More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Greenwald and Derrick Crowe

Robert Greenwald and Derrick Crowe

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Greenwald and Derrick Crowe
 

Pentagon to White House, American People on Afghanistan: Take a Hike

Posted: 05/10/11 02:11 PM ET

The Pentagon is working the press again, this time in support of a so-called withdrawal plan that would break a promise made to the American people by their president. According to The Wall Street Journal:

"U.S. military officers in Afghanistan have drawn up preliminary proposals to withdraw as many as 5,000 troops from the country in July and as many as 5,000 more by the year's end..."

This joke of a "withdrawal" plan isn't anything remotely approaching a real drawdown. It's less than a 10 percent reduction in U.S. forces in Afghanistan over 6 months. It puts the Pentagon squarely at odds both with the stated desires of the White House and the very clearly articulated will of the American people. If you agree, sign Rethink Afghanistan's petition to get the troops out of Afghanistan.

First, let's remember what the White House said on this:

"After 18 months, our troops will begin to come home....[O]ur troop commitment in Afghanistan cannot be open-ended -- because the nation that I'm most interested in building is our own."--President Barack Obama, Dec. 1, 2009.
"I'm confident that the withdrawal will be significant. People will say this is a real process of transition; this is not just a token gesture."--President Barack Obama, April 15, 2011.
"In July of 2011, you're going to see a whole lot of people moving out, bet on it."--Vice President Joe Biden, qtd. in Jonathan Alter's The Promise.

The American people are and have been crystal-clear about their expectations for a drawdown for months now.

  • Rasmussen Reports' latest polling (published on May 9, 2011) shows that 56 percent of likely voters want troops brought home within a year, and more than half of those want all troops withdrawn immediately. The number of likely voters who want troops home within a year has increased by four percentage points since the beginning of March.
  • A Pew Research poll taken May 5-8 shows that 49 percent of Americans want troops removed from Afghanistan "ASAP."
  • An NBC News poll taken May 5-7 shows that 56 percent of Americans disapprove of leaving some troops in Afghanistan until 2014.

These are not ambiguous numbers. Heading into a presidential election season, likely voters and Americans in general are telling pollsters and their elected representatives that they expect a real troop withdrawal, with most of them wanting troops out within a year. The Pentagon's draft plan isn't remotely in the ballpark of what the American people want.

Bringing home 5,000 people in July and maybe another 5,000 people by the end of the year is an insignificant, token withdrawal from a force of well over 100,000 U.S. forces in Afghanistan. It's less than a 10 percent adjustment of the American personnel on the ground. The Pentagon is telling the White House and the American people to take a hike.

Osama Bin Laden is dead. Al Qaeda has been driven from Afghanistan. The last plausible excuse for keeping troops in Afghanistan is gone. Yet, the military continues to fight a counterinsurgency campaign with tens of thousands of U.S. troops, a campaign that's failed to blunt the ever-growing level of insurgent attacks across Afghanistan. Civilian casualties are at an all-time high. Troop injuries and acute stress are at an all-time high in the war. Costs are at an all-time high. There's no rational reason left to continue this farce.

The Pentagon's token troop adjustment would break a promise made to the American people by their president, and it would blatantly flout the will of the voters. The "plan" is laughable and should be rejected by the White House. President Obama and Congress must demand a real plan to get the troops home as swiftly and safely as possible.

If you're fed up with this war that's not making us safer and that's not worth the costs, sign our petition to get troops home.

 

Follow Robert Greenwald and Derrick Crowe on Twitter: www.twitter.com/AfghanistanDocu

 
 
  • Comments
  • 189
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:15 PM on 05/12/2011
End the oil wars, bring the troops home to work on infrastructure, green energy and the citizen's safety net. That's real national security!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
N8tracks
I'm a workaholic
03:54 AM on 05/31/2011
We need to the troops to fill those jobs? I think we have people here now that would like a shot at them, too.
photo
ewldest
I don't care "whose" war it is - end it now
12:22 PM on 05/12/2011
"There's no rational reason left to continue this farce." Unfortunately colonial wars are not motivated through any reasoning, they are rationalized greed and bloodlust. The US is in Afghanistan to make a handful of corporations rich at the expense of human lives. They military is not going to stop until the American people insist loudly that they have had enough.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noelny11411
09:37 AM on 05/12/2011
We are in a $14 Trillion deficit hole, Afghanistan costs $110 Billion/yr, The Karzai Family is stealing from the people with a backhoe scooping up USAID and Opium cash. The best of American youth are unprotected from IED's. Our money is being recycled through corrupt officials and village chiefs to the Taliban who in turn pay locals to shoot at us. Think ... who could be a better suicide bomber than a heroin addict.

Let Afghans decide their own futures and governments. All we have to do is help them fight their cockroaches. Let us escalate the troop turnover, they already know how to fight. We need this breather to develop better ways to help friends and fight terrorists.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noelny11411
09:34 AM on 05/11/2011
How about 20,000 this year and 20,00 next year? Who are they to impose troop levels on us? We have been their water wings long enough, it's time to start walking away. It is a waste of blood and money to occupy those mountains. We have the initiative right now, if we can get the 3 stooges, Mullah Omar, Zawarhiri and Gadan by the end of the year, that's good enough for me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
wayoutleft
my nano-bio coded in a period: .
09:17 AM on 05/11/2011
The politicians have to CYA on Afghanistan big time with the elections looming and bin Laden gone. Liberal democrats, like all capitalists, support all war at all times. So the political challenge will be to adopt some political posture of "grave concern" that distances them from the war but sustains it. Lugar and Durbin have already begun their contortions.
Naively, the Left thinks Bin Laden's demise means the war can draw down. The Pentagon- true to their rule of "reinforcing success"- will expand it. It remains clear that the Muslim states have to be extensively manipulated to be benign to America.
04:24 AM on 05/11/2011
The Military are professional deceivers. I wouldn't trust a General any farther than I could throw him.
In war, truth is the first casualty. ~Aeschylus
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Over The Hill
Eyes on the future, head up my...
01:44 AM on 05/11/2011
Should have listened to Joe B. on this one.
photo
SparkyDash
Save a pretzel for the gas jets.
07:01 AM on 05/11/2011
Yup...fanned.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dissentiscool
Left of center. Degrees in English & history.
01:43 AM on 05/11/2011
I think there is a real need to begin the draw down of troops, especially in the wake of Osama bin Laden's death. But just because we stupidly entered this war does not mean we have to stupidly exit this war. We need to be careful to not make a bad situation worse. I don't think the authors of this post comprehend this. Also, just because the American people believe something, doesn't make it a good idea. This is why we have representative government. Our leaders sometimes have to do things that are in the nation's interest, even if the public is not supportive. Let's do this draw down responsibly and intelligently, not recklessly and stupidly. We do not want to have to re-invade Afghanistan or leave the people vulnerable to a bloody civil war.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
noelny11411
10:21 AM on 05/11/2011
Last week, I had a long talk with a young recon Marine, 2 tours in Iraq, 1 tour in Afghanistan and he will tell you that the Taliban are smart. They have a rank structure, snipers and good combat tactics. They fight when they are ready and we aren't, They keep fighting until we get the upper hand and when we do, they leave. Something like the Americans when they fought the British between 1775 and 1790. As long as they hold those mountains, they can keep fignting. But I do agree with the principle that we should walk, not run, to the nearest exit.

And, if there is a civil war, why should we be the self-declared referee? Why should we even care about them fighting a bloody civil war? We had one and it set some of the slaves free and preserved the Union. Maybe a civil war is the only way Afghanistan will find its true identity. Maybe brother David Petreus can stitch together an agreement between the Taliban and Kabul that will help us draw down. But, win , lose, or draw we must start to take big steps to leave that forlorn place. Please read: Afghanistan: "A military history from Alexander the Great to the war against the Taliban" by Stephen Tanner. That book will open your eyes.
photo
behindEnemyLines
Put down the talking point pamphlet.
01:19 AM on 05/11/2011
blame whoever you want but this still falls on the President. He can order a withdraw of troops at anytime he sees fit. Looks like we are heading to another broken promise....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JAT3
For every action there is a reaction...
06:32 AM on 05/11/2011
This was a catch 22 since years ago... no matter who the sitted pres is! Damned if you stay or if you go! Billions spent to stay or we're unsafe if we leave!

Bottomline of reality! You can't kill every Afgani. One can simply pass on the art of bomb making at their leisure. We need t refocus how we use our resources.

Who knows who really on the pro demo afgani gov't... given so much corruption. Fine, leave a security force to support the govt. but bring and redeploy troops to ports of interests and security risk to inspect cargo(could put more on mexico boarder). Simplicity: any and all suspect shipments of unknow origin checked. Terrorists are coming either by boat, plane or walk across out boarder....if not already here! They don't have the tech skills to fire no missle. So concentrate efforts at those areas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidrfunk2
We has seen the enemy and he is us
12:56 AM on 05/11/2011
If we had spent the trillions on internal security instead of fighting an external war we would be far safer and better of finically today
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Davidrfunk2
We has seen the enemy and he is us
12:51 AM on 05/11/2011
While I'm not in favor of continuing the war, lets remember the military will casher out all of the troops that come home. That will just be more unemployed
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
parlimentMike
Don't settle for less evil, demand good
12:50 AM on 05/11/2011
The Pentagon, after the Banking system is the second greatest threat facing America today.
Philimanjaro
Hate is law in the two-party system.
12:36 AM on 05/11/2011
The Iraq withdrawal? Troop transfer to Afghanistan.

The Afghanistan withdrawal? Probably something just as ridiculous.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edy Kel
12:32 AM on 05/11/2011
Just shows how the Pentagon is more interested in the bureaucracy behind the wars than the the reality of the situation.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
rumblingspire
light all the fires
12:30 AM on 05/11/2011
Tea Company - You Keep Me Hangin On
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWJzd6jWR5M&feature=related