More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert J. Elisberg

Robert J. Elisberg

GET UPDATES FROM Robert J. Elisberg
 

The "Tea Party" Is Not Revolting

Posted: 02/ 3/11 01:22 PM ET

Just in case anyone from the "Tea Party" is watching the news from Egypt, this is what an actual revolution looks like.

A quarter-million people randomly taking to the streets.

No one dressed up in funny costumes and hats. No tea bags worn.

Visceral, guttural, raw human outrage against one man's 29-year dictatorship while living under "emergency law" for 43 years.

No voters upset that they lost an election two years earlier.

Nobody angry that the government is trying to force national health care on them.

Not one poster of Adolf Hitler.

No professional lobbying organization putting together Official Protest Parties. BYOB.

No national TV network rallying its viewers with directions on where to meet and directions on how to get there.

Students and young people converging totally of their own accord, even as Internet accounts are turned off, even as phone service is turned off.

Middle-class, middle-aged people eventually joining in. Ultimately making it a national cause.

That's a revolution.

And watching it unfold lays bare the "Tea Party" for what it is and always has been. Frightened, middle-class, middle-aged people upset that they have to pay taxes, angry that they can't have life the way they alone want it, and disturbed that a Black man was elected president.

The spectacle of some reasonably-comfortable woman with tears filling her eyes, weeping mournfully that "I want my country back" looks even more utterly ludicrous while watching the nation of Egypt actually fighting to literally get their country back.

The display of some grown-up man in cruise wear sashaying about being a proud terrorist because he's willing to yell at his congressman over taxes looks buffoonish when seeing a mass of humanity in Cairo scrabbling in wrenching desperation to be given dignity, democracy, freedom.

Seeing torn people agonizingly putting their very lives on the line, getting beaten, crawling over one another to overthrow their nation after 43 years of "emergency law" and after 29 years of a one-man dictatorship makes it belly-achingly laughable to watch a coffee klatch in lawn chairs waving misspelled signs, screaming at their government for trying to give them all health care, and declaring themselves part of an actual "revolution" -- a "Tea Party Revolution!"

As global television is today demonstrating to the world in stark reality, the "Tea Party" is to revolution what a debutante cotillion is to the Vietnam War. What Bozo is to Shakespearean drama.

What we see daily in Egypt, that's a revolution. What we saw in America last November, that's democracy.

Democracy in all its glory.

"Throwing the bums" out isn't a revolution. It's what voters do. It happens. In fact, it happens a whole lot in elections whenever unemployment is high.

Billion dollar corporations paying to organize people so they'll complain about taxes also isn't a revolution. It's what billion dollar corporations do. They only pray they'll find customers gullible enough to not realize they're being used as pawns. But then, that's why God created marketing departments, to come up with a cute, endearing "Tea Party" brand name ("New! Improved! From the Makers of the John Birch Society!") and bamboozle otherwise mature people into dressing up. And flim-flam them into seriously believing that they're not only part of something, they're part of a "Revolution!"

All that's missing is the requirement to send in 10 box tops and getting a free decoder ring.

"The Tea Party Revolution." Taking back our country.

Turn on your TV. That's a revolution. That's taking back your country.

After seeing a real revolution in their living rooms, no doubt there will be some who'll start to back off a bit from looking too clownish, and now claim that, no, of course, it's not a "real" revolution, that it's just a metaphor.

Sort of like football players claiming that they're "warriors." Or Sarah Palin claiming that "Lock and Reload" is just about a surveyor's mark.

Just a metaphor.

I look forward to the "Tea Party" corporations trying to convince their pawns that what they're part of is a metaphor.

If supporters of the "Tea Party" corporations want to voice their displeasure at high taxes; want try to get rid of the Department of Education, National Public Radio, environmental protection, Social Security, Medicare, and national health care; and rail against every single word from the President of the United States solely because he's simply too different from them -- Godspeed. That's their right in America. It's the very soul of the nation. Indeed, while the creepiest among us call for Second Amendment Solutions, that's the noble First Amendment Solution. But at least now, today, we and everyone all over the world can see on our TVs what a real revolution is.

And it isn't the "Tea Party."

Pinkies up.

 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 302
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
04:17 PM on 02/09/2011
Great article! HuffPo should have more of these gut-check commentaries.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Mark Fey
10:45 PM on 02/08/2011
A very good read....Thanks
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HST
Conservatism = selfishness
10:46 PM on 02/07/2011
YOU KNOW YOU'RE A REPUBLIBAGGER WHEN...

You didn't get mad when:

* SCOTUS stopped a legal recount and appointed a President
* Cheney allowed Energy company officials to dictate energy policy
* A covert CIA operative got outed
* The Patriot Act got passed
* We illegally invaded a country that posed no threat to us
* We spent over 1 trillion(and counting) on on illegal war
* 10 billion dollars just disappeared in Iraq.
* You saw the Abu Grahib photos.
* You found out we were t.orturing people.
* The national debt doubled under the previous President from $5.674 Trillion to $10.024 Trillion.
* You saw the horrible conditions at Walter Reed.
* We let a major US city drown!
* The deficit hit the Trillion dollar mark.

You finally got mad when :

* The government decided that people in America deserved the right to see a doctor if they are sick
* The government tried to create jobs ( and did! )
* The government tried to save the economy ( and especially when they did)
* The government tried to protect the consumer from banks and CC companies
* The government tried to give basic equality to ALL of it's citizens
* The governement tried to function for the people and not just rich white guys
* The government was being run by an intelligent and brillant BLACK leader (.) period
02:40 PM on 02/05/2011
Would this authorhave the Tea Party use violence and unrest to achieve its means?

The Tea Party uses the American political system to make change. They encourage others to vote and support an agenda they deem is right and good. They donot use fear and intimidation and disobedience to involuntary action. It is because of people like those inthe Tea Party that we have never let things get as bad as they have it in Egypt.

This uprising in Egypt is in noway an example of how the people of the United States should inspire change!

The author of this article must have paid little attention to the Tea Party to write such inflammatory and inaccurate critiques. It is a weak and powerless argument that must resort to race and class war when describing the Tea Party. These twotopics automatically turn readers in to disgust toward the subject, even if the accusations are 100% untrue. A blatant lack of integrity on the part of the author.
This author would have the Tea Party feel shame for disagreeing with the administration's ideas and philosophies, for daring to disagree.

When the leaders of the country wander fromthe founding principles that created the country they love goes unheeded, then the people have a duty to 'take their country back'. We should be THANKFUL, that people like the Tea Party would never allow our country tofall under dictatorship such as that in Egypt.

It is a sick mind that wants a revolution such asthat.
04:39 PM on 02/05/2011
"We should be THANKFUL, that people like the Tea Party would never allow our country tofall under dictatorsh­ip such as that in Egypt."

LOL, right. Where was the "Tea Party" when Bush was arresting anti-war protesters or imprisoning Americans without trial? Please. You all waited until someone who was in office that would not arrest you, then you show up with assault weapons and Hitler signs screaming about "watering the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants". The Tea Party are a bunch of clowns.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tttt9erfan
gov't gave my bio to someone who doesn't post here
04:35 AM on 02/08/2011
Using your logic, where were the protesters in Egypt before now? They protest against a guy whose been in power, what, 30 years!! So are they too not legit because they didn't come together before now? That is the most ridiculous arguement against the tea party. We didn't come together before we did, therefore we are not legit....and that makes sense to you? Really?
04:46 PM on 02/05/2011
The point is not that he wants such a revolution. The point is that such a revolution does involve a more committed effort. That the tea-party people are just posers and the issues they rail against aren't real enough to justify what can be called a real revolution. All because someone else has fed them a bunch of unsubstantiated bull and that they were willing to swallow that bull because they just don't like Obama (for whatever reason doesn't matter - though its probably mostly because he is different than them).

(BTW, twisting words is just another way of being disingenuous, ignoring facts and refusing to have a legitimate debate).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tttt9erfan
gov't gave my bio to someone who doesn't post here
06:13 PM on 02/05/2011
To Keepingitreal-just because you choose to name call and say they are posers doesn't make it so. The TP issues may not be of any concern to you. However, they are a concern to others. And as typically, pulling the race card is thrown in. Those opposing Obama's policies are far less concerned with his race than most of you supporters!

I find it interesting that you on the left support those in Egypt but show such disrespect for those in the Tea Party. I guess you just hate the Tea Party people because they are different from you, right?
11:20 PM on 02/05/2011
The Tea Party isn't looking for a revolution. You talk about ignoring facts and refusing a legitimate debate......
10:21 AM on 02/05/2011
Start calling them what they really are: "KOCHISTS"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marthamothra
11:13 PM on 02/04/2011
Good one, Robert. I enjoyed reading your clever take on the difference.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tttt9erfan
gov't gave my bio to someone who doesn't post here
09:15 PM on 02/04/2011
If the Tea Party is so racist, then how do you explain the Black Tea Patriots?
10:35 AM on 02/05/2011
The US Calvary, campaigning in the West against the Indians, had a few N/A scouts that fought alongside them.

Just seems suspicious, "Black Tea Patriots" aside, that the movement is 98.67% white. What other group, in this richly diverse county, is statistically as overwhelmingly monochromatic?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tttt9erfan
gov't gave my bio to someone who doesn't post here
06:15 PM on 02/05/2011
And where do you get your statistics? And why put the BlackTeaPatriots "aside".? Or don't they count?
08:42 PM on 02/04/2011
Cogent, forceful and accurate.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StJames
In absentia luci tenebrae vincunt
08:21 PM on 02/04/2011
Mr. Elisberg:

Thank you for a great editorial.  You have brilliantly summed up the irrelevance of the Tea Party movement.  It will be difficult to ever take them seriously.
photo
Hugebrass
Defend the Constitution from "Progressive" Change
08:38 PM on 02/04/2011
...except on election day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tttt9erfan
gov't gave my bio to someone who doesn't post here
06:16 PM on 02/05/2011
If they are so irrelevant than why keep talking about them? If they can't be taken seriously, why are they continually being misrepresented?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
StJames
In absentia luci tenebrae vincunt
07:17 PM on 02/05/2011
Who misrepresents them?  More importantly, who represents them?  Are they going to have their own party?  How many different Tea Party organizations are there?  Have they come out with one platform agreed upon by all?  Is Sarah Palin your representative?  Michelle Bachmann?  Or is it someone else?  Is there anyone they all support? Are you really fiscal conservatives?  Then you would raise taxes and freeze spending in order to pay down the debt.  Are you interested in jobs and small government?  Or in redefining rape?  If you like small government are you going to stay out of the personal lives of women and homosexuals?  Or does your small government rhetoric end where you voyeurism begins? 

They are talked about, most often, because they are so very bizarre.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
EspritDeVoltaire
K Street PR firm board member
05:57 PM on 02/04/2011
Let's call them as they really are, the Tea Pansies. The pampered over indulged product of having it too good for too long.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
UncleSmrgol
pro-life Catholic
08:24 PM on 02/04/2011
Let's just say we Tea Partiers happen to live in a democracy, and are less violent that the pro- and anti-Mubarak protesters. We haven't beaten anybody and we haven't killed anybody in our efforts to return our country to its financial roots. You can make fun of us all you want, but I believe we "shallacked" you (to use President Obama's own words) in the last election cycle.

If you think that was pansy behavior, then you certainly won't mind us making the same effort for 2012.
07:29 PM on 02/05/2011
What Egypt shows is what true "tyranny" means. It means having government thugs showing up to your protest and throwing molotov cocktails at you. It means having baton-weilding thugs attack reporters. I don't begrudge any Tea Partier his beliefs, but if you say we live under tyranny because the government says you need to have health insurance, the Egypt example shows what a fool you are.
06:58 PM on 02/06/2011
"The pampered over indulged product of having it too good for too long."

And? What are you suggesting?
photo
Protocolor
Have maths, will travel.
02:52 PM on 02/04/2011
As if to reinforce Elisberg's article, the Google Ads above the comments section gives us:
________________
Ads by Google
Stop Liberals' Censorship
Stop Liberals from censoring con- servatives as done to Sarah Palin. www.TheTeaParty.net
________________

They really believe that 'liberals' are censoring Palin and conservatives!
The TPers are either profoundly intellectually challenged or off-the-wall insane... or both.
They think that they are some sort of revolution, and they think it's liberals' fault that Palin sounds so stupid.

I'm embarrassed for them.
10:23 AM on 02/05/2011
Was it Bill Maher who pointed out that SP Tweets, Facebook posts, e-mails, guest columns in the WSJ, is paid by Fox to espouse her views, all the while whining about being censored?
12:22 PM on 02/04/2011
Well, to be fair to the TPers, everyone's problems and grievances are relative to their own experience, values, and emotional makeup. When I was young, I never appreciated my parents' insistence that the solution to any and all of my problems was to simply consider theirs, and how insignificant mine were by comparison. Everyone's troubles are their own, and they seem just as intense to those harboring them as anyone else's.

That said, the article makes an excellent point. The nature and magnitude of the TP's rhetoric is grotesquely out of proportion to whatever -legitimate- complaints they may have, which is to say nothing of their sundry -il-legitimate complaints about imaginary strawmen and paranoid persecution fantasies.

I can imagine an Egyptian looking at a TP rally, shaking his head and saying to these people, You have -no- -idea- what tyranny is. You have -no- -idea- what it's like to be truly oppressed and persecuted. It's hard, even in light of what I wrote above, to look at the Egyptians, and then look at and listen to the TP and not ask, WTF are -you- complaining about?
photo
Hugebrass
Defend the Constitution from "Progressive" Change
12:38 PM on 02/04/2011
(From our previous thread...)

When I consider keeping what I earn, you call it “selfishness”. When you consider confiscating what I earn, I call it “stealing”.

Dogma is defined as “a political, philosophical, or moral group holds to be true”. Calling me “selfish” and “cruel” is not only unfair to me as a free human being, but you fly in the face of nearly every founding principal of the COUNTRY in which you live – not the least of which are “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.” For you to bloviate about “political, legal and economic principals” and insinuate that I’m not living by such a code, the obvious question becomes, “Who’s code”? Yours? Because the political, legal and economic principals you espouse couldn’t be further from the political, legal and economic principals clearly defined on our nation’s Founding Documents.

And this is the rub with the Progressive movement – all the way back to Woodrow Wilson…Your “society” is vastly different from mine, and vastly different from the founding principals. In my civil society, we don’t confiscate wealth from others and redistribute it as we see fit, and the Constitution prevents you from doing so. This is precisely why the Progressive movement needs judges like Brennan to reinterpret, and then re-reinterpret the constitution as they see fit.

As you may have noticed on November 2nd, we, the majority of this country, reject Progressivism and are going to continue doing so.

Get used to it.
01:42 PM on 02/04/2011
I think you've answered my question. Have a great weekend.
photo
morosemoose
Irritating the universe, one person at a time
05:52 PM on 02/04/2011
"When I consider keeping what I earn, you call it “selfishne­ss”. When you consider confiscati­ng what I earn, I call it “stealing”­. "

I call it what we fought a revolution for . The right to elect a government to represent us and to tax ourselves through those we elected. Those are the founding principles of the country. Our forefothers dumped the tea not because they didn't want to be taxed, but because they wanted a say in how they were taxed. "No taxation without representation!" Remember that? They taught it in 4th grade.

It is amazing how little the Tea Party knows about the real tea party they named themselves after.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
jmpurser
See My micro-bio
12:45 PM on 02/04/2011
Teabaggers are revolting against the notion of a black man in the White house.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Insanity rules
01:38 PM on 02/04/2011
Keep saying it honey, the delusion is final.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tttt9erfan
gov't gave my bio to someone who doesn't post here
08:26 PM on 02/04/2011
Doesn't pulling the race card ever get old? Please tell me, how one disagrees with the POTUS and/or his policies without being called a racist?? You answer would be greatly appriciated.
12:06 PM on 02/04/2011
Aren't we done with the so-called Tea Party yet?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tttt9erfan
gov't gave my bio to someone who doesn't post here
08:27 PM on 02/04/2011
Hardly.
photo
Daphydd
Lets play some music
12:06 PM on 02/04/2011
Thanks for an entertaining rant. I noted with some amusement, and amazement, that some Republican posters here at HP were trying to claim that the uprising in Egypt was inspired by the Tea Party. We can now add grandiose delusions to their list of pathologies.
photo
Hugebrass
Defend the Constitution from "Progressive" Change
03:06 AM on 02/05/2011
Don't forget about the 63 new House members...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mustraline
11:56 AM on 02/04/2011
Yes, the Tea-Party is pretty revolting.