More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert J. Elisberg

Robert J. Elisberg

Posted: January 19, 2011 10:28 AM

On this Friday, January 21, it is the one-year anniversary of the Citizens United decision by the Supreme Court, pretty much declaring corporations to be equal to individuals and giving them the same rights. Actually, more rights, since corporations don't have to do the dishes after dinner, visit in-laws or diaper their babies. And they get to give all the piles of money they want to any political candidate and not even declare it publicly. How cool is that?! Forget being president, it almost makes you want to grow up and be a corporation one day.

Like you, no doubt, I plan to have a big anniversary celebration on Friday. After all, it's not every day that you get to subvert democracy and let money pour out of every body orifice in total dark secret. Well...okay, now it's every day, true. But it's not completely true, you still have to be a corporation to do it. Individual citizens don't have that right - even though supposedly corporations and individual humans have the same rights. It just doesn't work in both directions.

(It's all very confusing. For instance, although the Supreme Court says that corporations and individuals get the same rights, corporations are physically unable to pee. But they are able to pee all over you. It's a quirk in the law. And biology. I leave that to constitutional scholars.)

For my gala Citizens United anniversary party on Friday, I plan to have to have a big piñata that we all will get to pound and pound with a stick until it bursts and all its insides fall out. But rather than being in the shape of some farm animal, I've had mine made up like a map of the United States.

I am also inviting all my dearest and closest corporations, and we can hold hands and dance around in a circle on a big American flag. Well, okay, we won't all be holding hands because corporations don't actually have "hands," per se. But that's nit-picking because they do have hands in politicians' pockets and fists up your butt, so it's pretty much the same. Anyway, that's another of those constitutional and physical oddities that's far beyond my understanding. And to be clear, all that wiping feet on Old Glory is not desecrating the flag, it's honoring it. I'm sure the Supreme Court can figure out a way to explain the difference. So, I won't be losing any sleep.

I'll also have a booth helping people incorporate themselves. I have personal experience with this, as I've explained on these pages in the past, incorporating myself twice. The first time was as the NoTel phone company after the Bush Administration passed a bill protecting telecoms from being sued for illegal activity in wiretapping, and the other came after I officially became the Bank of Bob to cash in on the Bush bailout money.

So, as you can see, I know what I'm talking about here. Being a corporation has worked out so wonderfully for me. I would tell you how wonderfully, but I'm a corporation, and I don't have to. Well, as a corporation, I do have to disclose public information, but as a corporation, I also have my rights as an individual, and I plan to stand and/or hide behind them. Let the Supreme Court figure out the difference. I feel comforted knowing they will.

If you can't make my party - either because you're not in the neighborhood or invited (after all, my corporate slogan as NoTel is "Where You Come First. (And by 'You,' I mean me.") - I came upon a video that explains it all for you, as well. It's by Rob Kutner, a writer for the Conan show, so as someone who went through his own share of corporate shenanigans in the past year, he knows what he's talking about.





And if you aren't attending my gala celebration, that's not reason why you shouldn't have your own. Or join others in Washington for a Happy Anniversary rally at the U.S Capitol on January 21.

(By the way, I have a proposal to rename it the "U.S. Capital." It seems more appropriate now.)

Cake will probably be served. Yes, yes, I'm aware that corporations can't actually eat cake. But they also live by the motto, "Let them eat cake." So - well, by this point you've no doubt realized that somehow the Supreme Court will be able to futz their way around it, making law by ignoring physical law and explaining reality away.

But most of all, don't forget to bring a gift! Any denomination will be accepted, please make sure bills are unmarked. Not to worry, it won't be reported.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 11
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
mcostello
It's just math
01:07 PM on 01/20/2011
Funny how you don't hear repubs bemoan "activist judges" in this case.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jerry Vasquez
A Unapologetic liberal
11:02 AM on 01/20/2011
In one fell swoop the average citizen was pushed to the back of the bus. Just as the civil right's
acts of the '60's advanced the rights that all citizen now enjoy, the citizen's united ruling made
second class citizens of us all. Our friends on the right are so fond of erasing, rolling back or
undoing intrusive government let them start here. I would applaud those efforts.
photo
bd7769
I may not always be right, but I am never wrong.
08:15 AM on 01/20/2011
Not only was it determined that congress lacks the authority, it was congress that wrote the law that the court overturned.
The main issue with the law passed by congress is that a person, PAC, corporation or whoever would need to go before a government agency and ask permission to air a political message, so much for free speech and the 1st amendment.
But let’s not confuse the facts with rhetoric. It’s been a year, both the congress and the president said that they would not let this decision stand and that new campaign finance law would be passed to correct this injustice by the court.
So I ask where is it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TRex86
Enjoying life in West Ohio
08:50 AM on 01/20/2011
The Supremes vastly over-reached the scope of the case before them and you know it. Why are you an apologist for the corporate take-over of this country? You think you'll get a better deal than with old fashioned democracy?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:33 AM on 01/20/2011
That was like getting batted around between amusement, disbelief and horror; thank you.
01:22 AM on 01/20/2011
Sometimes I wish I lived closer to Washington.

Hope you have a huge turnout at the rally!

Oh, and thanks for making me laugh---and cry---at the same time.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
Freesia2
I'm nicer than I appear in print. :-)
12:41 AM on 01/20/2011
It's been a year. Already? I spent so much of it dreading the ramifications (that we won't truly feel until election season for 2012 - and oooooh will we feel them. Or we will simply have no feeling left after they have finished beating us with their money bags til we're black and blue and can no longer feel and just ....pardon histrionics. It's going to be awful. Oh how I dread it. Goodbye everything I thought I ever knew including basic decency. You lied to me Mama - in case you're reading. Good manners and playing by the rules was a stinkin' lie and set me up for Citizen's United and I'm as helpless as a newborn baby.)

Your article was great Mr. Elisberg. "I laughed...I cried".

Please God take me now. What's that Grandma? Walk toward the light?
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
JStading
Trust me, I'm an attorney...
12:40 AM on 01/20/2011
The Citizens United holding wasn't that corporations are more people than people, it was that the Congress lacks the authority to pass laws that infringe upon the freedom of speech or of the press. The case got blown way out of proportion.  What harm did it do? Presumably none, since all it means is that Pepsi can now publish its political opinions in much the same fashion as news corporations do on a daily basis.  Moreover, it allows small business owners who cannot afford PAC participation to make their voice heard and to ensure that regulations that are passed consider their needs.  More freedom is rarely a problem, and it certainly isn't here.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark MacDonald
Pass the Scotch
10:21 AM on 02/14/2011
Thank you. I wonder how many of the people crying the world is coming to an end simply because corporations can speak freely have ever owned or worked for a corporation that is heavily regulated. I also wonder if any of them understand exactly how many Americans work for corporations. And as for whatever deceptive and self-serving political advertising corporations may produce, how could this possibly be different than any other of the stupid ads that are routinely produced every election year? The idea that the Congress of the United States has the right to curtail speech of any kind by anybody or entity is absurd and reactionary, dangerous. Go freedom.
12:24 AM on 01/20/2011
So sad, so true.
12:21 PM on 01/19/2011
HAHAHAHA!! Thanks for the laughs, I needed them! I usually feel alot more like crying when I contemplate this ruling.