More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert J. Elisberg

Robert J. Elisberg

Posted: August 19, 2010 09:11 AM

There are several ways to campaign.

One is to let voters know who caused the problems they are complaining about. A second way is letting voters know how you plan to resolve those problems.

(The trick here is coming up with solutions that at least sound rational. After all, "We can save Social Security by privatizing it like a murderous South American dictator did" may not appeal to all voters.)

And then there's letting voters know what your opponents will do. And here, Republicans, salivating rashly at visions of returning to power one-day, have inexplicably handed Democrats on-the-record opportunities.

Before the 2006 off-year elections, Democratic leaders fell over themselves calming voters (rightly or wrongly) that impeachment proceedings against President Bush was not on the table should the party take Congressional control, nor that they would use subpoena power to spend every day investigating crimes, even though so many Republicans had already gone to prison. Democrats swept back into power. And two years later won the White House.

Contrast that with the present, when Republicans are doing everything they can to bring out the crazy.

Not every Republican has proposed the same things, but if we've learned anything from recent history, it's unanimity of Republican thought. There is a recurring theme across the board from GOP leaders like Mitch McConnell, Jon Kyl, Lindsey Graham and others; from Republican mouthpieces who attach to the nearest camera like Michelle Bachmann, Newt Gingrich and the half-term former governor Sarah Palin; from the "new generation" of Republican/Tea Party candidates Sharron Angle, Rand Paul and more, all of whom are trying their best to set the table about what a Republican-controlled Congress would be like. Without prompting from anyone, almost begging for microphones to explain their agenda.

For starters, Republicans have been upfront that they hate and want to repeal the health care reforms. So, all those new protections that American citizens have already taken into their lives -- like adding one's adult children onto a parent's policy when that child would otherwise lose their coverage -- to all those protections to come that won't become active until 2014 (thanks to Republican insistence on delay) -- including not being refused coverage for pre-existing conditions -- Republicans want to get rid of that.

Republicans also have stated that they want to repeal the new banking reform laws against Wall Street. So, in the midst of America's worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, a recession brought on by Wall Street abuse, Republicans think it's a really wonderful idea to get rid of all the new national protections that Congress enacted.

Amazingly, Republicans have also gotten so giddy on the fumes of hoped-for power that many are increasingly bringing up the eternal GOP bugaboo, Social Security. When you hear the words, "privatize," just know it's code for the 75-year Republican dream to actually dismantle the protection supported by 88% of Americans.

Republicans in growing numbers have begun talking about repealing the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, the core right that any person born in the United States is an American citizen. You know, that whole "Give me your tired, your poor" thing.

There even have been Republicans sending up "trial balloons" about actually repealing the 17th Amendment -- your right to directly elect their senator by popular vote, rather than have members appointed by state legislatures.

And remarkable, too, is the anxious desire of Republicans to stop government in its tracks, phrased most emphatically by Ms. Bachmann (R-MN) "I think that all we should do is issue subpoenas," she told a GOP Youth Convention. Never mind the economy, unemployment and wars. "I think that's all we should do."

That's what America has in store if the Republican Party regains control in Congress, and not just in the coming election. Repealing healthcare. Repealing Wall Street banking reform. Repealing Social Security. Repealing unemployment insurance for those slackers who dared get fired during a recession. Repealing the 14th Amendment. Repealing the 17th Amendment. And issuing subpoena after subpoena, because "that's all we should do."

Forget what problems from the past the Republican Party created -- and that's a lot to forget: the economic crash, unemployment, doubling the national debt, the Iraq War, the Afghan War and more. Forget, too, that they want you to let them fix the mess they created. Forget even whether you think the Democratic Party can build strong enough solutions.

Just know that this is what will face America if a Republican Party is back in control. Repeal and subpoena. It's not opinion or guess: Republicans have themselves been excitedly telling you it's what they want. On the record. Imagine what they're saying out of the reach of microphones.

This isn't just the Party of No. This is the Party of Nowhere. No Way. No How.

America doesn't go backwards. America is a nation that has always gone forward. But the Republican Party is telling you it wants to drag the country in reverse. Into the past. Repeal! "I want my country back," they cry. When blacks knew their place. The poor and elderly were on their own. Women couldn't vote. Only Europeans immigrated. And the rich didn't have to worry about anybody getting in their way.

A "happier" time.

 
There are several ways to campaign. One is to let voters know who caused the problems they are complaining about. A second way is letting voters know how you plan to resolve those problems. (The ...
There are several ways to campaign. One is to let voters know who caused the problems they are complaining about. A second way is letting voters know how you plan to resolve those problems. (The ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 75
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Katy Haun
09:58 PM on 08/23/2010
If folks will remember, Bob Dole ran on a similar idea in 1996: he wanted to go back, too. Remember?

"In Bob Dole's acceptance speech, Dole stated "Let me be the bridge to an America that only the unknowing call myth. Let me be the bridge to a time of tranquillity, faith, and confidence in action",[8] to which incumbent president and Democratic nominee Bill Clinton responded, "We do not need to build a bridge to the past, we need to build a bridge to the future.".[9]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Dole#1996_presidential_campaign

And we all know how successful that was.
photo
JeffmChicago
It's A Mad Mad Mad Mad World
09:34 AM on 08/23/2010
Thank you Mr. Elisberg. I can now convey to people exactly what the Republican Party has in store for our country if they get control. Your words put it all into perspective for me.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StPeteDave
08:24 AM on 08/20/2010
I don't want to live in the 1880s
Gasparilla
buy your local newspaper
08:47 PM on 08/19/2010
Harry Reid had no problem with ending birthright citizenship in 1993 when he introduced a bill to do just that, and didn't "see the light" until 2006. We have a problem when one in twelve children is born to someone here illegally. And the plain fact is that the 14th HAS been altered, twice. It says that representation in Congress is to be based on "male inhabitants". Women and specifically Indians were not included. Women got the vote through another amendment and Indians got citizenship through an act of Congress in the 1920s. You can talk all you want about "give me your poor...", but when you have the low income government assistance programs that exist now, but not a hundred and fifty years ago, maybe it's not a good idea to be asking for more poor. Other countries have changed their laws on this issue, Ireland in 2005 for one, and it didn't involve all the hysteria.
IMOPINIONH8D
because I want it empty...
08:43 PM on 08/19/2010
I dont want the repubs taking our country anywhere.
06:48 PM on 08/19/2010
If you believe as I do in what Robert J. Elisberg is saying here, isn't the next step addressing the role of the Republican Party in a de facto two-party political system?

That is, can a nation with a two-party system still be considered a democracy if one of those political parties HATES the role of government? It doesn't make sense that if you hate government, that you're going to be very good at running it.
photo
Ojodelgato
Bios? We don't need no stinking Bios!
09:00 AM on 08/20/2010
It goes with the management fad in the 1990's, hiring energetic but untrained employees for breakthrough improvements. The thought was that if an employee didn't know that something was impossible they'd miraculously be able to make it happen through sheer grit and determination. My old boss hired several clueless people in middle management positions looking for miracles to happen. Amazingly they did poorly on the job.
06:45 PM on 08/19/2010
You cannot simply argue that it is a mistake to take the country back. A lot of people, while understanding that we must always move forward, would like to take the country back in certain ways, and those ways are valid and worthy of attention. Imagine going back to a country where customer service was automatic and friendly. Imagine going back to a country where courtesy always trumped rudeness. Imagine going back to a country where people had large vocabularies and did not have to utilize vulgar euphemisms to cover their ignorance. Imagine going back to a country where yelling in public was seldom noted and yelling on tv was reserved only for sporting events. I am a liberal Democrat who would love to see us go back to some very important aspects of behavior that we have lost! No, I do not want to repeat the George W. Bush years (they were not much different from now, actually). But, we Democrats would be foolish not to consider that there are good things about the past that we have simply lost and need to regain.
Jay Haney
My nuclear family imploded when I was 18. I've bee
11:52 PM on 08/19/2010
As the old saw goes, you can never go home again. What you're pining for will have to have wait quite a while before any of it can emerge from the radioactive environment we're in the middle of right now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
veritas aequitas
06:16 PM on 08/19/2010
For the American system of government to work, there’s an assumption that individuals will take care of themselves. This calls for individuals to have a sense of personal responsibility.

The assumption is that an individual will take the steps necessary to be self-sufficient by working in an occupation that they can contribute and be compensated to pay their own way.

In the past, the American culture prized personal responsibility and looked down on the willingness and desire to take without producing more than they consumed.

When the Tea Party talks about "taking our country back," that is what they mean.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
tabaqui
One of those weirdo hippy-dippy types.
06:47 PM on 08/19/2010
Oh, I see. So we should go back to a time when an old man, who worked all his life and paid his bills but suddenly became ill and was forced to spend his retirement money on medicine and health care....was allowed to freeze to death or starve because he'd run out of money, couldn't work any more, and there was no such thing as Medicare or Social Security.

Sounds awesome! Let's go back to *that*!!
IMOPINIONH8D
because I want it empty...
08:37 PM on 08/19/2010
They dont get it ............fnndndfvd
DianneinCA
running forward, laughing...
07:58 PM on 08/19/2010
If that is all they mean by "taking our country back" why did they wait until Obama was president to want that? Are you saying this lack of responsibility began in Jan 09? There was no sense of entitlement prior to that date?
04:23 PM on 08/19/2010
They are like Sherman & Peabody from the cartoon Rocky & Bullwinkle in the "Way Back Machine".

They liked the 8 years they had in power with nothing but failed policies the problem is nobody else did so the majority of Americans voted against those GOP failures and Americans elected Obama.

In spite of the fact the majority did the right thing under the circumstances the GOP is angry about the election and have proven to be very sore losers.

When Dems gave up the fight and Gore conceded they soldiered on through the 8 year Bush administration trying in vain to change things from heading in the wrong direction but the GOP had a strangle hold on America.

The GOP drove the economy off the cliff.

But even now with less than a full 2 years the GOP has done nothing since the election but complain and blame, voting no on everything that might move us forward while blaming Dems for the problems they left behind.

They never accepted responsibility for the mess the made or the crashed economy they left behind.

Then they never even made much of an attempt to change their policies and ideas or work in good faith to fix those problems.

They took a taxpayer salary to do nothing but vote no.

The GOP attitude is "I broke it and only I can fix it".

They won't lift a finger or vote yes even once. They have behaved like spiteful children at the taxpayer
DianneinCA
running forward, laughing...
08:00 PM on 08/19/2010
That is their "personal responsibility" for you. Good post and so true.

Fanned and faved
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:56 AM on 08/20/2010
Akin to their "family values" and government keeping its nose out of your business such as end of life and abortion matters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StPeteDave
08:29 AM on 08/20/2010
Rocky and Bullwinkle, my favorites. I really miss Jay Ward cartoons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mommadona
I paint. I blog. Therefore, I am.
01:21 PM on 08/19/2010
For a bunch of Grover Norquist disciples ~ the Republicans who hate U.S. soooo much SURE want to control U.S. ~ explain that to me.....you HATE something SO MUCH you want to CONTROL it?

Shoot, I suggest if they'd been given their way at the very beginning of this grand experiment of U.S., we wouldn't BE here today.

I call them absolutely Whiggy.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JDNTS2wHHo&feature=search
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarkinNM
Love politics, hate politicians
02:36 PM on 08/19/2010
I can help you out. They hate Americans, they love the power.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
01:11 PM on 08/19/2010
Republicans have no new proposals for solving this country's problems, they only want to go back to their failed policies of the past. That's why they scapegoat immigrants and trump up controversy like the NY mosque to take voter's attention away from what they would actually do in office.
11:54 AM on 08/19/2010
In the 30 years since Ronald Reagan was first elected, the Republicans have pulled too far to the RIGHT, and it has ended in the tears of this current Depression for all of us. Rather than negoatiate with the Republicans current stridency on behalf of their members who are already much too wealthy, we need to push hard back toward a progressive path. This means dissolving the wealth and power of our great self proclamed nobility and returning the country to the Middle Class.
photo
FirstGame72
The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters
12:13 PM on 08/19/2010
Your idea is correct. You left out the part about how to do this. It seems the owrde things get, the more the majority of the population turns to those who would harm them even more. It looks like a death spiral to me.
photo
FirstGame72
The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters
12:27 PM on 08/19/2010
That mangles word above was suppossed to read: worse.
cookcar
...talk to me so you can see whats going on...
02:31 PM on 08/19/2010
You are right!!! I had just turned 10 in 1979 when Reagan was elected. Through my child eyes I saw the Black middle class in this country dissolve in the 80's. However, it started in the 70's when our communities were flooded with drugs by the CIA to get rid of the Black Panther Party, which had spread to every major metro area in this country. Our communities were destroyed while the powers that be (CIA, lead by GHW Bush) got rich off of the drug trade; later they would all be singing "Just Say No".

Now, the white middle class haas caught up to what the non-existent black middle class has already been through. Our parents used to preach education to us as our only saving mechanism to possibly get out of poverty. Now, that is not a safe haven. Most of us get out of college with more debt than the low-paying jobs can help us repay.

Bill Maher asked the question on his show that he could not understand why a poor, working class, or even middle class person would vote for a Republican. The reply was "they trick them into it". He is right. They distract people with issues that don't really matter (homophobia, racism, religious discrimination, etc...), but issues that they know can get "a rise" out of certain people because of their own personal prejudices; they create fear and BAM!!!! they get their votes.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kiffanik
11:54 AM on 08/19/2010
The problem is that it's common for people in similar situations to look out for those with whom they share commonalities. Wealthy people tend to look out for wealthy people, it's to be expected. Poor people, on the other hand, don't always vote for things to help themselves or other poor people. Instead they fight each other over the most minute things (race, religion, etc) instead of realizing that if they channelled that energy into working together they might actually come up in the world. Who in their right mind says "I have no money and no job, but please don't extend my unemployment benefits, I'd rather just live in the street so long as we don't have none of that darn socialism"?
photo
FirstGame72
The Sleep of Reason Produces Monsters
12:11 PM on 08/19/2010
Spot on!
But is this behavior simple human nature or learned bahavior as part of the "American Experience?"
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:30 PM on 08/19/2010
I can say that it is learned behaviour, and contrary to the implicit social contract evolution has selected for. That contract is founded on reciprocity of fairness, equity and collaboration. To violate the social contract requires programming strong enough to override such ethics.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:12 PM on 08/19/2010
Willful ignorance does play a major role but it is downstream of cognitive problems. Those problems are a matter of developmental arrest in several of the most critical of the ten cognitive domains of human consciousness. The "Intrapersonal" domain can be summed up by the dictum "know thyself". The "existential" domain can be summed by, "know yourself in the world". The "ecological" domain is described by the phrase "know life". Now ask yourself what developmental arrest would look like in these three domains and you have the source of "personal selfishness" manifesting as a subconscious response to denial of the Developmental Imperative.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Madagain
antirepublicanism
10:55 AM on 08/20/2010
Right Kiffanik. If you go to a comunity hall and there are fifty people there, there are usually 50 opinions also. Then often there are sides taken up by diferent factions and a long battle over who is correct. Winning the argument becomes more important sometimes than solving the initial problem. That, at least has been my experiance with small, community type meetings.
11:27 AM on 08/19/2010
This versus Obama's vision of taking us to the gutter.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kiffanik
11:48 AM on 08/19/2010
We've been in the gutter for a long time, well, except for wealthiest 2% of the country. Where have you been? The middle class has been shrinking, GW just pushed them past the brink.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rextrek
50yr old, Moderate-liberal in S.NJ/Phila
11:51 AM on 08/19/2010
Ohhh please...what did you do...take a break from FOX news to post that?
photo
bookreader451
"You can't ever have my books," she said.
11:25 AM on 08/19/2010
The reactionary turn our country is facing is being driven by greed, fear of loss of power. History has shown that when a country's citizenry is poor and hungry and angry at the leadership they revolt. People are angry and they want change but the republicans need to understand that if you begin to dismantle the few safety nets the middle class has and continue to funnel up the wealth of our county eventually there will be a revolt. Electing Obama was a start but the sweeping changes cannot take place with the current obstruction adjenda. Each and every piece of legislation enacted to protect Americans has been watered down by the Republicans so that it has become effectively useless. If the Republican adgended wants to move backwards then it needs to focus on rebuilding our manufacturing base, returning the strength of the unions and pensions. Then maybe we will get somewhere. Americans are hard working people that want to work and have the dignity provided with doing a job well.
photo
bookreader451
"You can't ever have my books," she said.
11:33 AM on 08/19/2010
note: I can spell agenda just not today when I am tying fast
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:32 PM on 08/19/2010
Well stated!