More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Greenwald

Robert Greenwald

Posted: September 2, 2010 07:11 AM

When candidates have to raise millions of dollars just to run a competitive campaign, they're going to turn to wealthy donors, and the voice of the everyday American isn't going to be heard. It's time we take the "for sale" sign off the Capitol lawn. We can't afford the price we're paying for corporate-sponsored government.

Jim, Barb, Dominica and Chuck, featured in the video above, can't afford to compete with the influence of corporate donations. When Washington makes decisions regarding their lives, they are not the people getting meetings with lawmakers. Instead, corporate lobbyists come to collect on prior donations made. And the end result means working people suffer from legislative decisions that benefit the rich.

As long as politicians are accountable to the corporations and lobbyists who finance their campaigns, they're never going to be accountable to the people that elected them. It's time ordinary Americans had their voices heard. Our elected officials should be concerned with solving our problems and concerns, not those of special interests who can afford to pay for special treatment.

The only way to make Congress accountable to working Americans is to have Fair Elections, where a coal miner's voice can be heard as clearly as the owner of that mine. We need to put elections back in the hands of ordinary Americans.

It's time we return government to of, by, and for the people, not government bought and paid for by special interests.

Join us today in demanding Fair Elections Now.

 
 
 

Follow Robert Greenwald on Twitter: www.twitter.com/robertgreenwald

 
 
  • Comments
  • 92
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:20 PM on 09/03/2010
Hear, hear! Publicly funded elections and a workable instant runoff voting system (or Borda count, or Condorcet). Votes should be made for who you really want to represent you rather than handicap your decison as if it were a horse race. There is much to be said for a system that allows you to add the weight of your vote to 2nd choices or more.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dsws
No owning ideas. Limit only commercial use.
07:03 AM on 09/03/2010
Middle-class individuals can afford a few hundred dollars every two or four years. Upper-middle-class individuals can afford a maximum contribution to a political campaign.

There's a donut shop across from the Y, where people pay enough more for a snack than it would have cost at the grocery store, that doing it once a week would really add up over the course of an election cycle. If political participation were really a priority for ordinary people, so that half the population spent half of what they now spend on frivolous stuff like getting a snack from a donut shop instead of a grocery store, that would greatly exceed what gets spent on direct political contributions by the rich. There's not enough money in campaigns now to support a sustained discussion of complex issues. It's tiny compared to other categories of advertising. TV ads are expensive per ad, but cheap per eyeball. Setting up events where people actually talk about the issues would be much more expensive, and we "can't afford" it because it's not a priority to enough people.

On the other hand, revolving-door jobs, sweetheart-deal government contracts, and the economic effects of seemingly-minor details of regulation, all are a lot bigger than the amount of money in campaigns.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Soulcatcher
Soulcatcher
08:55 PM on 09/02/2010
Yes, take the For Sale sign off the lawn. It's already been sold.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
OleProfessor
"Ours is not a system based upon trust"
07:38 PM on 09/02/2010
Rescind Corporate "Personhood" it's corrupted our entire system..!

It's legalized bribery..!
06:59 PM on 09/02/2010
Don't forget the For Sale signs on the White House lawn and the steps of the Supreme Court.
05:37 PM on 09/02/2010
If the Founding Fathers had not meant for Congress to be for sale, they wouldn't have placed it at one end of a mall.
photo
sixchair
capitalist, job creator, progressive.
05:47 PM on 09/02/2010
that's a good one! fanned!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
7thcavman
05:28 PM on 09/02/2010
I thought that when Spanish authorities busted the male prostitute ring yesterday the GOP leadership was taking an overseas junket to Maiorca. I guess the "for sale" sign goes where you go (like VISA).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bert Juneau
05:23 PM on 09/02/2010
The system will not change because the people who would have to change it are empowered by it. We'd be asking them to level the playing field - when you have the advantage - what incentive is there to do that?

In election after election, the electorate has shown with their votes that they don't care who bribes their politicians.

We can't be bothered to pay attention to things like this - so we'll get what we deserve.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BocaMom
05:21 PM on 09/02/2010
It's too late. Wall Street and the unions own the White House, lock, stock and barrel.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sporty1
being me
04:51 PM on 09/02/2010
Yes of course they do it, they have to to win. The Democrats are the party that continually seeks to reform the election process however, and the Republicans block them. Your argument is a sham. As if you don't know that. Stop spreading Republican propaganda.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bert Juneau
05:24 PM on 09/02/2010
Both parties play the game of pretend reform. How many legislative initiatives have been aimed at this issue - and yet - more money than ever is in the system. That's not an accident.
03:50 PM on 09/02/2010
It'd be very nice, and it is indeed the solution to the problem. Those in power, however, will never allow it to happen as they know they could be voted out in the following election by a more qualified and less connected candidate.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony C Wilson
03:48 PM on 09/02/2010
And....we need a Supreme Court that does not believe that corporations are people. Why can't we just not allow lobbyists access to OUR elected officials? Maybe the politicians don't want the system reformed. They could easily stop the lobbyist b.s. and keep elections in the people's hands - they just don't have the will to do so.
02:48 PM on 09/02/2010
Keep dreaming. If you want real change get ready for good old fashioned class warfare. You think the rich will allow something like that to happen? No way, they'll just find a way to use the army. Every other government does it and when things get desperate enough here they'll use their army to quell "domestic terrorists" as well.

Either we are slaves to the rich or we are shooting at them and being killed and imprisoned by them. It's the story of human history.....and America sure as hell ain't changing that....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anthony C Wilson
03:48 PM on 09/02/2010
Fanned. For speaking the heartbreaking truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CindyinEncinitas
02:14 PM on 09/02/2010
Love you, Bob!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
02:03 PM on 09/02/2010
"It's time we return government to of, by, and for the people, not government bought and paid for by special interests"

Agreed. We need to restore the proscriptions of Graft, Corruption, and Influence Peddling. Somehow all this got confused with "fund raising" and Congress has been an "open store" ever since and with the recent SCOTUS decision giving Corporations citizenship, it's not going to get better.