iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert Hardaway

GET UPDATES FROM Robert Hardaway
 

Reagan/Bush Amnesty Agenda an Economic Catastrophe for Minorities and Legal Immigrants

Posted: 08/15/2012 2:44 pm

In 1986, President Reagan ushered in the first of the great immigration amnesty bills, offering amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants in return for assurances that border security would be tightened, and employers would be rigorously prosecuted for hiring illegal immigrants.

We all know the consequences of this first great amnesty bill and those that followed: millions more illegal immigrants were lured into the U.S. in hopes of future amnesties (many to agonizing deaths in the desert), flooding the unskilled labor pool and reducing minorities and legal immigrants to poverty and economic desperation. Meanwhile, to no one's surprise, border security was neglected, and Big Business, in the pursuit of cheap labor and high profits, vigorously resisted all attempts at immigration job enforcement, particularly any means of enforcement, which would actually work to preserve jobs for minorities and legal immigrants, such as e-verify.

In the 1970s, for example, office buildings in Los Angeles hired union workers as janitors, paying high wages and substantial health and other benefits. Thengreedy businessmen thirsty for cheap labor and high profits began to hire independent contractors who in turn hired illegal immigrants. Within a year, wages were cut by two-thirds and benefits were eliminated.

In 1987, at a time when teenage unemployment among African Americans approached 80 percent [1] , greedy garment makers petitioned the INS to import more cheap labor on grounds that there was an "unskilled labor shortage", repeating the tired mantra that "Americans won't do the dirty work that illegal immigrants are willing to do"-- ignoring the fact that it isn't the dirty jobs that Americans disdain. Cities have no problem recruiting for the dirtiest of jobs, like garbage collection, when decent wages are offered. Most Americans would be willing to pay a few cents more for their tomatoes if it meant social justice for minorities and the legal immigrants who have been reduced to grinding poverty by the Reagan/Bush amnesty agenda.

Few did not see through President Bush's lame claim that his immigration plan was not amnesty because illegals would pay a $500 fine in order return for being allowed to jump the line for legal residency in front of the teeming millions waiting many years for legal entry, paying thousands for physical exams andbackground checks, or trying to a win a million to one immigration lottery. Why risk winning the lottery, when a winning ticket can be earned by illegal entry, identity theft, and felonious forgery of social security cards and other government documents in order to gain jobs that reduce wages of legal immigrants and minorities?

As immigration researcher Gary Imhoff has observed, illegal immigration "widens the differences between classes in the U.S.; it keeps down the price of hiring a maid or gardener for the rich while it makes thing more desperate for the poor."

Meanwhile, Big Business and many populist politicians seeking votes have adopted the Reagan/Bush amnesty agenda, apparently ignorant of a poll by Hispanic Opinion and Preference Research showing that "70 percent of Hispanics do not want Latin Americans given preferential treatment in immigration," or an INS poll showing that only 11 percent of Hispanics would like to see more visas granted for people from Mexico." [2] Despite the fact that our public schools notoriously fail to teach macro-economics, and in particular how the laws of labor supply and demand affect wages, most minorities and legal immigrants do understand the devastating effects of illegal immigration that has reduced so many of them to grinding poverty.

Perhaps most puzzling, Big Business and populist politicians continue to demand even more of the Reagan/Bush-type amnesty programs as the only means of "fixing" the illegal immigration problem, while at the same time disdaining the plan of Romney and other moderate immigration reformers to "make legal immigration more attractive than illegal immigration."

Anything but that!

-----------
References:

[1] Robert Hardaway, Population, Law, and the Environment (Praeger, 1994), 138.
[2] Robert Hardaway, Population, Law, and the Environment (Praeger, 1994), 142

 
FOLLOW COLLEGE
In 1986, President Reagan ushered in the first of the great immigration amnesty bills, offering amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants in return for assurances that border security would be tighten...
In 1986, President Reagan ushered in the first of the great immigration amnesty bills, offering amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants in return for assurances that border security would be tighten...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 55
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vicky Valentine Proud
It is what it is.
01:05 AM on 08/18/2012
At last, an aarticle that actually spells out the harm that illegal immigration has on this country!! Such a change a pace from a site that usually displays articles about these ilegals and their plights for rights in this country. Thank you, Mr. Hardaway, now if only the rest of the country would wake up and smell the coffee.
12:30 AM on 08/17/2012
This will bring the worst war on American soil ever.
10:03 PM on 08/16/2012
As for the last paragraph of the article, I doubt Romney will provide any better immigration policies. After all, his family immigrated here from Mexico. The family as I have heard it, moved to Mexico when polygamy was outlawed in Utah by the U.S. government. Romney's Dad, George Romney who was born in Mexico, became Governor of Michigan when I was a kid. There was talk of him running for President, but it ended when it was discovered he was not born in the U.S.
photo
gywkwakwa
sick of LP bull
10:17 AM on 08/17/2012
You provide a false equivalency in that a person's immigration history does not automatically determine their attitudes/opinions on immigration. The last paragraph states that Romney says making legal immigration more attractive than illegal immigration is actually set upon a firm base. In plain language he is saying; "Fix legal immigration and make illegal immigration more onerous". In Behavior Analysis we change behavior by making the desired behavior easier or more rewarding than the undesired behavior.

As to your information regarding his father, you are incorrect. George Romney was in fact born in Mexico, but to U.S. citizens living abroad, therefore he is, under the Constitution, a natural born citizen. He did in fact run for President against Nixon but lost in the primary and was appointed Secretary of Housing and Urban Development by Nixon when he won the Presidency.
BTW: Returning citizens do not immigrate, they return or are repatriated, but they were always U.S. citizens. And before you or anyone else mentions it, George Romney's Grandparents were polygamous, but his parents and he and his wife were monogamous.

Come on, a little basic research could have informed you of these facts; i.e.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Romney
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alitoo
11:23 AM on 08/18/2012
BUT the Romneys remained American citizens even though they lived in Mexico. And the Mexican government did NOT give Grandpa Romney Mexican citizenship.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:11 PM on 08/16/2012
NAFTA put into law by Clinton was the beginning of the downfall of the American Worker, we can't compete with people who work for $1 a day. Open borders have destroyed the middle class American and his way of life.
07:59 AM on 08/17/2012
agreed! Before each election we need to review the immigration report card of candidates at www.numbersusa.com. Things may not change until this becomes an election issue.
llwlknsn
Adequate words fail me.
09:06 PM on 08/16/2012
Amazing. Huffpost trying to spin the feedback.

The President is and remains a usurper who has just violated the 14th Amendment to the Constitution by putting the economic interests of NON CITIZENS above those of Citizens based completely on RACE.

Look it up.
08:57 PM on 08/16/2012
One of the problems it seems between the Leftie socialist marxists and the Right Side Concervatives is that the Lefties seem / appear to place great value on feelings and pretty well ignore the logical deductions, and the fact of Laws broken in this entire senario!
Fact: there is not one nation in this world that allows illegal immigrants to flaunt that nations Laws like the USA does presently! Just sneak into Mexico and see what they do to your white Gringo butt! They lock you up and throw away the key. However, our USA Lefties give them so many bennies that it is no wonder we are simply overrun by numbers: free hospitization, free food stamps, aid to dependent children, free schools, and on and on it goes!! All this even though our nation broke, deeply in debt, adn going down fast!!! Wake up Lefties or we all sink.... including you.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
billhodges
Self Reliant Yet Charitable
06:13 AM on 08/17/2012
You are so spot on!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alitoo
11:30 AM on 08/18/2012
Democrats have traditionally been the party of the AMERICAN worker. Samuel Gompers, a Scottish immigrant and founder of the AFL-CIO, opposed more immigration on the grounds that it harmed unions' ability to negotiate with employers for better wages and working conditions. Cesar Chavez realized the same thing about illegal immigration. Too bad today's union leaders and other Democratic Party elite are willing to overlook the harm that illegal immigration and amnesty do to the AMERICAN working man. Guess they figure that THEY win if illegal aliens are legalized and become union members and Democrats, even if AMERICANS are displaced from jobs and see their wages decrease.
04:04 PM on 08/18/2012
Sadly, unions no longer represent their membership like in the old days. It used to be that union leadership was made up of people who worked in the industry and moved up. That is no longer the case. Today's union leadership has more in common with the CEOs they sit across from at the negotiating table, then the people they are supposed to represent. Most union leadership has very little hands on experience of the trades they represent, most have never worked a day in their union trades. The leadership of most unions from the local presidents and business agents make far and away more then the highest paid union worker they represent. They also have better health care, retirement and vacation benefits.

Most union workers today joined the union, not because they believed in it, but because they had to as a requirement to work in that trade. Most members rarely attend union meeting and seldom vote on anything other then contracts. Today's unions are pretty much like churches. They want more members so as to garner more money. It doesn't matter if the current membership is fully employed, so long as they all members are paying their dues. Unions are now looking at illegal aliens as a money source, just like a lot of churches do.
llwlknsn
Adequate words fail me.
08:15 PM on 08/16/2012
Any one awake at Huff Post?

Care to hear more about a Constitutionally INELIGIBLE PRESIDENT knifing 20 million long term unemployed workers IN THE BACK with a memo?

Huffpost put him in office on the basis of his skin color. You people own him now.
yellowbusdriver
In trying times, don't quit trying.
03:58 PM on 08/17/2012
i smell a Birther ... really? still with that ...
llwlknsn
Adequate words fail me.
08:00 PM on 08/16/2012
As an American worker forced into proverty because of the ethnic agenda on the left and the economic agenda on the right, it seems no one is listening.

It will take a lawsuit challenging this latest travesty to turn things around.

The American Dream is now reserved for illegal aliens. No one else need apply.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
twjones
04:51 PM on 08/16/2012
Well I guess we could just go ahead and kill off the rest of the tax paying jobs. This way the government can take care of all of us paid for by the 1 percent who make enough money to survive. Or wait a minute will they have any money left after that? Wow what a great bunch of leaders we have. For what jobs are left here we need to bring in enough foreigners to fill them all. Those high paying jobs that no American could do (BO stated there are not enough engineers in the US so he had to give those hundreds of thousands of work visa to fill them) and now those low paying jobs that no American wants.

Simple. Illegal is breaking law. In the US to allow someone to break the law is illegal. Now we have 1.7m more people who are criminals working for the bigger corporate criminals who are financed by even bigger money criminals who are being given a free ticket and more money by the ruling criminals. Guess the criminals have it under control then.
04:46 PM on 08/16/2012
It didn't work the first time and its not going to work this time! All its going to do is make those 25 MILLION UNEMPLOYED AMERICAN CITIZENS compete with all those who are given work permits and cheap labor! Thanks for having our backs obama! We're already seeing a flooding of more illegals into America because they are rewarded for doing so! Its to bad our government doesn't look out for the LEGAL AMERICAN CITIZEN like they do illegals in this country! Did you know that under obama's rules, any illegal can steal your identity and never be charged with a felony even if they are caught? But boy howdy, let an American do it and they'd be sent away for life in prision! Right now, law enforcement authorities can't charge them for anything and are orderd to let them go no matter what the crime was they committed! Lawlessness in America under obama's rules! Nothing like it! And if given a second term, there isn't any telling what other laws he decides he doesn't want to abide by!
llwlknsn
Adequate words fail me.
08:04 PM on 08/16/2012
You are missing the point. This is not about making things work. This is about advancing an ethnic agenda that has been in the works since 1965. This is about a demographic inversion and the introduction of Mexican style politics into US Government.

This is where a usurper gets elected because of his skin color and then grants Amnesty to illegals without having to worry about accountability. No one can touch Obama because he is not a contitutionally eligible President.


We were lied to. The dismaying part is that so many refuse to see the lie for what it is.
04:46 PM on 08/16/2012
rep or demo it doesnt matter they all want to destroy the average working american through h1b visas and illegal immigration. its called supply and demand
04:44 PM on 08/16/2012
What about the 22 million Americans who cannot find work? Why are we not railing about them? We are in a deficit crisis and Obama wants to bring in even more people who will not be able to find work but are eligible for welfare. Does this make sense to you? It doesn't to me. His plan sounds just like a welfare mother wanting another baby to get more welfare money. How many dependents is enough?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
12:01 PM on 08/16/2012
If this so, why did the President allow some young illegal immigrants who came to the US as children get work permits for two years to compete in a labor market where that age group has the highest unemployment? The work permit allows the immigrants to apply for Social Security numbers and driver's licenses, open bank accounts and secure other benefits.. I would be interested why a SS number is issued for two years and what the other benefits are......welfare, SNAP...unemployment. The SS could be a free ticket at the taxpayers expense..
llwlknsn
Adequate words fail me.
08:08 PM on 08/16/2012
It is not a Social Security number. It is called an ITIN. Independent Tax Identification Number. It is assigned by the IRS for the purposes of collecting taxes. That's the fiction. The real use is a stealth subsidy to illegal aliens who then are able to claim refunds and child tax credits on an UNLIMITED number of children WHO DO NOT LIVE WITH THEM.

WE are watching an invasion by a hostile ethnic group in slow motion and cannot seem to understand that it is permanent.
yellowbusdriver
In trying times, don't quit trying.
04:02 PM on 08/17/2012
i remember read these same arguments about the Irish. In the 80's everyone said the Japanese would own this country. Now its China and Mexicans.

Hate is hate. Paranoia is paranoia. Truth is truth.
James Greybush
The rules should be the same for everyone
06:16 PM on 08/21/2012
they are getting SS numbers with their work permits and amnesty. Yes the few that have ITIN's do pay taxes but claim the child tax credits just like you said.

They pay $500 a year in income tax and get $2000 refund for child tax credits. But the illegals are all like that. they are just here to suck the system dry, they don't care about this country, its laws or its people.
08:27 AM on 08/16/2012
The immigrants don't come here to be Americans. They come here because business offers them work. Business in America is addicted to cheap labor and they will do anything legal or illegal to get their fix of cheap labor. Start putting these business owners in jail for employing illegals and the problem will stop. If there are no jobs available for them they will stop coming.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Pablo Manriquez
Huffpo Latino Affairs blogger
05:40 PM on 08/16/2012
There are currently so few jobs available for undocumented workers that evidence seems to indicate that have stopped coming.
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
06:14 PM on 08/16/2012
The numbers are down. They haven't stopped. And that still leaves 12 million [supposedly] here.
llwlknsn
Adequate words fail me.
08:09 PM on 08/16/2012
Keep watching. We are still allowing 2 million immigrants into the country a MONTH.

Who supports them?
12:49 AM on 08/18/2012
First need to put the politicians in jail who take bribes to not enforce immigration law.
08:18 AM on 08/16/2012
What prevents our parents from robbing banks and giving their loot to their children? Given this scenario, in this country, if the parents are not caught for a certain period of time (lets say the child is 15 when the robbery occurs and just turned 16 when their parent is caught) then the children could benefit significantly right? I mean they (the children) did not know they (the parents) were doing something wrong and therefore when the parent(s) are caught, this government could not take that money back from the children. Based on this law, the parents did something illegal and not the children so how could the government come and take the illegal gift which was given to these children? Is this not the same scenario? Parent does something illegal which benefits the child, but that is not the child's fault and therefore you cannot take back what was given to them, right? This country is doomed and people like the president are spearheading the effort to direct it towards its demise... Why? So that he might get move votes and subsequently elected for another term!
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Pablo Manriquez
Huffpo Latino Affairs blogger
05:42 PM on 08/16/2012
So...in effect what you're saying is that we need to start holding children accountable for their parents' crimes?
Gasparilla
there is no clean coal
06:12 PM on 08/16/2012
Why is this always portrayed as those who came at a very young age. You'd think we were talking about five year olds only. The fact is that it applies if you came before 16 and have been here only 5 years. So you can live most of your life in another country and still get it.
llwlknsn
Adequate words fail me.
08:10 PM on 08/16/2012
No. We need to start holding the parents accountable for their crimes and deporting the entire family back to Mexico. Anchors as well. They can return when they are 18 and able to work on their own.