More

Featuring fresh takes and real-time analysis from HuffPost's signature lineup of contributors
Robert L. Cavnar

Robert L. Cavnar

Posted: May 10, 2010 02:40 PM

BP Press Conference: More Experimental Steps to Stymie the Disaster

What's Your Reaction:

I'm listening to BP's Monday noon press conference in Houston as engineers are describing current operations and plan to get the blowout well killed. It's the most informative and open conversation I've heard since this accident occurred, and demonstrates, finally, the depth of the analysis and work that we all knew has been going on behind the scenes. Unfortunately, this was a "pen and paper" press conference where cameras were not allowed even though they used visual aids. Odd. A few new facts, though:

They are preparing to run a new, much smaller dome over the riser leak, calling it a "top hat", and hope to have it on bottom at the end of this week. It's only 5 feet in diameter, much smaller than the first dome, designed with the idea of reducing the volume of seawater within the vessel, thus lowering the chances for the formation of hydrates. They plan to set it already connected to the Transocean Enterprise, so it can immediately begin to gather oil rather than sitting unconnected for a period of time. Another key change is that the double riser to the drillship will be pumping methanol down the outside pipe, producing oil up the inner pipe. The methanol will be used to prevent hydrate and ice formation.

They also described the "junk shot" and "top kill" techniques they plan to try next week when preparations are complete. They indicate that there is indeed some restriction in the BOP (blowout preventer) which will make a junk shot more likely to be successful. They have been testing various "recipes" of junk to pump into the well that will be made up of various sizes of rubber balls, ground rubber and other material (even golf balls) that they hope will hang up in the BOP and stop the flow. They will then pump kill mud from those same valves into the well to stop the flow. This method of top kill is call "bullheading" which requires a lot of pressure to get started, but once the hydrostatic pressure of the column overtakes the formation, should take less to get it to bottom. This plan squares with information I have been getting from others familiar with the operation, that the ROVs are setting a new manifold next to the wellhead. This manifold will probably used for the pumping operation. One other bit of information I learned was that BP is reconstructing the kill and choke lines from the BOP back to the Enterprise, so they can conduct these operations from the surface.

I believe the junk shot and top kill are their best hopes in the near term. If they can indeed get the BOP to bridge off long enough to get sufficient kill mud into the well, maybe they can actually pull this off. That's a lot better than 2 more months of hand wringing as the relief well is drilled.

One very strong impression I have is just how unprepared BP was for an incident of this magnitude. They have had to manufacture all of these devices on the fly, including the manifold they are currently setting next to the wellhead. They are taking suggestions from anyone and everyone who wants to call, and seem willing to try almost anything. It's remarkable to me that a super major like BP, spending $100 million to drill each deepwater well, was so unprepared for what we all knew would happen eventually, an uncontrolled blowout on the sea floor. They were so dependent on, and comfortable with, the latest whiz-bang technology that they were caught flat footed; they are now scrambling to make up for this massive failure. The absolutely reliable became absolutely unreliable, and they are learning how to cope with it in real time, with disastrous consequences.


 
 
 

Follow Robert L. Cavnar on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@dailyhurricane

I'm listening to BP's Monday noon press conference in Houston as engineers are describing current operations and plan to get the blowout well killed. It's the most informative and open conversation I...
I'm listening to BP's Monday noon press conference in Houston as engineers are describing current operations and plan to get the blowout well killed. It's the most informative and open conversation I...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 38
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
10:16 AM on 07/05/2010
i have an idea that has probably already been thought of yet i keep thinking. three lines are put down with a ring that covers the hole the ring is attached by pins which have to be anchored into the ground . then a cover is put onto the ring. this could come from inside the ring and pulled out once ring is anchored. .once the ring is firmly anchored and lots of ideas for applying pressure could be added to top of ring. just an idea .ds
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pearl Neidlinger
10:06 AM on 05/28/2010
I have been glued to CNN watching top kill. I get up every morning hoping that top kill will work. But I am wondering how many gallons of mud they have pumped in. I am also wondering if they are putting off the cement so they can cover up the oil on the botton of the Gulf with as much mud as possible to make it look a bit better. First they said top kill would work in 24 hours, now 48 hours, and I am listening to Hayward saying to GMA that they are going to spend the day pumping in more mud. I don't know anything about top kill, but the time line keeps dragging on with the mud.
Are they just doing this to cover the sea floor as much as possible and who will check 5000' under mud?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William Waterway Marks
Water researcher, author, publisher
05:45 AM on 05/28/2010
Just imagine the future of all life on Earth if we fail to stop the oil gushing into the Gulf.
04:02 AM on 05/14/2010
Will someone get a count of the number of people on BP payroll doing actual clean-up and prevention on this spill and report it in relationship to the number of square miles or even acres involved, so the pitiful response is quantified for the general public to better understand. Do it for the other principle culprits, too. What is Halliburton contributing, what is Transocean contributing? What is Anadarko contributing? What are oil industry organizations contributing? (Relative to value of the capitalization and relative to total earnings and relative to profits.) How are the oil industry trade mags and papers reporting this? Shame them into doing more.


Will someone report boom in miles instead of feet so people realize how puny their efforts have been. And what about redundant lines of boom, two and three rows deep! BP can afford it!

How about getting those dredges going!

What is best method of containment in stormy seas?
03:47 AM on 05/14/2010
We need better investigative reporting. Perhaps a central collection point on the web for factual information to flow in. Add to this site your list of practical real story ideas. and brainstorming suggestions. Keep general grousing for other blogs. Welcomed but in another place. ;>)
03:44 AM on 05/14/2010
I don't know if insulation material would be detrimental to the environment, but there is lots of fiber insulation in the construction industry in this country. Can it also be used to fill bats that will absorb oil, in lieu of hair, which can then be collected? Bales of cotton?

Is anyone seining for the underwater effluent created by the dispersants & testing the resulting adulterated oil? Quantify the mess & what it is affecting? If there is skimming of the surface why isn't seining of the underwater mess happening on a large scale? Shrimp boats could drag seines?


Are sea life leaving the area, or are we seeing a lot of dead sea fish & animals floating on the water? Is there a concerted effort to collect carcases & dispose of them in a safer way?

What is being done to make the booms more effective in rough seas, as we are likely to have more of them?

Why is there no count of the number of boats, people & organizations & what they are doing bveing made public.

I think it is like Katrina in that the problem is so massive that what BP is really doing is a pitance of what it can afford and should be doing. Highlight the scale of problem to the scale of BP's response in the media daily. Make it a very specific black eye to get them to do massively more than they are currently. What is Anadarko Petroleum actually doing?
03:19 AM on 05/14/2010
Imagine a giant bladder, lightweight, that oil doesn't penetrate, like a giant hot air balloon. Hold loosely over the leak so the outflow goes into the bladder. When filled so the oil has pushed out most of the water, tie off the neck and let it go to the surface to be collected. Oil will rise to float on water, and the natural gas will help that further. (Plan for expansion as it rises.) Get next bladder in place. Harvest the oil to help pay for the operation.
10:44 AM on 05/12/2010
I say put like a smoke stack type idea to the surface and keep sucking it off from there like a filling station for the tankers. They wanted to put a lid on it and that didn't work, it might not be a permanent fix, but I think a good one in the mean time. At least it won't be leaking into the gulf and they could still use it. It might be a long way to the surface but oh well BP can afford it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
KarenM
Former Air Force Brat.... I've lived all over the
10:25 AM on 05/11/2010
...and also about liability. Most likely, none of the other oil companies are willing to share any potential liability for any "solutions" that might go wrong.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bbrecht
"pray for the dead, fight like hell for the liv
09:02 AM on 05/11/2010
Blame the regulators. They are the ones who should have required emergency plans.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
anothervoice
The eighth deadly sin is willful ignorance.
07:49 AM on 05/11/2010
Good morning, HuffPosters -

I need your help. There's a question that's not being asked and I'm hoping some of you will pick up this question and help it spread until someone in the media steps up and asks...

In the midst of one of the largest environmental disasters in history, WHERE are the oil companies? We see ad-nauseum, commercial after commercial soft-focus eyewash about how they are so community oriented, building schools in Africa, part of the community, finding ways to be more environmentally responsible, volunteering, waving the flag, the hard-working, steely-eyed oil workers of the steely-eyed oil industry.

Where are all the OTHER oil companies now? This is THEIR industry. You'd think they would have ponied up just about every tool that wasn't tied down to help fight this oil spill but I'm not seeing anyone chipping in. They sure manage to pool their efforts when there's legislation to be watered down or a clandestine meeting with a certain Vice President. Where ARE they?

As an analogy, if this was a cruise ship sinking, every vessel within any range would be racing to help. We sink or swim together.

Where are the OTHER oil companies? It can't be just about the MONEY, can it?

Thanks much,

AV
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
bbrecht
"pray for the dead, fight like hell for the liv
09:03 AM on 05/11/2010
Ummmm yes....it can be just about money.
photo
Scoppertop
Sunny Side
04:15 PM on 05/12/2010
Not to mention being GREAT public relations for other oil companies to donate a quarter of their annual profits until it is fixed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:35 PM on 05/10/2010
At time like this, it helps to do something positive. In addition to the animal rescue organizations posted below, please see this website:

http://www.matteroftrust.org/

Waste fibers like human hair & animal fur clippings are great for absorbing and cleaning up oil. This wonderful organization has been collecting material from barber shops, pet groomers, etc., and making it into mats and booms to clean up oil spills. Now they are developing ways to compost the mats after they're used, to reduce the waste even further.

Please go this link & read the fascinating news on their website. Then donate to help out - they'll take cash donations via PayPal. And if you need haircut (or dog grooming), you have a great opportunity to pass on the info!

Please feel free to repost, thank you.
photo
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
08:27 PM on 05/10/2010
SInce BP seems to be desperate for ideas, might it be feasible to capture the escaping oil with an undersea version of a sky hook high altitude balloon envelopes? Send them down collapsed and unfurl them with ROVs on the sea floor. Position the open end over the leak and let if fill. No riser, the whole thing just floats to the surface. It would seem hard to plug and quick to build. Some precedent in the form of the 1960s Bathescaphes, which were basically gasoline filled underwater blimps. Possibly crazy, definitely outside my domain of expertise.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LiberalDem
09:52 AM on 05/11/2010
Well, we could also by lottery pick members of the BP board of directors and drop them into the well to plug it. I think that's a viable option.
05:10 PM on 05/11/2010
Make them take $arah Palin with them!
07:58 PM on 05/10/2010
This is surprising?

It costs money to be prepared. Reduces profit.

Reduces the CEO's bonus.
08:01 PM on 05/10/2010
It's time to cut off some CEOs' bonuses, then.
11:38 PM on 05/10/2010
I would like to cut other things off than just their bonuses.
06:57 PM on 05/10/2010
a 1,000 mile hypoxia zone from Louisiana to Texas and now the spill to the Florida keys. and beyond. The gulf is not going to recover.
07:59 PM on 05/10/2010
Oh, it'll recover. Just not within the lifetime of anyone alive today.