Bleeding Heart Liberals Proven Right: Too Much Inequality Harms a Society
An important new book substantiates something progressives have long intuited. Published first in Britain and now headed for the United States, it's by epidemiologist Richard Wilkinson and health researcher Kate Pickett, and its title conveys its message: The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better.
Since the French Revolution, belief in the social benefits of egalitarianism has been central to progressive thought. Now Wilkinson and Pickett have produced some hard evidence for this plank in the liberal platform. They show conclusively that the well being of whole societies is closely correlated not with average income level but rather with the size of the disparity of income between the top 20% and the bottom 20%. Countries with smaller disparities like Norway, Sweden, and Japan (4 to 1) have fewer medical, mental, crime, and educational problems than countries like the Britain, U.S. and Portugal with higher disparities (7 or 8 to 1). France and Canada both have mid-range disparities (6 to 1) and place in the middle on health, education and psychological indicators. Even within American society, it's not the absolute income level of a state that determines its social well being, but rather the level of income disparity. Economic inequality and social dysfunction go hand in hand, and Wilkinson and Pickett have marshaled the evidence to make the case.
It's one thing to demonstrate the social benefits of egalitarianism, and another to spell out the underlying political, economic, and psychological mechanisms that explain these findings. Only as we understand how the level of income disparity affects social well being will we be able to generate the political will to undo the damage wrought by gross inequality.
Dignity and Its Enemy--Rankism
An explanation of the social dysfunction associated with large income disparities can be organized around the notion of rankism. Rankism is defined as a generalization of the familiar isms and encompasses them all. Specifically, in the same way that racism insulted the dignity of blacks, and sexism was an affront to the dignity of women, so, too, rankism is behavior that diminishes human dignity--black or white, female or male, gay or straight, immigrant or native-born, poor or rich, etc.
Rankism is the abuse of power attached to rank. A difference of rank alone does not cause indignity, but abuse of rank invariably does. Put simply, rankism is what somebodies may do to nobodies. But just as not all whites were racists, so too not everyone of high rank is a rankist.
Therefore, rankism, not rank differences, is the source of indignity. Indignity causes indignation, and indignation takes its toll either on the health of the individual who must contain it or it manifests as withdrawal or anger/aggression.
Rankism functions socially in the same way that racism does. No one doubts any longer that racism cemented in large, self-perpetuating income disparities between the white majority and black victims of slavery and segregation. In a parallel way, rankism marginalizes the working poor, keeping them in their place while their low salaries effectively make the goods and services they produce available to society at subsidized prices. This process, whereby the most indigent Americans have become the benefactors of those better off, is vividly described by Barbara Ehrenreich in Nickel and Dimed. In The Working Poor: Invisible in America, David Shipler depicts the less fortunate as disappearing into a "black hole" from which there is virtually no exit. As class membranes become ever less permeable, resignation, cynicism, and hostility mount.
In the economic realm, the market mechanism, at least when it's working, functions to limit abuses of power, but political arrangements can trump the market. Large enough disparities in economic power may be used to influence politics so that laws and regulations perpetuate the economic gap.
Once established, economic inequality, if it is steep enough, also perpetuates exploitation because it imprisons the poor in their poverty. When missing a single paycheck means homelessness, people are not likely to demand better wages or working conditions. As Rev. Jim Wallis says, "Poverty is the new slavery."
There is another important reason that eightfold factors in wealth disparity cause more social distress than factors of four. When the top 20 % are eight times better off than the bottom 20 %, far more people are vulnerable to rankism because people in the middle quintiles are also separated from the top and bottom quintiles by significant differences in economic status and power. Instead of being confined within a narrower spectrum (characterized by, say, a disparity factor of four or five), people are spread out over a broader economic range. When the first (poorest) quintile is further from the top (richest) quintile, so, too is the second quintile further from the fourth, and the third from the first and the fifth. These larger differences in economic power make possible more abuse. Economic gaps soon become dignity gaps. As rankism gains ground, more people experience its indignities and humiliations, and these individual wounds compound into illness and social dysfunction.
Dignity is to the identity what food is to the body--indispensable. By confirming our identity and affirming our dignity, respect and recognition provide assurance that our place in the group is secure. Absent periodic and appropriate validation, our survival feels at risk. Without proper recognition, individuals may sink into self-doubt and subgroups are marginalized and set up for exploitation.
Dignity and recognition are inseparable. We can't all be famous, but fortunately recognition is not limited to the red carpet. We can learn to understand the effects on those who are either denied a chance to seek it, or from whom it is otherwise withheld. Once aware of the deleterious effects of "malrecognition," we can act against it as we now take steps to prevent malnutrition.
Like malnutrition, malrecognition lowers the body's resistance to disease and reduces life expectancy. For most people, just the opportunity to contribute something of themselves to the world is enough to stifle the indignation that accumulates from exposure to indignities caused by rankism. This means that malrecognition, like its somatic counterpart, is a preventable and treatable malady. To increase the supply of recognition we need only discern people's contributions, acknowledge them appropriately, and compensate them equitably. When the average compensation of the richest 20 % exceeds that of the poorest 20 % by factors greater than four or five, the poor experience this as unfair, unjust distribution of recognition. The deleterious consequences of malrecognition manifest in the familiar array of social problems tracked in The Spirit Level--mental illness, drug and alcohol abuse, obesity and teenage pregnancy, an elevated homicide rate, a shorter life expectancy, and lower educational performance and literacy rates.
More than either liberty or equality, people need dignity. In contrast to libertarian or egalitarian societies, a dignitarian society is one in which everyone, regardless of role or rank, is treated with equal dignity. The findings reported in The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better suggest that as societies become more dignitarian they will, in the words of the subtitle, "do better."
A startling example of this proposition comes from, of all places, our prison population where indignity and malrecognition are endemic. Recent work done under the auspices of The Center for Therapeutic Justice in Virginia indicates that the recidivism rate for inmates who serve their sentences in a dignitarian community drops from 50 % to 5 %.
Social Isolation and Depression
In explaining their findings, Wilkinson and Pickett put the emphasis on the lack of trust fostered by large wealth disparities. Put the other way round, the connectedness experienced in dignitarian communities is the equivalent of social oxygen.
Some thirty years ago a physician (Wolf) and a sociologist (Bruhn) teamed up to explain why, in the town of Roseto, Pennsylvania, there was a group of poor Italian immigrants whose health and welfare were vastly better than their neighbors. After a twenty year study of immigrant families in Roseto, and a comparable study in a nearby, non-immigrant town, they found that health and welfare were dependent on what they called cohesion, the opposite of isolation and the antithesis of distrust. As the younger generation adopted American ways of geographic and status mobility, their health and welfare levels decreased to the level of the neighbors.
In addition to directly affecting health and welfare, disconnection has an effect on the emotions. Just as being closely connected with others leads to authentic pride, so disconnection leads to shame and humiliation. The isolated person is apt to feel rejected, if not completely worthless, and live in a more or less permanent state of shame.
One way of defending against the shame of malrecognition is to withdraw, sometimes all the way into the isolation of depression. Such withdrawal then leads to further isolation, which in turn compounds the rejection by the community and accelerates the downward spiral. Again, malrecogntion compounds into social dysfunction as confirmed in this eye-opening book.
Conclusion
In addition to caring for the weak, humans are still capable of predatory behavior towards those lacking the protection of social rank. Rankism is the residue of more overt predatory practices of the past. Now that rankism has a name, the miasma of malrecognition is visible and we are in a position to begin rooting it out. Rooting out rankism, like overcoming racism, is a multi-generational undertaking. Despite the enormity of the task, we are likely to look back on the 21st century as marking an epochal transformation from a predatory to a dignitarian era. Disallowing rankism betters human well being in the same way that disallowing racism and sexism improve the lives of blacks and women. The hard evidence that Wilkinson and Pickett have provided demonstrates the benefits of dignitarian societies and validates the egalitarian instinct that has long been a mainstay of the liberal creed.
Loading comments…
Want to reply to a comment? Hint: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to
Exactly. Another word for it is diversity. I try to treat everyone I know with the same amount of respect. I have a lot of friends. I get respect because I give respect.
I also had a conversation along similar lines with a relative of mine on social status and how education is essentially a fake institution. This country spends untold resources spreading the message that hard work, study and education will yield the desired results and a secure, hardship free way of life. This is not the case.
Fake institution?
Hard work and bettering yourself is the only way out of poverty. That along with not making dumb choices.
Speaking of rankism. I read somewhere that in the US upward class mobility is even less than it was in Victorian England. It might have been in the book A Brief History of Neoliberalism.
The ultimate form of dignity is a job that pays the bills. I think alot of people fail to recognize the consequences of poverty beyond being hungry and wanting. Poverty breeds alcoholism, abuse, lack of life skills, poor ethic, and the full array of mental illness that can perpetuate into future generations even after the initial poverty has been remediated. These problems permanently damage people and most people would gladly work if a job that paid the bills was available.
It is ridiculous that the richest country in the world---the home of bling and Mcmansions
You got a funny way of doing it but you seem to be defending us working poor. I thank you for that. America's working poor have the muscle you need to overthrow corporate rule. WE NEED LEADERS.
See Beth Borzone's Profile
I think the country of dignity that you describe is totally supported by the values stated in the Preamble of our Constitution. "We the people....
I think the first step we can start working on right now is to promote Healthcare for all, so people don't have to mortgage their homes to pay for medical care. The rankism that you describe is totally evident when you look at our current healthcare system. H.R. 676, Improved and Expanded Medicare for All would be a very cost effective way to provide healthcare to everyone. It could be funded from the $4 billion dollars that would be saved by eliminating the private health insurance companies, rather than by increasing taxes on working people.
I always thought that Kenny Lay should have been executed:
Raping California to the tune of 50 billion dollars
Stiffing his employees of their retirement funds
Stiffing his investors of their investment
I never believed in capital punishment until this Mans Crimes came to light. Think about what he did to those thousands of employees and millions of people in CA.... think about the domestic abuse, divorces, suicides, childrens education fund evaporatin
The Status Syndrome by Marmot concludes similarly.
This article neatly sums up what I have spent many, many discussions trying to explain to my very right wing extended family members. If people spend much of their life being disrespected, they come to believe that disrespect, and they return that disrespect to others. All of us who see the problem and want to correct the problem need this kind of ammunition to answer the "individualism and free-market above all" worshippers. We are indeed our brothers' keepers, and ALL of us benefit from that.
I've never heard it put so nicely--Di
I think I've found my new dogma. I am a Dignitarian ...
Let's spread it.
Do you have any idea of the ramifications of this concept of dignity for all? We daily observe the negative impact of rankism on us all! Thank you for making it so clear. The awareness we get when something is so right -- like Robet Fuller's words that we need dignity more than almost anything else on this planet. Spreading dignity brings life and energy and spirit. It seems so concrete and is readily accomplished. It costs us nothing and the rewards have a positive ripple effect. There is something so fundamental about being dignitarian -- isn't this what the great spiritual leaders have tried to teach us. Please try an experiment for yourself -- tomorrow go about your day spreading dignity to every one and every thing you come into contact with. When I have done this it transforms me and the people I meet. Thank you, gentlemen! May your message be heard far and wide. For those who needed any proof, they now have it.
That's right. The proof for those who needed any proof consists in the fact that they won't manage a single day of spreading dignity.
Let's hope that it makes them sick to find out this little fact about themselves.
You must be logged in to comment. Log in or connect with
