment problem friend.......

In 2008, nearly half of U.S. companies surveyed saw their China-based businesses perform better than the overall company, the U.S.-China Business Council found in a poll of its members. The results show that the once-prevalent notion that U.S. companies "cannot be profitable in China is a myth," says John Frisbie, the council's president.

Even though the U.S. economy is recovering, the tough economic climate means that "growth has never been more important, and that's what dried up," says Kent Kedl, general manager at Technomic Asia, a market strategy firm. U.S. companies are looking to China and other parts of Asia as the "hot spot of global growth opportunities."
09:34 PM on 08/02/2011
Lucky for us. If the rich start fleeing our taxes will go through the roof.
CognitoErgoSum
CogitoErgoSum was taken when I signed up.
02:31 AM on 08/03/2011
The Bush tax cuts for the wealthy were on capital gains which are income from speculation, NOT EARNED. Earned income is taxed at a higher rate, so those who work for a living pay a higher tax rate than those who live off investments.

Consumers are the REAL job creators. The GOP are the job cremators with policies that reduce the large-scale economic activity that Capitalism needs to sustain itself by concentrating in the hands of the top 2%.

Stimulus spending on infrastructure and aid to states to keep teachers, police and firefighters on the job DOES create economic activity as FDR demonstrated. Those paychecks end up being spent in the private sector bolstering them as well, until the private sector can get back on its feet. Then, as the private sector recovers and contributes more tax revenue, federal assistance can contract, lower spending and pay down the deficit then. Those are proven economic FACTS.
07:45 PM on 08/02/2011
An insightful post, although I think you misconstrue (some of) the motives of the extreme right wing. Its been my experience of TP activists that there is a thread of anti-federalism tying these otherwise disparate movements together. This would suggest that the goals of the TP Congress members are not so much to privatize government services as to destroy them in favor of state-level alternatives. So to a TP'er, defaulting on government debt is not at all irrational. Rather it's just hastening the destruction of centralized government in America. After all, what is "small government," but a rebranding of "states' rights?"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mansterEZ
searching for secular humanist fact-based truth
07:00 PM on 08/02/2011
I whole-heartedly agree. Getting every potential eligible voter to the polls is absolutely necessary to take control of the political spectrum and return it to rational reason. The wealthy has sucked on the teet of democracy for long enough. It's time for full employment based on shared sacrifice.
06:53 PM on 08/02/2011
I don't see how this will change...

The electoral process favors those with the most $s - and Citizens United put another nail into the "fair elections" coffin

Our "liberal" MSM media, where the majority get their opinions from, follow the rules set by their corporate masters

We progressives can explain our viewpoint nicely all we want - but that message is drowned out by the noise of lies from megaphones purchased by big money

For eight years we watched on the sidelines, unable to effect any meaningful change with the right in charge - and for the last 2+ years it seems to me that we've been watching the same bad movie.

I am getting sick and tired of bashing my head against a brick wall - but I will continue to fight on - what else can we do?

Most likely, it will need to get a lot worse before it gets any better - perhaps when a majority have't eaten for a week, we will see some change...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John D Rachel
Expat living in Japan writing a new novel.
06:30 PM on 08/02/2011
The three priorities Mr. Creamer cites are the essence of a solid game plan to challenge the insane right wing juggernaut. It should be noted, however, that this agenda will get no assistance from the White House. It is not entirely clear that Obama would put up direct resistance. That would require taking a strong, honest, principled stand on something. More likely he will talk the talk, then work for the opposition behind closed doors. The point is, in the struggle to get America back on some sensible track, this administration must be viewed as a mole in the ranks of true progressives and isolated so that he can do no further damage.